If, after forwarding an intercepted payment to our counterparty, we
restart with a ChannelMonitor update having been persisted, but the
corresponding ChannelManager update not having been persisted,
we'll still have the intercepted HTLC in the
`pending_intercepted_htlcs` map on start (and potentially a pending
`HTLCIntercepted` event). This will cause us to allow the user to
handle the forwarded HTLC twice, potentially double-forwarding it.
This builds on 0bb87ddad7, which
provided a preemptive fix for the general relay case (though it was
not an actual issue at the time). We simply check for the HTLCs
having been forwarded on startup and remove them from the map.
Fixes#1858
When a channel is force-closed, if a `ChannelMonitor` update is
completed but a `ChannelManager` persist has not yet happened,
HTLCs which were removed in the latest (persisted) `ChannelMonitor`
update will not be failed even though they do not appear in the
commitment transaction which went on chain. This is because the
`ChannelManager` thinks the `ChannelMonitor` is responsible for
them (as it is stale), but the `ChannelMonitor` has no knowledge of
the HTLC at all (as it is not stale).
The fix for this is relatively simple - we need to check for this
specific case and fail back such HTLCs when deserializing a
`ChannelManager`
If, after forwarding a payment to our counterparty, we restart with
a ChannelMonitor update having been persisted, but the
corresponding ChannelManager update was not persisted, we'll still
have the forwarded HTLC in the `forward_htlcs` map on start. This
will cause us to generate a (spurious) `PendingHTLCsForwardable`
event. However, when we go to forward said HTLC, we'll notice the
channel has been closed and leave it up to the `ChannelMontior` to
finalize the HTLC.
This is all fine today - we won't lose any funds, we'll just
generate an excess forwardable event and then fail to forward.
However, in the future when we allow for forward-time channel
changes this could break. Thus, its worth adding tests for this
behavior today, and, while we're at it, removing the spurious
forwardable HTLCs event.
When we process a `channel_reestablish` message we free the HTLC
update holding cell as things may have changed while we were
disconnected. However, some time ago, to handle freeing from the
holding cell when a monitor update completes, we added a holding
cell freeing check in `get_and_clear_pending_msg_events`. This
leaves the in-`channel_reestablish` holding cell clear redundant,
as doing it immediately or is `get_and_clear_pending_msg_events` is
not a user-visible difference.
Thus, we remove the redundant code here, substantially simplifying
`handle_chan_restoration_locked` while we're at it.
