mirror of
https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning.git
synced 2025-02-24 15:02:20 +01:00
Wait to free the holding cell during channel_reestablish handling
When we process a `channel_reestablish` message we free the HTLC update holding cell as things may have changed while we were disconnected. However, some time ago, to handle freeing from the holding cell when a monitor update completes, we added a holding cell freeing check in `get_and_clear_pending_msg_events`. This leaves the in-`channel_reestablish` holding cell clear redundant, as doing it immediately or is `get_and_clear_pending_msg_events` is not a user-visible difference. Thus, we remove the redundant code here, substantially simplifying `handle_chan_restoration_locked` while we're at it.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c8c0997862
commit
7e9b88a5cd
5 changed files with 30 additions and 113 deletions
|
@ -1128,6 +1128,7 @@ fn test_monitor_update_fail_reestablish() {
|
|||
get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id())
|
||||
.contents.flags & 2, 0); // The "disabled" bit should be unset as we just reconnected
|
||||
|
||||
nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events(); // Free the holding cell
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
|
||||
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -439,8 +439,6 @@ pub(super) struct ReestablishResponses {
|
|||
pub raa: Option<msgs::RevokeAndACK>,
|
||||
pub commitment_update: Option<msgs::CommitmentUpdate>,
|
||||
pub order: RAACommitmentOrder,
|
||||
pub mon_update: Option<ChannelMonitorUpdate>,
|
||||
pub holding_cell_failed_htlcs: Vec<(HTLCSource, PaymentHash)>,
|
||||
pub announcement_sigs: Option<msgs::AnnouncementSignatures>,
|
||||
pub shutdown_msg: Option<msgs::Shutdown>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3955,9 +3953,8 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> Channel<Signer> {
|
|||
// Short circuit the whole handler as there is nothing we can resend them
|
||||
return Ok(ReestablishResponses {
|
||||
channel_ready: None,
|
||||
raa: None, commitment_update: None, mon_update: None,
|
||||
raa: None, commitment_update: None,
|
||||
order: RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst,
|
||||
holding_cell_failed_htlcs: Vec::new(),
|
||||
shutdown_msg, announcement_sigs,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3970,9 +3967,8 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> Channel<Signer> {
|
|||
next_per_commitment_point,
|
||||
short_channel_id_alias: Some(self.outbound_scid_alias),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
raa: None, commitment_update: None, mon_update: None,
|
||||
raa: None, commitment_update: None,
|
||||
order: RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst,
|
||||
holding_cell_failed_htlcs: Vec::new(),
|
||||
shutdown_msg, announcement_sigs,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -4015,46 +4011,12 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> Channel<Signer> {
|
|||
log_debug!(logger, "Reconnected channel {} with no loss", log_bytes!(self.channel_id()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (self.channel_state & (ChannelState::AwaitingRemoteRevoke as u32 | ChannelState::MonitorUpdateInProgress as u32)) == 0 {
|
||||
// We're up-to-date and not waiting on a remote revoke (if we are our
|
||||
// channel_reestablish should result in them sending a revoke_and_ack), but we may
|
||||
// have received some updates while we were disconnected. Free the holding cell
|
||||
// now!
|
||||
match self.free_holding_cell_htlcs(logger) {
|
||||
Err(ChannelError::Close(msg)) => Err(ChannelError::Close(msg)),
|
||||
Err(ChannelError::Warn(_)) | Err(ChannelError::Ignore(_)) =>
|
||||
panic!("Got non-channel-failing result from free_holding_cell_htlcs"),
|
||||
Ok((Some((commitment_update, monitor_update)), holding_cell_failed_htlcs)) => {
|
||||
Ok(ReestablishResponses {
|
||||
channel_ready, shutdown_msg, announcement_sigs,
|
||||
raa: required_revoke,
|
||||
commitment_update: Some(commitment_update),
|
||||
order: self.resend_order.clone(),
|
||||
mon_update: Some(monitor_update),
|
||||
holding_cell_failed_htlcs,
|
||||
})
|
||||
},
|
||||
Ok((None, holding_cell_failed_htlcs)) => {
|
||||
Ok(ReestablishResponses {
|
||||
channel_ready, shutdown_msg, announcement_sigs,
|
||||
raa: required_revoke,
|
||||
commitment_update: None,
|
||||
order: self.resend_order.clone(),
|
||||
mon_update: None,
|
||||
holding_cell_failed_htlcs,
|
||||
})
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(ReestablishResponses {
|
||||
channel_ready, shutdown_msg, announcement_sigs,
|
||||
raa: required_revoke,
|
||||
commitment_update: None,
|
||||
order: self.resend_order.clone(),
|
||||
mon_update: None,
|
||||
holding_cell_failed_htlcs: Vec::new(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(ReestablishResponses {
|
||||
channel_ready, shutdown_msg, announcement_sigs,
|
||||
raa: required_revoke,
|
||||
commitment_update: None,
|
||||
order: self.resend_order.clone(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else if msg.next_local_commitment_number == next_counterparty_commitment_number - 1 {
|
||||
if required_revoke.is_some() {
|
||||
log_debug!(logger, "Reconnected channel {} with lost outbound RAA and lost remote commitment tx", log_bytes!(self.channel_id()));
|
||||
|
@ -4066,9 +4028,8 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> Channel<Signer> {
|
|||
self.monitor_pending_commitment_signed = true;
|
||||
Ok(ReestablishResponses {
|
||||
channel_ready, shutdown_msg, announcement_sigs,
|
||||
commitment_update: None, raa: None, mon_update: None,
|
||||
commitment_update: None, raa: None,
|
||||
order: self.resend_order.clone(),
|
||||
holding_cell_failed_htlcs: Vec::new(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(ReestablishResponses {
|
||||
|
@ -4076,8 +4037,6 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> Channel<Signer> {
|
|||
raa: required_revoke,
|
||||
commitment_update: Some(self.get_last_commitment_update(logger)),
|
||||
order: self.resend_order.clone(),
|
||||
mon_update: None,
|
||||
holding_cell_failed_htlcs: Vec::new(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1518,13 +1518,11 @@ macro_rules! emit_channel_ready_event {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
macro_rules! handle_chan_restoration_locked {
|
||||
($self: ident, $channel_lock: expr, $channel_state: expr, $channel_entry: expr,
|
||||
$raa: expr, $commitment_update: expr, $order: expr, $chanmon_update: expr,
|
||||
($self: ident, $channel_state: expr, $channel_entry: expr,
|
||||
$raa: expr, $commitment_update: expr, $order: expr,
|
||||
$pending_forwards: expr, $funding_broadcastable: expr, $channel_ready: expr, $announcement_sigs: expr) => { {
|
||||
let mut htlc_forwards = None;
|
||||
|
||||
let chanmon_update: Option<ChannelMonitorUpdate> = $chanmon_update; // Force type-checking to resolve
|
||||
let chanmon_update_is_none = chanmon_update.is_none();
|
||||
let counterparty_node_id = $channel_entry.get().get_counterparty_node_id();
|
||||
let res = loop {
|
||||
let forwards: Vec<(PendingHTLCInfo, u64)> = $pending_forwards; // Force type-checking to resolve
|
||||
|
@ -1533,24 +1531,7 @@ macro_rules! handle_chan_restoration_locked {
|
|||
$channel_entry.get().get_funding_txo().unwrap(), forwards));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if chanmon_update.is_some() {
|
||||
// On reconnect, we, by definition, only resend a channel_ready if there have been
|
||||
// no commitment updates, so the only channel monitor update which could also be
|
||||
// associated with a channel_ready would be the funding_created/funding_signed
|
||||
// monitor update. That monitor update failing implies that we won't send
|
||||
// channel_ready until it's been updated, so we can't have a channel_ready and a
|
||||
// monitor update here (so we don't bother to handle it correctly below).
|
||||
assert!($channel_ready.is_none());
|
||||
// A channel monitor update makes no sense without either a channel_ready or a
|
||||
// commitment update to process after it. Since we can't have a channel_ready, we
|
||||
// only bother to handle the monitor-update + commitment_update case below.
|
||||
assert!($commitment_update.is_some());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(msg) = $channel_ready {
|
||||
// Similar to the above, this implies that we're letting the channel_ready fly
|
||||
// before it should be allowed to.
|
||||
assert!(chanmon_update.is_none());
|
||||
send_channel_ready!($self, $channel_state.pending_msg_events, $channel_entry.get(), msg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let Some(msg) = $announcement_sigs {
|
||||
|
@ -1562,33 +1543,6 @@ macro_rules! handle_chan_restoration_locked {
|
|||
|
||||
emit_channel_ready_event!($self, $channel_entry.get_mut());
|
||||
|
||||
let funding_broadcastable: Option<Transaction> = $funding_broadcastable; // Force type-checking to resolve
|
||||
if let Some(monitor_update) = chanmon_update {
|
||||
// We only ever broadcast a funding transaction in response to a funding_signed
|
||||
// message and the resulting monitor update. Thus, on channel_reestablish
|
||||
// message handling we can't have a funding transaction to broadcast. When
|
||||
// processing a monitor update finishing resulting in a funding broadcast, we
|
||||
// cannot have a second monitor update, thus this case would indicate a bug.
|
||||
assert!(funding_broadcastable.is_none());
|
||||
// Given we were just reconnected or finished updating a channel monitor, the
|
||||
// only case where we can get a new ChannelMonitorUpdate would be if we also
|
||||
// have some commitment updates to send as well.
|
||||
assert!($commitment_update.is_some());
|
||||
match $self.chain_monitor.update_channel($channel_entry.get().get_funding_txo().unwrap(), monitor_update) {
|
||||
ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus::Completed => {},
|
||||
e => {
|
||||
// channel_reestablish doesn't guarantee the order it returns is sensical
|
||||
// for the messages it returns, but if we're setting what messages to
|
||||
// re-transmit on monitor update success, we need to make sure it is sane.
|
||||
let mut order = $order;
|
||||
if $raa.is_none() {
|
||||
order = RAACommitmentOrder::CommitmentFirst;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break handle_monitor_update_res!($self, e, $channel_entry, order, $raa.is_some(), true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
macro_rules! handle_cs { () => {
|
||||
if let Some(update) = $commitment_update {
|
||||
$channel_state.pending_msg_events.push(events::MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs {
|
||||
|
@ -1615,6 +1569,8 @@ macro_rules! handle_chan_restoration_locked {
|
|||
handle_cs!();
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let funding_broadcastable: Option<Transaction> = $funding_broadcastable; // Force type-checking to resolve
|
||||
if let Some(tx) = funding_broadcastable {
|
||||
log_info!($self.logger, "Broadcasting funding transaction with txid {}", tx.txid());
|
||||
$self.tx_broadcaster.broadcast_transaction(&tx);
|
||||
|
@ -1622,13 +1578,6 @@ macro_rules! handle_chan_restoration_locked {
|
|||
break Ok(());
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if chanmon_update_is_none {
|
||||
// If there was no ChannelMonitorUpdate, we should never generate an Err in the res loop
|
||||
// above. Doing so would imply calling handle_err!() from channel_monitor_updated() which
|
||||
// should *never* end up calling back to `chain_monitor.update_channel()`.
|
||||
assert!(res.is_ok());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(htlc_forwards, res, counterparty_node_id)
|
||||
} }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -4520,7 +4469,7 @@ impl<M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelManager<M, T, K, F
|
|||
})
|
||||
} else { None }
|
||||
} else { None };
|
||||
chan_restoration_res = handle_chan_restoration_locked!(self, channel_lock, channel_state, channel, updates.raa, updates.commitment_update, updates.order, None, updates.accepted_htlcs, updates.funding_broadcastable, updates.channel_ready, updates.announcement_sigs);
|
||||
chan_restoration_res = handle_chan_restoration_locked!(self, channel_state, channel, updates.raa, updates.commitment_update, updates.order, updates.accepted_htlcs, updates.funding_broadcastable, updates.channel_ready, updates.announcement_sigs);
|
||||
if let Some(upd) = channel_update {
|
||||
channel_state.pending_msg_events.push(upd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -5279,7 +5228,7 @@ impl<M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelManager<M, T, K, F
|
|||
|
||||
fn internal_channel_reestablish(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::ChannelReestablish) -> Result<(), MsgHandleErrInternal> {
|
||||
let chan_restoration_res;
|
||||
let (htlcs_failed_forward, need_lnd_workaround) = {
|
||||
let need_lnd_workaround = {
|
||||
let mut channel_state_lock = self.channel_state.lock().unwrap();
|
||||
let channel_state = &mut *channel_state_lock;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -5314,18 +5263,17 @@ impl<M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelManager<M, T, K, F
|
|||
}
|
||||
let need_lnd_workaround = chan.get_mut().workaround_lnd_bug_4006.take();
|
||||
chan_restoration_res = handle_chan_restoration_locked!(
|
||||
self, channel_state_lock, channel_state, chan, responses.raa, responses.commitment_update, responses.order,
|
||||
responses.mon_update, Vec::new(), None, responses.channel_ready, responses.announcement_sigs);
|
||||
self, channel_state, chan, responses.raa, responses.commitment_update, responses.order,
|
||||
Vec::new(), None, responses.channel_ready, responses.announcement_sigs);
|
||||
if let Some(upd) = channel_update {
|
||||
channel_state.pending_msg_events.push(upd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
(responses.holding_cell_failed_htlcs, need_lnd_workaround)
|
||||
need_lnd_workaround
|
||||
},
|
||||
hash_map::Entry::Vacant(_) => return Err(MsgHandleErrInternal::send_err_msg_no_close("Failed to find corresponding channel".to_owned(), msg.channel_id))
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
post_handle_chan_restoration!(self, chan_restoration_res);
|
||||
self.fail_holding_cell_htlcs(htlcs_failed_forward, msg.channel_id, counterparty_node_id);
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(channel_ready_msg) = need_lnd_workaround {
|
||||
self.internal_channel_ready(counterparty_node_id, &channel_ready_msg)?;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2413,6 +2413,14 @@ macro_rules! handle_chan_reestablish_msgs {
|
|||
assert_eq!(*node_id, $dst_node.node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut had_channel_update = false; // ChannelUpdate may be now or later, but not both
|
||||
if let Some(&MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate { ref node_id, ref msg }) = msg_events.get(idx) {
|
||||
assert_eq!(*node_id, $dst_node.node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
idx += 1;
|
||||
assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & 2, 0); // "disabled" flag must not be set as we just reconnected.
|
||||
had_channel_update = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut revoke_and_ack = None;
|
||||
let mut commitment_update = None;
|
||||
let order = if let Some(ev) = msg_events.get(idx) {
|
||||
|
@ -2457,6 +2465,7 @@ macro_rules! handle_chan_reestablish_msgs {
|
|||
assert_eq!(*node_id, $dst_node.node.get_our_node_id());
|
||||
idx += 1;
|
||||
assert_eq!(msg.contents.flags & 2, 0); // "disabled" flag must not be set as we just reconnected.
|
||||
assert!(!had_channel_update);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), idx);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -786,9 +786,9 @@ fn do_test_partial_claim_before_restart(persist_both_monitors: bool) {
|
|||
let ds_msgs = nodes[3].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[3], 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(ds_msgs.len(), 2);
|
||||
if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate { .. } = ds_msgs[1] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||||
if let MessageSendEvent::SendChannelUpdate { .. } = ds_msgs[0] {} else { panic!(); }
|
||||
|
||||
let cs_updates = match ds_msgs[0] {
|
||||
let cs_updates = match ds_msgs[1] {
|
||||
MessageSendEvent::UpdateHTLCs { ref updates, .. } => {
|
||||
nodes[2].node.handle_update_fulfill_htlc(&nodes[3].node.get_our_node_id(), &updates.update_fulfill_htlcs[0]);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[2], 1);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue