clnrest installation instruction on the markdown tries to install `flask_restx` not `flask-restx`.
Reference: clnrest plugin complains of flask_restx missing (#7383)
Changelog-None.
Documents which are deleted from lightning schema were still listed on readme server.
This script was adding or updating the list but delete action was missing.
Changelog-None.
Shahana decided this was the optimal UX path, though I insisted that we still
report the actual problem directly when in dev mode, as a compromise.
Suggested-by: https://github.com/Amperstrand
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: Do not return the contents of invalid parameters in error messages, refer to logs (use 'check' to get full error messages)
Fixes: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/7338
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It doesn't actually log, just gets the `struct logger`, so this name is better.
We're also going to implement command_log() as an actual logging
function in next commit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
```
2024-06-24T05:09:32.5233603Z assert l1.rpc.listfunds()["channels"][0]["state"] == "ONCHAIN"
2024-06-24T05:09:32.5234187Z > assert l2.rpc.listfunds()["channels"][0]["state"] == "ONCHAIN"
2024-06-24T05:09:32.5234917Z E AssertionError: assert 'FUNDING_SPEND_SEEN' == 'ONCHAIN'
2024-06-24T05:09:32.5235464Z E - ONCHAIN
2024-06-24T05:09:32.5235773Z E + FUNDING_SPEND_SEEN
2024-06-24T05:09:32.5236096Z
2024-06-24T05:09:32.5236242Z tests/test_misc.py:2907: AssertionError
```
It's possible that l2 hasn't seen the onchain tx yet. What we really want to do is
wait for it, then test that l1 really can spend the output it has recovered.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
```
2024-06-24T05:14:14.9939033Z > l1.rpc.call('dev-feerate', [l2.info['id'], rate - 5])
2024-06-24T05:14:14.9939354Z
2024-06-24T05:14:14.9939466Z tests/test_connection.py:3439:
...
2024-06-24T05:14:14.9967617Z > raise RpcError(method, payload, resp['error'])
2024-06-24T05:14:14.9968833Z E pyln.client.lightning.RpcError: RPC call failed: method: dev-feerate, payload: ['022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59', 2290], error: {'code': -1, 'message': 'Peer bad state'}
```
The disconnect can actually take a while: wait for both sides to
believe they're reconnected. Also wait a little to make sure the
feerate change doesn't create a bad signature.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
lightningd-3 penalizes lightningd-2 but then it can see the preimage for the HTLC which
has already been timed out:
```
2024-06-24T02:41:29.4633900Z lightningd-3 2024-06-24T02:33:54.073Z **BROKEN** 022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-onchaind-chan#1: HTLC already resolved by THEIR_HTLC_TIMEOUT_TO_THEM when we found preimage
```
This is fair: the test deliberately takes l3 offline for long enough
that the HTLC can get timed out.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Found by very slow CI: the two io_breaks() can combine into one, so we
block waiting for the second initialization which never happens.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
checkchain_timer is run by chaintopology, so why have the pointer in
bitcoind?
And since we free the timers, we don't need them to self-disable by
checking the stopped flag.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Handling half in main() and half here was a mess. And the name
"max_blockheight" was poor: it was the max in the db, or UINT32_MAX,
but then we changed it depending on what height we wanted to start at.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fixes: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/6924
Changelog-Changed: lightningd: we wait for bitcoind if it has somehow gone backwards (as long as header height is still ok).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The current code is confusing: there are polling loops, but we wait for
them to run once.
Be explicit: make the calls once, then start the loops in begin_topology.
This removes various chain_topology struct members which only exist for
startup.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Example usage has been either merged with examples or usage keys. This heading was not required separately.
This PR edits & rearranges Examples, Example Notifications and Example Usage data.
Changelog-None.
- Added missing Example Notifications Heading
- Renamed `example_json_notifications` to `example_notifications`
- Moved `example_notifications` to the end of the page
- Changed ALL `doc/schemas/lightning-*.json` file's `json_example` to `examples`
- Change the heading from example to examples
- Bring shell command before the json command
- Move Example to the end of the page
- Remove horizontal line from Example
I was trying to debug a node with several multiplexed channels, and
was finding it a bit difficult to determine which channel index
matches which result of `listpeerchannels` as well as figuring out
what their status was. This just prints the status in string format
when loading the channel from the DB.
Changelog-Changed: wallet: The channel status is printed when loading it from the DB
[ Fix not to include 'value' and 'default' (if None) in getmanifest response --RR ]
[ Fix to support [] operator for existing plugins (including our test ones!) --RR ]
I was looking into using the `threading.Condition` but since we're
already rather heavily using callbacks, this allows us to stay
single-threaded, and not having to completely hook the `setconfig`
function.
Changelog-Added: pyln-client: Added a notification mechanism for config changes
We didn't actually *change* the value you'd see, when we got a setconfig call!
Changelog-Added: pyln-client: implement setconfig hook for plugins so you can see changes in `dynamic` options.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can filter down to only the list* fields we need. In the case of a
node with 1M forwards, this reduces listforwards time from 5 seconds
to 4 seconds. It will also reduce memory consumption.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are really three subsystems: invoices, forwards and sendpays,
each of which has two variants we care about (successes and failures).
If we split the code that way, we can extract the core differences in
each of these cases and share most of the logic.
It's a bit awkward to iterate over each "subsystem" in the JSON
parameter sense, so we have some iteration code to do that where we
need to.
The result is going to be much easier to paginate!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're about to make this a more complex struct, so introducing a
new_clean_info() function unifies the code paths.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
