By whitelisting the peers via -whitelist, the inventory is transmissioned
immediately rather than on average every 5 seconds, speeding up the test by at
least a factor of two:
before:
$ time ./wallet_listtransactions.py
...
0m40.25s real 0m01.74s user 0m01.70s system
with this PR:
$ time ./wallet_listtransactions.py
...
0m14.93s real 0m01.68s user 0m01.87s system
This commit also moves the wallet_listtransactions tests into the < 30s group.
7593b06bd1 test: ensure I2P addresses are relayed (Vasil Dimov)
e7468139a1 test: make CAddress in functional tests comparable (Vasil Dimov)
33e211d2a4 test: implement ser/unser of I2P addresses in functional tests (Vasil Dimov)
86742811ce test: use NODE_* constants instead of magic numbers (Vasil Dimov)
ba45f02708 net: relay I2P addresses even if not reachable (by us) (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Nodes that can reach the I2P network (have set `-i2psam=`) will relay
I2P addresses even without this patch. However, nodes that can't reach
the I2P network will not. This was done as a precaution in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20119 before anybody could
connect to I2P because then, for sure, it would have been useless.
Now, however, we have I2P support and a bunch of I2P nodes, so get all
nodes on the network to relay I2P addresses to help with propagation,
similarly to what we do with Tor addresses.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 7593b06bd1
naumenkogs:
ACK 7593b06bd1.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7593b06bd1
kristapsk:
ACK 7593b06bd1. Code looks correct, tested that functional test suite passes and also that `test/functional/p2p_addrv2_replay.py` fails if I undo changes in `IsRelayable()`.
Tree-SHA512: c9feec4a9546cc06bc2fec6d74f999a3c0abd3d15b7c421c21fcf2d610eb94611489e33d61bdcd5a4f42041a6d84aa892f7ae293b0d4f755309a8560b113b735
fa84caebc7 doc: added info to bitcoin.conf doc (Brian Liotti)
Pull request description:
Should probably be explicitly stated to not make modifications to the conf file while daemon is running. ref #11586
For example, if rpc credentials are modified while bitcoind is running, `bitcoin-cli stop` is unable to stop bitcoind until the original credentials are restored in `bitcoin.conf`
ACKs for top commit:
rajarshimaitra:
ACK fa84caebc7
Zero-1729:
ACK fa84caebc7
theStack:
ACK fa84caebc7🗄️
Tree-SHA512: f6ddffc25563c0b01e661b6abe43a7909938ad8eca38d6d0e2d4a2ce9fb850e51b54d950ef3118b74b6e340c64fe3f37205861720a2de2933db29782234869bb
a16378e501 doc: Remove unnecessary steps from translations update process (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
2584929823 doc: Add steps for transifex to release process (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Document how to update settings on and for the transifex website before and after branch-off of a new release.
(This is #21440, updated with the review feedback.)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a16378e501
hebasto:
ACK a16378e501
Tree-SHA512: 9669cc3bc7ba056f913ee77c2ef9d9ee2313da947fc07f8cd955807c34c5d39e3af73587adfe734274ab2412a7dfb1e2dfe7ee4904ca28cfef9bf8061d26a573
b1d905c225 p2p: earlier continuation when no remaining eviction candidates (Vasil Dimov)
c9e8d8f9b1 p2p: process more candidates per protection iteration (Jon Atack)
02e411ec45 p2p: iterate eviction protection only on networks having candidates (Jon Atack)
5adb064574 bench: add peer eviction protection benchmarks (Jon Atack)
566357f8f7 refactor: move GetRandomNodeEvictionCandidates() to test utilities (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This follow-up to #21261 improves `ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio()` for better performance.
Benchmarks are added; the performance improvement is between 2x and 5x for the benchmarked cases (CPU 2.50GHz, Turbo off, performance mode, Debian Clang 11 non-debug build).
```
$ ./src/bench/bench_bitcoin -filter="EvictionProtection*.*"
```
The refactored code is well-covered by existing unit tests and also a fuzzer.
- `$ ./src/test/test_bitcoin -t net_peer_eviction_tests`
- `$ FUZZ=node_eviction ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz ../qa-assets/fuzz_seed_corpus/node_eviction`
ACKs for top commit:
klementtan:
Tested and code review ACK b1d905c2.
vasild:
ACK b1d905c225
jarolrod:
ACK b1d905c225
Tree-SHA512: a3a6607b9ea2fec138da9780c03f63e177b6712091c5a3ddc3804b896a7585216446310280791f5e20cc023d02d2f03a4139237e12b5c1d7f2a1fa1011610e96
ceb7b35a39 refactor: move UpdateTip into CChainState (James O'Beirne)
4abf0779d6 refactor: no mempool arg to GetCoinsCacheSizeState (James O'Beirne)
46e3efd1e4 refactor: move UpdateMempoolForReorg into CChainState (James O'Beirne)
617661703a validation: make CChainState::m_mempool optional (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Make `CChainState::m_mempool` optional by making it a pointer instead of a reference. This will allow a simplification to assumeutxo semantics (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905) and help facilitate the `-nomempool` option.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK ceb7b35a39
naumenkogs:
ACK ceb7b35a39
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK ceb7b35a39 (just minor style and test tweaks since last review)
lsilva01:
Code review ACK and tested on Signet ACK ceb7b35a39
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ceb7b35a39😌
Tree-SHA512: cc445ad33439d5918cacf80a6354eea8f3d33bb7719573ed5b970fad1a0dab410bcd70be44c862b8aba1b71263b82d79876688c553e339362653dfb3d8ec81e6
fa5658ed07 Use DeploymentEnabled to hide VB deployments (MarcoFalke)
fa11fecf0d doc: Move buried deployment doc to the enum that enumerates them (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Plus a doc commit.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa5658ed07
ajtowns:
utACK fa5658ed07
Tree-SHA512: 2aeceee0674feb603d76656eff40695b7d7305de309f837bbb6a8c1dbb1d0b962b741f06ab7b9a8b1dbd1964c9c0c9aa5dc9588fd8e6d896e620b69e08eedbaa
a3d6ec5bb5 test: move rpc_rawtransaction tests to < 30s group (Jon Atack)
5a1ed96077 test: whitelist rpc_rawtransaction peers to speed up tests (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Speed up the somewhat slow `rpc_rawtransaction.py` test by more than 3x (from 45-55 seconds to 15 seconds on a laptop running 2 x 2.5GHz).
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
ACK a3d6ec5bb5
kristapsk:
ACK a3d6ec5bb5
theStack:
ACK a3d6ec5bb5🐎
brunoerg:
tACK a3d6ec5bb5
Tree-SHA512: f1d105594c9b5b257a7096b631a6fa5aeb50e330a351f75c2d6ffa7dd73abdb6e1f596a78c16d204a9bac3fe506e0519f9ad96bb8477ab6424c8e18125ccb659
0c845e3f89 test: Fix wallet_listdescriptors.py if bdb is not compiled (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
If build system is configured `--without-bdb`, the `wallet_listdescriptors.py` fails:
```
$ test/functional/wallet_listdescriptors.py --descriptors
2021-07-14T13:20:52.931000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test_02p7o1c9
2021-07-14T13:21:23.377000Z TestFramework (INFO): Test that the command is not available for legacy wallets.
2021-07-14T13:21:23.381000Z TestFramework (ERROR): JSONRPC error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 128, in main
self.run_test()
File "test/functional/wallet_listdescriptors.py", line 34, in run_test
node.createwallet(wallet_name='w1', descriptors=False)
File "/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 685, in createwallet
return self.__getattr__('createwallet')(wallet_name, disable_private_keys, blank, passphrase, avoid_reuse, descriptors, load_on_startup, external_signer)
File "/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/coverage.py", line 47, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 146, in __call__
raise JSONRPCException(response['error'], status)
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: Compiled without bdb support (required for legacy wallets) (-4)
2021-07-14T13:21:23.436000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2021-07-14T13:21:24.092000Z TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/bitcoin_func_test_02p7o1c9
2021-07-14T13:21:24.092000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/bitcoin_func_test_02p7o1c9/test_framework.log
2021-07-14T13:21:24.092000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2021-07-14T13:21:24.092000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Hint: Call /home/hebasto/GitHub/bitcoin/test/functional/combine_logs.py '/tmp/bitcoin_func_test_02p7o1c9' to consolidate all logs
2021-07-14T13:21:24.092000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2021-07-14T13:21:24.092000Z TestFramework (ERROR): If this failure happened unexpectedly or intermittently, please file a bug and provide a link or upload of the combined log.
2021-07-14T13:21:24.092000Z TestFramework (ERROR): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues
2021-07-14T13:21:24.092000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
```
This PR fixes this issue.
Also see #20267.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0c845e3f89
Tree-SHA512: d7116a9ae30c7b7e3f55f55d2eea66f9e293c38d6757ed66d0477e4256ff5fedca5ddedafa0ef0c09f4dc1f7f973163e5a46090da26b067fdddbd9ea2ee76633
fa80e10d94 test: Add feature_taproot.py --previous_release (MarcoFalke)
85ccffa266 test: move releases download incantation to README (Sjors Provoost)
29d6b1da2a test: previous releases: add v0.20.1 (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Disabling the new consensus code at runtime is fine, but potentially fragile and incomplete. Fix that by giving the option to run with a version that has been compiled without any taproot code.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK fa80e10
NelsonGaldeman:
tACK fa80e10d94
Tree-SHA512: 1a1feef823f08c05268759645a8974e1b2d39a024258f5e6acecbe25097aae3fa9302c27262978b40f1aa8e7b525b60c0047199010f2a5d6017dd6434b4066f0
Since we now have multiple chainstate objects, only one of them is active at any given
time. An active chainstate has a mempool, but there's no point to others having one.
This change will simplify proposed assumeutxo semantics. See the discussion here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
4101ec9d2e doc: mention that we enforce port=0 in I2P (Vasil Dimov)
e0a2b390c1 addrman: reset I2P ports to 0 when loading from disk (Vasil Dimov)
41cda9d075 test: ensure I2P ports are handled as expected (Vasil Dimov)
4f432bd738 net: do not connect to I2P hosts on port!=0 (Vasil Dimov)
1f096f091e net: distinguish default port per network (Vasil Dimov)
aeac3bce3e net: change I2P seeds' ports to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
38f900290c net: change assumed I2P port to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
_This is an alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514, inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-815049933. They are mutually exclusive. Just one of them should be merged._
Change assumed ports for I2P to 0 (instead of the default 8333) as this is closer to what actually happens underneath with SAM 3.1 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-812632520, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-816564719).
Don't connect to I2P peers with advertised port != 0 (we don't specify a port to our SAM 3.1 proxy and it always connects to port = 0).
Note, this change:
* Keeps I2P addresses with port != 0 in addrman and relays them to others via P2P gossip. There may be non-bitcoin-core-22.0 peers using SAM 3.2 and for them such addresses may be useful.
* Silently refuses to connect to I2P hosts with port != 0. This is ok for automatically chosen peers from addrman. Not so ok for peers provided via `-addnode` or `-connect` - a user who specifies `foo.b32.i2p:1234` (non zero port) may wonder why "nothing is happening".
Fixes#21389
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4101ec9d2e
jonatack:
re-ACK 4101ec9d2e per `git range-diff efff9c3 0b0ee03 4101ec9`, built with DDEBUG_ADDRMAN, did fairly extensive testing on mainnet both with and without a peers.dat / -dnsseeds=0 to test boostrapping.
Tree-SHA512: 0e3c019e1dc05e54f559275859d3450e0c735596d179e30b66811aad9d5b5fabe3dcc44571e8f7b99f9fe16453eee393d6e153454dd873b9ff14907d4e6354fe
2feec3ce31 net: don't bind on 0.0.0.0 if binds are restricted to Tor (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 2feec3ce31
jonatack:
utACK 2feec3ce31 per `git diff a004833 2feec3c`
hebasto:
ACK 2feec3ce31, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64):
Tree-SHA512: a04483af601706da928958b92dc560f9cfcc78ab0bb9d74414636eed1c6f29ed538ce1fb5a17d41ed82c9c9a45ca94899d0966e7ef93da809c9bcdcdb1d1f040
e65d1d4986 doc: recommend `--disable-external-signer` in OpenBSD build guide (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Building the master branch with the default build settings (i.e. with external signer support enabled) leads to the following errors on my OpenBSD 6.9 machine:
```
In file included from util/system.cpp:9:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/process.hpp:25:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/process/group.hpp:32:
/usr/local/include/boost/process/detail/posix/wait_group.hpp:38:17: error: no member named 'waitid' in the global namespace
ret = ::waitid(P_PGID, p.grp, &status, WEXITED | WNOHANG);
~~^
/usr/local/include/boost/process/detail/posix/wait_group.hpp:38:24: error: use of undeclared identifier 'P_PGID'
ret = ::waitid(P_PGID, p.grp, &status, WEXITED | WNOHANG);
^
/usr/local/include/boost/process/detail/posix/wait_group.hpp:38:48: error: use of undeclared identifier 'WEXITED'
ret = ::waitid(P_PGID, p.grp, &status, WEXITED | WNOHANG);
^
/usr/local/include/boost/process/detail/posix/wait_group.hpp:144:17: error: no member named 'waitid' in the global namespace
ret = ::waitid(P_PGID, p.grp, &siginfo, WEXITED | WSTOPPED | WNOHANG);
~~^
/usr/local/include/boost/process/detail/posix/wait_group.hpp:144:24: error: use of undeclared identifier 'P_PGID'
ret = ::waitid(P_PGID, p.grp, &siginfo, WEXITED | WSTOPPED | WNOHANG);
^
/usr/local/include/boost/process/detail/posix/wait_group.hpp:144:49: error: use of undeclared identifier 'WEXITED'
ret = ::waitid(P_PGID, p.grp, &siginfo, WEXITED | WSTOPPED | WNOHANG);
^
/usr/local/include/boost/process/detail/posix/wait_group.hpp:144:59: error: use of undeclared identifier 'WSTOPPED'
ret = ::waitid(P_PGID, p.grp, &siginfo, WEXITED | WSTOPPED | WNOHANG);
^
7 errors generated.
```
This PR recommends passing `--disable-external-signer` in the OpenBSD build guide ([as suggested by laanwj](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22294#issuecomment-867452411)). The same commit also bumps the OpenBSD version mentioned in the header to 6.9 -- I recently used this document to setup a Bitcoin Core build on 6.9 and the description and all mentioned versions were still valid (before external signer support was enabled by default).
Would be nice if another OpenBSD user could confirm the build error.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK e65d1d4986
Tree-SHA512: c3ae7eca29cf42b4b52024477e1c3fb7242bbf9d809bc95f8fa08b2f9bf4bcfd4f22457d58569a208ac1d8e5fe41b270addd13d85a5bba0521a0f9e325288448
b7a8cd9963 [test] submit same txid different wtxid as mempool tx (glozow)
fdb48163bf [validation] distinguish same txid different wtxid in mempool (glozow)
Pull request description:
On master, if you submit a transaction with the same txid but different witness to the mempool, it thinks the transactions are the same. Users submitting through `BroadcastTransaction()` (i.e. `sendrawtransaction` or the wallet) don't get notified that there's a different transaction in the mempool, although it doesn't crash. Users submitting through `testmempoolaccept()` will get a "txn-already-in-mempool" error.
This PR simply distinguishes between `txn-already-in-mempool` and `txn-same-nonwitness-data-in-mempool`, without handling them differently: `sendrawtransaction` still will not throw, but `testmempoolaccept` will give you a different error.
I believe the intention of #19645 is to allow full swaps of transactions that have different witnesses but identical nonwitness data. Returning a different error message + adding a test was suggested: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19645#issuecomment-705109193 so this is that PR.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK b7a8cd9963
jnewbery:
Code review ACK b7a8cd9963
theStack:
Code-review ACK b7a8cd9963
darosior:
re-utACK b7a8cd9963
Tree-SHA512: 9c6591edaf8727ba5b4675977adb8cbdef7288584003b6cd659828032dc92d2ae915800a8ef8b6fdffe112c1b660df72297a3dcf2e2e3e1f959c6cb3678c63ee
This is a temporary change to convert I2P addresses that have propagated
with port 8333 to ones with port 0.
It would cause a problem some day if indeed some bitcoin software is
listening on port 8333 only and rejects connections to port 0 and we are
still using SAM 3.1 which only supports port 0. In this case we would
replace 8333 with 0 and try to connect to such nodes.
This commit should be included in 22.0 and be reverted before 23.0 is
released.
When connecting to an I2P host we don't specify destination port and it
is being forced to 0 by the SAM 3.1 proxy, so if we connect to the same
host on two different ports, that would be actually two connections to
the same service (listening on port 0).
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21389
* When accepting an I2P connection, assume the peer has port 0 instead
of the default 8333 (for mainnet). It is not being sent to us, so we
must assume something.
* When deriving our own I2P listen CService use port 0 instead of the
default 8333 (for mainnet). So that we later advertise it to peers
with port 0.
In the I2P protocol SAM 3.1 and older (we use 3.1) ports are not used,
so they are irrelevant. However in SAM 3.2 and newer ports are used and
from the point of view of SAM 3.2, a peer using SAM 3.1 seems to have
specified port=0.
905d672b74 test: use script_util helpers for creating P2W{PKH,SH} scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
285a65ccfd test: use script_util helpers for creating P2SH scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b57b633b94 test: use script_util helpers for creating P2PKH scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
61b6a017a9 test: wallet util: fix multisig P2SH-P2WSH script creation (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
PR #18788 (commit 08067aebfd) introduced functions to generate output scripts for various types. This PR replaces all manual CScript creations in the P2PKH, P2SH, P2WPKH, P2WSH formats with those helpers in order to increase readability and maintainability over the functional test codebase. The first commit fixes a bug in the wallet_util helper module w.r.t. to P2SH-P2WSH script creation (the result is not used in any test so far, hence it can still be seen as refactoring).
The following table shows a summary of the output script patterns tackled in this PR:
| Type | master branch | PR branch |
| ---------- | ------------- | ------------- |
| P2PKH | `CScript([OP_DUP, OP_HASH160, hash160(key), OP_EQUALVERIFY, OP_CHECKSIG])` | `key_to_p2pkh_script(key)` |
| | `CScript([OP_DUP, OP_HASH160, keyhash, OP_EQUALVERIFY, OP_CHECKSIG])` | `keyhash_to_p2pkh_script(keyhash)` |
| P2SH | `CScript([OP_HASH160, hash160(script), OP_EQUAL])` | `script_to_p2sh_script(script)` |
| P2WPKH | `CScript([OP_0, hash160(key)])` | `key_to_p2wpkh_script(key)` |
| P2WSH | `CScript([OP_0, sha256(script)])` | `script_to_p2wsh_script(script)` |
Note that the `key_to_...` helpers can't be used if an invalid key size (not 33 or 65 bytes) is passed, which is the case in some rare instances where the scripts still have to be created manually.
Possible follow-up ideas:
* further simplify by identifying P2SH-wrapped scripts and using `key_to_p2sh_p2wpkh_script()` and `script_to_p2sh_p2wsh_script()` helpers
* introduce and use `key_to_p2pk_script()` helper for P2PK scripts
ACKs for top commit:
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 905d672b74
LarryRuane:
tACK 905d672b74
0xB10C:
ACK 905d672b74
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 905d672b74 🕹
Tree-SHA512: 7ccfe69699bc81168ac122b03536720013355c1b2fbb088355b616015318644c4d1cd27e20c4f56c89ad083ae609add4bc838cf6316794d0edb0ce9cf7fa0fd8
4e44f5bac4 test: Correct outstanding -Werror=sign-compare errors (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
I'm unclear on why these aren't failing on CI, but they failed for me locally, e.g.:
```
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/test/test_tools.hpp:46:
/usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:107:17: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'const unsigned int' and 'const int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
return left == right;
~~~~ ^ ~~~~~
/usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:130:16: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl<unsigned int, int>' requested here
return equal_impl( left, right );
^
/usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:145:16: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd::call_impl<unsigned int, int>' requested here
return call_impl( left, right, left_is_array() );
^
/usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:92:50: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd::operator()<unsigned int, int>' requested here
BOOST_PP_REPEAT( BOOST_TEST_MAX_PREDICATE_ARITY, IMPL_FRWD, _ )
^
/usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/repetition/repeat.hpp:30:26: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_REPEAT'
^
/usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp:22:32: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_CAT'
^
/usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp:29:34: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_CAT_I'
^
<scratch space>:153:1: note: expanded from here
BOOST_PP_REPEAT_1
^
test/streams_tests.cpp:122:5: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::check_frwd<boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd, unsigned int, int>' requested here
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(varint, 54321);
^
/usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:107:17: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'const unsigned long long' and 'const long' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
return left == right;
~~~~ ^ ~~~~~
/usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:130:16: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl<unsigned long long, long>' requested here
return equal_impl( left, right );
^
/usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:145:16: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd::call_impl<unsigned long long, long>' requested here
return call_impl( left, right, left_is_array() );
^
/usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:92:50: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd::operator()<unsigned long long, long>' requested here
BOOST_PP_REPEAT( BOOST_TEST_MAX_PREDICATE_ARITY, IMPL_FRWD, _ )
^
/usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/repetition/repeat.hpp:30:26: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_REPEAT'
^
/usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp:22:32: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_CAT'
^
/usr/local/include/boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp:29:34: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_CAT_I'
^
<scratch space>:161:1: note: expanded from here
BOOST_PP_REPEAT_1
^
test/serfloat_tests.cpp:41:5: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::test_tools::tt_detail::check_frwd<boost::test_tools::tt_detail::equal_impl_frwd, unsigned long long, long>' requested here
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(TestDouble(std::numeric_limits<double>::infinity()), 0x7ff0000000000000);
^
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 4e44f5bac4
Tree-SHA512: 8d9e5245676c61207ceacdf78c78a78ccc9fd2a2551d4d8df023513795591334aa2f5e1f4a2a8ed2bfeb381f1e226b6ba84c07e0de29a1f3f00da71f3a257bc1
5b4703c6a7 guix: Test security-check sanity before performing them (Carl Dong)
6cf3345297 scripts: adjust test-symbol-check for guix release environment (fanquake)
1946b5f77c scripts: more robustly test macOS symbol checks (fanquake)
a8127b34bc build: Use and test PE binutils with --reloc-section (Carl Dong)
678348db51 guix: Patch binutils to add security-related disable flags (Carl Dong)
9fdc8afe11 devtools: Improve *-check.py tool detection (Carl Dong)
bda62eab38 ci: skip running the Linux test-security-check target for now (fanquake)
d6ef3543ae lint: Run mypy with --show-error-codes (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This is #20980 rebased (to include the Boost Process fix), and with an additional commit (892d6897f1e613084aa0517a660eab2412308e6e) to fix running the `test-security-check` target for the macOS build. It should pass inside Guix, as well as when cross-compiling on Ubuntu, or building natively on macOS.
Note that the `test-security-check` may output some warnings (similar too):
```bash
ld: warning: passed two min versions (10.14, 11.4) for platform macOS. Using 11.4.
ld: warning: passed two min versions (10.14, 11.4) for platform macOS. Using 11.4.
ld: warning: passed two min versions (10.14, 10.14) for platform macOS. Using 10.14.
```
but those can be ignored, and come about due to us passing `-platform_version` when `-mmacosx-version-min` is already part of `CC`.
Guix builds:
```bash
71ed0c7a13a4726300779ffc87f7d271086a2744c36896fe6dc51fe3dc33df2e guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
9273980a17052c8ec45b77579781c14ab5d189fa25aa29907d5115513dd302b1 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-aarch64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
9c042179af43c8896eb95a34294df15d4910308dcdba40b2010cd36e192938b8 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/aarch64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
1ceddecac113f50a952ba6a201cdcdb722e3dc804e663f219bfac8268ce42bf0 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part
759597c4e925e75db4a2381c06cda9b9f4e4674c23436148676b31c9be05c7aa guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz
34e3b6beabaf8c95d7c2ca0d2c3ac4411766694ef43e00bd9783badbbaf045a7 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/dist-archive/SKIPATTEST.TAG
3664f6ceee7898caa374281fd877a7597fe491fa2e9f0c174c28d889d60b559c guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d.tar.gz
d6bc35ba0750c1440bb32831b8c12cddee62f6dce10fec2650897444c2bf4748 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
a836edf6474ba0c16c19bb217549bac7936c1b44306ed512df58f607ee5568f2 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
7cc91c6805d5069ca3bd1771e77d95f83eb184b137198cbf84d1d11d0a5c5afe guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
93b4cb7b83c4975120ad5de5a92f050f5760a2a3f2c37c204c647f5a581c924a guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
2266e2c5d0dafa28c6c057ccfc1c439baeab1d714d8c3f64a83015d2827116d2 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
85f41f42c319b83d049d6fd2e2278c07b40a1e28a2eac596427822c0eef9dc3f guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.tar.gz
1499ca9119926083d8c3714ca10d8d4c8d864cbeee8848fd8445b7a1d081222d guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
1995fc1a2e45c49d4b0718aff5dcdac931917e8ae9e762fd23f1126abcecc248 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
266889eb58429a470f0fd7bb123f2ae09b0aef86c47b0390938b3634a8f748a9 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
cdc3a0dcf80b110443dac5ddf8bc951001a776a651c898c5ea49bb2d487bfe29 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-apple-darwin18/SHA256SUMS.part
8538d1eab96c97866b24546c453d95822f24cf9c6638b42ba523eb7aa441cb26 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-apple-darwin18/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-osx-unsigned.dmg
d1b73133f1da68586b07292a8425f7f851e93f599c016376f23728c041cf39cc guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-apple-darwin18/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-osx-unsigned.tar.gz
5ad94c5f8a5f29405955ff3ab35d137de1acc04398d6c8298fb187b57a6e316a guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-apple-darwin18/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-osx64.tar.gz
8c6d7b3f847faa7b4d16ceecf228f26f146ea982615c1d7a00c57f9230a0c484 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
d0a8c99750319ad8046cfa132a54e5c13a08351f94439ae9af0f8e5486c2c2ea guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
d816bb26dd4b0e309f2f576b1cccc6d78743fb2f357daad2da09bb1177330971 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
65caaa7f648c7eab1eb82c3331a2ca25b8cd4fe41439de55604501e02571de55 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/SHA256SUMS.part
5bf6f7328cbceb0db22a2d7babb07b60cb6dcc19a6db84a1698589b7f5173a06 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-win-unsigned.tar.gz
7aabcb56115decef78d3797840b6e49dbc9b202d56f892490e92616fb06fec9e guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-win64-debug.zip
2f369694648ff9dc5ca1261a1e5874b1c7408ccf2802f9caef56c1334e8a5b7c guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
1c1f92513c4aad38419ff49a7b80bf10e6b1eca01ee8c5e3b2acd1768cf1e3d5 guix-build-5b4703c6a70d/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-5b4703c6a70d-win64.zip
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
Approach ACK 5b4703c6a7.
Tree-SHA512: 2cd92a245ea64ef7176cf402a1fa5348a9421c30a4d30d01c950c48f6dcc15cf22ce69ffe1657be97e5fccc14bd933d64683c4439b695528ce3dc34d72dda927
1f449586a9 test: add `bad-txns-prevout-null` test to mempool_accept.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
aa0a5bb70d test: add `bad-txns-prevout-null` test case to invalid_txs.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This simple PR adds missing tests for the reject reason `bad-txns-prevout-null`, which is thrown in the function `CheckTransaction()`: a62fc35a15/src/consensus/tx_check.cpp (L52-L54)
Basically this condition is met for non-coinbase transactions (the code snippet above only hits if `!tx.IsCoinBase()`) with coinbase-like outpoints, i.e. hash=0, n=0xffffffff.
Can be tested by running the functional tests `feature_block.py`, `p2p_invalid_tx.py` and `mempool_accept.py`. Not sure if the redundancy in the tests is desired (I guess it would make sense if the mempool acceptance test also makes use of the invalid_txs templates?).
ACKs for top commit:
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 1f449586a9
brunoerg:
tACK 1f449586a9
kristapsk:
ACK 1f449586a9, code looks correct and all tests pass.
Tree-SHA512: 2d4f940a6ac8e0d80d2670c9e1111cbf43ae6ac62809a2ccf17cffee9a41d387ea4d889ee300eb4a407c055b13bfa5d37102a32ed59964a9b6950bd907ba7204
00b875ba94 addrman: remove invalid addresses when unserializing (Vasil Dimov)
bdb62096f0 fuzz: reduce possible networks check (Vasil Dimov)
a164cd3ba6 net: simplify CNetAddr::IsRoutable() (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
* Simplify some code, now that we know `CNetAddr::IsRFC4193()` and `CNetAddr::IsTor()` cannot be `true` at the same time.
* Drop Tor v2 addresses when loading addrman from `peers.dat` - they would have been loaded as dummy-all-zeros IPv6 addresses and linger in addrman, wasting space.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 00b875ba94. Reviewed the code, and tested with -DDEBUG_ADDRMAN (unit tests + mainnet run with peers.dat that contained v2 onions).
laanwj:
Code review and lightly tested ACK 00b875ba94
jonatack:
ACK 00b875ba94 reviewed, debug-built with -DEBUG_ADDRMAN rebased to current master, restarted node on mainnet/signet/testnet and verified that on each chain -addrinfo shows no change in address counts (as expected). Added some sanity check asserts, rebuilt/re-ran test. Checked that the new test fails on master with "test/addrman_tests.cpp(824): error: in "addrman_tests/remove_invalid": check addrman.size() == 2 has failed [4 != 2]"
jarolrod:
ACK 00b875ba94
Tree-SHA512: 6ed8e6745134b1b94fffaba28482de909ea39483b46b7f57bda61cdbae7a51251d15cb674de3631772fbeabe153d77a19269f96e62a89102a2d5c01e48f0ba06
in ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio().
With this change, `if (n.count == 0) continue;` will be true
if a network had candidates protected in the first iterations
and has no candidates remaining to be protected in later iterations.
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
for the usual case when some of the protected networks
don't have eviction candidates, to reduce the number
of iterations in ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio().
Picks up an idea in ef411cd2 that I had dropped.
in ProtectEvictionCandidatesByRatio().
Thank you to Vasil Dimov, whose suggestions during a post-merge
discussion about PR 21261 reminded me that I had done this in
earlier versions of the PR, e.g. commits like ef411cd2.
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
cdb41d5573 doc: Install Rosetta on M1-macOS for qt in depends (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (c609e10545) `make -C depends qt` on Apple Silicon based macOS 11.4 ends with an error:
```
/bin/sh: /Users/hebasto/bitcoin/depends/work/build/aarch64-apple-darwin20.5.0/qt/5.12.11-6c4d47a8f8f/qtbase/bin/moc: Bad CPU type in executable
```
Installing Rosetta 2 fixes it.
Explanation. On Apple Silicon macOS the `qt` package in depends actually is cross compiled. All native tools (including `moc`) are x86_64 binaries, that require Rosetta 2 to run.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK cdb41d5573.
fanquake:
ACK cdb41d5573 - I have not tested after installing Rosetta 2, but I saw the same issue during my first cross-compile on an M1 box.
Zero-1729:
ACK cdb41d5573
Tree-SHA512: fb06a32d6fb40f405ce856b44f5d3af0c51089886f3be79e509e5c325614d7af58ce4480c064c17e0efb695a1f69f68d533c417f9631d46d8a630aba60ce4433
Now that our release binaries are build in a glibc 2.24 and 2.27
environment, we can't use a symbol from glibc 2.28 to test our checks.
Replace renameat2() with nextup(), which was introduced in 2.24.
Note that this also means re-disabling the test for RISC-V, however
RISC-V is built in a glibc 2.27 environment, and our minimum required
glibc for that binary is 2.27.
We use these flags in our test-security-check make target, but they are
only available because debian patches them in.
We can patch them in for our Guix builds so that we can check the sanity
of our security/symbol checking suite before running them.
