Unfortunately clang 10 does not understand "-mmacosx-version-min=11.0",
as it expects to see only 10.x.
Bump minimally to 11.1 to fix that problem. This will likely be our last
binary toolchain bump, as it will soon be replaced with usage of upstream
vanilla llvm.
61f4b9b7ad Manage exceptions in bcc callback functions (virtu)
Pull request description:
Address #27380 (and similar future issues) by handling failed `assert_equal()` assertions in bcc callback functions
### Problem
Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc. This means an AssertionError exception raised by `assert_equal()` to signal a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead, the error is logged to stdout and execution of the callback stops.
The current workaround to check whether all `assert_equal()` assertions in a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be used to check whether a callback executed successfully.
One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception occurs, there is no way of telling which of the `assert_equal()` statements caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the pieces of data that got compared in `assert_equal()` differed (often a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong).
This problem is happening in #27380: Sporadically, in the `mempool:rejected` test, execution does not reach the end of the callback function and the success counter is not incremented. Thus, the test fails when comparing the counter to its expected value of one. Without knowing which of the asserts failed any why it failed, this issue is hard to debug.
### Solution
Two fixes come to mind. The first involves having the callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and inspecting the event using `assert_equal()` outside the callback. This solution still requires a counter in the callback in order to tell whether a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to perf_buffer_poll() timed out.
The second fix entails wrapping all relevant `assert_equal()` statements inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events).
The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on a case-by-case basis: Tests in `interface_usdt_net.py`, `interface_usdt_mempool.py` and `interface_usdt_validation.py` have been refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was chosen for `interface_usdt_utxocache.py` (partly to provide a reference for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach would negatively impact their readability). Lastly, `interface_usdt_coinselection.py` was kept unchanged because it does not use `assert_equal()` statements inside callback functions.
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
Reviewed the changes since my last review. ACK 61f4b9b7ad. I've tested that the combined log contains both exceptions by modifying `interface_usdt_utxocache.py`.
willcl-ark:
utACK 61f4b9b
stickies-v:
utACK 61f4b9b7a
Tree-SHA512: 85cdaabf370d4f09a9eab6af9ce7c796cd9d08cb91f38f021f71adda34c5f643331022dd09cadb95be2185dad6016c95cbb8942e41e4fbd566a49bf431c5141a
28fff06afe test: Make linter to look for `BOOST_ASSERT` macros (Hennadii Stepanov)
47fe551e52 test: Kill `BOOST_ASSERT` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
One of the goals of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27783 was to get rid of the `BOOST_ASSERT` macros instead of including the `boost/assert.hpp` headers. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27783#discussion_r1210612717.
It turns out that a couple of those macros sneaked into the codebase in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27790.
This PR makes the linter guard against new instances of the `BOOST_ASSERT` macros and replaces the current ones.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [28fff06](28fff06afe)
stickies-v:
ACK 28fff06af
TheCharlatan:
ACK 28fff06afe
Tree-SHA512: 371f613592cf677afe0196d18c83943c6c8f1e998f57b4ff3ee58bfeff8636e4dac1357840d8611b4f7b197def94df10fe1a8ca3282b00b7b4eff4624552dda8
cbee1d7091 depends: modernize clang flags (Cory Fields)
2a85857ce5 ci: disable false-positive warnings for now (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
This is a cleaner and simpler alternative to #25098. Inspired by [this conversation](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27737#issuecomment-1562543301). The diff is large but the change itself is quite small.
Fixes builds with llvm >= 11 in guix by working around the problem. As a bonus, this is much cleaner and more maintainable than what we had before.
See the updated comment for more info. At a high level: rather than playing tricks and trying to work around clang's default includes, disable them and re-add what we want.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK cbee1d7091 - tested Guix and the depends cross-compile. Would like to move this along, to unblock #27676, which itself might be a blocker for #27897. Note that macOS might seem somewhat in flux for the moment, but once we finish the migration to LLVM Clang + LLD, things will be must simpler, and ultimately more maintainable.
TheCharlatan:
ACK cbee1d7091
Tree-SHA512: 5a8300be528f550e15ab23d869e77df7a62201c6d40c0384795a9eecee38118a676e0b79b2b76c5e597597181443caada54a01b75a544dbcde76da1deba8e3a4
e639364495 validation: add missing insert to m_dirty_blockindex (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
When the status of a block index is changed, we must add it to `m_dirty_blockindex` or the change might not get persisted to disk.
This is missing from one spot in `FindMostWorkChain()`, where `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD` is set.
Since we have [code](f0758d8a66/src/node/blockstorage.cpp (L284-L287)) that later sets missing `BLOCK_FAILED_CHILD` during the next startup, I don't think that this can lead to bad block indexes in practice, but I still think it's worth fixing.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK e639364495
stickies-v:
ACK e639364495
Tree-SHA512: a97af9c173e31b90b677a1f95de822e08078d78013de5fa5fe4c3bec06f45d6e1823b7694cdacb887d031329e4b4afc6a2003916e0ae131279dee71f43e1f478
bdea2bb114 scripted-diff: Following the C++ Standard rules for identifiers with _. (Brotcrunsher)
Pull request description:
Any identifier starting with 2 _ is reserved for the compiler and thus must not be used.
See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/228797/7130273
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK bdea2bb114
Tree-SHA512: 74c8e676449f3f61476d846bfd2c514103c8914e13c4a0db841203abdc0267c25ddc6ed57d6791459efe3edea17753a1b53c3795071ddfe8aba8662521063407
1a572ce7d6 test: refactor: introduce `generate_keypair` helper with WIF support (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In functional tests it is a quite common scenario to generate fresh elliptic curve keypairs, which is currently a bit cumbersome as it involves multiple steps, e.g.:
privkey = ECKey()
privkey.generate()
privkey_wif = bytes_to_wif(privkey.get_bytes())
pubkey = privkey.get_pubkey().get_bytes()
Simplify this by providing a new `generate_keypair` helper function that returns the private key either as `ECKey` object or as WIF-string (depending on the boolean `wif` parameter) and the public key as byte-string; these formats are what we mostly need (currently we don't use `ECPubKey` objects from generated keypairs anywhere).
With this, most of the affected code blocks following the pattern above can be replaced by one-liners, e.g.:
privkey, pubkey = generate_keypair(wif=True)
Note that after this commit, the only direct uses of `ECKey` remain in situations where we want to set the private key explicitly, e.g. in MiniWallet (test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py) or the test for the signet miner script (test/functional/tool_signet_miner.py).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 1a572ce7d6
kevkevinpal:
reACK [1a572ce](1a572ce7d6)
stratospher:
ACK 1a572ce7. neat to have this since keypair generation is done in lots of places.
Tree-SHA512: ceb695ba7b34dc9f65357b55be03e67609e7e13a178083d405284eff4d8d3c5cea4fb0b6632658604a533f38ebfefc33e0c375995cc21ebc7843442ad764287b
0000f55293 ci: Run fuzz target even if input folder is empty (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This should catch trivial integer sanitizer bugs if the author and all reviewers forget to look for them.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
reACK 0000f55293
dergoegge:
reACK 0000f55293
Tree-SHA512: f139b9d56f0cf1aae339c2890721c77c88d1fea77b73d492c1386ec99b4f393c5b664029919ff4a22e4e8a2929f085699a148c6acc2cc3e40df8a72fd39ff474
fa76f0d0ef refactor: Make m_count_with_* in CTxMemPoolEntry int64_t, drop UBSAN supp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is a refactor as long as no signed integer overflow appears. In normal operation and absent bugs, signed integer overflow should never happen in the touched code paths.
The main benefit of this refactor is to drop the file-wide ubsan suppression `unsigned-integer-overflow:txmempool.cpp`.
For now, this only changes the internal private representation and the publicly returned type remains `uint64_t`.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK fa76f0d0ef
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa76f0d0ef
Tree-SHA512: a09e33a915d60c65d369d44ba1a45ce4a6a76e6dc2bea43216ba02b5eab0b74e214b2c7cc44360493f2c483d18d96e4636b7a75b23050976efc80e38de852c39
a1e653828b test: Add test for migrating default wallet and plain file wallet (Andrew Chow)
bdbe3fd76b wallet: Generated migrated wallet's path from walletdir and name (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes an assertion error that is hit during the setup of the new database during migration of a wallet that was not contained in a wallet dir. Also added a test for this case as well as one for migrating the default wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a1e653828b
furszy:
ACK a1e65382
Tree-SHA512: 96b218c0de8567d8650ec96e1bf58b0f8ca4c4726f5efc6362453979b56b9d569baea0bb09befb3a5aed8d16d29bf75ed5cd8ffc432bbd4cbcad3ac5574bc479
clang <=17 warns on -nostdlibinc, which causes an error on our -Werror builds.
Note that this breaks the "-fPIE" check in configure because it relies on
catching warnings, but that is not a problem for macOS.
daa5a658c0 refactor: rename BCLog::BLOCKSTORE to BLOCKSTORAGE (Jon Atack)
cf622b214b doc: release note re raising on invalid -debug/debugexclude/loglevel (Jon Atack)
6cb1c66041 init: remove config option names from translated -loglevel strings (Jon Atack)
2547829272 test: -loglevel raises on invalid values (Jon Atack)
a9c295888b init: raise on invalid loglevel config option (Jon Atack)
b0c3995393 test: -debug and -debugexclude raise on invalid values (Jon Atack)
4c3c19d943 init: raise on invalid debug/debugexclude config options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
and rename BCLog::BLOCKSTORE to BLOCKSTORAGE so the enum is the same as its value like the other BCLog enums.
Per discussion in bitcoin-core-dev IRC today from https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2023-05-11#921458.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK daa5a658c0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK daa5a658c0. Just translated string template cleanup since last review
pinheadmz:
re-ACK daa5a658c0
Tree-SHA512: 4c107a93d8e8ce4e2ee81d44aec672526ca354ec390b241221067f68204beac8b4ba7a65748bcfa124ff2245c4307fa9243ec4fe0b464d0fa69c787fb322c3cc
a72af2e833 bench: disable birth time block skip for wallet_create_tx.cpp (furszy)
Pull request description:
As the benchmarks inside `wallet_create_tx.cpp` assert the wallet
balance at the end, they require all blocks to be scanned by the wallet.
So, we need to ensure that no blocks are skipped by the recently added
wallet birth time functionality.
This just means setting the wallet birth time to the genesis block time.
So the wallet is always older than any new block.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a72af2e833
hernanmarino:
ACK a72af2e833
TheCharlatan:
ACK a72af2e833
Tree-SHA512: d3148659bd633d20978736e1292e3456a2c6dd2b6c8f60625a4160e16818d923487c889237eb3f34693f7dd78b7d124b89afdc56e4c9fad370026d0733ef1e08
faa05d1965 fuzz: Fix implicit-integer-sign-change in wallet/fees fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes a bug in the fuzz target.
```
echo 'OiAAAPr//wAAAAAAAAA=' | base64 --decode > /tmp/a
UBSAN_OPTIONS="suppressions=$(pwd)/test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan:print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1:report_error_type=1" FUZZ=wallet_fees ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz /tmp/a
```
```
wallet/fees.cpp:58:58: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'unsigned int' of value 4294574080 (32-bit, unsigned) to type 'int' changed the value to -393216 (32-bit, signed)
#0 0x5625ef46a094 in wallet::GetMinimumFeeRate(wallet::CWallet const&, wallet::CCoinControl const&, FeeCalculation*) src/wallet/fees.cpp:58:58
#1 0x5625eedd467f in wallet::(anonymous namespace)::wallet_fees_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>) src/wallet/test/fuzz/fees.cpp:64:11
...
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: implicit-integer-sign-change wallet/fees.cpp:58:58 in
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
tACK faa05d1965
brunoerg:
ACK faa05d1965
Tree-SHA512: 66a4020d6a4153a92c7023e9f94ec6279862566db7236ce3cf6951b7fbee616dc88a56fe9502de4099d74f9840439b20a984b0733fb432e43129e774bcc2a6e6
d2b39e09bc test: ensure old fee_estimate.dat not read on restart and flushed (ismaelsadeeq)
cf219f29f3 tx fees, policy: read stale fee estimates with a regtest-only option (ismaelsadeeq)
3eb241a141 tx fees, policy: do not read estimates of old fee_estimates.dat (ismaelsadeeq)
5b886f2b43 tx fees, policy: periodically flush fee estimates to fee_estimates.dat (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Fixes#27555
The issue arises when an old `fee_estimates.dat` file is sometimes read during initialization.
Or after an unclean shutdown, the latest fee estimates are not flushed to `fee_estimates.dat`.
If the fee estimates in the old file are old, they can cause transactions to become stuck in the mempool.
This PR ensures that nodes do not use stale estimates from the old file during initialization. If `fee_estimates.dat`
has not been updated for 60 hours or more, it is considered stale and will not be read during initialization. To avoid
having old estimates, the `fee_estimates.dat` file will be flushed periodically every hour. As mentioned #27555
> "The immediate improvement would be to store fee estimates to disk once an hour or so to reduce the chance of having an old file. From there, this case could probably be detected, and refuse to serve estimates until we sync."
In addition, I will follow-up PR to persist the `mempoolminfee` across restarts.
ACKs for top commit:
willcl-ark:
ACK d2b39e09bc
instagibbs:
reACK d2b39e09bc
glozow:
ACK d2b39e09bc. One nit if you follow up.
Tree-SHA512: 4f6e0c296995d0eea5cf80c6aefdd79b7295a6a0ba446f2166f32afc105fe4f831cfda1ad3abd13c5c752b4fbea982cf4b97eaeda2af1fd7184670d41edcfeec
Any identifier starting with two _, or one _ followed by a capital letter is reserved for the compiler and thus must not be used. See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/228797/7130273
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
s() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
s '__pushKV' 'pushKVEnd'
s '_EraseTx' 'EraseTxNoLock'
s '_Other' 'Other'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
40b333e21f fuzz: wallet, add target for CoinControl (Ayush Singh)
Pull request description:
This PR adds fuzz coverage for `wallet/coincontrol`.
Motivation: Issue [#27272](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27272#issue-1628327906)
The idea is to create different/unique instances of `COutPoint` by placing it inside the `CallOneOf` function, which may or may not be consumed by all of the `CoinControl` file's methods.
This is my first PR on Bitcoin Core, and I will try my best to address any reviews/changes ASAP. I'm also working on fuzz harness files for other files in the wallet and plan to open PR for them soon.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
reACK [40b333e](40b333e21f)
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 40b333e21f
achow101:
ACK 40b333e21f
brunoerg:
crACK 40b333e21f
dergoegge:
ACK 40b333e21f
Tree-SHA512: 174769f4e86df8590b532b85480fd620082587e84e50e49ca9b52f0588a219355362cefd66250dd9942e86019d27af4ca599b45e871e9f147d2cc0ba97c4aa7b
In functional tests it is a quite common scenario to generate fresh
elliptic curve keypairs, which is currently a bit cumbersome as it
involves multiple steps, e.g.:
privkey = ECKey()
privkey.generate()
privkey_wif = bytes_to_wif(privkey.get_bytes())
pubkey = privkey.get_pubkey().get_bytes()
Simplify this by providing a new `generate_keypair` helper function that
returns the private key either as `ECKey` object or as WIF-string
(depending on the boolean `wif` parameter) and the public key as
byte-string; these formats are what we mostly need (currently we don't
use `ECPubKey` objects from generated keypairs anywhere).
With this, most of the affected code blocks following the pattern above
can be replaced by one-liners, e.g.:
privkey, pubkey = generate_keypair(wif=True)
Note that after this commit, the only direct uses of `ECKey` remain in
situations where we want to set the private key explicitly, e.g. in
MiniWallet (test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py) or the test for
the signet miner script (test/functional/tool_signet_miner.py).
Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc.
This means an AssertionError exception raised by check_equal() to signal
a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead,
the error is logged to stdout and execution of the handler stops.
The current workaround to check whether all check_equal() assertions in
a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the
assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and
stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be
used to check whether a callback executed successfully.
One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception
occurs, there is no way of telling which of the check_equal() statements
caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the
pieces of data that got compared in check_equal() differed (often
a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong).
Two fixes to this problem come to mind. The first involves having the
callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and
inspecting the event using check_equal() outside the callback. This
solution still requires a counter in the callback to tell whether
a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to
perf_buffer_poll() timed out.
The second fix entails wrapping all relevant check_equal() statements
inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging
AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach
can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving
multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events).
The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on
a case-by-case basis: Tests in interface_usdt_net.py,
interface_usdt_mempool.py and interface_usdt_validation.py have been
refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was
chosen for interface_usdt_utxocache.py (partly to provide a reference
for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the
most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach
would negatively impact their readability). Lastly,
interface_usdt_coinselection.py was kept unchanged because it does not
use check_equal() statements inside callback functions.
As the benchmarks inside wallet_create_tx.cpp assert the
wallet balance at the end, they require all
blocks to be scanned by the wallet. So, we need
to ensure that no blocks are skipped by the recently
added wallet birth time functionality.
This just means setting the wallet birthtime to the
genesis block time. So the wallet is always older than
any new block.
5524fa00fa doc: add release note about removal of `deprecatedrpc=walletwarningfield` flag (Sebastian Falbesoner)
5c77db7354 Restorewallet/createwallet help documentation fixups/improvements (Jon Atack)
a00ae31fcc rpc: remove deprecated "warning" field from {create,load,restore,unload}wallet (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The "warning" string field for wallet creating/loading RPCs (`createwallet`, `loadwallet`, `unloadwallet` and `restorewallet`) has been deprecated with the configuration option `-deprecatedrpc=walletwarningfield` in PR #27279 (released in v25.0). For the next release v26.0, the field and the configuration option can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5524fa00fa
jonatack:
ACK 5524fa00fa
Tree-SHA512: 8212f72067d08095304018b8a95d2ebef630004b65123483fbbfb078cc5709c2d825bbc35b16ea5f6b28ae7377347382d7e9afaf7bdbf0575d2c229d970784de
fc6c17b838 build: make sure we can overwrite config.{guess,sub} (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
Since ea7b8528 (#26422), `autogen.sh` overwrites the `build-aux/config.{guess, sub}` files (installed there by `autoreconf`) with the `depends/config.{guess, sub}` files if these are newer.
The `autoreconf` tool copies them from it's `share/autoconf/build-aux/` directory. Specifically on NixOS, the `share/autoconf/build-aux/` files are located in the nix-store and are read-only. `autoreconf` preserves the read-only permissions when copying. Overwriting them with our `depends/config.{guess, sub}` files subsequently fails.
To make sure we can overwrite the files, set write permissions to the current user and group before overwriting. This fixes the problem on NixOS.
fixes#27873
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
tACK fc6c17b838
fanquake:
ACK fc6c17b838
Tree-SHA512: e8a31f739d5b598b2fe9fe6fc3d02303c117a6adccc49b8d0fea4980027a64f915a0e1e00e4788dce6113ef1b9ec9acf9e4164486f6e4904bad405f20b6746a0
a97c59f12d test: p2p: check misbehavior for non-continuous headers messages (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for a peer sending a `headers` message where the headers don't connect to each other, which should be treated as misbehaving (not disconnecting though, as the score increase is only 20). The relevant code path is `PeerManagerImpl::ProcessHeadersMessage` -> `PeerManagerImpl::CheckHeadersPoW` -> `PeerManagerImpl::CheckHeadersAreContinuous`:
17acb2782a/src/net_processing.cpp (L2415-L2419)17acb2782a/src/net_processing.cpp (L2474-L2484)
ACKs for top commit:
sr-gi:
ACK a97c59f12d
achow101:
ACK a97c59f12d
instagibbs:
ACK a97c59f12d
Tree-SHA512: 3f8d6a2492e5c8b63c7b11be2e4ec455f83581b2c58f2d4e705baadfe8d7c6377296d6cd0eda679d291a13d8930b09443f8e3d183795df34b780c703d5d3aeb3
fa8ef7d138 refactor: Avoid copy of bilingual_str when formatting, Fix ADL violation (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This refactor shouldn't change behavior, but may fix compile errors such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27862#issuecomment-1592516184
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa8ef7d138
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa8ef7d138. Looks great! Thanks for updating
hebasto:
ACK fa8ef7d138, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
Tree-SHA512: 903019962f27b5432b8e3af052b472238ef68d3ee165148c9d2232bf290309075f9f17d8d06c9b5c7fddb89c1a9c3a4c09c6310af01e8561adc0244a30db0857
6779e6ed7f test: clean up is node stopped (dimitaracev)
Pull request description:
Fixes#27893
Use f'strings for the message when asserting `expected_ret_code` and `return_code`. Change the `expected_ret_code` from an optional to have a default value of `0`.
cc MarcoFalke
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 6779e6ed7f
stickies-v:
ACK 6779e6ed7f
brunoerg:
ACK 6779e6ed7f
Tree-SHA512: af84e7ffe467ced29236dee9206687786a2efb89ab8b039c3ebfb93ea23fc273206cd51f20c9fb6bee4135770e9a649538942571d9c0be83ba9535fa8e59cb28
The return type of TranslateArg is std::string, which creates a copy.
Fix this by moving everything into a lambda that takes a reference and
returns a reference.
Also, the format function is called without specifying the namespace it
lives in. Fix this by specifying the namespace. See also:
7a59865793/doc/developer-notes.md (L117-L137).
3b2acfcfec build: suppress external warnings by default (fanquake)
Pull request description:
I think we are at the point where it make more sense to make this the default, than not. It's already used in the CI, and I assume most building locally are also utilising it.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3b2acfcfec
hebasto:
ACK 3b2acfcfec
stickies-v:
ACK 3b2acfcfec
Tree-SHA512: be20203381c03dea8b5d64876c56bf8bb8defdfd6fc6d5398b71d3f28d0209c4bd1374f108df708aaa8867fda818a9bc611d1908c9fbb74f8cccdfbc5aff05af
162602b208 fuzz: wallet, add target for `fees` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds fuzz coverage for `wallet/fees`. Some functions may use or not (non default) values from `wallet`, `CCoinControl` or `FeeCalculation`. So the logic is to make the test sometimes fill up some attributes and others no.
Obs: As soon as this PR gets some reviews, I can open the proper PR to `qa-assets` as well.
ACKs for top commit:
Xekyo:
ACK 162602b208
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 162602b208
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 162602b208
Tree-SHA512: 6545802f27aafb60bf5a119af514e9425b643780dea6650bba766bb5be813f2aaddb7afc7f0efa2943ceb26f5ea08b42c95a3c0df897493c71f2d2f99e9e4236
This commit adds tests to ensure that old fee_estimates.dat files
are not read and that fee_estimates are periodically flushed to the
fee_estimates.dat file.
Additionaly it tests the -regtestonly option -acceptstalefeeestimates.
If -acceptstalefeeestimates option is passed stale fee estimates can now
be read when operating in regtest environments.
Additionally, this commit updates all declarations of the CBlockPolicyEstimator
class to include a the second constructor variable.
This is a refactor as long as no signed integer overflow appears. In
normal operation and absent bugs, signed integer overflow should never
happen in the touched code paths.
The main benefit of this refactor is to drop the file-wide ubsan
suppression unsigned-integer-overflow:txmempool.cpp.
For now, this only changes the internal private representation and the
publicly returned type remains uint64_t.
