aaa6ad5455 [MOVEONLY] [tests] Move addrman ser/deser tests to addrman_tests.cpp (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Addrman serialization/deserialization tests are currently in net_tests.cpp.
Move them to addrman_tests.cpp with the rest of the addrman tests.
Reviewer hint: review using `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK aaa6ad5455📺
mjdietzx:
ACK aaa6ad5455
Saviour1001:
Concept ACK <code>[aaa6ad5](aaa6ad5455)</code>
Tree-SHA512: 9a575e63f8830a9dfba30ef63c83ae4b45813add9973308f0d7a2463886438575a2e8a4a23af5b19ed977fbaab1a212ef832f89a25de03920d493e9ebafa9c30
5c5d0b6264 Add FoundBlock.found member (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change lets IPC serialization code handle FoundBlock arguments more simply and efficiently. Without this change there was no way to determine from a FoundBlock object whether a block was found or not. So in order to correctly implement behavior of leaving FoundBlock output variables unmodified when a block was not found, IPC code would have to read preexisting output variable values from the local process, send them to the remote process, receive output values back from the remote process, and save them to output variables unconditionally. With FoundBlock.found method, the process is simpler. There's no need to read or send preexisting local output variable values, just to read final output values from the remote process and set them conditionally if the block was found.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 5c5d0b6264
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK 5c5d0b6264
jamesob:
ACK 5c5d0b6264 ([`jamesob/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock))
Zero-1729:
crACK 5c5d0b6
Tree-SHA512: d906e1b7100ff72c3aa06d80bd77673887b2db670ebd52dce7c4f6f557a23a1744c6109308228a37fda6c6ea74f05ba0efecff0ef235ab06ea8acd861fbb8675
Addrman serialization/deserialization tests are currently in net_tests.cpp.
Move them to addrman_tests.cpp with the rest of the addrman tests.
Reviewer hint: review using `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
4c43b7d41d contrib: use hkps://keys.openpgp.org to retrieve builder keys (fanquake)
Pull request description:
`hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net` is essentially no-longer functional,
and a number of distributions and GPG tools have since switched to using
the `keys.openpgp.org` key server as their default.
See this Debian patch for additional context:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnupg2/-/blob/debian/main/debian/patches/Use-hkps-keys.openpgp.org-as-the-default-keyserver.patch
Switch to using keys.openpgp.org in the CI as well.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 4c43b7d41d
Zero-1729:
ACK 4c43b7d41d
Tree-SHA512: e6c72b67778b76f81c659eee0e4195fea9e579587c64921affd35b9d46a077d4e8754b7fb85ca90a9a4bbc5cd5a47b0c6e4c9dbf9a335418a12f774d665e5a19
60e0cbdd57 [addrman] Merge the two Add() functions (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
This PR merges the two definitions of this overloaded function to reduce code duplication.
When these functions were introduced in 5fee401fe1, there were multiple places that invoked `Add()` with a single addr and a vector of addrs each, so it made sense to overload the function. I could see how the small difference in log statement was more meaningful when a peer was added via IRC :)
Now, the definition of `Add()` that takes in a single address is only invoked from the hidden/test-only RPC `addpeeraddress`. These changes should not cause any observable difference, and are covered by the existing tests that use this RPC endpoint.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 60e0cbdd57
Zero-1729:
crACK 60e0cbd
fanquake:
ACK 60e0cbdd57
Tree-SHA512: 782fb2ac6d2d403ba7d7ff543197ca42b610b9a8806952d271e57e2ee3527ad1a94af4ebbad5371b5e95d77df07c56ccc8c1d5a2c82cdecb0d2b5085b3bdd5ee
2d7534bd93 wallet: use PACKAGE_NAME instead of "Bitcoin" in rpcdump (fanquake)
14b4802405 wallet: use FormatFullVersion instead of CLIENT_BUILD in rpcdump (fanquake)
Pull request description:
The dumpwallet RPC is the last place we're using CLIENT_BUILD directly, rather FormatFullVersion() (which just returns it), so switch to using that. At the same time, use PACKAGE_NAME (Bitcoin Core), rather than just "Bitcoin".
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 2d7534bd93
laanwj:
Tested ACK 2d7534bd93
achow101:
ACK 2d7534bd93
Zero-1729:
crACK 2d7534b
Tree-SHA512: b38ee074e317448719d2a628380786ec665413515b38d9ce680c21608bc2acf6a2bf817f78f100a8310477613ae72d6969cc4f595f4f44af0896659d3ebf2671
e2ff385e13 test: check for invalid `-prune` parameters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small PR adds missing test coverage for invalid `-prune` parameter values / combinations:
77e23ca945/src/init.cpp (L926-L928)77e23ca945/src/init.cpp (L935-L937)77e23ca945/src/init.cpp (L844-L849)
Not sure if the tests fit into `feature_config_args.py` or should rather be moved into `feature_pruning.py`; the latter though seems to be run less often due to being very memory-hungry.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e2ff385e13
Tree-SHA512: bb0db98090058ecac9f8a01301634e9dba9a65fd56b6a0b770f88da28c4f01e240e22b1225f0d231e28bdd4b5b51bff0e6853cccc46ed0190e91b84f7954a9db
fa7718344d fuzz: Avoid OOM in system fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
If the inputs size is unlimited, the target may consume unlimited memory, because the argsmanager stores the argument names. Limiting the size should fix this issue.
Should fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=36906
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa7718344d
Tree-SHA512: 6edfcf324ee9d94e511038ee01340f02db50bcb233af3f1a1717c3602164c88528d9d987e971ec32f1a4593b868019bea0102c53c9b02bfefec3dfde959483cf
5100deee58 clientversion: No suffix #if CLIENT_VERSION_IS_RELEASE (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
Previously, building from a release source tarball would result in a
version string like v22.0.0-<commithash>, but we expect just v22.0.0.
This commit solves this problem.
Also use PACKAGE_VERSION instead of reconstructing it.
```
Fixes the underlying problem of #22623
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5100deee58
fanquake:
ACK 5100deee58 - tested that prior the output of `src/bitcoind -version` on the `22.x` branch was `Bitcoin Core version v22.0.0-d3bd5410f64e`, and with this commit cherry-picked it is `Bitcoin Core version v22.0.0rc2`.
Tree-SHA512: 78705e285ff1271d5012e888837049044db4d11d66c252c6b964685892ef078c56fe122f12daa87c71532f4352f695d1e88a228665adcd7afe3ddce3f209b49f
92885c4f69 test: Test for ApproximateBestSubset edge case with too little fees (Andrew Chow)
d9262324e8 wallet: Assert that enough was selected to cover the fees (Andrew Chow)
2de222c401 wallet: Use GetSelectionAmount for target value calculations (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The `m_value` used for the target calculation in `ApproximateBestSubset` is incorrect, it should be `GetSelectionAmount`. This causes a bug that is only apparent when the minimum relay fee is set to be very high.
A test case is added for this, in addition to an assert in `CreateTransactionInternal` that would have also caught this issue if someone were able to hit the edge case.
Fixes#22670
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 92885c4f69
Tree-SHA512: bd61fa61ffb60873e097737eebea3afe8a42296ba429de9038b3a4706763b34de9409de6cdbab21ff7f51f4787b503f840873182d9c4a1d6e12a54b017953547
7d95777417 builder-keys: Add dongcarl (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=04017A2A6D9A0CCDC81D8EC296AB007F1A7ED999
This is my master key, will be bumping the expiration of subkeys or rotating when necessary.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 7d95777417 - matches what I've got.
Tree-SHA512: 3a76b8eda81821b3221402501cf8191bce73118624b932aa80a7fc1a32a91e3825aeb2b03ed261bbf284b088e927c384f92e08eadddf7f94ed4de579d9f6d2b7
5fe8100ff3 Change the wallet_backup.py test to use the restorewallet RPC command instead of restoring wallets manually. (lsilva01)
ae23faba6f Add a new RPC command: restorewallet (lsilva01)
Pull request description:
As far as I know, there is no command to restore the wallet from a backup file.
The only way to do this is to replace the `wallet.dat` of a newly created wallet with the backup file, which is hardly an intuitive way.
This PR implements the `restorewallet` RPC command which restores the wallet from the backup file.
To test:
First create a backup file:
`$ bitcoin-cli -rpcwallet="wallet-01" backupwallet /home/Backups/wallet-01.bak`
Then restore it in another wallet:
`$ bitcoin-cli restorewallet "restored-wallet-01" /home/Backups/wallet-01.bak`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 5fe8100ff3
prayank23:
tACK 5fe8100ff3
meshcollider:
utACK 5fe8100ff3
Tree-SHA512: 9639df4d8ad32f255f5b868320dc69878bd9aceb3b471b49dfad500b67681e2d354292b5410982fbf18e25a44ed0c06fd4a0dd010e82807c2e00ff32e84047a1
4844b74ba7 p2p: log addrman consistency checks (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This mini-patch picks up #22479 to log addrman consistency checks in the `BCLOG::ADDRMAN` category when they are enabled with the `-checkaddrman=<n>` configuration option for values of n greater than 0.
```
$ ./src/bitcoind -signet -checkaddrman=20 -debug=addrman
...
2021-08-13T11:14:45Z Addrman checks started: new 3352, tried 89, total 3441
2021-08-13T11:14:45Z Addrman checks completed successfully
```
This allows people to
- verify the checks are running
- see when and how often they are being performed
- see the number of new/tried/total addrman entries per check
- see the start/end of the checks
Thanks to John Newbery for ideas to improve this logging.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 4844b74ba7
Zero-1729:
tACK 4844b74ba7
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK 4844b74ba7♟️
Tree-SHA512: 10b51c480d52a753ea8a59dbdd1e2c4f49067e7f4afe59d58426a8fb438f52447fe3a6090fa52132bc382d876927fa338b229c906d85668086f7f8f5bd8ed38a
d930c7f5b0 p2p, rpc, test: address rate-limiting follow-ups (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Incorporates review feedback in #22387.
Edit, could be considered separately: should a release note (or two) be added for 22.0? e.g. the new getpeerinfo fields in `Updated RPCs` and the rate-limiting itself in `P2P and network changes`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d930c7f5b0
theStack:
re-ACK d930c7f5b0🌮
Zero-1729:
crACK d930c7f
Tree-SHA512: b2101cad87f59c238603f38bd8e8df7a4d48929794e4de9e0e0ff2afa935a68475c2d369aa669d124a0bec2f50280fb47e8b980bde6ad812db08cf67b71c066a
a4d78546b0 [addrman] Make addrman consistency checks a runtime option (John Newbery)
10aac24145 [tests] Make deterministic addrman use nKey = 1 (John Newbery)
fa9710f62c [addrman] Add deterministic argument to CAddrMan ctor (John Newbery)
ee458d84fc Add missing const to CAddrMan::Check_() (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
CAddrMan has internal consistency checks. Currently, these are only run when the program is compiled with the `DEBUG_ADDRMAN` option. This option is not enabled on any of our CI builds, and it's likely that no-one is running them at all.
This PR makes consistency checks a (hidden) runtime option that can be enabled with `-checkaddrman`, where `-checkaddrman=n` will result in the consistency checks running every n operations (similar to `-checkmempool=n`). We set the ratio to 1/100 for our unit tests, and leave it disabled by default for all networks. Additionally, a consistency check failure now asserts, rather than logging and continuing. This matches the behavior of CTxMemPool and TxRequestTracker, where a failed consistency check asserts.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK a4d78546b0 per `git diff 00fd089 a4d7854`, tested by adding logging similar to #22479 and running with `-checkaddrman=<n>` for various values 0/1/10/100 etc, tested the updated docs with `bitcoind -help-debug | grep -A2 "checkaddrman\|checkmempool"` and verified rebased on master that compiling with `CPPFLAGS="-DDEBUG_ADDRMAN"` no longer causes the build to error.
mzumsande:
Code-review ACK a4d78546b0
theStack:
Code-review ACK a4d78546b0
Tree-SHA512: eaee003f7a99154822c5b5efbc62008d32c1efbecc6fec6e183427f6b2ae5d30b3be7924e3a7271b1a1de91517f5bd2a70011d45358c3105c6a0702f12b70f7c
ApproximateBestSubset had an edge case (due to not using
GetSelectionAmount) where it was possible for it to return success but
fail to select enough to cover transaction fees. A test is added that
could trigger this failure prior to the fix being implemented.
When the fee is not subtracted from the outputs, the amount that has
been reserved for the fee (change_and_fee - change_amount) must be
enough to cover the fee that is needed. It would be a bug to not do so,
so use an assert to make this obvious if such a situation were to occur.
For target value calculations, GetSelectionAmount should be used, not
m_effective_value or m_value.
Specifically, ApproximateBestSubset mistakenly uses m_value when
calculating whether the target value has been met. This has been changed
to use GetSelectionAmount.
93cc53a2b2 gui: Unregister wallet notifications before unloading wallets (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change was originally part of both bitcoin/bitcoin#10102 and bitcoin/bitcoin#19101 and is required for both because it avoids the IPC wallet implementation in bitcoin/bitcoin#10102 and the WalletContext implementation in bitcoin/bitcoin#19101 needing to deal with notification objects that have stale pointers to deleted wallets.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 93cc53a2b2.
hebasto:
ACK 93cc53a2b2
Tree-SHA512: 805f50a493291ad0f7c48725fbc5058d58ebbdb0770befd51d8aa241209a13f8a46f5982481336ab8338cdc83e9017668089a71deccf1587308e841cf8697825
