893aa207e8 tests: Add fuzzing harness for CheckBlock(...) and other CBlock related functions (practicalswift)
ec8dcb0199 tests: Add corpora suppression (FUZZERS_MISSING_CORPORA) for fuzzers missing in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/tree/master/fuzz_seed_corpus (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for `CheckBlock(...)` and other `CBlock` related functions.
**Testing this PR**
Run:
```
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure --enable-fuzz --with-sanitizers=address,fuzzer,undefined
$ make
$ src/test/fuzz/block
…
# And to to quickly verify that the relevant code regions are triggered, that the
# fuzzing throughput seems reasonable, etc.
$ contrib/devtools/test_fuzzing_harnesses.sh '^block$'
```
`test_fuzzing_harnesses.sh` can be found in PR #17000.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 275abd46d8ac970b28d8176f59124988b1e07c070173e001acd55995b830333417f301c309199fc589da08a6ac4c03aa74650d5e1638f6e3023dfbd3c9f6921d
244501fc85 depends: disable unused qt networking features (fanquake)
29d56c62b7 depends: -optimized-qmake is now -optimized-tools (fanquake)
ccdda96804 depends: skip building qt proxies (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Somewhat of a followup to removing BIP70 support in #17165. This removes networking features from our Qt build. This also removes the need to link against the `CFNetwork` and `SystemConfiguration` libraries on macOS.
```diff
src/qt/bitcoin-qt:
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
/System/Library/Frameworks/IOKit.framework/Versions/A/IOKit
/System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Foundation
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/CoreServices
/System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Versions/C/AppKit
/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/ApplicationServices
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation
-/System/Library/Frameworks/SystemConfiguration.framework/Versions/A/SystemConfiguration
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreGraphics.framework/Versions/A/CoreGraphics
/System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Carbon
/usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib
-/System/Library/Frameworks/CFNetwork.framework/Versions/A/CFNetwork
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreText.framework/Versions/A/CoreText
/System/Library/Frameworks/ImageIO.framework/Versions/A/ImageIO
/usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib
```
> Introduced the -optimized-tools option; supersedes -optimized-qmake.
`optimized-qmake` became `optimized-tools` in Qt 5.6.0. While the former still works, we can use the newer flag.
A diff of the removed symbols is available [here](https://gist.github.com/fanquake/9c8d5961c91f90a2966191367adfb391).
We still need to actually build the network module, because we are using `QLocalServer` & `QLocalSocket` in the payment server.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK 244501fc85: just a rebase (_updated since I accidentally repeated the previous hash_)
practicalswift:
ACK 244501fc85 -- diff looks correct
promag:
Code review ACK 244501fc85.
Tree-SHA512: 79734e3c96c40e7e484c86ac4cd4f738c05fcebe4771aeac443883f618a6c766e667909d5f8f14f9bd82f43206387c952458c5fa765cd0830f8beda6e6ac80ae
7d263571be rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start action (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It was reported on [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-11.html#l-377) that `scantxoutset`'s API was broken in 0.19.0:
```
<belcher> i think scantxoutset may have been broken in bitcoin core 0.19 ? regardless of what parameters i run it with (e.g. "scantxoutset abort", "scantxoutset status") it just returns the help doc, according to the release notes the only change was https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16285/files but i dont see anything that wouldve broken it, it works fine in 0.18
<belcher> im on regtest, in case its important
<harding> I can confirm `scantxoutset abort` returns the help doc on latest master. Waiting for 0.18.1 to start now to attempt to reproduce there.
<harding> It looks like it's expecting a second parameter (even though that doesn't make sense with "abort").
<jonatack> Same for me as well
<harding> Can also confirm that `scantxoutset abort` returns the expected result on 0.18.1.
```
As noted in the conversation, previously, the second argument of `scanobjects` is only required for the `start` action. `Stop` and `abort` actions did not and could work without them.
It appears that this was broken by #16240 which enforced the size of the arguments to match the listed required arguments.
To fix this issue, this PR makes the `scanobjects` argument an optional argument. Then only in the `start` action do we check whether the `scanobjects` argument is there and throw an informative error about that. Also a test is added for this case.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7d263571be
promag:
ACK 7d263571be.
Tree-SHA512: 828bdfe47f4fffa5d00a2cf88db6cea4a2714d9c49276841ca5cbdd1603b87bb6862147b86edcf36d7b40314ddb80b1a07fd399faf288572c55cc788c5cf9526
2081442c42 test: Add test for rpc_whitelist (Emil Engler)
7414d3820c Add RPC Whitelist Feature from #12248 (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Summary
====
This patch adds the RPC whitelisting feature requested in #12248. RPC Whitelists help enforce application policies for services being built on top of Bitcoin Core (e.g., your Lightning Node maybe shouldn't be adding new peers). The aim of this PR is not to make it advisable to connect your Bitcoin node to arbitrary services, but to reduce risk and prevent unintended access.
Using RPC Whitelists
====
The way it works is you specify (in your bitcoin.conf) configurations such as
```
rpcauth=user1:4cc74397d6e9972e5ee7671fd241$11849357f26a5be7809c68a032bc2b16ab5dcf6348ef3ed1cf30dae47b8bcc71
rpcauth=user2:181b4a25317bff60f3749adee7d6bca0$d9c331474f1322975fa170a2ffbcb176ba11644211746b27c1d317f265dd4ada
rpcauth=user3:a6c8a511b53b1edcf69c36984985e$13cfba0e626db19061c9d61fa58e712d0319c11db97ad845fa84517f454f6675
rpcwhitelist=user1:getnetworkinfo
rpcwhitelist=user2:getnetworkinfo,getwalletinfo, getbestblockhash
rpcwhitelistdefault=0
```
Now user1 can only call getnetworkinfo, user2 can only call getnetworkinfo or getwalletinfo, while user3 can still call all RPCs.
If any rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists unless rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 0. If rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 1 and no rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists.
Review Request
=====
In addition to normal review, would love specific review from someone working on LN (e.g., @ roasbeef) and someone working on an infrastructure team at an exchange (e.g., @ jimpo) to check that this works well with their system.
Notes
=====
The rpc list is spelling sensitive -- whitespace is stripped though. Spelling errors fail towards the RPC call being blocked, which is safer.
It was unclear to me if HTTPReq_JSONRPC is the best function to patch this functionality into, or if it would be better to place it in exec or somewhere else.
It was also unclear to me if it would be preferred to cache the whitelists on startup or parse them on every RPC as is done with multiUserAuthorized. I opted for the cached approach as I thought it was a bit cleaner.
Future Work
=====
In a future PR, I would like to add an inheritance scheme. This seemed more controversial so I didn't want to include that here. Inheritance semantics are tricky, but it would also make these whitelists easier to read.
It also might be good to add a `getrpcwhitelist` command to facilitate permission discovery.
Tests
=====
Thanks to @ emilengler for adding tests for this feature. The tests cover all cases except for where `rpcwhitelistdefault=1` is used, given difficulties around testing with the current test framework.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 2081442c42
Tree-SHA512: 0dc1ac6a6f2f4b0be9c9054d495dd17752fe7b3589aeab2c6ac4e1f91cf4e7e355deedcb5d76d707cbb5a949c2f989c871b74d6bf129351f429569a701adbcbf
75d9317bc1 Update msvc build for Visual Studio 2019 v16.4 (Aaron Clauson)
Pull request description:
msvc warning C4834 for the Bitcoin Core build was introduced by Visual Studio 16.4.0. This PR adds an ignore rule for the warning (it's related to the nodiscard attribute and is not considered relevant).
An additional side effect of the msvc compiler update is the prebuilt Qt5.9.8 libraries cannot be linked due to being built with an earlier version of the compiler. To fix this a new Qt5.9.8 version has been compiled and the appveyor job updated to use them.
The GitHub Actions job needs to continue to use the original Qt5.9.8 libraries until the latest GitHub Windows image also updates to >= Visual Studio 2019 v16.4.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: c28d64d78a968eb0bd614932b2d42d762d68853120c345970072b473e2c43fb34e99865062ae1517b10e76f269de6b8f4eed119cf05d59aa883a3553d6a76812
msvc warning C4834 for the Bitcoin Core build was introduced by Visual Studio 16.4.0. This PR adds an ignore rule for the warning (it's related to the nodiscard attribute and is not considered relevant).
An additional side effect of the msvc compiler update is the prebuilt Qt5.9.8 libraries cannot be linked due to being built with an earlier version of the compiler. To fix this a new Qt5.9.8 version has been compiled and the appveyor job updated to use them. The GitHub Actions job needs to continue to use the original Qt5.9.8 libraries until the latest GitHub Windows image also updates to >= Visual Studio 2019 v16.4.
034561f9cd cli: fix Fatal LevelDB error when specifying -blockfilterindex=basic twice (Harris)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes#17679 by replacing BlockFilterType-vector with a set of the same type to make sure that only unique filter types get inserted.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 034561f9cd📖
laanwj:
ACK 034561f9cd
fanquake:
ACK 034561f9cd - Tested with `src/bitcoind --blockfilterindex=basic --blockfilterindex=basic`
Tree-SHA512: 64ccec4d23528abfbb564f2b41fb846137875260ce06ea461da12175819985964a1a7442788d5ff7282b5de0c5fd46524d9a793788ee3b876626cbdf05b28c16
fab2f351f2 doc: Update release process with latest changes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Mainly adding the reminder to bump the flatpak
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fab2f351f2
fanquake:
ACK fab2f351f2
Tree-SHA512: fe279a6cdee881e8dd608cb7d09d992c4b668b01b9d0d2dbfaf92f12f3032b8fcb2c256b20fcee861397451add1338f162b6e5fa7b3c21e76c247cc419315284
fabd5b444e ci: Use python 3.7 on Windows Github Actions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This mirrors the appveyor config 7da9e3a817/.appveyor.yml (L10) and is needed for PEP 540
ACKs for top commit:
sipsorcery:
tACK fabd5b444e.
laanwj:
ACK fabd5b444e
Tree-SHA512: 2d0118bf4eb5ec510d1ad6e287d35bf28cc800101fa18704c119c7bc84f545aaa236ffe45dc425559e6bd896610302a133b2c50ccdcd3ced6e4d6f8302de7cdb
7cecf10ac3 Replace LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::IsCrypted with LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::HasEncryptionKeys (Andrew Chow)
bf6417142f Remove SetCrypted() and fUseCrypto; Change IsCrypted()'s implementation (Andrew Chow)
77a777118e Rename EncryptKeys to Encrypt and pass in the encrypted batch to use (Andrew Chow)
35f962fcf0 Clear mapKeys before encrypting (Andrew Chow)
14b5efd66f Move fDecryptionThoroughlyChecked from CWallet to LegacyScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
97c0374a46 Move Unlock implementation to LegacyScriptPubKeyMan (Andrew Chow)
e576b135d6 Replace LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::vMasterKey with GetDecryptionKey() (Andrew Chow)
fd9d6eebc1 Add GetEncryptionKey() and HasEncryptionKeys() to WalletStorage (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Let wallet class handle locked/unlocked status and master key, and let keyman
handle encrypting its data and determining whether there is encrypted data.
There should be no change in behavior, but state is tracked differently. The
fUseCrypto atomic bool is eliminated and replaced with equivalent
HasEncryptionKeys checks.
Split from #17261
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7cecf10ac3
Tree-SHA512: 95a997c366ca539abba0c0a7a0015f39d27b55220683d8d86344ff2d926db4724da67700d2c8ec2d82ed75d07404318c6cb81544af8aadeefab312167257e673
b6f9e3576a test: re-enable CLI test support by using EncodeDecimal in json.dumps() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
As mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17675#issuecomment-563188648.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK b6f9e3576a assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
MarcoFalke:
> ACK b6f9e35 assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
Tree-SHA512: 79fa535cc1756c8ee610a3d6a316a1c4f036797d6990a5620e44985393a2e52f78450f8e0021d0a148c08705fd1ba765508464a365f9030ae0d2cacbd7a93e19
4341bffb6e GUI: Refactor formatServicesStr to warn when a ServicesFlag is missing (Luke Dashjr)
df77de8c21 Bugfix: GUI: Recognise NETWORK_LIMITED in formatServicesStr (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Currently, only the bottom 8 service bits are shown in the GUI peer details view.
`NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED` is the 11th bit (2^10).
The first commit expands the range to cover the full 64 bits, and properly label `"NETWORK_LIMITED"`.
The second commit refactors the code so that any future omitted service bits will trigger a compile warning.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 4341bffb6e
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 4341bffb6e
hebasto:
Concept ACK 4341bffb6e
Tree-SHA512: 8338737d03fbcd92024159aabd7e632d46e13c72436d935b504d2bf7ee92b7d124e89a5917bf64d51c87f12a64de703270c2d7b4c6711fa8ed08ea7887d817c7
wallet/walletutil.cpp:77:23: error: no member named 'level' in 'boost::filesystem::recursive_directory_iterator'
} else if (it.level() == 0 && it->symlink_status().type() == fs::regular_file && IsBerkeleyBtree(it...
~~ ^
7e8b4de059 rpc: add missing newline in analyzepsbt rpcresult (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
follow-up to 638e40c in #17524
before
```
"error" : "error" (string) Error message if there is one}
```
after
```
"error" : "error" (string) Error message if there is one
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 7e8b4de059
promag:
ACK 7e8b4de059.
emilengler:
ACK 7e8b4de
Tree-SHA512: 4cdd365e39d15b7925ea277b7ff3e9bfdc22f5845aa41ca547343b4dabdf319579843a1c7f11fb0edd6abbc31bae2ec96236b83e84f8872bd662848723725e4c
b0b1531737 Adds GitHub Action workflow which duplicates AppVeyor job. (Aaron Clauson)
Pull request description:
As discussed in #17594 this PR contains a GitHub Action workflow file that performs the same job as the current Appveyor CI task except for the Python functional tests. For the latter I've been unable to get them to execute successfully due to a Unicode error. I've tried on and off for a week to get it to work but with no joy.
It may be that someone more proficient in Python will recognise the error and be able to provide a pointer on how to proceed. I've tried some obvious things like changing the Windows console code page.
To run this job it should just be a matter of clicking on the GitHub `Actions` tab and enabling workflows. It's also not required that the file is on the `master` branch for the job to run. If anyone else wants to run the job they can pull this PR into their own fork and enable `Actions` (it's free).
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 8dce7509922ece3438b15ea371ec509a08b507e981a8fb705f1cf5a2b4a147a22ded599942aa95f3bd8d5e98cfc65b50cf3df6171f02dd863659160f1d77ef76
e97f5c1823 depends: don't configure xcb_proto (fanquake)
Pull request description:
xcb_proto's configure doesn't understand `--disable-shared` or
`--with-pic`. All the package does it put a stack of XML files into
a directory to be used by libxcb.
Probably enough to close#16354.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK e97f5c1823
Tree-SHA512: 1a49fd7c8269405bbf312be33c1aeaac5f25ef8666829b01dc3c58f3a2a9281c23c42614a7f1cfc3ee260be4ea3e71285869b1cb9c2035dceda336296d9d9dea
5db506ba59 tests: Add option --valgrind to run nodes under valgrind in the functional tests (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
What is better than fixing bugs? Fixing entire bug classes of course! :)
Add option `--valgrind` to run the functional tests under Valgrind.
Regular functional testing under Valgrind would have caught many of the uninitialized reads we've seen historically.
Let's kill this bug class once and for all: let's never use an uninitialized value ever again. Or at least not one that would be triggered by running the functional tests! :)
My hope is that this addition will make it super-easy to run the functional tests under Valgrind and thus increase the probability of people making use of it :)
Hopefully `test/functional/test_runner.py --valgrind` will become a natural part of the pre-release QA process.
**Usage:**
```
$ test/functional/test_runner.py --help
…
--valgrind run nodes under the valgrind memory error detector:
expect at least a ~10x slowdown, valgrind 3.14 or
later required
```
**Live demo:**
First, let's re-introduce a memory bug by reverting the recent P2P uninitialized read bug fix from PR #17624 ("net: Fix an uninitialized read in ProcessMessage(…, "tx", …) when receiving a transaction we already have").
```
$ git diff
diff --git a/src/consensus/validation.h b/src/consensus/validation.h
index 3401eb64c..940adea33 100644
--- a/src/consensus/validation.h
+++ b/src/consensus/validation.h
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ inline ValidationState::~ValidationState() {};
class TxValidationState : public ValidationState {
private:
- TxValidationResult m_result = TxValidationResult::TX_RESULT_UNSET;
+ TxValidationResult m_result;
public:
bool Invalid(TxValidationResult result,
const std::string &reject_reason="",
```
Second, let's test as normal without Valgrind:
```
$ test/functional/p2p_segwit.py -l INFO
2019-11-28T09:30:42.810000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test__fc8q3qo
…
2019-11-28T09:31:57.187000Z TestFramework (INFO): Subtest: test_non_standard_witness_blinding (Segwit active = True)
…
2019-11-28T09:32:08.265000Z TestFramework (INFO): Tests successful
```
Third, let's test with `--valgrind` and see if the test fail (as we expect) when the unitialized value is used:
```
$ test/functional/p2p_segwit.py -l INFO --valgrind
2019-11-28T09:32:33.018000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test_gtjecx2l
…
2019-11-28T09:40:36.702000Z TestFramework (INFO): Subtest: test_non_standard_witness_blinding (Segwit active = True)
2019-11-28T09:40:37.813000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
ConnectionRefusedError: [Errno 111] Connection refused
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5db506ba59
jonatack:
ACK 5db506ba59
Tree-SHA512: 2eaecacf4da166febad88b2a8ee6d7ac2bcd38d4c1892ca39516b6343e8f8c8814edf5eaf14c90f11a069a0389d24f0713076112ac284de987e72fc5f6cc3795
3ab1824625 build: Use dnl for all comments in configure.ac, rather than # (fanquake)
8ddcbb4e41 build: Remove backticks from configure.ac (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Use `dnl` for all comments, rather than `#`.
Remove backticks - Their usage for the `bdb_prefix` and `qt5_prefix` commands may have improved backwards compatibility in some cases, however we now require recent versions of macOS. I'm not sure why they were being used in the `HAVE_STD__SYSTEM` and `HAVE_WSYSTEM` defines.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK 3ab1824625
hebasto:
ACK 3ab1824625, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 2bcffb52c365acff87a0e6b9527ae31f36fdabb7ea095a8fd261f9a39b2c2848f5dfc148bc38d21e21e7bd761b1a2960e9a96f508c66be84d9569b8a401e812a
5ad4dd1ea1 doc: Changed MiniUPnPc link to https in dependencies.md (Marius Kjærstad)
Pull request description:
doc: Changed MiniUPnPc link to https in dependencies.md
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 228ee98c877612468a34d09610999a47257ab1e060f3004a530639f0c29fb473b48e59588ff70297c53a3abeb2bb32bfedbb61e102a7fc10df4bb1b5d0d5893b
1bb5d517aa test: add unit test for non-standard bare multisig txs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches another missing unit test of issue #17394: Checks that the function `IsStandardTx()` returns rejection reason `"bare-multisig"` if any one of the outputs' scriptPubKey has bare multisignature format (i.e. `M <PubKey1> <PubKey2> ... <PubKeyN> N OP_CHECKSIG`, not P2SH!) and the policy flag `fIsBareMultisigStd` is set to false.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 1bb5d517aa
Tree-SHA512: d7c95e35da16520d6dcd2b4278e2426fedd13f68d1f23c90e85e929774e123fbfcfbccc26df6ad1c0dd61780896fa4b4b3d4e8280c647bb06df2bfcf2ba572fb
