22e9afe40d use sha256 command instead of sha256sum on FreeBSD (Murray Nesbitt)
Pull request description:
The FreeBSD version of `sha256sum` takes different arguments than the GNU version.
The `sha256_check` function in `contrib/install_db4.sh` has code specific to FreeBSD, however it doesn't get reached because while the `sha256sum` command does exist on FreeBSD, it is incompatible and results in an error:
```
sha256sum: option requires an argument -- c
usage: sha256sum [-pqrtx] [-c file] [-s string] [files ...]
```
This change moves the FreeBSD-specific code before the check for the `sha256sum` command.
Fixes: #26774
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 2485e2e7d8fdca3b072b29fb22bbdfd69e520740537b331b33c64cc645b63da712cfa63a23bdf039bbc92a6558fc7bf03323a51784bf601ff360ff0ef59506c8
927b8d4e0c rpc: Correct RPCHelpMan for fundrawtransaction's input_weights field (jdjkelly@gmail.com)
Pull request description:
`input_weights` is incorrectly documented as a fixed length JSON array, but it is actually a JSON array of JSON objects - this commit changes `input_weights` to use `RPCArg::Type::OBJ`
The behavior of `input_weights` as an object exists as a functional test in [wallet_fundrawtransaction.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 927b8d4e0c
Tree-SHA512: 384f5e16be36dba670d64d96f16f1fde2d0d51357e1094ae13eb71d004af0f4dc8bac965b4d2d724ccf64fb671faad37b73055152a9882af24f65dfceaf1e5fb
fa818e103c txmempool: Remove unused clear() member function (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to have code in Bitcoin Core that is unused.
Moreover the function was broken (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24145) and is brittle, as there is nothing that prevents similar bugs from re-appearing.
Fix both issues by replacing it with C++11 member initializers.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK fa818e103c
Tree-SHA512: e79e44cac7d5a84d9ecc8e3f3b0b9a50e1e3ebec358b20ba5dac175ef07d1fbe338a20f83ee80f746f7c726c79e77f8be49e14bca57a41063da8a5302123c3a9
76dc547ee7 gui: create tx, launch error dialog if backend throws runtime_error (furszy)
f4d79477ff wallet: coin selection, add duplicated inputs checks (furszy)
0aa065b14e wallet: return accurate error messages from Coin Selection (furszy)
7e8340ab1a wallet: make SelectCoins flow return util::Result (furszy)
e5e147fe97 wallet: refactor eight consecutive 'AttemptSelection' calls into a loop (furszy)
Pull request description:
Work decoupled from #25806, which cleanup and improves the Coin Selection flow further.
Adding the capability to propagate specific error messages from the Coin Selection process to the user.
Instead of always returning the general "Insufficient funds" message which is not always accurate to what happened internally.
Letting us instruct the user how to proceed under certain circumstances.
The following error messages were added:
1) If the selection result exceeds the maximum transaction weight,
we now will return:
-> "The inputs size exceeds the maximum weight. Please try sending
a smaller amount or manually consolidating your wallet's UTXOs".
2) If the user pre-selected inputs and disallowed the automatic coin
selection process (no other inputs are allowed), we now will
return:
-> "The preselected coins total amount does not cover the transaction
target. Please allow other inputs to be automatically selected or include
more coins manually".
3) The double-counted preset inputs during Coin Selection error will now
throw an "internal bug detected" message instead of crashing the node.
The essence of this work comes from several comments:
1. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26560#discussion_r1037395665
2. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25729#discussion_r940619491
3. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25269#pullrequestreview-1135240825
4. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23144 (which is connected to #24845)
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
crACK 76dc547ee7
achow101:
ACK 76dc547ee7
aureleoules:
ACK 76dc547ee7
theStack:
ACK 76dc547ee7🌇
Tree-SHA512: 9de30792d7a5849cae77747aa978e70390b66ee9d082779a56088a024f82e725b0af050e6603aece0ac8229f6d73bc471ba97b4ab69dc7eddf419f5f56ae89a5
47c4b1f52a mempool: log/halt when CalculateMemPoolAncestors fails unexpectedly (stickies-v)
5481f65849 mempool: add AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors helper function (stickies-v)
f911bdfff9 mempool: use util::Result for CalculateMemPoolAncestors (stickies-v)
66e028f739 mempool: use util::Result for CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Upon reviewing the documentation for `CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors`, I noticed `setAncestors` was meant to be an `out` parameter but actually is an `in,out` parameter, as can be observed by adding `assert(setAncestors.empty());` as the first line in the function and running `make check`. This PR fixes this unexpected behaviour and introduces refactoring improvements to make intents and effects of the code more clear.
## Unexpected behaviour
This behaviour occurs only in the package acceptance path, currently only triggered by `testmempoolaccept` and `submitpackage` RPCs.
In `MemPoolAccept::AcceptMultipleTransactions()`, we first call `PreChecks()` and then `SubmitPackage()` with the same `Workspace ws` reference. `PreChecks` leaves `ws.m_ancestors` in a potentially non-empty state, before it is passed on to `MemPoolAccept::SubmitPackage`. `SubmitPackage` is the only place where `setAncestors` isn't guaranteed to be empty before calling `CalculateMemPoolAncestors`. The most straightforward fix is to just forcefully clear `setAncestors` at the beginning of CalculateMemPoolAncestors, which is done in the first bugfix commit.
## Improvements
### Return value instead of out-parameters
This PR updates the function signatures for `CTxMemPool::CalculateMemPoolAncestors` and `CTxMemPool::CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits` to use a `util::Result` return type and eliminate both the `setAncestors` `in,out`-parameter as well as the error string. It simplifies the code and makes the intent and effects more explicit.
### Observability
There are 7 instances where we currently call `CalculateMemPoolAncestors` without actually checking if the function succeeded because we assume that it can't fail, such as in [miner.cpp](69b10212ea/src/node/miner.cpp (L399)). This PR adds a new wrapper `AssumeCalculateMemPoolAncestors` function that logs such unexpected failures, or in case of debug builds even halts the program. It's not crucial to the objective, more of an observability improvement that seems sensible to add on here.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 47c4b1f52a
w0xlt:
ACK 47c4b1f52a
glozow:
ACK 47c4b1f52a
furszy:
light code review ACK 47c4b1f5
aureleoules:
ACK 47c4b1f52a
Tree-SHA512: d908dad00d1a5645eb865c4877cc0bae74b9cd3332a3641eb4a285431aef119f9fc78172d38b55c592168a73dae83242e6af3348815f7b37cbe2d448a3a58648
1e5e87cec3 script: update python linter dependencies (Jon Atack)
459cb637ac script, test: fix python linter E275 errors with flake8 5.0.4 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
It is helpful to be able to run the python linter locally to review PRs and check local diffs and work. Fix the errors raised by `./test/lint/lint-python.py` when run locally with flake8 5.0.4, which enforces rule E275 more strictly than previous versions, and update our python linter CI dependencies.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 1e5e87cec3
Tree-SHA512: c7da09396144b9fed4ce6405c0763b2e3e5651d49a5220b053da465aceca09f754fb70a8ab9647278ce2028dde803bea461a3cd93fb39868ead39d06187cd8af
04609284ad rpc: Improve error when wallet is already loaded (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Currently, trying to load a descriptor (sqlite) wallet that is already loaded throws the following error:
> error code: -4
> error message:
> Wallet file verification failed. SQLiteDatabase: Unable to obtain an exclusive lock on the database, is it being used by another instance of Bitcoin Core?
I don't think it is very clear what it means for a user.
While a legacy wallet would throw:
> error code: -35
> error message:
> Wallet file verification failed. Refusing to load database. Data file '/home/user/.bitcoin/signet/wallets/test_wallet/wallet.dat' is already loaded.
This PR changes the error message for both types of wallet to:
> error code: -35
> error message:
> Wallet file verification failed. Wallet "test_wallet" is already loaded.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 04609284ad
hernanmarino:
ACK 0460928
theStack:
Tested ACK 04609284ad
Tree-SHA512: a8f3d5133bfaef7417a6c05d160910ea08f32ac62bfdf7f5ec305ff5b62e9113b55f385abab4d5a4ad711aabcb1eb7ef746eb41f841b196e8fb5393ab3ccc01e
9622fe64b8 test: move coins result test to wallet_tests.cpp (furszy)
f69347d058 test: extend and simplify availablecoins_tests (furszy)
212ccdf2c2 wallet: AvailableCoins, add arg to include/skip locked coins (furszy)
Pull request description:
Negative PR with extended test coverage :).
1) Cleaned duplicated code and added coverage for the 'AvailableCoins' incremental result.
2) The class `AvailableCoinsTestingSetup` inside `availablecoins_tests.cpp` is a plain copy
of `ListCoinsTestingSetup` that is inside `wallet_tests.cpp`.
So, deleted the file and moved the `BasicOutputTypesTest` test case to `wallet_tests.cpp`.
3) Added arg to include/skip locked coins from the `AvailableCoins` result. This is needed for point (1) as otherwise the wallet will spend the coins that we recently created due its closeness to the recipient amount.
Note: this last point comes from #25659 where I'm using the same functionality to clean/speedup another flow as well.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9622fe64b8
theStack:
ACK 9622fe64b8
aureleoules:
reACK 9622fe64b8, nice cleanup!
Tree-SHA512: 1ed9133120bfe8815455d1ad317bb0ff96e11a0cc34ee8098716ab9b001749168fa649212b2fa14b330c1686cb1f29039ff1f88ae306db68881b0428c038f388
81d4a2b14f refactor: Move feerate comparison invariant outside of the loop (yancy)
365aca4045 refactor: Simplify feerate comparison statement (yancy)
Pull request description:
This is a small nit, however I think it's more understandable to write:
`utxo_pool.at(0).fee > utxo_pool.at(0).long_term_fee`
vs
`(utxo_pool.at(0).fee - utxo_pool.at(0).long_term_fee) > 0`
ACKs for top commit:
Xekyo:
ACK 81d4a2b14f
achow101:
ACK 81d4a2b14f
aureleoules:
ACK 81d4a2b14f
Tree-SHA512: 3e89377989c36716b53114fe40178261671dde5688075fab1c21ec173ac310f8c84ed6af90354d7c329176cb7262dfcaa7191fd19847d3b7147a9a10c3e31176
f496528556 walletdb: refactor: drop unused `FindWalletTx` parameter and rename (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Since commit 3340dbadd3 ("Remove -zapwallettxes"), the `FindWalletTx` helper is only needed to read tx hashes, so drop the other parameter and rename the method accordingly.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
code review ACK f496528556
achow101:
ACK f496528556
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK f496528556
Tree-SHA512: ead85bc724462f9e920f9d7fe89679931361187579ffd6e63427c8bf5305cd5f71da24ed84f3b1bd22a12be46b5abec13f11822e71a3e1a63bf6cf49de950ab5
input_weights is incorrectly documented as a fixed length JSON array,
but it is actually a JSON array of JSON objects - this commit changes
input_weights to use RPCArg::Type::OBJ
fabb6af850 ci: Remove duplicate CC and CXX from tsan task (MarcoFalke)
fa5d9a0e24 Revert "ci: Use clang-15 in tsan task" (MarcoFalke)
faa835e7e5 Revert "test: Drop no longer needed `race:epoll_ctl` TSan suppression" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Looks like there are still bugs in clang-15, so we need to roll back all the way to the previously used version (clang-13).
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fabb6af850, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: d62203049847ab9095ee3fc89e18bdd721d1d9d5a7ef7a9f524c80e6be58d1d9f6aa2f14533df1ea77eb59597fba6fa9b987b17eb03b2c3f7cb577ab59cd59c0
090ad51c80 rpc: Remove duplicate field in RPCHelpMan for gettransactions (Joshua Kelly)
Pull request description:
The field 'comment' appears twice in `TransactionDescriptionString`, incorrectly - this commit removes the instance of the comment field without a description, preserving the one with a description.
On master, the duplicate fields can be be viewed here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp#L419-L423
`TransactionDescriptionString` is included in RPC calls such as `listtransactions` which have functional tests.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK 090ad51c80
Tree-SHA512: 4bacdafdb517dda2af6d1c193f331b634ae74bd62ac6289c0c288957f39f98a73d07aeab72fbe5bf1ece5532406d4a40a5b8a2277be50115f76c92bb938e21fa
The field 'comment' appears twice in TransactionDescriptionString,
incorrectly - this commit removes the instance of the comment field
without a description, preserving the one with a description
faa00ca78e ci: Use clang-15 in tsan task (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Generally it is best to use the latest clang version for sanitizers, because it comes with the most features and bugfixes.
So bump to clang-15, the latest release, for the tsan task.
The task was using clang-13 (instead of 14) due to a bug, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24572#issue-1169970859. Bumping to 15 will hopefully fix this bug, as well as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26759#issuecomment-1367360491
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK faa00ca78e
Tree-SHA512: adb2386bb9615a3e1185e0624b0b68cd2738309530185819714a26e63bdf1c79461c4b4d3aa9cbe2fe08cc412349d7453f192abbbe9fb5adca74cf4b148ae7b7
f1e89597c8 test: Drop no longer required bench output redirection (Hennadii Stepanov)
4dbcdf26a3 bench: Suppress output when running with `-sanity-check` option (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This change allows to simplify CI tests, and makes it easier to integrate the `bench_bitcoin` binary into CMake custom [targets](https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/command/add_custom_target.html) or [commands](https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/command/add_custom_command.html), as `COMMAND` does not support output redirection.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
tACK f1e89597c8. Ran as expected and is more practical than using an output redirection.
Tree-SHA512: 29086d428cccedcfd031c0b4514213cbc1670e35f955e8fd35cee212bc6f9616cf9f20d0cb984495390c4ae2c50788ace616aea907d44e0d6a905b9dda1685d8
a3f5e54152 test: Drop no longer needed `race:epoll_ctl` TSan suppression (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The removed suppression seems no needed.
I cannot point the exact commit/PR which makes this change possible.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 8ee79cbdb2bc62796d72c69be4a818379132eae47be33951e8b9d224b049ff77e867004801c7cb0cc564a5374f318dafd9142b5231e9bd428f80acc75253933e
3ae76ea6dd scripted-diff: Insert missed copyright header (Hennadii Stepanov)
306ccd4927 scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR bumps the existing copyright headers, as we did every year, and adds a missed one.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 5f6b02e2baad21750e3dd8f0612bb6e7e2cfa6a743c669f26baf5a39c168b2d3a92afae1ce2dad59b70492175186c38f172c4ee68fc7ac87a4d85330429ca054
As no process should be able to trigger this error
using the regular transaction creation process, throw
a runtime_error if happens to tell users/devs to
report the bug if happens.
and not the general "Insufficient funds" when the wallet
actually have funds.
Two new error messages:
1) If the selection result exceeds the maximum transaction weight,
we now will return: "The inputs size exceeds the maximum weight".
2) If the user preselected inputs and disallowed the automatic coin
selection process (no other inputs are allowed), we now will
return: "The preselected coins total amount does not cover the
transaction target".
b2aa9e8528 Add release note for MIN_STANDARD_TX_NONWITNESS_SIZE relaxation (Greg Sanders)
8c5b3646b5 Relax MIN_STANDARD_TX_NONWITNESS_SIZE to 65 non-witness bytes (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
Since the original fix was set to be a "reasonable" transaction to reduce allocations and the true motivation later revealed, it makes sense to relax this check to something more principled.
There are more exotic transaction patterns that could take advantage of a relaxed requirement, such as 1 input, 1 output OP_RETURN to burn a utxo to fees for CPFP purposes when change isn't practical.
Two changes could be accomplished:
1) Anything not 64 bytes could be allowed
2) Anything above 64 bytes could be allowed
In the Great Consensus Cleanup, suggestion (2)
was proposed as a consensus change, and is the simpler of the two suggestions. It would not allow an "empty" OP_RETURN but would reduce the required padding from 22 bytes to 5.
The functional test is also modified to test the actual case
we care about: 64 bytes
Related mailing list discussions here:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-October/020995.html
And a couple years earlier:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2020-May/017883.html
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
reACK b2aa9e8528
glozow:
reACK b2aa9e8528
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK b2aa9e8528
jonatack:
ACK b2aa9e8528 with some suggestions
Tree-SHA512: c1ec1af9ddcf31b2272209a4f1ee0c5607399f8172e5a1dfd4604cf98bfb933810dd9369a5917ad122add003327c9fcf6ee26995de3aca41d5c42dba527991ad
dc12f2e212 test: improve error msg on previous release tarball extraction failure (kdmukai)
7121fd8fa7 test: self-sign previous release binaries for arm64 macOS (kdmukai)
Pull request description:
## The Problem
If you run `test/get_previous_releases.py -b` on an M1 or M2 mac, you'll get an unsigned v23.0 binary in the arm64 tarball. macOS [sets stricter requirements on ARM binaries](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26996578) so the unsigned arm64 binary is apparently completely unusable without being signed/notarized(?).
This means that any test that depends on a previous release (e.g. `wallet_backwards_compatibility.py`) will fail because the v23.0 node cannot launch:
```
TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/kdmukai/dev/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 563, in start_nodes
node.wait_for_rpc_connection()
File "/Users/kdmukai/dev/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 231, in wait_for_rpc_connection
raise FailedToStartError(self._node_msg(
test_framework.test_node.FailedToStartError: [node 2] bitcoind exited with status -9 during initialization
```
This can also be confirmed by downloading bitcoin-23.0-arm64-apple-darwin.tar.gz (https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-23.0/) and trying to run any of the binaries manually on an M1 or M2 mac.
## Solution in this PR
(UPDATED) Per @ hebasto, we can self-sign the arm64 binaries. This PR checks each binary in the previous release's "bin/" and verifies if the arm64 binary is signed. If not, attempt to self-sign and confirm success.
(note: an earlier version of this PR downloaded the x86_64 binary as a workaround but this approach has been discarded)
## Longer term solution
If possible, produce signed arm64 binaries in a future v23.x tarball?
Note that this same problem affects the new v24.0.1 arm64 tarball so perhaps a signed v24.x.x tarball would also be ideal?
That being said, this PR will check all current and future arm64 binaries and self-sign as needed, so perhaps we need not worry about pre-signing the tarball binaries. And I did test a version of `get_previous_releases.py` that includes the new v24.0.1 binaries and it successfully self-signed both v23.0 and v24.0.1, as expected.
## Further info:
Somewhat related to: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15774#issuecomment-1265164753
And @ fanquake noted on IRC that you can confirm which binaries are or are not signed via:
```
$ codesign -v -d bitcoin-qt
bitcoin-qt: code object is not signed at all
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK dc12f2e212
Tree-SHA512: 644895f8e97f5ffb3c4754c1db2c48abd77fa100c2058e3c896af04806596fc2b9c807a3f3a2add5be53301ad40ca2b8171585bd254e691f6eb38714d938396b
d3a84347e8 ci: remove --prefix from msan job (fanquake)
574e50addf ci: Use `CONFIG_SITE` variable and `--prefix` option properly (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
When running CI scripts locally, they attempt to use a `$DEPENDS_DIR/$HOST` directory even `NO_DEPENDS=1` is provided.
This PR fixes this broken behavior.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 5e83b921763e6d463e520bbee2ed1599e9f4de36668d19b23dd9d2d7e4441c415e275f588c585b72cadda8bfab5a938979acc1ee4963230aa47081785c741e98
bb5ea1d9a9 qt: Load PSBTs using istreambuf_iterator rather than istream_iterator (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`istream_iterator` eats whitespace charactesr which causes parsing failures for PSBTs that contain the bytes corresponding to those characters. `istreambuf_iterator` is the correct thing to use here.
This is a regression in 24.0. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25001 accidentally changed the original `istreambuf_iterator` to `istream_iterator`.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
Tested ACK bb5ea1d9
MarcoFalke:
review ACK bb5ea1d9a9🍇
Tree-SHA512: 35d90eee3efdcb6a360af69ac1727f9f2837ea621297196de3136299f5de6d9975df4e425e1fc5b8813c1ddb2a4d60c3969e1d5d968953a4628ca45e37d3bf05
31fdc54dba test: speed up wallet_fundrawtransaction.py and wallet_sendall.py (kdmukai)
Pull request description:
## Problem
`wallet_fundrawtransaction.py` and `wallet_sendall.py` are the two slowest functional tests *when running without a RAM disk*.
```
# M1 MacBook Pro timings
wallet_fundrawtransaction.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 55 s
wallet_fundrawtransaction.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 381 s
wallet_sendall.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 43 s
wallet_sendall.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 327 s
```
In each case, the majority of the time is spent iterating through 1500 to 1600 `getnewaddress()` calls. This is particularly slow in the `--legacy-wallet` runs.
see: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py#L986-L987
see: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/wallet_sendall.py#L324
## Solution
Pre-fill the keypool before iterating through those `getnewaddress()` calls.
With this change, the execution time drops to:
```
wallet_fundrawtransaction.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 52 s # -3s diff
wallet_fundrawtransaction.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 291 s # -90s diff
wallet_sendall.py --descriptors | ✓ Passed | 27 s # -16s diff
wallet_sendall.py --legacy-wallet | ✓ Passed | 228 s # -99s diff
```
---
Tagging @ Sjors as he had encouraged me to take a look at speeding up the tests.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 31fdc54dba
Tree-SHA512: e8dd89323551779832a407d068977c827c09dff55c1079d3c19aab39fcce6957df22b1da797ed7aa3bc2f6dd22fdf9e6f5e1a9a0200fdb16ed6042fc5f6dd992
