fa2d21fec8 add missing atomic include (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`std::atomic` is used in the file, so to avoid compile issues, add the missing include.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa2d21fec8
jamesob:
crACK fa2d21fec8
hebasto:
ACK fa2d21fec8, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
prayank23:
crACK fa2d21fec8
Tree-SHA512: 307b15abd62006be4457b2437fb65de517c296bf0417e8acd181904eb6056dba5655dd5bc43b834bf68a087d06637f5e99ba5a6bc8be3e12388cea470dc155d0
fa09fd1a09 doc: Final merge of release notes snippets (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
None of the remaining pulls tagged for 22.0 have snippets, so merge them and move them to the wiki.
Trivial to review with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa09fd1a09
jonatack:
ACK fa09fd1a09
Tree-SHA512: d5d272a9fc2217a87988efa189000cae5330da22f0459dd5e4340a18aba3d67d8fe8661016cb777e2e15f5d137c1c2b3de7d576c942eaf4201dabdc4e9c783f4
testshell in jupyter was failing due to an extra arg.
this adds a dummy -f param, which allows TestShell to
be used in a command line or jupyter environment
d6d2ab9845 test: MiniWallet: fix fee calculation for P2PK and check tx vsize (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ce024b1c0e test: MiniWallet: force P2PK signature to have fixed size (71 bytes) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #21945. It aims to both fix the fee calculation for P2PK mode transactions and enable its vsize check. Currently, the latter assumes a fixed tx length, which is fine for anyone-can-spend txs but doesn't apply to P2PK output spends due to varying DER signature size; the vsize check is therefore disabled for P2PK mode on master branch.
Creating one million DER signatures with MiniWallet shows the following distribution of sizes (smart people with better math skills probably could deduce the ratios without trying, but hey):
| DER signature size [bytes] | #occurences (ratio) |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| 71 | 498893 (49.89%) |
| 70 | 497244 (49.72%) |
| 69 | 3837 (0.38%) |
| 68 | 22 (0.0022%) |
Note that even smaller signatures are possible (for smaller R and S values with leading zero bytes), it's just that the probability decreases exponentially. Instead of choosing a large vsize check range and hoping that smaller signatures are never created (potentially leading to flaky tests), the proposed solution is ~~to limit the signature size to the two most common sizes 71 and 70 (>99.6% probability) and then accordingly only check for two vsize values; the value to be used for fee calculation is a decimal right between the two possible sizes (167.5 vbytes) and for the vsize check it's rounded down/up integer values are used.~~ to simply grind the signature to a fixed size of 71 bytes (49.89% probability, i.e. on average each call to `sign_tx()`, on average two ECC signing operations are needed).
~~The idea of grinding signatures to a fixed size (similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13666 which grinds to low-R values) would be counter-productive, as the signature creation in the test suite is quite expensive and this would significantly slow down tests that calculate hundreds of signatures (like e.g. feature_csv_activation.py).~~
For more about transaction sizes on different input/output types, see the following interesting article: https://medium.com/coinmonks/on-bitcoin-transaction-sizes-97e31bc9d816
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK d6d2ab9845
Tree-SHA512: 011c70ee0e4adf9ba12902e4b6c411db9ae96bdd8bc810bf1d67713367998e28ea328394503371fc1f5087a819547ddaea56c073b28db893ae1c0031d7927f32
b9e76f1bf0 rpc: Add test for -rpcwaittimeout (Christian Decker)
f76cb10d7d rpc: Prefix rpcwaittimeout error with details on its nature (Christian Decker)
c490e17ef6 doc: Add release notes for the `-rpcwaittimeout` cli parameter (Christian Decker)
a7fcc8eb59 rpc: Add a `-rpcwaittimeout` parameter to limit time spent waiting (Christian Decker)
Pull request description:
Adds a new numeric `-rpcwaittimeout` that can be used to limit the
time we spend waiting on the RPC server to appear. This is used by
downstream projects to provide a bit of slack when `bitcoind`s RPC
interface is not available right away.
This makes the `-rpcwait` argument more useful, since we can now limit
how long we'll ultimately wait, before potentially giving up and reporting
an error to the caller. It was discussed in the context of the BTCPayServer
wanting to have c-lightning wait for the RPC interface to become available
but still have the option of giving up eventually ([4355]).
I checked with laanwj whether this is already possible ([comment]), and
whether this would be a welcome change. Initially I intended to repurpose
the (optional) argument to `-rpcwait`, however I decided against it since it
would potentially break existing configurations, using things like `rpcwait=1`,
or `rpcwait=true` (the former would have an unintended short timeout, when
old behavior was to wait indefinitely).
~Due to its simplicity I didn't implement a test for it yet, but if that's desired I
can provide one.~ Test was added during reviews.
[4355]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355
[comment]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355#issuecomment-768288261
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b9e76f1bf0
promag:
ACK b9e76f1bf0.
Tree-SHA512: 3cd6728038ec7ca7c35c2e7ccb213bfbe963f99a49bb48bbc1e511c4dd23d9957c04f9af1f8ec57120e47b26eaf580b46817b099d5fc5083c98da7aa92db8638
4e353cb618 http: Release work queue after event base finish (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This fixes a race between `http_request_cb` and `StopHTTPServer` where
the work queue is used after release.
Fixes#18856.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 4e353cb618
achow101:
ACK 4e353cb618
LarryRuane:
ACK 4e353cb618
hebasto:
ACK 4e353cb618, tested (rebased on top of master 9313c4e6aa) on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) using MarcoFalke's [patch](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19033#issuecomment-640106647), including different `-rpcthreads`/`-rpcworkqueue` cases. The bug is fixed. The code is correct.
Tree-SHA512: 185d2a9744d0d5134d782bf321ac9958ba17b11a5b3d70b4897c8243e6b146dfd3f23c57aef8e10ae9484374120b64389c1949a9cf0a21dccc47ffc934c20930
30aee2dfe6 tests: Add test for compact block HB selection (Pieter Wuille)
6efbcec4de Protect last outbound HB compact block peer (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
If all our high-bandwidth compact block serving peers (BIP 152) stall block
download, then we can be denied a block for (potentially) a long time. As
inbound connections are much more likely to be adversarial than outbound
connections, mitigate this risk by never removing our last outbound HB peer if
it would be replaced by an inbound.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 30aee2dfe6
ariard:
Code ACK 30aee2dfe
jonatack:
ACK 30aee2dfe6
Tree-SHA512: 5c6c9326e3667b97e0864c371ae2174d2be9054dad479f4366127b9cd3ac60ffa01ec9707b16ef29cac122db6916cf56fd9985733390017134ace483278921d5
e8cd3700ee devtools: Integrate ARCH_MIN_GLIBC_VER table into MAX_VERSIONS in symbol-check.py (W. J. van der Laan)
a33381acf5 devtools: Add xkb version to symbol-check (W. J. van der Laan)
19e598bab0 devtools: Fix verneed section parsing in pixie (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
I misunderstood the ELF specification for version symbols (verneed): The `vn_aux` pointer is relative to the main verneed record, not the start of the section.
This caused many symbols to not be versioned properly in the return value of `elf.dyn_symbols`. This was discovered in #21454.
Fix it by correcting the offset computation.
- xkb versions symbols (using the prefix `V`), as this library is used by bitcoin-qt, add it to the valid versions in `symbol-check.py`
This unfortunately brings to light some symbols that have been introduced since and weren't caught (from a gitian compile of master):
```
bitcoin-cli: symbol getrandom from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
bitcoin-cli: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
bitcoind: symbol getrandom from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
bitcoind: symbol log from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoind: symbol fcntl64 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoind: symbol pow from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoind: symbol exp from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoind: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
bitcoin-qt: symbol exp from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-qt: symbol fcntl64 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoin-qt: symbol log from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-qt: symbol pow from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-qt: symbol statx from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoin-qt: symbol getrandom from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
bitcoin-qt: symbol renameat2 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoin-qt: symbol getentropy from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
bitcoin-qt: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
bitcoin-wallet: symbol exp from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-wallet: symbol log from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-wallet: symbol fcntl64 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoin-wallet: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
test_bitcoin: symbol getrandom from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
test_bitcoin: symbol log from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
test_bitcoin: symbol fcntl64 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
test_bitcoin: symbol pow from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
test_bitcoin: symbol exp from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
test_bitcoin: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK e8cd3700ee
Tree-SHA512: 8c15e3478eb642f01a1ddaadef03f80583f088f9fa8e3bf171ce16b0ec05ffb4675ec147d7ffc6a4360637ed47fca517c6ca2bac7bb30d794c03783cfb964b79
906d791311 fuzz: add missing ECCVerifyHandle to base_encode_decode (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
It is possible to trigger a fuzztest failure in the `base_encode_decode` by asking it to decode any PSBT that has HD keypaths in it. For example, this one
```
cHNidP8BAFUCAAAAASeaIyOl37UfxF8iD6WLD8E+HjNCeSqF1+Ns1jM7XLw5AAAAAAD/////AaBa6gsAAAAAGXapFP/pwAYQl8w7Y28ssEYPpPxCfStFiKwAAAAAAAEBIJVe6gsAAAAAF6kUY0UgD2jRieGtwN8cTRbqjxTA2+uHIgIDsTQcy6doO2r08SOM1ul+cWfVafrEfx5I1HVBhENVvUZGMEMCIAQktY7/qqaU4VWepck7v9SokGQiQFXN8HC2dxRpRC0HAh9cjrD+plFtYLisszrWTt5g6Hhb+zqpS5m9+GFR25qaAQEEIgAgdx/RitRZZm3Unz1WTj28QvTIR3TjYK2haBao7UiNVoEBBUdSIQOxNBzLp2g7avTxI4zW6X5xZ9Vp+sR/HkjUdUGEQ1W9RiED3lXR4drIBeP4pYwfv5uUwC89uq/hJ/78pJlfJvggg71SriIGA7E0HMunaDtq9PEjjNbpfnFn1Wn6xH8eSNR1QYRDVb1GELSmumcAAACAAAAAgAQAAIAiBgPeVdHh2sgF4/iljB+/m5TALz26r+En/vykmV8m+CCDvRC0prpnAAAAgAAAAIAFAACAAAA=
```
which I took straight from the PSBT test vectors. The reason is that in src/psbt.h we call `DeserializeHDKeypaths`, which in turn calls `CPubKey::IsFullyValid`, which in turn asserts that a secp context has been created.
The error appears to be masked on many systems by the definition of `instance_of_eccryptoclosure` in src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp, which defines a static object which contains an `ECCVerifyHandle`. If you just comment out that line you can reliably trigger the fuzz test failure, e.g. by creating a file `crash` with the above PSBT, and runnnig
```
ASAN_OPTIONS=symbolize=0:detect_stack_use_after_return=1:check_initialization_order=1:strict_init_order=1 UBSAN_OPTIONS=suppressions=./test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan:print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1:report_error_type=1 FUZZ=base_encode_decode ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz -seed_inputs=crash
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 906d791311
Tree-SHA512: b98b60573c21efe28503fe351883c6f0d9ac99d0dd6f100537b16ac53476617b8a3f899faf0c23d893d34a01b3bbe4a784499ec6f9c7000292e850bed449bd85
fa7d71f270 test: Run pep-8 on touched test (MarcoFalke)
fab7e99c2a test: Use MiniWallet in test_no_inherited_signaling RBF test (MarcoFalke)
fab871f649 test: Remove unused generate() from test (MarcoFalke)
faff3f35b7 test: Add txin.sequence option to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This comes with nice benefits:
* Less code and complexity
* Test can be run without wallet compiled in
Also add some additional checks for `getmempoolentry` (#22209) and other cleanups 🎨
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
Tested ACK fa7d71f270 thanks for the explanations, nicely done
theStack:
ACK fa7d71f270🍷
Tree-SHA512: 0e9b8fe985779d8d7034d256deed627125bb374b6ae2972c461b3a220739a51061c6147ad69339bee16282f82716c7f3f8a7a89c693ceb1e47ea50709272332a
55311197c4 Added new test for future blocks reacceptance (sanket1729)
511a5af462 Fixed inconsistencies between code and comments (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
This Commit does 3 things:
1) Adds a test case for checking reacceptance a previously rejected block which
was too far in the future.
~~2) clean up uses of rehash or calc_sha256 where it was not needed~~
3) While constructing block 44, this commit makes the code consistent with the expected figure in
the comment just above it by adding a transaction to the block.
4) Fix comment describing `sign_tx()` function
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
reACK 5531119
brunoerg:
reACK 55311197c4
Tree-SHA512: d40c72fcdbb0b2a0715adc58441eeea08147ee2ec5e371a4ccc824ebfdc6450698bd40aaeecb7ea7bfdb3cd1b264dd821b890276fff8b8d89b7225cdd9d6b546
451b96f7d2 test: kill process group to avoid dangling processes (S3RK)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #19281
This PR fixes a problem when after test failure with `--failfast` option there could be dangling nodes. The nodes will continue to occupy rpc/p2p ports on the machine and will cause further test failures.
If there are any dangling nodes left at the end of the test run we kill the whole process group.
Pros: the operations is immediate and won't lead to CI timeout
Cons: the test_runner process is also killed and exit code is 137
Example output:
```
...
Early exiting after test failure
TEST | STATUS | DURATION
rpc_decodescript.py | ✓ Passed | 2 s
rpc_deprecated.py | ✓ Passed | 2 s
rpc_deriveaddresses.py | ✓ Passed | 2 s
rpc_dumptxoutset.py | ✖ Failed | 2 s
ALL | ✖ Failed | 8 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 4 s
Killed: 9
> echo $?
137
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 451b96f7d2
aitorjs:
ACK 451b96f7d2. Manual testing with and without **--failfast**.
Tree-SHA512: 87e510a1411b9e7571e63cf7ffc8b9a8935daf9112ffc0f069d6c406ba87743ec439808181f7e13cb97bb200fad528589786c47f0b43cf3a2ef0d06a23cb86dd
The (ancient) versions specified here were deceptive. Entries older than
MAX_VERSIONS['GLIBC'], which is 2.17, are ignored here. So reorganize
the code to avoid confusion for other people reading this code.
aa80b5759d scripts: check macOS SDK version is set (fanquake)
c972345bac scripts: check minimum required Windows version is set (fanquake)
29615aef52 scripts: check minimum required macOS vesion is set (fanquake)
8732f7b6c9 scripts: LIEF 0.11.5 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
macOS:
We use a compile flag ([-mmacosx-version-min=10.14](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/depends/hosts/darwin.mk#L96)) to set the minimum required version of macOS needed to run our binaries. This adds a sanity check that the version is being set as expected.
Clangs Darwin driver should infer the SDK version used during compilation, and forward that through to the linker. Add a check that this has been done, and the expected SDK version is set. Should help prevent issues like #21771 in future.
Windows:
We use linker flags ([-Wl,--major/minor-subsystem-version](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/configure.ac#L683)) to set the minimum required version of Windows needed to run our binaries. This adds a sanity check that the version is being set as expected.
Gitian builds:
```bash
# macOS:
8b6fcd61d75001c37b2af3fceb5ae09f5d2fe85e97d361f684214bd91c27954a bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-osx-unsigned.dmg
3c1e412bc7f5a7a5d0f78e2cd84b7096831414e1304c1307211aa3e135d89bbf bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-osx-unsigned.tar.gz
50b7b2804e8481f63c69c78e3e8a71c0d811bf2db8895dd6d3edae9c46a738ae bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-osx64.tar.gz
fe6b5c0a550096b76b6727efee30e85b60163a41c83f21868c849fdd9876b675 src/bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9.tar.gz
8a20f21b20673dfc8c23e22b20ae0839bcaf65bf0e02f62381cdf5e7922936f0 bitcoin-core-osx-22-res.yml
# Windows:
b01fcdc2a5673387050d6c6c4f96f1d350976a121155fde3f76c2af309111f9d bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-win-unsigned.tar.gz
b95bdcbef638804030671d2332d58011f8c4ed4c1db87d6ffd211515c32c9d02 bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-win64-debug.zip
350bf180252d24a3d40f05e22398fec7bb00e06d812204eb5a421100a8e10638 bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
2730ddabe246d99913c9a779e97edcadb2d55309933d46f1dffd0d23ecf9aae5 bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9-win64.zip
fe6b5c0a550096b76b6727efee30e85b60163a41c83f21868c849fdd9876b675 src/bitcoin-f015e1c2cac9.tar.gz
aa60d7a753e8cb2d4323cfbbf4d964ad3645e74c918cccd66862888f8646d80f bitcoin-core-win-22-res.yml
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK aa80b5759d, tested by breaking tests:
Tree-SHA512: 10150219910e8131715fbfe20edaa15778387616ef3bfe1a5152c7acd3958fe8f88c74961c3d3641074eb72824680c22764bb1dc01a19e92e946c2d4962a8d2c
8f7704d032 build: improve detection of eBPF support (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Just checking for the `sys/sdt.h` header isn't enough, as systems like macOS have the header, but it doesn't actually have the `DTRACE_PROBE*` probes, which leads to [compile failures](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22006#issuecomment-859559004). The contents of `sys/sdt.h` in the macOS SDK is:
```bash
#ifndef _SYS_SDT_H
#define _SYS_SDT_H
/*
* This is a wrapper header that wraps the mach visible sdt.h header so that
* the header file ends up visible where software expects it to be. We also
* do the C/C++ symbol wrapping here, since Mach headers are technically C
* interfaces.
*
* Note: The process of adding USDT probes to code is slightly different
* than documented in the "Solaris Dynamic Tracing Guide".
* The DTRACE_PROBE*() macros are not supported on Mac OS X -- instead see
* "BUILDING CODE CONTAINING USDT PROBES" in the dtrace(1) manpage
*
*/
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
__BEGIN_DECLS
#include <mach/sdt.h>
__END_DECLS
#endif /* _SYS_SDT_H */
```
The `BUILDING CODE CONTAINING USDT PROBES` section from the dtrace manpage is available [here](https://gist.github.com/fanquake/e56c9866d53b326646d04ab43a8df9e2), and outlines the more involved process of using USDT probes on macOS.
ACKs for top commit:
jb55:
utACK 8f7704d032
practicalswift:
cr ACK 8f7704d032
hebasto:
ACK 8f7704d032, tested on macOS Big Sur 11.4 (20F71) and on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with depends.
Tree-SHA512: 5f1351d0ac2e655fccb22a5454f415906404fdaa336fd89b54ef49ca50a442c44ab92d063cba3f161cb8ea0679c92ae3cd6cfbbcb19728cac21116247a017df5
458a345b05 Add support for SIGHASH_DEFAULT in RPCs, and make it default (Pieter Wuille)
c0f0c8eccb tests: check spending of P2TR (Pieter Wuille)
a2380127e9 Basic Taproot signing logic in script/sign.cpp (Pieter Wuille)
49487bc3b6 Make GetInputUTXO safer: verify non-witness UTXO match (Pieter Wuille)
fd3f6890f3 Construct and use PrecomputedTransactionData in PSBT signing (Pieter Wuille)
5cb6502ac5 Construct and use PrecomputedTransactionData in SignTransaction (Pieter Wuille)
5d2e22437b Don't nuke witness data when signing fails (Pieter Wuille)
ce9353164b Permit full precomputation in PrecomputedTransactionData (Pieter Wuille)
e841fb503d Add precomputed txdata support to MutableTransactionSignatureCreator (Pieter Wuille)
a91d532338 Add CKey::SignSchnorr function for BIP 340/341 signing (Pieter Wuille)
e77a2839b5 Use HandleMissingData also in CheckSchnorrSignature (Pieter Wuille)
dbb0ce9fbf Add TaprootSpendData data structure, equivalent to script map for P2[W]SH (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Builds on top of #22051, adding signing support after derivation support.
Nothing is changed in descriptor features. Signing works for key path and script path spending, through the normal sending functions, and PSBT-based RPCs. However, PSBT usability is rather low as no extensions have been defined to convey Taproot-specific information, so all script information must be known to the signing wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 458a345b05
fjahr:
Code review ACK 458a345b05
Sjors:
ACK 458a345b05
Tree-SHA512: 30ed212cf7754763a4a81624ebc084c51727b8322711ac0b390369213c1a891d367ed8b123882ac08c99595320c11ec57ee42304ff22a69afdc3d1a0d55cc711
9550dffa0c fuzz: Assert roundtrip equality for `CPubKey` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a (quite late) follow-up to #19237 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19237#issuecomment-642203251). Looking at `CPubKey::Serialize` and `CPubKey::Unserialize` I can't think of a scenario where the roundtrip (serialization/deserialization) equality wouldn't hold.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
crACK 9550dffa0c pending CI
Tree-SHA512: 640fb9e777d249769b22ee52c0b15a68ff0645b16c986e1c0bce9742155d14f1be601e591833e1dc8dcffebf271966c6b861b90888a44aae1feae2e0248e2c55
f8866e8c32 Add roundtrip fuzz tests for CAddress serialization (Pieter Wuille)
e2f0548b52 Use addrv2 serialization in anchors.dat (Pieter Wuille)
8cd8f37dfe Introduce well-defined CAddress disk serialization (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Alternative to #20509.
This makes the `CAddress` disk serialization format well defined, and uses it to enable addrv2 support in anchors.dat (in a way that's compatible with older software). The new format is:
- The first 4 bytes store a format version number. Its low 19 bits are ignored (as those historically stored the `CLIENT_VERSION`), but its high 13 bits specify the actual serialization:
- 0x00000000: LE64 encoding for `nServices`, V1 encoding for `CService` (like pre-BIP155 network serialization).
- 0x20000000: CompactSize encoding for `nServices`, V2 encoding for `CService` (like BIP155 network serialization).
- Any other value triggers an unsupported format error on deserialization, and can be used for future format changes.
- The `ADDRV2_FORMAT` flag in the stream's version does not determine the actual serialization format; it only sets whether or not V2 encoding is permitted.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f8866e8c32
laanwj:
Code review ACK f8866e8c32
vasild:
ACK f8866e8c32
jonatack:
ACK f8866e8c32 tested rebased to master and built/run/restarted with DEBUG_ADDRMAN, peers.dat and anchors ser/deser seems fine
hebasto:
ACK f8866e8c32, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64).
Tree-SHA512: 3898f8a8c51783a46dd0aae03fa10060521f5dd6e79315fe95ba807689e78f202388ffa28c40bf156c6f7b1fc2ce806b155dcbe56027df73d039a55331723796
faf1af58f8 fuzz: Add Temporary debug assert for oss-fuzz issue (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
oss-fuzz is acting weird, so add an earlier assert to help troubleshooting
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faf1af58f8
Tree-SHA512: 85830d7d47cf6b4edfe91a07bd5aa8f7110db0bade8df93868cf276ed04d5dd17e671f769e6a0fb5092012b86aa82bb411fb171411f15746981104ce634c88c1
754e802274 test: check rejected future block later accepted (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
(Luke) was unsure if the code sufficiently avoided caching a
time-too-new rejection, so wrote this test to check it. It looks like
despite only exempting BLOCK_MUTATED, it is still okay because header
failures never cache block invalidity. This test will help ensure that
if this ever changes, BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE gets excluded at the same time.
This PR re-opens https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17872 which went stale and addresses the nits raised by reviewers there.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 754e802274
Tree-SHA512: a2bbc8fffb523cf2831e1ecb05f20868e30106a38cc2e369e4973fa549cca06675a668df16f76c49cc4ce3a22925404255e5c53c4232d63ba1b9fca878509aa0
e2c40a4ed5 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong)
4cc35daed5 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong)
28a9c9b839 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #22075
Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff
The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me:
1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents
2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting
3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var)
4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server.
For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work:
1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest`
2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine
3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files:
```bash
for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do
gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,}
done
```
5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs`
-----
After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build:
```
output
└── x86_64-w64-mingw32
├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip
├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip
├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz
└── SHA256SUMS.part
```
These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like:
```
3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825 dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz
def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip
643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288 x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz
fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip
```
Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level
When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create:
1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and
3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs
Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy:
```
4e069f7589da/
└── dongcarl
├── all.SHA256SUMS
├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc
├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS
└── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e2c40a4ed5
hebasto:
ACK e2c40a4ed5, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only.
Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2f5bdcbc31 gui: misc external signer fixes and translation hints (Sjors Provoost)
d672404466 refactor: make ExternalSigner NetworkArg() and m_chain private (Sjors Provoost)
4455145e26 refactor: reduce #ifdef ENABLE_EXTERNAL_SIGNER usage (Sjors Provoost)
5be90c907e build: enable external signer by default (Sjors Provoost)
7d9453041b refactor: clean up external_signer.h includes (Sjors Provoost)
fc0eca31b3 fuzz: fix fuzz binary linking order (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This follows the introduction of GUI support in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/4
I don't think we should expect GUI users to self compile. This also enables external signer support by default for RPC users.
In addition this PR reduces the number of `#ifdef ENABLE_EXTERNAL_SIGNER`, which also fixes#21919. When compiled with `--disable-external-signer` such wallets can't be created in RPC or GUI, but they can be loaded. Attempting any action that calls HWI will trigger an error.
Side-note: this PR may or may not (currently) break CI for the GUI repository, as explained here: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/4#issuecomment-769859001
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2f5bdcbc31
hebasto:
re-ACK 2f5bdcbc31
Tree-SHA512: 1b71c5a8bea2be077ee9fa33a01130c957a0cf90951d4b7b04d3d0ef826bb77e474c3963abddfef2e2c1ea99d9c72cd2302d1eb9b5fcb7ba0bd2a625f006aa05
1) Makes the code for block 44 consistent with the expected figure in
the comment above it by adding a transaction to the block
2) Fixed comment describing sign_tx() function
We encountered a linking error when attempting to include external_signer_scriptpubkeyman.cpp when configured with --disable-external-signer.
Everywhere else we have LIBBITCOIN_WALLET, it is always before LIBBITCOIN_COMMON. But if you go up to where FUZZ_SUITE_LD_COMMON is first set, you see that we will end up having LIBBITCOIN_COMMON set before LIBBITCOIN_WALLET which means that the linker will have problems linking things common things that the wallet uses. Because the order is correct for the other targets, we only see a linker error for test/fuzz/fuzz.
In this diff, LIBTEST_UTIL and LIBTEST_FUZZ are moved to the top because they include LIBBITCOIN_SERVER and LIBBITCOIN_COMMON. LIBBITCOIN_SERVER always needs to be the first item in the linker order since it has the most dependencies.
The makefiles for making the fuzz and test binaries should be revisited so that the linking order is made consistent with the rest of the code and to avoid other linker order issues that may crop up in the future.
Co-Authored-By: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com>
79c02c88b3 Randomize message processing peer order (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Right now, the message handling loop iterates the list of nodes always in the same order: the order they were connected in (see the `vNodes` vector). For some parts of the net processing logic, this order matters. Transaction requests are assigned explicitly to peers since #19988, but many other parts of processing work on a "first-served-by-loop-first" basis, such as block downloading. If peers can predict this ordering, it may be exploited to cause delays.
As there isn't anything particularly optimal about the current ordering, just make it unpredictable by randomizing.
Reported by Crypt-iQ.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 79c02c88b3
Crypt-iQ:
ACK 79c02c88b3
sdaftuar:
utACK 79c02c88b3
achow101:
Code Review ACK 79c02c88b3
jamesob:
crACK 79c02c88b3
jonatack:
ACK 79c02c88b3
vasild:
ACK 79c02c88b3
theStack:
ACK 79c02c88b3
Tree-SHA512: 9a87c4dcad47c2d61b76c4f37f59674876b78f33f45943089bf159902a23e12de7a5feae1a73b17cbc3f2e37c980ecf0f7fd86af9e6fa3a68099537a3c82c106
Just checking for the `sys/sdt.h` header isn't enough, as systems like
macOS have the header, but it doesn't actually have the dtrace probes,
which leads to compile failures.
(Luke) was unsure if the code sufficiently avoided caching a
time-too-new rejection, so wrote this test to check it. It looks like
despite only exempting BLOCK_MUTATED, it is still okay because header
failures never cache block invalidity. This test will help ensure that
if this ever changes, BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE gets excluded at the same time.
Co-authored-by: Will Clark <will8clark@gmail.com>
aab7fd0f8d Switch Appveyor CI to VS2019 stable image (Aaron Clauson)
Pull request description:
The current appveyor config is using the VS2019 preview image so the latest prebuilt Qt5.12.11 binaries can be used, see #22224.
Appveyor updated the Visual Studio 2019 image to msbuild v16.10.1 on 14th of June. This is the version used to build the latest Qt binaries and removes the need to use the Appveyor VS2019 preview image.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK aab7fd0f8d if green
practicalswift:
cr ACK aab7fd0f8d: patch looks correct
hebasto:
ACK aab7fd0f8d
Tree-SHA512: 42ea4e6e27a2099ddeed99a3352e8ff014df1e93fbcb1f0f2ebd6f22ec2fb71212275a2adb2a7858516203e566c6ba053367b4ac7e0b74457f7a35e941d6fdd4
e4c916a0ea Bugfix: GUI: Use a different shortcut for "1 d&ay" banning, due to conflict with "&Disconnect" (Luke Dashjr)
94e7cdd7e0 GUI: Add keyboard shortcuts for other context menus (Luke Dashjr)
02b5263cd4 GUI: Restore keyboard shortcuts for context menu entries (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Various keyboard shortcuts were lost in #263; this restores them, and also adds new ones for other context menus.
Note that with a context menu open, simply the shortcut by itself (no Alt) is used.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
Code Review ACK e4c916a
hebasto:
ACK e4c916a0ea, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (Qt 5.12.8).
Tree-SHA512: 949461acf7aac592bc48a1c5abad41b167365830e0cedb3aa11b6a87bd347e16126830ea87936f9c9efc4b7df5b09d3833fae784964d6d119ed45703cfba2ffd
The current appveyor config is using the VS2019 preview image so the latest prebuilt Qt5.12.11 binaries can be used, see #22224.
Appveyor updated the Visual Studio 2019 image to msbuild v16.10.1 on 14th of June. This is the version used to build the latest Qt binaries and removes the need to use the Appveyor VS2019 preview image.
