Non-CLI clients need a better way of accessing payment details
than a contract json string.
- Add grpc.proto PaymentAccountPayloadInfo field: payment_details.
- Adjust proto wrapper PaymentAccountPayloadInfo to new field.
- Add test asserts to verify payment details are sent to client.
- Fix a test name: testKeepFunds -> testCloseTrade.
Based on branch `master` @ Sat 12 Mar 2022 01:42 PM -03 ,
commit c6293b5273
This recently added field is automatically set inside PaymentAccount.
It should not be included in the payment acct json forms used by API clients.
Based on branch `master`.
I think this bug was introduced when deprecating GrpcOffersService
.getMyOffer(id), in favor of using only getOffer(id) for 'my'
and 'available' offers. This change explicitly sets the proto's
isActivated flag in the OfferInfo factory methods, and adds checks
to api offer test cases.
Based on branch `2-improve-grpc-exception-status-code-mapping`,
PR https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/6088
The resync popup was being shown when flag isInConflictWithSeedNode
was set, but there is also a different relevant flag
isDaoStateBlockChainNotConnecting which can happen in certain
situations. For that case we also need to show the popup.
Exceptions thrown by the core.api services for the daemon Grpc*Services
have to be converted into gRPC StatusRuntimeExceptions before being sent to
gRPC clients. Most of these gRPC StatusRuntimeExceptions had a gRPC
Status.Code.UNKNOWN, which not helpful to client error handlers.
This change partially resolves the issue by sending more meaningful
io.grpc.Status.Codes to clients, where possible. But it is not as
comprehensive as it an be for a webapp because HTTP has so many more
possible response status codes than the gRPC library (sixteen). See:
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/blob/master/api/src/main/java/io/grpc/Status.java
There are three types of changes:
- Create custom exceptions in bisq.core.api.exception.
- Map any custom bisq.core.api.exception to a meaningful
io.grpc.Status.Code within daemon Grpc*Service classes.
- Adjust apitest cases to new grpc status codes.
Based on branch `move-cli-crypto-offer-filter-to-server`, PR https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/6086
The resync popup was being shown when flag isInConflictWithSeedNode
was set, but there is also a different relevant flag
isDaoStateBlockChainNotConnecting which can happen in certain
situations. For that case we also need to show the popup.
Some API reference & Python bot examples exposed an API bug the Java CLI
has been hiding. Due due this Bisq v1 Offer entity design:
- In fiat offers, the baseCurrencyCode=BTC, counterCurrencyCode=FiatCode
- In altcoin offers, baseCurrencyCode=AltcoinCode, counterCurrencyCode=BTC,
new API examples were not doing what the CLI has been doing for several
months, which is get (cryptocurrency) all BTC offers from the server,
and filter on the altcoin code. The CLI side filtering should have been
done on the server, as it is in this commit.
A lot of dead gRPC client side offer filtering code is removed as well.
Based on `master`.
The client may have passed an empty string for the price parameter,
if only enabling or disabling the offer. If so, validate with new
price = old price.
The CLI and apitest cases always pass "0", but java & python clients
might pass an empty string. This change avoids number formatting
& scaling problems when clients pass an empty string in the price
parameter.
This protobuf definition and service stub has been in place since
the start of work on the API, but was never fully implmented, nor
intended to be included in the API beta & v1 releases.
Its presence added a useless section to the gRPC API Reference doc.
https://ghubstan.github.io/slate
Based on branch `7-more-grpcproto-comments`,
PR https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/6068.
Was getting an NPE with closed trades older than v1.7.0.
makerPaymentMethodId was new at that point (null for older trades).
makerPaymentAccountPayload can be null for trades where we have
removed account info for privacy reasons (see #6001).
The payment method ID can always be obtained from offerPayload.
