2 Meeting Notes 2024 05 13
Elias Rohrer edited this page 2024-05-13 19:23:30 +02:00
This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

LDK Releases

LDK Node Release

  • Tnull been OOO but now back
  • Today landed upgrade PR for lightning-liquidity for 0.0.123 and pushed out a new release
  • Using that, landed the final 123 upgrade PR for LDK Node, which unblocked a lot of PRs
  • When the open PRs landed, we are close to a 0.3
  • BOLT 12 coming in the next LDK Node release
  • Anchors PR still pending, wpaulino to take a look
  • https://github.com/lightningdevkit/ldk-node/issues/192

Language bindings

Developer support

Feature progress

  • Async payments
    • Onion message interception landed
    • Next up, static BOLT 12 invoices should be open soon and some trampoline spec updates to work
    • Arik focused on RGS recently but trampoline PRs under review
  • RGS
    • Landed a change that would make sure for channels that have seen a bunch of updates propagated that wed keep sending reminders, because RGS was only sending reminders that were changing, if the same update was sent repeatedly wed purge it
  • VSS
    • Will try to get willems PR landed relating to LNURL auth support this week and after that, the bindings PR that elias has published for LDK Node
  • Dual funding
  • Splicing
    • wpaulino off splicing for a few weeks, been led by optout and dunxen. Optout has been doing some local testing based on the interactive tx constructor changes, and recently posted a status about being able to do the splices in the happy path with the existing code
    • Still need quiescence. In terms of the spec, that seems to be maturing, they were discussing whether to add a stop_quiesence message but seems that wont happen, so things should be stable

Open Q&A

  • Shaavan: PTAL https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pull/3010
  • Willem: is it still correct for anchor output channels if the htlc claim tx is still not aggressively batched?
    • Wpaulino: time out txs are not batched, preimage ones should be but only if theyre all offered at the same time. E.g. if you have one preimage at 1 block and another preimage next block, they wont be batched. So def a lot more we can do there.
    • Willem: would like that to be on the roadmap, simplifies things. Will open an issue