When a channel is force-closed, if a `ChannelMonitor` update is
completed but a `ChannelManager` persist has not yet happened,
HTLCs which were removed in the latest (persisted) `ChannelMonitor`
update will not be failed even though they do not appear in the
commitment transaction which went on chain. This is because the
`ChannelManager` thinks the `ChannelMonitor` is responsible for
them (as it is stale), but the `ChannelMonitor` has no knowledge of
the HTLC at all (as it is not stale).
The fix for this is relatively simple - we need to check for this
specific case and fail back such HTLCs when deserializing a
`ChannelManager`
If, after forwarding a payment to our counterparty, we restart with
a ChannelMonitor update having been persisted, but the
corresponding ChannelManager update was not persisted, we'll still
have the forwarded HTLC in the `forward_htlcs` map on start. This
will cause us to generate a (spurious) `PendingHTLCsForwardable`
event. However, when we go to forward said HTLC, we'll notice the
channel has been closed and leave it up to the `ChannelMontior` to
finalize the HTLC.
This is all fine today - we won't lose any funds, we'll just
generate an excess forwardable event and then fail to forward.
However, in the future when we allow for forward-time channel
changes this could break. Thus, its worth adding tests for this
behavior today, and, while we're at it, removing the spurious
forwardable HTLCs event.
