As we add new supported channel types, inbound channels which use
new features may cause backwards-compatibility issues for clients.
If a new channel is opened using new features while a client still
wishes to ensure support for downgrading to a previous version of
LDK, that new channel may cause the `ChannelManager` to fail
deserialization due to unsupported feature flags.
By exposing the channel type flags to the user in channel requests,
users wishing to support downgrading to previous versions of LDK
can reject channels which use channel features which previous
versions of LDK do not understand.
1.51 (and other earlier versions of `rustc`) appear to refuse to
accept our documentation links due to a bogus failure to resolve
`ChannelTypeFeatures::supports_scid_privacy`.
When a routing hint is given in an invoice, the effective capacity of
the channel is assumed to be infinite (i.e., u64::max_value) if the hop
is private. Adding 1 to this in the success probability calculation will
cause an overflow and ultimately an `index out of bounds panic` in
log10_times_1024. This was not an issue with using log10 because the use
of f64 would give infinite which casts to 0 for u64.
ProbabilisticScorer tends to prefer longer routes to shorter ones. Make
the default scoring behavior include a customizable base penalty to
avoid longer routes.
`channel_update` messages already have their signatures checked
with the network graph write lock held, so there's no reason to
check the signatures before doing other quicker checks first,
including checking if we're already aware of a newer update for the
channel.
This reduces common-case CPU usage as `channel_update`s are sent
rather liberally over the p2p network to gossip them.
When we have many channels to the same first-hop, many of which do
not have sufficient balance to make the requested payment, but when
some do, instead of simply using the available channel balance we
may switch to MPP, potentially with many, many paths.
Instead, we should seek to use the smallest channel which can
easily handle the requested payment, which we do here by sorting
the first_hops in our router before beginning the graph search.
Note that the "real" fix for this should be to instead decide which
channel to use at HTLC-send time, as most other nodes do during
relay, but this provides a minimal fix without needing to do the
rather-large work of refactoring our HTLC send+relay pipelines.
Issues with overly-aggressive MPP on many channels were reported by
Cash App.
Type aliases are now more robustly being exported in the C bindings
generator, which requires ensuring we don't include some type
aliases which make no sense in bindings.
On connection, if our peer supports gossip queries, and we never
send a `gossip_timestamp_filter`, our peer is supposed to never
send us gossip outside of explicit queries. Thus, we'll end up
always having stale gossip information after the first few
connections we make to peers.
The solution is to send a dummy `gossip_timestamp_filter`
immediately after connecting to peers.
Its somewhat strange to have a trait method which is named after
the intended action, rather than the action that occurred, leaving
it up to the implementor what action they want to take.
If the scoring in the routing benchmark causes us to take a
different path from the original scan, we may end up deciding that
the only path to a node has a too-high total CLTV delta, causing us
to panic in the benchmarking phase.
Here we simply check for that possibility and remove paths that
fail post-scoring.
Filter the route hints in `create_phantom_invoice` based on the
following criteria:
* Only one channel for every counterparty node per phantom
payment-receiving node in the invoice
* Always select the channel with the highest inbound capacity
* For each payment-receiving node, filter out channels with a lower
inbound capacity than the invoice amount, if any channel exists with
enough capacity to cover the invoice amount
* If any public channels exists for a payment-receiving node, push a
single RouteHintHop with the phantom route and let the sender find the
path to the payment-receiving node through the public channels.
