Merge pull request #1359 from tnull/2022-03-real-random-shuffle

Randomize candidate paths during route selection.
This commit is contained in:
Matt Corallo 2022-03-24 23:13:12 +00:00 committed by GitHub
commit 216225c00b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View file

@ -332,11 +332,9 @@ struct RouteGraphNode {
impl cmp::Ord for RouteGraphNode {
fn cmp(&self, other: &RouteGraphNode) -> cmp::Ordering {
let other_score = cmp::max(other.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, other.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
.checked_add(other.path_penalty_msat)
.unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
.saturating_add(other.path_penalty_msat);
let self_score = cmp::max(self.lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node, self.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
.checked_add(self.path_penalty_msat)
.unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
.saturating_add(self.path_penalty_msat);
other_score.cmp(&self_score).then_with(|| other.node_id.cmp(&self.node_id))
}
}
@ -495,6 +493,10 @@ impl<'a> PaymentPath<'a> {
self.hops.last().unwrap().0.fee_msat
}
fn get_path_penalty_msat(&self) -> u64 {
self.hops.first().map(|h| h.0.path_penalty_msat).unwrap_or(u64::max_value())
}
fn get_total_fee_paid_msat(&self) -> u64 {
if self.hops.len() < 1 {
return 0;
@ -645,7 +647,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
pub(crate) fn get_route<L: Deref, S: Score>(
our_node_pubkey: &PublicKey, payment_params: &PaymentParameters, network_graph: &ReadOnlyNetworkGraph,
first_hops: Option<&[&ChannelDetails]>, final_value_msat: u64, final_cltv_expiry_delta: u32,
logger: L, scorer: &S, _random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]
logger: L, scorer: &S, random_seed_bytes: &[u8; 32]
) -> Result<Route, LightningError>
where L::Target: Logger {
let payee_node_id = NodeId::from_pubkey(&payment_params.payee_pubkey);
@ -856,7 +858,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
.entry(short_channel_id)
.or_insert_with(|| $candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat());
// It is tricky to substract $next_hops_fee_msat from available liquidity here.
// It is tricky to subtract $next_hops_fee_msat from available liquidity here.
// It may be misleading because we might later choose to reduce the value transferred
// over these channels, and the channel which was insufficient might become sufficient.
// Worst case: we drop a good channel here because it can't cover the high following
@ -896,8 +898,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
.checked_sub(2*MEDIAN_HOP_CLTV_EXPIRY_DELTA)
.unwrap_or(payment_params.max_total_cltv_expiry_delta - final_cltv_expiry_delta);
let hop_total_cltv_delta = ($next_hops_cltv_delta as u32)
.checked_add($candidate.cltv_expiry_delta())
.unwrap_or(u32::max_value());
.saturating_add($candidate.cltv_expiry_delta());
let doesnt_exceed_cltv_delta_limit = hop_total_cltv_delta <= max_total_cltv_expiry_delta;
let value_contribution_msat = cmp::min(available_value_contribution_msat, $next_hops_value_contribution);
@ -1004,9 +1005,9 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
}
}
let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.checked_add(
scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, amount_to_transfer_over_msat, *available_liquidity_msat,
&$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id)).unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
let path_penalty_msat = $next_hops_path_penalty_msat.saturating_add(
scorer.channel_penalty_msat(short_channel_id, amount_to_transfer_over_msat,
*available_liquidity_msat, &$src_node_id, &$dest_node_id));
let new_graph_node = RouteGraphNode {
node_id: $src_node_id,
lowest_fee_to_peer_through_node: total_fee_msat,
@ -1034,11 +1035,9 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
// the fees included in $next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, but also
// can't use something that may decrease on future hops.
let old_cost = cmp::max(old_entry.total_fee_msat, old_entry.path_htlc_minimum_msat)
.checked_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat)
.unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
.saturating_add(old_entry.path_penalty_msat);
let new_cost = cmp::max(total_fee_msat, path_htlc_minimum_msat)
.checked_add(path_penalty_msat)
.unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
.saturating_add(path_penalty_msat);
if !old_entry.was_processed && new_cost < old_cost {
targets.push(new_graph_node);
@ -1222,12 +1221,10 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
.unwrap_or_else(|| CandidateRouteHop::PrivateHop { hint: hop });
let capacity_msat = candidate.effective_capacity().as_msat();
aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat = aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat
.checked_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, capacity_msat, &source, &target))
.unwrap_or_else(|| u64::max_value());
.saturating_add(scorer.channel_penalty_msat(hop.short_channel_id, final_value_msat, capacity_msat, &source, &target));
aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta = aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta
.checked_add(hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32)
.unwrap_or_else(|| u32::max_value());
.saturating_add(hop.cltv_expiry_delta as u32);
if !add_entry!(candidate, source, target, aggregate_next_hops_fee_msat, path_value_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_htlc_minimum_msat, aggregate_next_hops_path_penalty_msat, aggregate_next_hops_cltv_delta) {
// If this hop was not used then there is no use checking the preceding hops
@ -1465,24 +1462,31 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
}
// Sort by total fees and take the best paths.
payment_paths.sort_by_key(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat());
payment_paths.sort_unstable_by_key(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat());
if payment_paths.len() > 50 {
payment_paths.truncate(50);
}
// Draw multiple sufficient routes by randomly combining the selected paths.
let mut drawn_routes = Vec::new();
for i in 0..payment_paths.len() {
let mut prng = ChaCha20::new(random_seed_bytes, &[0u8; 12]);
let mut random_index_bytes = [0u8; ::core::mem::size_of::<usize>()];
let num_permutations = payment_paths.len();
for _ in 0..num_permutations {
let mut cur_route = Vec::<PaymentPath>::new();
let mut aggregate_route_value_msat = 0;
// Step (6).
// TODO: real random shuffle
// Currently just starts with i_th and goes up to i-1_th in a looped way.
let cur_payment_paths = [&payment_paths[i..], &payment_paths[..i]].concat();
// Do a Fisher-Yates shuffle to create a random permutation of the payment paths
for cur_index in (1..payment_paths.len()).rev() {
prng.process_in_place(&mut random_index_bytes);
let random_index = usize::from_be_bytes(random_index_bytes).wrapping_rem(cur_index+1);
payment_paths.swap(cur_index, random_index);
}
// Step (7).
for payment_path in cur_payment_paths {
for payment_path in &payment_paths {
cur_route.push(payment_path.clone());
aggregate_route_value_msat += payment_path.get_value_msat();
if aggregate_route_value_msat > final_value_msat {
@ -1492,12 +1496,17 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
// also makes routing more reliable.
let mut overpaid_value_msat = aggregate_route_value_msat - final_value_msat;
// First, drop some expensive low-value paths entirely if possible.
// Sort by value so that we drop many really-low values first, since
// fewer paths is better: the payment is less likely to fail.
// TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed,
// so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat.
cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| path.get_value_msat());
// First, we drop some expensive low-value paths entirely if possible, since fewer
// paths is better: the payment is less likely to fail. In order to do so, we sort
// by value and fall back to total fees paid, i.e., in case of equal values we
// prefer lower cost paths.
cur_route.sort_unstable_by(|a, b| {
a.get_value_msat().cmp(&b.get_value_msat())
// Reverse ordering for fees, so we drop higher-fee paths first
.then_with(|| b.get_total_fee_paid_msat().saturating_add(b.get_path_penalty_msat())
.cmp(&a.get_total_fee_paid_msat().saturating_add(a.get_path_penalty_msat())))
});
// We should make sure that at least 1 path left.
let mut paths_left = cur_route.len();
cur_route.retain(|path| {
@ -1521,13 +1530,14 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
assert!(cur_route.len() > 0);
// Step (8).
// Now, substract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path.
// Now, subtract the overpaid value from the most-expensive path.
// TODO: this could also be optimized by also sorting by feerate_per_sat_routed,
// so that the sender pays less fees overall. And also htlc_minimum_msat.
cur_route.sort_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.candidate.fees().proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
cur_route.sort_unstable_by_key(|path| { path.hops.iter().map(|hop| hop.0.candidate.fees().proportional_millionths as u64).sum::<u64>() });
let expensive_payment_path = cur_route.first_mut().unwrap();
// We already dropped all the small channels above, meaning all the
// remaining channels are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat.
// We already dropped all the small value paths above, meaning all the
// remaining paths are larger than remaining overpaid_value_msat.
// Thus, this can't be negative.
let expensive_path_new_value_msat = expensive_payment_path.get_value_msat() - overpaid_value_msat;
expensive_payment_path.update_value_and_recompute_fees(expensive_path_new_value_msat);
@ -1539,7 +1549,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
// Step (9).
// Select the best route by lowest total fee.
drawn_routes.sort_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()).sum::<u64>());
drawn_routes.sort_unstable_by_key(|paths| paths.iter().map(|path| path.get_total_fee_paid_msat()).sum::<u64>());
let mut selected_paths = Vec::<Vec<Result<RouteHop, LightningError>>>::new();
for payment_path in drawn_routes.first().unwrap() {
let mut path = payment_path.hops.iter().map(|(payment_hop, node_features)| {