The `payment_hash` field in `PaymentPathSuccessful` is always
`Some` as long as the pening payment tracker has a `payment_hash`,
which is true for all `Pending` payments as well as all `Fulfilled`
payments starting with the commit which added
`PaymentPathSuccessful` -
3b5c370b404e2f5a8f3c35093b97406f149a9340c177c05252574083d68df0da.
It's a bit confusing when we see only "Peer sent a garbage
channel_reestablish" when a peer uses lnd's SCB feature to ask us
to broadcast the latest state. This updates the error message to be
a bit clearer.
If we detected a spend for a channel onchain prior to handling its
`ChannelForceClosed` monitor update, we'd log a concerning error
message and return an error unnecessarily. The channel has already been
closed, so handling the `ChannelForceClosed` monitor update at this
point should be a no-op.
A while back, in tests, we added a `AChannelManager` trait, which
is implemented for all `ChannelManager`s, and can be used as a
bound when we need a `ChannelManager`, rather than having to
duplicate all the bounds of `ChannelManager` everywhere.
Here we do the same thing for `PeerManager`, but make it public and
use it to clean up `lightning-net-tokio` and
`lightning-background-processor`.
We should likely do the same for `AChannelManager`, but that's left
as a followup.
The previous commits set up the ability for us to hold
`ChannelMonitorUpdate`s which are pending until we're ready to pass
them to users and have them be applied. However, if the
`ChannelManager` is persisted while we're waiting to give the user
a `ChannelMonitorUpdate` we'll be confused on restart - seeing our
latest `ChannelMonitor` state as stale compared to our
`ChannelManager` - a critical error.
Luckily the solution is trivial, we simply need to store the
pending `ChannelMonitorUpdate` state and load it with the
`ChannelManager` data, allowing stale monitors on load as long as
we have the missing pending updates between where we are and the
latest `ChannelMonitor` state.
This adds handling of the new `EventCompletionAction`s after
`Event`s are handled, letting `ChannelMonitorUpdate`s which were
blocked fly after a relevant `Event`.
This will allow us to block `ChannelMonitorUpdate`s on `Event`
processing in the next commit.
Note that this gets dangerously close to breaking forwards
compatibility - if we have an `Event` with an
`EventCompletionAction` tied to it, we persist a new, even, TLV in
the `ChannelManager`. Hopefully this should be uncommon, as it
implies an `Event` was delayed until after a full round-trip to a
peer.
In the coming commits, we need to delay `ChannelMonitorUpdate`s
until future actions (specifically `Event` handling). However,
because we should only notify users once of a given
`ChannelMonitorUpdate` and they must be provided in-order, we need
to track which ones have or have not been given to users and, once
updating resumes, fly the ones that haven't already made it to
users.
To do this we simply add a `bool` in the `ChannelMonitorUpdate` set
stored in the `Channel` which indicates if an update flew and
decline to provide new updates back to the `ChannelManager` if any
updates have their flown bit unset.
Further, because we'll now by releasing `ChannelMonitorUpdate`s
which were already stored in the pending list, we now need to
support getting a `Completed` result for a monitor which isn't the
only pending monitor (or even out of order), thus we also rewrite
the way monitor updates are marked completed.
As pointed out in https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/754/commits/6656b70,
we can move the `shutdown_scriptpubkey` field into the TLV streams of
`OpenChannel` and `AcceptChannel` without affecting the resulting encoding.
We use `WithoutLength` encoding here to ensure that we do not encode a
length prefix along with `Script` as is normally the case.
The fields provided by `DataLossProtect` have been mandatory since
https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/754/commits/6656b70, regardless
of whether `option_dataloss_protect` or `option_remote_key` feature bits
are set.
We move the fields out of `DataLossProtect` to make encoding definitions
more succinct with `impl_writeable_msg!` and to reduce boilerplate.
This paves the way for completely removing `OptionalField` in subsequent
commits.
`PeerManager` takes a `MessageHandler` struct which contains all
the known message handlers for it to pass messages to. It then,
separately, takes a `CustomMessageHandler`. This makes no sense, we
should simply include the `CustomMessageHandler` in the
`MessageHandler` struct for consistency.
If we have more than
127 / `MAX_BUFFER_DRAIN_TICK_INTERVALS_PER_PEER` (31) peers,
`awaiting_pong_timer_tick_intervals` can overflow before we hit
the limit. This isn't super harmful, we'll still disconnect peers
as long as they don't send *any* messages between two pings, but it
does cause us to not disconnect peers which are extremely slow in
responding to messages, e.g. because they are overloaded.
PaymentParameters already includes this value.
This set us up to better support route blinding, since there is no known
final_cltv_delta when paying to a blinded route.
If a `Notifier` has an internal `FutureState` which gathers some
sleeper callbacks, but is never actaully woken, those callbacks
will leak due to a circular `Arc` reference when the `Notifier` is
`drop`'d.
Because `Notifier`s are rarely `drop`'d in production this isn't a
huge deal, but shows up materially in bindings tests as they spawn
many nodes over the course of a short test.
Fixes#2232
Previously, we were requiring any `UPDATE` onion errors to include
a `channel_update`, as the spec mandates[1]. If we see an onion
error which is missing one we treat it as a misbehaving node that
isn't behaving according to the spec and simply remove the node.
Sadly, it appears at least some versions of CLN are such nodes, and
opt to not include `channel_update` at all if they're returning a
`temporary_channel_failure`. This causes us to completely remove
CLN nodes from our graph after they fail to forward our HTLC.
While CLN is violating the spec here, there's not a lot of reason
to not allow it, so we go ahead and do so here, treating it simply
as any other failure by letting the scorer handle it.
[1] The spec says `Please note that the channel_update field is
mandatory in messages whose failure_code includes the UPDATE flag`
however doesn't repeat it in the requirements section so its not
crazy that someone missed it when implementing.
