mirror of
https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning.git
synced 2025-02-22 14:33:08 +01:00
Merge pull request #3564 from TheBlueMatt/2025-01-revoked-htlc-not-pinnable
Set correct `counterparty_spendable_height` on c.p. revoked HTLCs
This commit is contained in:
commit
1434e9c1e2
4 changed files with 88 additions and 54 deletions
|
@ -3564,11 +3564,16 @@ impl<Signer: EcdsaChannelSigner> ChannelMonitorImpl<Signer> {
|
|||
return (claimable_outpoints, to_counterparty_output_info);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let revk_htlc_outp = RevokedHTLCOutput::build(per_commitment_point, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_delayed_payment_base_key, self.counterparty_commitment_params.counterparty_htlc_base_key, per_commitment_key, htlc.amount_msat / 1000, htlc.clone(), &self.onchain_tx_handler.channel_transaction_parameters.channel_type_features);
|
||||
let counterparty_spendable_height = if htlc.offered {
|
||||
htlc.cltv_expiry
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
height
|
||||
};
|
||||
let justice_package = PackageTemplate::build_package(
|
||||
commitment_txid,
|
||||
transaction_output_index,
|
||||
PackageSolvingData::RevokedHTLCOutput(revk_htlc_outp),
|
||||
htlc.cltv_expiry,
|
||||
counterparty_spendable_height,
|
||||
);
|
||||
claimable_outpoints.push(justice_package);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -699,8 +699,13 @@ impl PackageSolvingData {
|
|||
match self {
|
||||
PackageSolvingData::RevokedOutput(RevokedOutput { .. }) =>
|
||||
PackageMalleability::Malleable(AggregationCluster::Unpinnable),
|
||||
PackageSolvingData::RevokedHTLCOutput(..) =>
|
||||
PackageMalleability::Malleable(AggregationCluster::Pinnable),
|
||||
PackageSolvingData::RevokedHTLCOutput(RevokedHTLCOutput { htlc, .. }) => {
|
||||
if htlc.offered {
|
||||
PackageMalleability::Malleable(AggregationCluster::Unpinnable)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
PackageMalleability::Malleable(AggregationCluster::Pinnable)
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
PackageSolvingData::CounterpartyOfferedHTLCOutput(..) =>
|
||||
PackageMalleability::Malleable(AggregationCluster::Unpinnable),
|
||||
PackageSolvingData::CounterpartyReceivedHTLCOutput(..) =>
|
||||
|
@ -771,10 +776,12 @@ pub struct PackageTemplate {
|
|||
/// Block height at which our counterparty can potentially claim this output as well (assuming
|
||||
/// they have the keys or information required to do so).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is used primarily by external consumers to decide when an output becomes "pinnable"
|
||||
/// because the counterparty can potentially spend it. It is also used internally by
|
||||
/// [`Self::get_height_timer`] to identify when an output must be claimed by, depending on the
|
||||
/// type of output.
|
||||
/// This is used primarily to decide when an output becomes "pinnable" because the counterparty
|
||||
/// can potentially spend it. It is also used internally by [`Self::get_height_timer`] to
|
||||
/// identify when an output must be claimed by, depending on the type of output.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note that for revoked counterparty HTLC outputs the value may be zero in some cases where
|
||||
/// we upgraded from LDK 0.1 or prior.
|
||||
counterparty_spendable_height: u32,
|
||||
// Cache of package feerate committed at previous (re)broadcast. If bumping resources
|
||||
// (either claimed output value or external utxo), it will keep increasing until holder
|
||||
|
@ -834,17 +841,17 @@ impl PackageTemplate {
|
|||
// Now check that we only merge packages if they are both unpinnable or both
|
||||
// pinnable.
|
||||
let self_pinnable = self_cluster == AggregationCluster::Pinnable ||
|
||||
self.counterparty_spendable_height() <= cur_height + COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE;
|
||||
self.counterparty_spendable_height <= cur_height + COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE;
|
||||
let other_pinnable = other_cluster == AggregationCluster::Pinnable ||
|
||||
other.counterparty_spendable_height() <= cur_height + COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE;
|
||||
other.counterparty_spendable_height <= cur_height + COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE;
|
||||
if self_pinnable && other_pinnable {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let self_unpinnable = self_cluster == AggregationCluster::Unpinnable &&
|
||||
self.counterparty_spendable_height() > cur_height + COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE;
|
||||
self.counterparty_spendable_height > cur_height + COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE;
|
||||
let other_unpinnable = other_cluster == AggregationCluster::Unpinnable &&
|
||||
other.counterparty_spendable_height() > cur_height + COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE;
|
||||
other.counterparty_spendable_height > cur_height + COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE;
|
||||
if self_unpinnable && other_unpinnable {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -855,13 +862,6 @@ impl PackageTemplate {
|
|||
pub(crate) fn is_malleable(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
matches!(self.malleability, PackageMalleability::Malleable(..))
|
||||
}
|
||||
/// The height at which our counterparty may be able to spend this output.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is an important limit for aggregation as after this height our counterparty may be
|
||||
/// able to pin transactions spending this output in the mempool.
|
||||
pub(crate) fn counterparty_spendable_height(&self) -> u32 {
|
||||
self.counterparty_spendable_height
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub(crate) fn previous_feerate(&self) -> u64 {
|
||||
self.feerate_previous
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1225,6 +1225,18 @@ impl Readable for PackageTemplate {
|
|||
(4, _height_original, option), // Written with a dummy value since 0.1
|
||||
(6, height_timer, option),
|
||||
});
|
||||
for (_, input) in &inputs {
|
||||
if let PackageSolvingData::RevokedHTLCOutput(RevokedHTLCOutput { htlc, .. }) = input {
|
||||
// LDK versions through 0.1 set the wrong counterparty_spendable_height for
|
||||
// non-offered revoked HTLCs (ie HTLCs we sent to our counterparty which they can
|
||||
// claim with a preimage immediately). Here we detect this and reset the value to
|
||||
// zero, as the value is unused except for merging decisions which doesn't care
|
||||
// about any values below the current height.
|
||||
if !htlc.offered && htlc.cltv_expiry == counterparty_spendable_height {
|
||||
counterparty_spendable_height = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(PackageTemplate {
|
||||
inputs,
|
||||
malleability,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ use crate::chain;
|
|||
use crate::chain::{ChannelMonitorUpdateStatus, Confirm, Listen, Watch};
|
||||
use crate::chain::chaininterface::LowerBoundedFeeEstimator;
|
||||
use crate::chain::channelmonitor;
|
||||
use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{Balance, ChannelMonitorUpdateStep, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY};
|
||||
use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{Balance, ChannelMonitorUpdateStep, CLTV_CLAIM_BUFFER, LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, ANTI_REORG_DELAY, COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE};
|
||||
use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
|
||||
use crate::sign::{ecdsa::EcdsaChannelSigner, EntropySource, OutputSpender, SignerProvider};
|
||||
use crate::events::bump_transaction::WalletSource;
|
||||
|
@ -2631,14 +2631,12 @@ fn test_justice_tx_htlc_timeout() {
|
|||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
{
|
||||
let mut node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap();
|
||||
// The unpinnable, revoked to_self output, and the pinnable, revoked htlc output will
|
||||
// be claimed in separate transactions.
|
||||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
|
||||
for tx in node_txn.iter() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(tx.input.len(), 1);
|
||||
check_spends!(tx, revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
|
||||
// The revoked HTLC output is not pinnable for another `TEST_FINAL_CLTV` blocks, and is
|
||||
// thus claimed in the same transaction with the revoked to_self output.
|
||||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 2);
|
||||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[0].input[1].previous_output);
|
||||
node_txn.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
|
@ -2858,28 +2856,26 @@ fn claim_htlc_outputs() {
|
|||
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_events().is_empty());
|
||||
|
||||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // Two penalty transactions:
|
||||
assert_eq!(node_txn[0].input.len(), 1); // Claims the unpinnable, revoked output.
|
||||
assert_eq!(node_txn[1].input.len(), 2); // Claims both pinnable, revoked HTLC outputs separately.
|
||||
check_spends!(node_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
check_spends!(node_txn[1], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
|
||||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[1].previous_output);
|
||||
assert_ne!(node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[1].previous_output);
|
||||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2); // ChannelMonitor: penalty txn
|
||||
|
||||
// The ChannelMonitor should claim the accepted HTLC output separately from the offered
|
||||
// HTLC and to_self outputs.
|
||||
let accepted_claim = node_txn.iter().filter(|tx| tx.input.len() == 1).next().unwrap();
|
||||
let offered_to_self_claim = node_txn.iter().filter(|tx| tx.input.len() == 2).next().unwrap();
|
||||
check_spends!(accepted_claim, revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
check_spends!(offered_to_self_claim, revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(accepted_claim.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut witness_lens = BTreeSet::new();
|
||||
witness_lens.insert(node_txn[0].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||||
witness_lens.insert(node_txn[1].input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||||
witness_lens.insert(node_txn[1].input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||||
assert_eq!(witness_lens.len(), 3);
|
||||
witness_lens.insert(offered_to_self_claim.input[0].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||||
witness_lens.insert(offered_to_self_claim.input[1].witness.last().unwrap().len());
|
||||
assert_eq!(witness_lens.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(0).next().unwrap(), 77); // revoked to_local
|
||||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked offered HTLC
|
||||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(2).next().unwrap(), ACCEPTED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT); // revoked received HTLC
|
||||
assert_eq!(*witness_lens.iter().skip(1).next().unwrap(), OFFERED_HTLC_SCRIPT_WEIGHT);
|
||||
|
||||
// Finally, mine the penalty transactions and check that we get an HTLC failure after
|
||||
// Finally, mine the penalty transaction and check that we get an HTLC failure after
|
||||
// ANTI_REORG_DELAY confirmations.
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[1]);
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], accepted_claim);
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||||
expect_payment_failed!(nodes[1], payment_hash_2, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -5042,8 +5038,7 @@ fn test_static_spendable_outputs_timeout_tx() {
|
|||
check_spends!(spend_txn[2], node_txn[0], commitment_tx[0]); // All outputs
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx() {
|
||||
fn do_test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx(split_tx: bool) {
|
||||
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||||
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
|
||||
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
|
||||
|
@ -5059,20 +5054,28 @@ fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx() {
|
|||
|
||||
claim_payment(&nodes[0], &vec!(&nodes[1])[..], payment_preimage);
|
||||
|
||||
if split_tx {
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE + 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||||
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
|
||||
check_closed_event!(nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::CommitmentTxConfirmed, [nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
|
||||
|
||||
// The unpinnable, revoked to_self output and the pinnable, revoked HTLC output will be claimed
|
||||
// in separate transactions.
|
||||
// If the HTLC expires in more than COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE blocks, we'll
|
||||
// claim both the revoked and HTLC outputs in one transaction, otherwise we'll split them as we
|
||||
// consider the HTLC output as pinnable and want to claim pinnable and unpinnable outputs
|
||||
// separately.
|
||||
let node_txn = nodes[1].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().clone();
|
||||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(node_txn.len(), if split_tx { 2 } else { 1 });
|
||||
for tx in node_txn.iter() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(tx.input.len(), 1);
|
||||
assert_eq!(tx.input.len(), if split_tx { 1 } else { 2 });
|
||||
check_spends!(tx, revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
|
||||
if split_tx {
|
||||
assert_ne!(node_txn[0].input[0].previous_output, node_txn[1].input[0].previous_output);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[1], &node_txn[0]);
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], ANTI_REORG_DELAY - 1);
|
||||
|
@ -5082,6 +5085,12 @@ fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx() {
|
|||
check_spends!(spend_txn[0], node_txn[0]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx() {
|
||||
do_test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx(true);
|
||||
do_test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_commitment_tx(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_htlc_timeout_tx() {
|
||||
let mut chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
|
||||
|
@ -5114,6 +5123,10 @@ fn test_static_spendable_outputs_justice_tx_revoked_htlc_timeout_tx() {
|
|||
check_spends!(revoked_htlc_txn[0], revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
assert_ne!(revoked_htlc_txn[0].lock_time, LockTime::ZERO); // HTLC-Timeout
|
||||
|
||||
// In order to connect `revoked_htlc_txn[0]` we must first advance the chain by
|
||||
// `TEST_FINAL_CLTV` blocks as otherwise the transaction is consensus-invalid due to its
|
||||
// locktime.
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[1], TEST_FINAL_CLTV);
|
||||
// B will generate justice tx from A's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
|
||||
connect_block(&nodes[1], &create_dummy_block(nodes[1].best_block_hash(), 42, vec![revoked_local_txn[0].clone(), revoked_htlc_txn[0].clone()]));
|
||||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[1], true);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
|
|||
//! Further functional tests which test blockchain reorganizations.
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::sign::{ecdsa::EcdsaChannelSigner, OutputSpender, SpendableOutputDescriptor};
|
||||
use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{ANTI_REORG_DELAY, ARCHIVAL_DELAY_BLOCKS,LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, Balance, BalanceSource, ChannelMonitorUpdateStep};
|
||||
use crate::chain::channelmonitor::{ANTI_REORG_DELAY, ARCHIVAL_DELAY_BLOCKS,LATENCY_GRACE_PERIOD_BLOCKS, COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE, Balance, BalanceSource, ChannelMonitorUpdateStep};
|
||||
use crate::chain::transaction::OutPoint;
|
||||
use crate::chain::chaininterface::{ConfirmationTarget, LowerBoundedFeeEstimator, compute_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight};
|
||||
use crate::events::bump_transaction::{BumpTransactionEvent, WalletSource};
|
||||
|
@ -1734,6 +1734,12 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances(anchors: bool) {
|
|||
assert_eq!(revoked_htlc_success.lock_time, LockTime::ZERO);
|
||||
assert_ne!(revoked_htlc_timeout.lock_time, LockTime::ZERO);
|
||||
|
||||
// First connect blocks until the HTLC expires with
|
||||
// `COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE` blocks, making us consider all the HTLCs
|
||||
// pinnable claims, which the remainder of the test assumes.
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], TEST_FINAL_CLTV - COUNTERPARTY_CLAIMABLE_WITHIN_BLOCKS_PINNABLE);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(&nodes[0],
|
||||
[HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: failed_payment_hash }]);
|
||||
// A will generate justice tx from B's revoked commitment/HTLC tx
|
||||
mine_transaction(&nodes[0], &revoked_local_txn[0]);
|
||||
check_closed_broadcast!(nodes[0], true);
|
||||
|
@ -1846,8 +1852,6 @@ fn do_test_revoked_counterparty_htlc_tx_balances(anchors: bool) {
|
|||
sorted_vec(nodes[0].chain_monitor.chain_monitor.get_monitor(funding_outpoint).unwrap().get_claimable_balances()));
|
||||
|
||||
connect_blocks(&nodes[0], revoked_htlc_timeout.lock_time.to_consensus_u32() - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
|
||||
expect_pending_htlcs_forwardable_and_htlc_handling_failed_ignore!(&nodes[0],
|
||||
[HTLCDestination::FailedPayment { payment_hash: failed_payment_hash }]);
|
||||
// As time goes on A may split its revocation claim transaction into multiple.
|
||||
let as_fewer_input_rbf = nodes[0].tx_broadcaster.txn_broadcasted.lock().unwrap().split_off(0);
|
||||
for tx in as_fewer_input_rbf.iter() {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue