In this commit, we attempt to fix a race condition that may occur in the
current AMP and MPP tests.
It appears the following scenario is possible:
* The `mppTestContext` [is used to create 6 channels back to
back](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/blob/master/lntest/itest/lnd_amp_test.go#L43)
* The method used to create the channel ends up calling
[`openChannelAndAssert`](edd4152682/lntest/itest/lnd_mpp_test.go (L300))
which'll open the channel, mine 6 blocks, [then ensure that the
channel gets
advertised](edd4152682/lntest/itest/assertions.go (L78))
* Later on, [we wait for all nodes to hear about all channels on the
network
level](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/blob/master/lntest/itest/lnd_amp_test.go#L62)
I think the issue here is that we'll potentially already have mined 30
or so blocks before getting to the final nodes, and those nodes may have
already heard about the channel already. This may then cause their
[`lightningNetworkWatcher`](edd4152682/lntest/node.go (L1213))
goroutine to not properly dispatch this, since it's assumed that the
channel hasn't been announced (or notified) when the method is called.
One solution here is to just check if the channel is already in the
node's graph or not, when we go to register the notification. If we do
this in the same state machine as the watcher, then we ensure if the
channel is already known, the client is immediately notified. One thing
that can help us debug this more in the future is adding additional
logging in some of these helper goroutines so we can more easily track
the control flow.
This commit implements this solution by checking to ensure that the
channel isn't already known in our channel graph before attempting to
wait for its notification, as we may already have missed the
notification before this registration request came in.
This commit creates the file lnd_misc_test.go to hold all miscellaneous
tests in the file lnd_test.go. From now on, the lnd_test.go will only be
responsible for handling the "top" level functionalities such as
splitting test cases and run them. Newly created test cases should find
their places in the related test files, or create new one when needed.
This commit refactors the function assertNumConnections to use
wait.NoError. Prior to this commit, `make lint` will fail on this
function. While fixing it, it's noticed that wait.NoError suits the
case so it's refactored to use it.
In this commit, we fix a regression introduced by a recent bug fix in
this area. Before this change, we'd inspect the error returned by
`processSendError`, and then fail the payment from the PoV of mission
control using the returned error.
A recent refactoring removed `processSendError` and combined the logic
with `tryApplyChannelUpdate` in order to introduce a new
`handleSendError` method that consolidates the logic within the
`shardHandler`. Along the way, the behavior of the prior check was
replicated in the form of a new internal `failPayment` closure. However,
the new function closure ends up returning a `channeldb.FailureReason`
instance, which is actually an `error`.
In the wild, when `SendToRoute` fails due to an error at the
destination, then this new logic caused the `handleSendErorr` method to
fail with an error, returning an unstructured error back to the caller,
instead of the usual payment failure details.
We fix this by no longer checking the `handleSendErorr` for an error as
normal. The `handleSendErorr` function as is will always return an error
of type `*channeldb.FailureReason`, therefore we don't need to treat it
as a normal error. Instead, we check for the type of error returned, and
update the control tower state accordingly.
With this commit, the test added in the prior commit now passes.
Fixes#5477.
In this commit, we modify the existing `TestSendToRouteStructuredError`
test to return an error that doesn't trigger the second chance logic.
Otherwise, we'll get a nil failure result from the mission control
interpretation, meaning we won't exercise the full code path. Instead,
we use a terminal error to ensure that the expected code path is hit.
As is, this test will fail as a recent refactoring causes us to return a
`channeldb.FailureReason` error, since the newly added `handleSendError`
code path in the `SendToRoute` method will return the raw error, rather
than the `shardError`, which is of the expected type.
In this commit, in order to allow the test added in the prior commit to
pass, we'll increment the mockHTLCAmt value by 1 to ensure we never
attempt to add a zero value HTLC.
Fixes#5468
As is, if the remote party proposes a min HTLC of 0 `mSat` to us, then
we won't ever be able to _send outgoing_ in the channel as the
`MayAddOutgoingHtlc` will attempt to add a zero-value HTLC, which isn't
allowed within the protocol.
The default channels created actually already use a min HTLC value of
zero within the tests, so this test case fails as is.
As requested by users of node bundle software. They want to use the
wallet-unlock-password-file configuration option in their
default/template config file. This makes the first-time lnd setup a bit
more tricky since lnd will fail with an error if no wallet exists yet
while that config option is used.
The new wallet-unlock-allow-create option instructs lnd to not fail if
no wallet exists yet but instead spin up its unlocker RPC as it would
without the wallet-unlock-password-file being present.
This is not recommended for auto-provisioned or high-security systems
because the wallet creation RPC is unauthenticated and an attacker could
inject a seed while lnd is in that state.
