We update several of our integration tests that exercise different
scenarios with regards to the broadcast of a channel commitment
transaction with HTLCs in-flight to use the new commitment type for
channel leases. We do this to ensure we have complete coverage of said
channel commitment type. This required changing several assumptions
throughout the tests based on when we should expect sweeps to happen.
This aims to cover an edge case and also serves as an optimization of
what happens when an input that was offered to the Sweeper with an
exclusive group is re-offered without one. This happens every time we
attempt to sweep the different possible anchors of a channel at the time
of broadcast, as we don't know which commitment transaction will end up
confirming in the chain. Once the commitment transaction confirms
however, we know which anchor output to act upon and re-offer it to the
Sweeper without an exclusive group. At this point, the Sweeper will
continue to attempt sweeping the other anchor output versions even know
we know they are not valid.
In order to sweep the commitment and HTLC outputs belonging to a
script-enforced leased channel, each resolver must know whether the
additional CLTV clause on the channel initiator applies to them. To do
so, we retrieve the historical channel state stored within the database
and supplement it to the resolvers to provide them with what's needed in
order to sweep the necessary outputs and resolve their respective
contracts.
This commit modifies the channel state machine to be able to derive the
proper commitment and second-level HTLC output scripts required by the
new script-enforced leased channel commitment type.
The new commitment type consists of adding an additional CLTV
requirement to guarantee a leased channel's expiration on any commitment
and HTLC outputs that pay directly to the channel initiator.
Pass htlc amount down to the channel so that we don't need to rely
on minHtlc (and pad it when the channel sets a 0 min htlc). Update
test to just check some sane values since we're no longer relying
on minHtlc amount at all.
In order to support the full range of on-chain functionality, including
importing watch-only accounts in the watch-only instance, we need to
forward some calls like creating new addresses or importing accounts to
the remote signing instance.
To make it possible to supply our own implementation of a secret key
ring, we extract that part from the chain control and split the whole
chain control creation into two parts.
This commit adds a new health check, tor connection, to our liveness
monitor. A monitor refactor is applied to the server creation such that
the scope of health check creation is managed within one function.
