2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
package itest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
"context"
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-23 14:48:00 +01:00
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcutil"
|
2020-03-04 13:21:29 +01:00
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/wire"
|
2022-10-25 08:29:46 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lncfg"
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnrpc"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnrpc/invoicesrpc"
|
2022-10-25 08:29:46 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnrpc/routerrpc"
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntemp"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntemp/node"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntemp/rpc"
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntest"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntypes"
|
2022-08-01 20:16:17 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/routing"
|
2022-10-25 08:29:46 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
2022-08-01 20:16:17 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
|
|
finalCltvDelta = routing.MinCLTVDelta // 18.
|
|
|
|
thawHeightDelta = finalCltvDelta * 2 // 36.
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
func testMultiHopHtlcClaims(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest) {
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
type testCase struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
test func(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest, alice, bob *node.HarnessNode,
|
|
|
|
c lnrpc.CommitmentType, zeroConf bool)
|
|
|
|
commitType lnrpc.CommitmentType
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subTests := []testCase{
|
2022-07-28 19:24:54 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// bob: outgoing our commit timeout
|
|
|
|
// carol: incoming their commit watch and see timeout
|
|
|
|
name: "local force close immediate expiry",
|
|
|
|
test: testMultiHopHtlcLocalTimeout,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2022-07-29 05:38:13 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// bob: outgoing watch and see, they sweep on chain
|
|
|
|
// carol: incoming our commit, know preimage
|
|
|
|
name: "receiver chain claim",
|
|
|
|
test: testMultiHopReceiverChainClaim,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2022-07-29 06:15:25 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// bob: outgoing our commit watch and see timeout
|
|
|
|
// carol: incoming their commit watch and see timeout
|
|
|
|
name: "local force close on-chain htlc timeout",
|
|
|
|
test: testMultiHopLocalForceCloseOnChainHtlcTimeout,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2022-07-29 06:26:58 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// bob: outgoing their commit watch and see timeout
|
|
|
|
// carol: incoming our commit watch and see timeout
|
|
|
|
name: "remote force close on-chain htlc timeout",
|
|
|
|
test: testMultiHopRemoteForceCloseOnChainHtlcTimeout,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2022-07-29 06:34:08 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// bob: outgoing our commit watch and see, they sweep
|
|
|
|
// on chain
|
|
|
|
// bob: incoming our commit watch and learn preimage
|
|
|
|
// carol: incoming their commit know preimage
|
|
|
|
name: "local chain claim",
|
|
|
|
test: testMultiHopHtlcLocalChainClaim,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2022-07-29 06:40:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// bob: outgoing their commit watch and see, they sweep
|
|
|
|
// on chain
|
|
|
|
// bob: incoming their commit watch and learn preimage
|
|
|
|
// carol: incoming our commit know preimage
|
|
|
|
name: "remote chain claim",
|
|
|
|
test: testMultiHopHtlcRemoteChainClaim,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2022-07-29 06:48:21 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// bob: outgoing and incoming, sweep all on chain
|
|
|
|
name: "local htlc aggregation",
|
|
|
|
test: testMultiHopHtlcAggregation,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-04 23:01:07 +02:00
|
|
|
commitWithZeroConf := []struct {
|
|
|
|
commitType lnrpc.CommitmentType
|
|
|
|
zeroConf bool
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
commitType: lnrpc.CommitmentType_LEGACY,
|
|
|
|
zeroConf: false,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
commitType: lnrpc.CommitmentType_ANCHORS,
|
|
|
|
zeroConf: false,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
commitType: lnrpc.CommitmentType_ANCHORS,
|
|
|
|
zeroConf: true,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
commitType: lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE,
|
|
|
|
zeroConf: false,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
commitType: lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE,
|
|
|
|
zeroConf: true,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
runTestCase := func(st *lntemp.HarnessTest, name string, tc testCase,
|
|
|
|
zeroConf bool) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create the nodes here so that separate logs will be created
|
|
|
|
// for Alice and Bob.
|
|
|
|
args := nodeArgsForCommitType(tc.commitType)
|
|
|
|
if zeroConf {
|
|
|
|
args = append(
|
|
|
|
args, "--protocol.option-scid-alias",
|
|
|
|
"--protocol.zero-conf",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
alice := st.NewNode("Alice", args)
|
|
|
|
bob := st.NewNode("Bob", args)
|
|
|
|
st.ConnectNodes(alice, bob)
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
// Start each test with the default static fee estimate.
|
|
|
|
st.SetFeeEstimate(12500)
|
2022-04-04 23:01:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
// Add test name to the logs.
|
|
|
|
alice.AddToLogf("Running test case: %s", name)
|
|
|
|
bob.AddToLogf("Running test case: %s", name)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tc.test(st, alice, bob, tc.commitType, zeroConf)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, subTest := range subTests {
|
|
|
|
subTest := subTest
|
2022-04-04 23:01:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
for _, typeAndConf := range commitWithZeroConf {
|
|
|
|
typeAndConf := typeAndConf
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
subTest.commitType = typeAndConf.commitType
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
name := fmt.Sprintf("%s/zeroconf=%v/committype=%v",
|
|
|
|
subTest.name, typeAndConf.zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
typeAndConf.commitType.String())
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
s := ht.Run(name, func(t1 *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
st, cleanup := ht.Subtest(t1)
|
|
|
|
defer cleanup()
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
runTestCase(
|
|
|
|
st, name, subTest, typeAndConf.zeroConf,
|
2020-11-21 12:52:02 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
if !s {
|
|
|
|
return
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// waitForInvoiceAccepted waits until the specified invoice moved to the
|
|
|
|
// accepted state by the node.
|
|
|
|
func waitForInvoiceAccepted(t *harnessTest, node *lntest.HarnessNode,
|
|
|
|
payHash lntypes.Hash) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), defaultTimeout)
|
|
|
|
defer cancel()
|
|
|
|
invoiceUpdates, err := node.SubscribeSingleInvoice(ctx,
|
|
|
|
&invoicesrpc.SubscribeSingleInvoiceRequest{
|
|
|
|
RHash: payHash[:],
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("subscribe single invoice: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
update, err := invoiceUpdates.Recv()
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("invoice update err: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if update.State == lnrpc.Invoice_ACCEPTED {
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// checkPaymentStatus asserts that the given node list a payment with the given
|
|
|
|
// preimage has the expected status.
|
2021-08-20 11:33:42 +02:00
|
|
|
func checkPaymentStatus(node *lntest.HarnessNode, preimage lntypes.Preimage,
|
|
|
|
status lnrpc.Payment_PaymentStatus) error {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctxb := context.Background()
|
|
|
|
ctxt, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctxb, defaultTimeout)
|
|
|
|
defer cancel()
|
2020-03-23 11:19:18 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req := &lnrpc.ListPaymentsRequest{
|
|
|
|
IncludeIncomplete: true,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
paymentsResp, err := node.ListPayments(ctxt, req)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("error when obtaining Alice payments: %v",
|
|
|
|
err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
payHash := preimage.Hash()
|
|
|
|
var found bool
|
|
|
|
for _, p := range paymentsResp.Payments {
|
|
|
|
if p.PaymentHash != payHash.String() {
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found = true
|
|
|
|
if p.Status != status {
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected payment status "+
|
|
|
|
"%v, got %v", status, p.Status)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch status {
|
|
|
|
// If this expected status is SUCCEEDED, we expect the final preimage.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.Payment_SUCCEEDED:
|
|
|
|
if p.PaymentPreimage != preimage.String() {
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("preimage doesn't match: %v vs %v",
|
|
|
|
p.PaymentPreimage, preimage.String())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise we expect an all-zero preimage.
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
if p.PaymentPreimage != (lntypes.Preimage{}).String() {
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected zero preimage, got %v",
|
|
|
|
p.PaymentPreimage)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !found {
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("payment with payment hash %v not found "+
|
|
|
|
"in response", payHash)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-04 13:21:29 +01:00
|
|
|
// assertAllTxesSpendFrom asserts that all txes in the list spend from the given
|
|
|
|
// tx.
|
|
|
|
func assertAllTxesSpendFrom(t *harnessTest, txes []*wire.MsgTx,
|
|
|
|
prevTxid chainhash.Hash) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, tx := range txes {
|
|
|
|
if tx.TxIn[0].PreviousOutPoint.Hash != prevTxid {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("tx %v did not spend from %v",
|
|
|
|
tx.TxHash(), prevTxid)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// createThreeHopNetwork creates a topology of `Alice -> Bob -> Carol`.
|
|
|
|
func createThreeHopNetwork(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest,
|
|
|
|
alice, bob *node.HarnessNode, carolHodl bool, c lnrpc.CommitmentType,
|
|
|
|
zeroConf bool) (*lnrpc.ChannelPoint,
|
|
|
|
*lnrpc.ChannelPoint, *node.HarnessNode) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ht.EnsureConnected(alice, bob)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll create a new node "carol" and have Bob connect to her.
|
|
|
|
// If the carolHodl flag is set, we'll make carol always hold onto the
|
|
|
|
// HTLC, this way it'll force Bob to go to chain to resolve the HTLC.
|
|
|
|
carolFlags := nodeArgsForCommitType(c)
|
|
|
|
if carolHodl {
|
|
|
|
carolFlags = append(carolFlags, "--hodl.exit-settle")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if zeroConf {
|
|
|
|
carolFlags = append(
|
|
|
|
carolFlags, "--protocol.option-scid-alias",
|
|
|
|
"--protocol.zero-conf",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
carol := ht.NewNode("Carol", carolFlags)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ht.ConnectNodes(bob, carol)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure there are enough utxos for anchoring. Because the anchor
|
|
|
|
// by itself often doesn't meet the dust limit, a utxo from the wallet
|
|
|
|
// needs to be attached as an additional input. This can still lead to
|
|
|
|
// a positively-yielding transaction.
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
|
2022-08-01 20:16:17 +02:00
|
|
|
ht.FundCoinsUnconfirmed(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin, alice)
|
|
|
|
ht.FundCoinsUnconfirmed(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin, bob)
|
|
|
|
ht.FundCoinsUnconfirmed(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin, carol)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine 1 block to get the above coins confirmed.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(1)
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll start the test by creating a channel between Alice and Bob,
|
|
|
|
// which will act as the first leg for out multi-hop HTLC.
|
|
|
|
const chanAmt = 1000000
|
|
|
|
var aliceFundingShim *lnrpc.FundingShim
|
|
|
|
var thawHeight uint32
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
_, minerHeight := ht.Miner.GetBestBlock()
|
2022-08-01 20:16:17 +02:00
|
|
|
thawHeight = uint32(minerHeight + thawHeightDelta)
|
2022-07-28 14:15:22 +02:00
|
|
|
aliceFundingShim, _, _ = deriveFundingShim(
|
|
|
|
ht, alice, bob, chanAmt, thawHeight, true,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
cancel context.CancelFunc
|
|
|
|
acceptStream rpc.AcceptorClient
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// If a zero-conf channel is being opened, the nodes are signalling the
|
|
|
|
// zero-conf feature bit. Setup a ChannelAcceptor for the fundee.
|
|
|
|
if zeroConf {
|
|
|
|
acceptStream, cancel = bob.RPC.ChannelAcceptor()
|
|
|
|
go acceptChannel(ht.T, true, acceptStream)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aliceParams := lntemp.OpenChannelParams{
|
|
|
|
Amt: chanAmt,
|
|
|
|
CommitmentType: c,
|
|
|
|
FundingShim: aliceFundingShim,
|
|
|
|
ZeroConf: zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceChanPoint := ht.OpenChannel(alice, bob, aliceParams)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Remove the ChannelAcceptor for Bob.
|
|
|
|
if zeroConf {
|
|
|
|
cancel()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll then create a channel from Bob to Carol. After this channel is
|
|
|
|
// open, our topology looks like: A -> B -> C.
|
|
|
|
var bobFundingShim *lnrpc.FundingShim
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
bobFundingShim, _, _ = deriveFundingShim(
|
|
|
|
ht, bob, carol, chanAmt, thawHeight, true,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Setup a ChannelAcceptor for Carol if a zero-conf channel open is
|
|
|
|
// being attempted.
|
|
|
|
if zeroConf {
|
|
|
|
acceptStream, cancel = carol.RPC.ChannelAcceptor()
|
|
|
|
go acceptChannel(ht.T, true, acceptStream)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bobParams := lntemp.OpenChannelParams{
|
|
|
|
Amt: chanAmt,
|
|
|
|
CommitmentType: c,
|
|
|
|
FundingShim: bobFundingShim,
|
|
|
|
ZeroConf: zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bobChanPoint := ht.OpenChannel(bob, carol, bobParams)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Remove the ChannelAcceptor for Carol.
|
|
|
|
if zeroConf {
|
|
|
|
cancel()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure alice and carol know each other's channels.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertTopologyChannelOpen(alice, bobChanPoint)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertTopologyChannelOpen(carol, aliceChanPoint)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return aliceChanPoint, bobChanPoint, carol
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-10-25 08:29:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testMultiHopHtlcLocalTimeout tests that in a multi-hop HTLC scenario, if the
|
|
|
|
// outgoing HTLC is about to time out, then we'll go to chain in order to claim
|
|
|
|
// it using the HTLC timeout transaction. Any dust HTLC's should be immediately
|
|
|
|
// canceled backwards. Once the timeout has been reached, then we should sweep
|
|
|
|
// it on-chain, and cancel the HTLC backwards.
|
|
|
|
func testMultiHopHtlcLocalTimeout(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest,
|
|
|
|
alice, bob *node.HarnessNode, c lnrpc.CommitmentType, zeroConf bool) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a three hop network: Alice -> Bob -> Carol, with
|
|
|
|
// Carol refusing to actually settle or directly cancel any HTLC's
|
|
|
|
// self.
|
|
|
|
aliceChanPoint, bobChanPoint, carol := createThreeHopNetwork(
|
|
|
|
ht, alice, bob, true, c, zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that our channels are set up, we'll send two HTLC's from Alice
|
|
|
|
// to Carol. The first HTLC will be universally considered "dust",
|
|
|
|
// while the second will be a proper fully valued HTLC.
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
|
|
dustHtlcAmt = btcutil.Amount(100)
|
|
|
|
htlcAmt = btcutil.Amount(300_000)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll create two random payment hashes unknown to carol, then send
|
|
|
|
// each of them by manually specifying the HTLC details.
|
|
|
|
carolPubKey := carol.PubKey[:]
|
|
|
|
dustPayHash := ht.Random32Bytes()
|
|
|
|
payHash := ht.Random32Bytes()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
alice.RPC.SendPayment(&routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
Dest: carolPubKey,
|
|
|
|
Amt: int64(dustHtlcAmt),
|
|
|
|
PaymentHash: dustPayHash,
|
|
|
|
FinalCltvDelta: finalCltvDelta,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
alice.RPC.SendPayment(&routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
Dest: carolPubKey,
|
|
|
|
Amt: int64(htlcAmt),
|
|
|
|
PaymentHash: payHash,
|
|
|
|
FinalCltvDelta: finalCltvDelta,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify that all nodes in the path now have two HTLC's with the
|
|
|
|
// proper parameters.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(alice, dustPayHash, payHash)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(bob, dustPayHash, payHash)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(carol, dustPayHash, payHash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Increase the fee estimate so that the following force close tx will
|
|
|
|
// be cpfp'ed.
|
|
|
|
ht.SetFeeEstimate(30000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now mine enough blocks to trigger Bob's broadcast of his
|
|
|
|
// commitment transaction due to the fact that the HTLC is about to
|
|
|
|
// timeout. With the default outgoing broadcast delta of zero, this will
|
|
|
|
// be the same height as the htlc expiry height.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := padCLTV(
|
|
|
|
uint32(finalCltvDelta - lncfg.DefaultOutgoingBroadcastDelta),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Bob's force close transaction should now be found in the mempool. If
|
|
|
|
// there are anchors, we also expect Bob's anchor sweep.
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes := 1
|
|
|
|
hasAnchors := commitTypeHasAnchors(c)
|
|
|
|
if hasAnchors {
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
op := ht.OutPointFromChannelPoint(bobChanPoint)
|
|
|
|
closeTx := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(op)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine a block to confirm the closing transaction.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, Bob should have canceled backwards the dust HTLC
|
|
|
|
// that we sent earlier. This means Alice should now only have a single
|
|
|
|
// HTLC on her channel.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(alice, payHash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With the closing transaction confirmed, we should expect Bob's HTLC
|
|
|
|
// timeout transaction to be broadcast due to the expiry being reached.
|
|
|
|
// If there are anchors, we also expect Carol's anchor sweep now.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll also obtain the expected HTLC timeout transaction hash.
|
|
|
|
htlcOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: closeTx.TxHash(), Index: 0}
|
|
|
|
commitOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: closeTx.TxHash(), Index: 1}
|
|
|
|
if hasAnchors {
|
|
|
|
htlcOutpoint.Index = 2
|
|
|
|
commitOutpoint.Index = 3
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
htlcTimeoutTxid := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
htlcOutpoint,
|
|
|
|
).TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine a block to confirm the expected transactions.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With Bob's HTLC timeout transaction confirmed, there should be no
|
|
|
|
// active HTLC's on the commitment transaction from Alice -> Bob.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumActiveHtlcs(alice, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, Bob should show that the pending HTLC has advanced to
|
|
|
|
// the second stage and is ready to be swept once the timelock is up.
|
|
|
|
pendingChanResp := bob.RPC.PendingChannels()
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(ht, 1, len(pendingChanResp.PendingForceClosingChannels))
|
|
|
|
forceCloseChan := pendingChanResp.PendingForceClosingChannels[0]
|
|
|
|
require.NotZero(ht, forceCloseChan.LimboBalance)
|
|
|
|
require.Positive(ht, forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(ht, 1, len(forceCloseChan.PendingHtlcs))
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(ht, uint32(2), forceCloseChan.PendingHtlcs[0].Stage)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
htlcTimeoutOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: htlcTimeoutTxid, Index: 0}
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
// Since Bob is the initiator of the script-enforced leased
|
|
|
|
// channel between him and Carol, he will incur an additional
|
|
|
|
// CLTV on top of the usual CSV delay on any outputs that he can
|
|
|
|
// sweep back to his wallet.
|
|
|
|
blocksTilMaturity := uint32(forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(blocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that the sweep spends the expected inputs.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(commitOutpoint)
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(htlcTimeoutOutpoint)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// Since Bob force closed the channel between him and Carol, he
|
|
|
|
// will incur the usual CSV delay on any outputs that he can
|
|
|
|
// sweep back to his wallet. We'll subtract one block from our
|
|
|
|
// current maturity period to assert on the mempool.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := uint32(forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity - 1)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that the sweep spends from the mined commitment.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(commitOutpoint)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine a block to confirm Bob's commit sweep tx and assert it
|
|
|
|
// was in fact mined.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine an additional block to prompt Bob to broadcast their
|
|
|
|
// second layer sweep due to the CSV on the HTLC timeout output.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 0)
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(htlcTimeoutOutpoint)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll mine a final block that should confirm the sweeping
|
|
|
|
// transactions left.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Once this transaction has been confirmed, Bob should detect that he
|
|
|
|
// no longer has any pending channels.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(bob, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Coop close channel, expect no anchors.
|
|
|
|
ht.CloseChannel(alice, aliceChanPoint)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testMultiHopReceiverChainClaim tests that in the multi-hop setting, if the
|
|
|
|
// receiver of an HTLC knows the preimage, but wasn't able to settle the HTLC
|
|
|
|
// off-chain, then it goes on chain to claim the HTLC uing the HTLC success
|
|
|
|
// transaction. In this scenario, the node that sent the outgoing HTLC should
|
|
|
|
// extract the preimage from the sweep transaction, and finish settling the
|
|
|
|
// HTLC backwards into the route.
|
|
|
|
func testMultiHopReceiverChainClaim(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest,
|
|
|
|
alice, bob *node.HarnessNode, c lnrpc.CommitmentType, zeroConf bool) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a three hop network: Alice -> Bob -> Carol, with
|
|
|
|
// Carol refusing to actually settle or directly cancel any HTLC's
|
|
|
|
// self.
|
|
|
|
aliceChanPoint, bobChanPoint, carol := createThreeHopNetwork(
|
|
|
|
ht, alice, bob, false, c, zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With the network active, we'll now add a new hodl invoice at Carol's
|
|
|
|
// end. Make sure the cltv expiry delta is large enough, otherwise Bob
|
|
|
|
// won't send out the outgoing htlc.
|
|
|
|
const invoiceAmt = 100000
|
|
|
|
var preimage lntypes.Preimage
|
|
|
|
copy(preimage[:], ht.Random32Bytes())
|
|
|
|
payHash := preimage.Hash()
|
|
|
|
invoiceReq := &invoicesrpc.AddHoldInvoiceRequest{
|
|
|
|
Value: invoiceAmt,
|
|
|
|
CltvExpiry: finalCltvDelta,
|
|
|
|
Hash: payHash[:],
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
carolInvoice := carol.RPC.AddHoldInvoice(invoiceReq)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Subscribe the invoice.
|
|
|
|
stream := carol.RPC.SubscribeSingleInvoice(payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that we've created the invoice, we'll send a single payment from
|
|
|
|
// Alice to Carol. We won't wait for the response however, as Carol
|
|
|
|
// will not immediately settle the payment.
|
|
|
|
req := &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
PaymentRequest: carolInvoice.PaymentRequest,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
alice.RPC.SendPayment(req)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, all 3 nodes should now have an active channel with
|
|
|
|
// the created HTLC pending on all of them.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(alice, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(bob, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(carol, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for carol to mark invoice as accepted. There is a small gap to
|
|
|
|
// bridge between adding the htlc to the channel and executing the exit
|
|
|
|
// hop logic.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertInvoiceState(stream, lnrpc.Invoice_ACCEPTED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
restartBob := ht.SuspendNode(bob)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Settle invoice. This will just mark the invoice as settled, as there
|
|
|
|
// is no link anymore to remove the htlc from the commitment tx. For
|
|
|
|
// this test, it is important to actually settle and not leave the
|
|
|
|
// invoice in the accepted state, because without a known preimage, the
|
|
|
|
// channel arbitrator won't go to chain.
|
|
|
|
carol.RPC.SettleInvoice(preimage[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Increase the fee estimate so that the following force close tx will
|
|
|
|
// be cpfp'ed.
|
|
|
|
ht.SetFeeEstimate(30000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now we'll mine enough blocks to prompt carol to actually go to the
|
|
|
|
// chain in order to sweep her HTLC since the value is high enough.
|
|
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): modify once go to chain policy changes
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := padCLTV(uint32(
|
|
|
|
invoiceReq.CltvExpiry - lncfg.DefaultIncomingBroadcastDelta,
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, Carol should broadcast her active commitment
|
|
|
|
// transaction in order to go to the chain and sweep her HTLC. If there
|
|
|
|
// are anchors, Carol also sweeps hers.
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes := 1
|
|
|
|
hasAnchors := commitTypeHasAnchors(c)
|
|
|
|
if hasAnchors {
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
closingTx := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
ht.OutPointFromChannelPoint(bobChanPoint),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
closingTxid := closingTx.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Confirm the commitment.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Restart bob again.
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(ht, restartBob())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After the force close transaction is mined, a series of transactions
|
|
|
|
// should be broadcast by Bob and Carol. When Bob notices Carol's second
|
|
|
|
// level transaction in the mempool, he will extract the preimage and
|
|
|
|
// settle the HTLC back off-chain.
|
|
|
|
switch c {
|
|
|
|
// Carol should broadcast her second level HTLC transaction and Bob
|
|
|
|
// should broadcast a sweep tx to sweep his output in the channel with
|
|
|
|
// Carol.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_LEGACY:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol should broadcast her second level HTLC transaction and Bob
|
|
|
|
// should broadcast a sweep tx to sweep his output in the channel with
|
|
|
|
// Carol, and another sweep tx to sweep his anchor output.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_ANCHORS:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol should broadcast her second level HTLC transaction and Bob
|
|
|
|
// should broadcast a sweep tx to sweep his anchor output. Bob's commit
|
|
|
|
// output can't be swept yet as he's incurring an additional CLTV from
|
|
|
|
// being the channel initiator of a script-enforced leased channel.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
ht.Fatalf("unhandled commitment type %v", c)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// All transactions should be spending from the commitment transaction.
|
|
|
|
txes := ht.Miner.GetNumTxsFromMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertAllTxesSpendFrom(txes, closingTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now mine an additional block which should confirm both the
|
|
|
|
// second layer transactions.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): assert bob pending state as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol's pending channel report should now show two outputs under
|
|
|
|
// limbo: her commitment output, as well as the second-layer claim
|
|
|
|
// output, and the pending HTLC should also now be in stage 2.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumHTLCsAndStage(carol, bobChanPoint, 1, 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Once the second-level transaction confirmed, Bob should have
|
|
|
|
// extracted the preimage from the chain, and sent it back to Alice,
|
|
|
|
// clearing the HTLC off-chain.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumActiveHtlcs(alice, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we mine 4 additional blocks, then Carol can sweep the second level
|
|
|
|
// HTLC output.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(defaultCSV)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We should have a new transaction in the mempool.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally, if we mine an additional block to confirm these two sweep
|
|
|
|
// transactions, Carol should not show a pending channel in her report
|
|
|
|
// afterwards.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(1)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(carol, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The invoice should show as settled for Carol, indicating that it was
|
|
|
|
// swept on-chain.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertInvoiceSettled(carol, carolInvoice.PaymentAddr)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally, check that the Alice's payment is correctly marked
|
|
|
|
// succeeded.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertPaymentStatus(alice, preimage, lnrpc.Payment_SUCCEEDED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
// Bob still has his commit output to sweep to since he incurred
|
|
|
|
// an additional CLTV from being the channel initiator of a
|
|
|
|
// script-enforced leased channel, regardless of whether he
|
|
|
|
// forced closed the channel or not.
|
|
|
|
pendingChanResp := bob.RPC.PendingChannels()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, pendingChanResp.PendingForceClosingChannels, 1)
|
|
|
|
forceCloseChan := pendingChanResp.PendingForceClosingChannels[0]
|
|
|
|
require.Positive(ht, forceCloseChan.LimboBalance)
|
|
|
|
require.Positive(ht, forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO: Bob still shows a pending HTLC at this point when he
|
|
|
|
// shouldn't, as he already extracted the preimage from Carol's
|
|
|
|
// claim.
|
|
|
|
// require.Len(t.t, forceCloseChan.PendingHtlcs, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine enough blocks for Bob's commit output's CLTV to expire
|
|
|
|
// and sweep it.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := uint32(forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
commitOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: closingTxid, Index: 3}
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(commitOutpoint)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(1)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(bob, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll close out the channel between Alice and Bob, then shutdown
|
|
|
|
// carol to conclude the test.
|
|
|
|
ht.CloseChannel(alice, aliceChanPoint)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testMultiHopLocalForceCloseOnChainHtlcTimeout tests that in a multi-hop HTLC
|
|
|
|
// scenario, if the node that extended the HTLC to the final node closes their
|
|
|
|
// commitment on-chain early, then it eventually recognizes this HTLC as one
|
|
|
|
// that's timed out. At this point, the node should timeout the HTLC using the
|
|
|
|
// HTLC timeout transaction, then cancel it backwards as normal.
|
|
|
|
func testMultiHopLocalForceCloseOnChainHtlcTimeout(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest,
|
|
|
|
alice, bob *node.HarnessNode, c lnrpc.CommitmentType, zeroConf bool) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a three hop network: Alice -> Bob -> Carol, with
|
|
|
|
// Carol refusing to actually settle or directly cancel any HTLC's
|
|
|
|
// self.
|
|
|
|
aliceChanPoint, bobChanPoint, carol := createThreeHopNetwork(
|
|
|
|
ht, alice, bob, true, c, zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With our channels set up, we'll then send a single HTLC from Alice
|
|
|
|
// to Carol. As Carol is in hodl mode, she won't settle this HTLC which
|
|
|
|
// opens up the base for out tests.
|
|
|
|
const htlcAmt = btcutil.Amount(300_000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now send a single HTLC across our multi-hop network.
|
|
|
|
carolPubKey := carol.PubKey[:]
|
|
|
|
payHash := ht.Random32Bytes()
|
|
|
|
req := &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
Dest: carolPubKey,
|
|
|
|
Amt: int64(htlcAmt),
|
|
|
|
PaymentHash: payHash,
|
|
|
|
FinalCltvDelta: finalCltvDelta,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
alice.RPC.SendPayment(req)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Once the HTLC has cleared, all channels in our mini network should
|
|
|
|
// have the it locked in.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(alice, payHash)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(bob, payHash)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(carol, payHash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Increase the fee estimate so that the following force close tx will
|
|
|
|
// be cpfp'ed.
|
|
|
|
ht.SetFeeEstimate(30000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that all parties have the HTLC locked in, we'll immediately
|
|
|
|
// force close the Bob -> Carol channel. This should trigger contract
|
|
|
|
// resolution mode for both of them.
|
|
|
|
hasAnchors := commitTypeHasAnchors(c)
|
|
|
|
stream, _ := ht.CloseChannelAssertPending(bob, bobChanPoint, true)
|
|
|
|
closeTx := ht.AssertStreamChannelForceClosed(
|
|
|
|
bob, bobChanPoint, hasAnchors, stream,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If the channel closed has anchors, we should expect to see a sweep
|
|
|
|
// transaction for Carol's anchor.
|
|
|
|
htlcOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: *closeTx, Index: 0}
|
|
|
|
bobCommitOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: *closeTx, Index: 1}
|
|
|
|
if hasAnchors {
|
|
|
|
htlcOutpoint.Index = 2
|
|
|
|
bobCommitOutpoint.Index = 3
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(1)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Before the HTLC times out, we'll need to assert that Bob broadcasts a
|
|
|
|
// sweep transaction for his commit output. Note that if the channel has
|
|
|
|
// a script-enforced lease, then Bob will have to wait for an additional
|
|
|
|
// CLTV before sweeping it.
|
|
|
|
if c != lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
// The sweep is broadcast on the block immediately before the
|
|
|
|
// CSV expires and the commitment was already mined inside
|
|
|
|
// closeChannelAndAssertType(), so mine one block less than
|
|
|
|
// defaultCSV in order to perform mempool assertions.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(defaultCSV - 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commitSweepTx := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
bobCommitOutpoint,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
txid := commitSweepTx.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
block := ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &txid)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now mine enough blocks for the HTLC to expire. After this, Bob
|
2022-10-25 08:41:05 +02:00
|
|
|
// should hand off the now expired HTLC output to the utxo nursery. We
|
|
|
|
// mine finalCltvDelta-1 blocks here as we've already mined 1 block
|
|
|
|
// while confirming the closing tx.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := padCLTV(finalCltvDelta - 1)
|
2022-10-25 08:29:46 +02:00
|
|
|
if c != lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
// Subtract the number of blocks already mined to confirm Bob's
|
|
|
|
// commit sweep.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks -= defaultCSV
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Bob's pending channel report should show that he has a single HTLC
|
|
|
|
// that's now in stage one.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumHTLCsAndStage(bob, bobChanPoint, 1, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We should also now find a transaction in the mempool, as Bob should
|
|
|
|
// have broadcast his second layer timeout transaction.
|
|
|
|
timeoutTx := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(htlcOutpoint).TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll mine an additional block. This should serve to confirm
|
|
|
|
// the second layer timeout transaction.
|
|
|
|
block := ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &timeoutTx)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With the second layer timeout transaction confirmed, Bob should have
|
|
|
|
// canceled backwards the HTLC that carol sent.
|
2022-10-25 08:41:05 +02:00
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumActiveHtlcs(bob, 0)
|
2022-10-25 08:29:46 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Additionally, Bob should now show that HTLC as being advanced to the
|
|
|
|
// second stage.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumHTLCsAndStage(bob, bobChanPoint, 1, 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Bob should now broadcast a transaction that sweeps certain inputs
|
|
|
|
// depending on the commitment type. We'll need to mine some blocks
|
|
|
|
// before the broadcast is possible.
|
|
|
|
resp := bob.RPC.PendingChannels()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, resp.PendingForceClosingChannels, 1)
|
|
|
|
forceCloseChan := resp.PendingForceClosingChannels[0]
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, forceCloseChan.PendingHtlcs, 1)
|
|
|
|
pendingHtlc := forceCloseChan.PendingHtlcs[0]
|
|
|
|
require.Positive(ht, pendingHtlc.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
numBlocks = uint32(pendingHtlc.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that the CSV/CLTV timelock has expired, the transaction should
|
|
|
|
// either only sweep the HTLC timeout transaction, or sweep both the
|
|
|
|
// HTLC timeout transaction and Bob's commit output depending on the
|
|
|
|
// commitment type.
|
|
|
|
htlcTimeoutOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: timeoutTx, Index: 0}
|
|
|
|
sweepTx := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
htlcTimeoutOutpoint,
|
|
|
|
).TxHash()
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(bobCommitOutpoint)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
block = ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &sweepTx)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, Bob should no longer show any channels as pending
|
|
|
|
// close.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(bob, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Coop close, no anchors.
|
|
|
|
ht.CloseChannel(alice, aliceChanPoint)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testMultiHopRemoteForceCloseOnChainHtlcTimeout tests that if we extend a
|
|
|
|
// multi-hop HTLC, and the final destination of the HTLC force closes the
|
|
|
|
// channel, then we properly timeout the HTLC directly on *their* commitment
|
|
|
|
// transaction once the timeout has expired. Once we sweep the transaction, we
|
|
|
|
// should also cancel back the initial HTLC.
|
|
|
|
func testMultiHopRemoteForceCloseOnChainHtlcTimeout(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest,
|
|
|
|
alice, bob *node.HarnessNode, c lnrpc.CommitmentType, zeroConf bool) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a three hop network: Alice -> Bob -> Carol, with
|
|
|
|
// Carol refusing to actually settle or directly cancel any HTLC's
|
|
|
|
// self.
|
|
|
|
aliceChanPoint, bobChanPoint, carol := createThreeHopNetwork(
|
|
|
|
ht, alice, bob, true, c, zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With our channels set up, we'll then send a single HTLC from Alice
|
|
|
|
// to Carol. As Carol is in hodl mode, she won't settle this HTLC which
|
|
|
|
// opens up the base for out tests.
|
|
|
|
const htlcAmt = btcutil.Amount(30000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now send a single HTLC across our multi-hop network.
|
|
|
|
var preimage lntypes.Preimage
|
|
|
|
copy(preimage[:], ht.Random32Bytes())
|
|
|
|
payHash := preimage.Hash()
|
|
|
|
invoiceReq := &invoicesrpc.AddHoldInvoiceRequest{
|
|
|
|
Value: int64(htlcAmt),
|
|
|
|
CltvExpiry: finalCltvDelta,
|
|
|
|
Hash: payHash[:],
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
carolInvoice := carol.RPC.AddHoldInvoice(invoiceReq)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Subscribe the invoice.
|
|
|
|
stream := carol.RPC.SubscribeSingleInvoice(payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req := &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
PaymentRequest: carolInvoice.PaymentRequest,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
alice.RPC.SendPayment(req)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Once the HTLC has cleared, all the nodes in our mini network should
|
|
|
|
// show that the HTLC has been locked in.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(alice, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(bob, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(carol, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Increase the fee estimate so that the following force close tx will
|
|
|
|
// be cpfp'ed.
|
|
|
|
ht.SetFeeEstimate(30000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, we'll now instruct Carol to force close the
|
|
|
|
// transaction. This will let us exercise that Bob is able to sweep the
|
|
|
|
// expired HTLC on Carol's version of the commitment transaction. If
|
|
|
|
// Carol has an anchor, it will be swept too.
|
|
|
|
hasAnchors := commitTypeHasAnchors(c)
|
|
|
|
closeStream, _ := ht.CloseChannelAssertPending(
|
|
|
|
carol, bobChanPoint, true,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
closeTx := ht.AssertStreamChannelForceClosed(
|
|
|
|
carol, bobChanPoint, hasAnchors, closeStream,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, Bob should have a pending force close channel as
|
|
|
|
// Carol has gone directly to chain.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(bob, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var expectedTxes int
|
|
|
|
switch c {
|
|
|
|
// Bob can sweep his commit output immediately.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_LEGACY:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Bob can sweep his commit and anchor outputs immediately.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_ANCHORS:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Bob can't sweep his commit output yet as he was the initiator of a
|
|
|
|
// script-enforced leased channel, so he'll always incur the additional
|
|
|
|
// CLTV. He can still sweep his anchor output however.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
ht.Fatalf("unhandled commitment type %v", c)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll mine enough blocks for the HTLC to expire. At this
|
|
|
|
// point, Bob should hand off the output to his internal utxo nursery,
|
|
|
|
// which will broadcast a sweep transaction.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := padCLTV(finalCltvDelta - 1)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we check Bob's pending channel report, it should show that he has
|
|
|
|
// a single HTLC that's now in the second stage, as skip the initial
|
|
|
|
// first stage since this is a direct HTLC.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumHTLCsAndStage(bob, bobChanPoint, 1, 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We need to generate an additional block to trigger the sweep.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Bob's sweeping transaction should now be found in the mempool at
|
|
|
|
// this point.
|
|
|
|
sweepTx := ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(1)[0]
|
|
|
|
// The following issue is believed to have been resolved. Keep the
|
|
|
|
// original comments here for future reference in case anything goes
|
|
|
|
// wrong.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// If Bob's transaction isn't yet in the mempool, then due to
|
|
|
|
// internal message passing and the low period between blocks
|
|
|
|
// being mined, it may have been detected as a late
|
|
|
|
// registration. As a result, we'll mine another block and
|
|
|
|
// repeat the check. If it doesn't go through this time, then
|
|
|
|
// we'll fail.
|
|
|
|
// TODO(halseth): can we use waitForChannelPendingForceClose to
|
|
|
|
// avoid this hack?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we mine an additional block, then this should confirm Bob's
|
|
|
|
// transaction which sweeps the direct HTLC output.
|
|
|
|
block := ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, sweepTx)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that the sweeping transaction has been confirmed, Bob should
|
|
|
|
// cancel back that HTLC. As a result, Alice should not know of any
|
|
|
|
// active HTLC's.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumActiveHtlcs(alice, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now we'll check Bob's pending channel report. Since this was Carol's
|
|
|
|
// commitment, he doesn't have to wait for any CSV delays, but he may
|
|
|
|
// still need to wait for a CLTV on his commit output to expire
|
|
|
|
// depending on the commitment type.
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
resp := bob.RPC.PendingChannels()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, resp.PendingForceClosingChannels, 1)
|
|
|
|
forceCloseChan := resp.PendingForceClosingChannels[0]
|
|
|
|
require.Positive(ht, forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := uint32(forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bobCommitOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: *closeTx, Index: 3}
|
|
|
|
bobCommitSweep := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
bobCommitOutpoint,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
bobCommitSweepTxid := bobCommitSweep.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
block := ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &bobCommitSweepTxid)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(bob, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// While we're here, we assert that our expired invoice's state is
|
|
|
|
// correctly updated, and can no longer be settled.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertInvoiceState(stream, lnrpc.Invoice_CANCELED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll close out the test by closing the channel from Alice to Bob,
|
|
|
|
// and then shutting down the new node we created as its no longer
|
|
|
|
// needed. Coop close, no anchors.
|
|
|
|
ht.CloseChannel(alice, aliceChanPoint)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testMultiHopHtlcLocalChainClaim tests that in a multi-hop HTLC scenario, if
|
|
|
|
// we force close a channel with an incoming HTLC, and later find out the
|
|
|
|
// preimage via the witness beacon, we properly settle the HTLC on-chain using
|
|
|
|
// the HTLC success transaction in order to ensure we don't lose any funds.
|
|
|
|
func testMultiHopHtlcLocalChainClaim(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest,
|
|
|
|
alice, bob *node.HarnessNode, c lnrpc.CommitmentType, zeroConf bool) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a three hop network: Alice -> Bob -> Carol, with
|
|
|
|
// Carol refusing to actually settle or directly cancel any HTLC's
|
|
|
|
// self.
|
|
|
|
aliceChanPoint, bobChanPoint, carol := createThreeHopNetwork(
|
|
|
|
ht, alice, bob, false, c, zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With the network active, we'll now add a new hodl invoice at Carol's
|
|
|
|
// end. Make sure the cltv expiry delta is large enough, otherwise Bob
|
|
|
|
// won't send out the outgoing htlc.
|
|
|
|
const invoiceAmt = 100000
|
|
|
|
var preimage lntypes.Preimage
|
|
|
|
copy(preimage[:], ht.Random32Bytes())
|
|
|
|
payHash := preimage.Hash()
|
|
|
|
invoiceReq := &invoicesrpc.AddHoldInvoiceRequest{
|
|
|
|
Value: invoiceAmt,
|
|
|
|
CltvExpiry: finalCltvDelta,
|
|
|
|
Hash: payHash[:],
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
carolInvoice := carol.RPC.AddHoldInvoice(invoiceReq)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Subscribe the invoice.
|
|
|
|
stream := carol.RPC.SubscribeSingleInvoice(payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that we've created the invoice, we'll send a single payment from
|
|
|
|
// Alice to Carol. We won't wait for the response however, as Carol
|
|
|
|
// will not immediately settle the payment.
|
|
|
|
req := &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
PaymentRequest: carolInvoice.PaymentRequest,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
alice.RPC.SendPayment(req)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, all 3 nodes should now have an active channel with
|
|
|
|
// the created HTLC pending on all of them.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(alice, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(bob, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(carol, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for carol to mark invoice as accepted. There is a small gap to
|
|
|
|
// bridge between adding the htlc to the channel and executing the exit
|
|
|
|
// hop logic.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertInvoiceState(stream, lnrpc.Invoice_ACCEPTED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Increase the fee estimate so that the following force close tx will
|
|
|
|
// be cpfp'ed.
|
|
|
|
ht.SetFeeEstimate(30000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, Bob decides that he wants to exit the channel
|
|
|
|
// immediately, so he force closes his commitment transaction.
|
|
|
|
hasAnchors := commitTypeHasAnchors(c)
|
|
|
|
closeStream, _ := ht.CloseChannelAssertPending(
|
|
|
|
bob, aliceChanPoint, true,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
bobForceClose := ht.AssertStreamChannelForceClosed(
|
|
|
|
bob, aliceChanPoint, hasAnchors, closeStream,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var expectedTxes int
|
|
|
|
switch c {
|
|
|
|
// Alice will sweep her commitment output immediately.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_LEGACY:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Alice will sweep her commitment and anchor output immediately.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_ANCHORS:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Alice will sweep her anchor output immediately. Her commitment
|
|
|
|
// output cannot be swept yet as it has incurred an additional CLTV due
|
|
|
|
// to being the initiator of a script-enforced leased channel.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
ht.Fatalf("unhandled commitment type %v", c)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Suspend Bob to force Carol to go to chain.
|
|
|
|
restartBob := ht.SuspendNode(bob)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Settle invoice. This will just mark the invoice as settled, as there
|
|
|
|
// is no link anymore to remove the htlc from the commitment tx. For
|
|
|
|
// this test, it is important to actually settle and not leave the
|
|
|
|
// invoice in the accepted state, because without a known preimage, the
|
|
|
|
// channel arbitrator won't go to chain.
|
|
|
|
carol.RPC.SettleInvoice(preimage[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now mine enough blocks so Carol decides that she needs to go
|
|
|
|
// on-chain to claim the HTLC as Bob has been inactive.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := padCLTV(uint32(invoiceReq.CltvExpiry -
|
|
|
|
lncfg.DefaultIncomingBroadcastDelta))
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol's commitment transaction should now be in the mempool. If
|
|
|
|
// there is an anchor, Carol will sweep that too.
|
|
|
|
if commitTypeHasAnchors(c) {
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Look up the closing transaction. It should be spending from the
|
|
|
|
// funding transaction,
|
|
|
|
closingTx := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
ht.OutPointFromChannelPoint(bobChanPoint),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
closingTxid := closingTx.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine a block that should confirm the commit tx, the anchor if
|
|
|
|
// present and the coinbase.
|
|
|
|
block := ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, expectedTxes)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &closingTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Restart bob again.
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(ht, restartBob())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After the force close transaction is mined, transactions will be
|
|
|
|
// broadcast by both Bob and Carol.
|
|
|
|
switch c {
|
|
|
|
// Carol will broadcast her second level HTLC transaction and Bob will
|
|
|
|
// sweep his commitment output.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_LEGACY:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol will broadcast her second level HTLC transaction and Bob will
|
|
|
|
// sweep his commitment and anchor output.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_ANCHORS:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol will broadcast her second level HTLC transaction and anchor
|
|
|
|
// sweep, and Bob will sweep his anchor output. Bob can't sweep his
|
|
|
|
// commitment output yet as it has incurred an additional CLTV due to
|
|
|
|
// being the initiator of a script-enforced leased channel.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
ht.Fatalf("unhandled commitment type %v", c)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
txes := ht.Miner.GetNumTxsFromMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Both Carol's second level transaction and Bob's sweep should be
|
|
|
|
// spending from the commitment transaction.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertAllTxesSpendFrom(txes, closingTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point we suspend Alice to make sure she'll handle the
|
|
|
|
// on-chain settle after a restart.
|
|
|
|
restartAlice := ht.SuspendNode(alice)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine a block to confirm the expected transactions (+ the coinbase).
|
|
|
|
block = ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, expectedTxes)[0]
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, block.Transactions, expectedTxes+1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// For non-anchor channel types, the nursery will handle sweeping the
|
|
|
|
// second level output, and it will wait one extra block before
|
|
|
|
// sweeping it.
|
|
|
|
secondLevelMaturity := uint32(defaultCSV)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If this is a channel of the anchor type, we will subtract one block
|
|
|
|
// from the default CSV, as the Sweeper will handle the input, and the
|
|
|
|
// Sweeper sweeps the input as soon as the lock expires.
|
|
|
|
if hasAnchors {
|
|
|
|
secondLevelMaturity = defaultCSV - 1
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Keep track of the second level tx maturity.
|
|
|
|
carolSecondLevelCSV := secondLevelMaturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// When Bob notices Carol's second level transaction in the block, he
|
|
|
|
// will extract the preimage and broadcast a second level tx to claim
|
|
|
|
// the HTLC in his (already closed) channel with Alice.
|
|
|
|
bobSecondLvlTx := ht.Miner.GetNumTxsFromMempool(1)[0]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// It should spend from the commitment in the channel with Alice.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertTxSpendFrom(bobSecondLvlTx, *bobForceClose)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, Bob should have broadcast his second layer success
|
|
|
|
// transaction, and should have sent it to the nursery for incubation.
|
|
|
|
numPendingChans := 1
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
numPendingChans++
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(bob, numPendingChans)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumHTLCsAndStage(bob, aliceChanPoint, 1, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now mine a block which should confirm Bob's second layer
|
|
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
|
|
block = ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
bobSecondLvlTxid := bobSecondLvlTx.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &bobSecondLvlTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Keep track of Bob's second level maturity, and decrement our track
|
|
|
|
// of Carol's.
|
|
|
|
bobSecondLevelCSV := secondLevelMaturity
|
|
|
|
carolSecondLevelCSV--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that the preimage from Bob has hit the chain, restart Alice to
|
|
|
|
// ensure she'll pick it up.
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(ht, restartAlice())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we then mine 3 additional blocks, Carol's second level tx should
|
|
|
|
// mature, and she can pull the funds from it with a sweep tx.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(carolSecondLevelCSV)
|
|
|
|
carolSweep := ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(1)[0]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mining one additional block, Bob's second level tx is mature, and he
|
|
|
|
// can sweep the output.
|
|
|
|
bobSecondLevelCSV -= carolSecondLevelCSV
|
|
|
|
block = ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(bobSecondLevelCSV, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, carolSweep)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bobSweep := ht.Miner.GetNumTxsFromMempool(1)[0]
|
|
|
|
bobSweepTxid := bobSweep.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure it spends from the second level tx.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertTxSpendFrom(bobSweep, bobSecondLvlTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// When we mine one additional block, that will confirm Bob's sweep.
|
|
|
|
// Now Bob should have no pending channels anymore, as this just
|
|
|
|
// resolved it by the confirmation of the sweep transaction.
|
|
|
|
block = ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &bobSweepTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With the script-enforced lease commitment type, Alice and Bob still
|
|
|
|
// haven't been able to sweep their respective commit outputs due to the
|
|
|
|
// additional CLTV. We'll need to mine enough blocks for the timelock to
|
|
|
|
// expire and prompt their sweep.
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
for _, node := range []*node.HarnessNode{alice, bob} {
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(node, 1)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Due to the way the test is set up, Alice and Bob share the
|
|
|
|
// same CLTV for their commit outputs even though it's enforced
|
|
|
|
// on different channels (Alice-Bob and Bob-Carol).
|
|
|
|
resp := alice.RPC.PendingChannels()
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, resp.PendingForceClosingChannels, 1)
|
|
|
|
forceCloseChan := resp.PendingForceClosingChannels[0]
|
|
|
|
require.Positive(ht, forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine enough blocks for the timelock to expire.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := uint32(forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Both Alice and Bob show broadcast their commit sweeps.
|
|
|
|
aliceCommitOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{
|
|
|
|
Hash: *bobForceClose, Index: 3,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceCommitSweep := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
aliceCommitOutpoint,
|
|
|
|
).TxHash()
|
|
|
|
bobCommitOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: closingTxid, Index: 3}
|
|
|
|
bobCommitSweep := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
bobCommitOutpoint,
|
|
|
|
).TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Confirm their sweeps.
|
|
|
|
block := ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 2)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &aliceCommitSweep)
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &bobCommitSweep)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// All nodes should show zero pending and open channels.
|
|
|
|
for _, node := range []*node.HarnessNode{alice, bob, carol} {
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(node, 0)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNodeNumChannels(node, 0)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally, check that the Alice's payment is correctly marked
|
|
|
|
// succeeded.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertPaymentStatus(alice, preimage, lnrpc.Payment_SUCCEEDED)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testMultiHopHtlcRemoteChainClaim tests that in the multi-hop HTLC scenario,
|
|
|
|
// if the remote party goes to chain while we have an incoming HTLC, then when
|
|
|
|
// we found out the preimage via the witness beacon, we properly settle the
|
|
|
|
// HTLC directly on-chain using the preimage in order to ensure that we don't
|
|
|
|
// lose any funds.
|
|
|
|
func testMultiHopHtlcRemoteChainClaim(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest,
|
|
|
|
alice, bob *node.HarnessNode, c lnrpc.CommitmentType, zeroConf bool) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a three hop network: Alice -> Bob -> Carol, with
|
|
|
|
// Carol refusing to actually settle or directly cancel any HTLC's
|
|
|
|
// self.
|
|
|
|
aliceChanPoint, bobChanPoint, carol := createThreeHopNetwork(
|
|
|
|
ht, alice, bob, false, c, zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With the network active, we'll now add a new hodl invoice at Carol's
|
|
|
|
// end. Make sure the cltv expiry delta is large enough, otherwise Bob
|
|
|
|
// won't send out the outgoing htlc.
|
|
|
|
const invoiceAmt = 100000
|
|
|
|
var preimage lntypes.Preimage
|
|
|
|
copy(preimage[:], ht.Random32Bytes())
|
|
|
|
payHash := preimage.Hash()
|
|
|
|
invoiceReq := &invoicesrpc.AddHoldInvoiceRequest{
|
|
|
|
Value: invoiceAmt,
|
|
|
|
CltvExpiry: finalCltvDelta,
|
|
|
|
Hash: payHash[:],
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
carolInvoice := carol.RPC.AddHoldInvoice(invoiceReq)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Subscribe the invoice.
|
|
|
|
stream := carol.RPC.SubscribeSingleInvoice(payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that we've created the invoice, we'll send a single payment from
|
|
|
|
// Alice to Carol. We won't wait for the response however, as Carol
|
|
|
|
// will not immediately settle the payment.
|
|
|
|
req := &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
PaymentRequest: carolInvoice.PaymentRequest,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
alice.RPC.SendPayment(req)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, all 3 nodes should now have an active channel with
|
|
|
|
// the created HTLC pending on all of them.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(alice, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(bob, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(carol, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for carol to mark invoice as accepted. There is a small gap to
|
|
|
|
// bridge between adding the htlc to the channel and executing the exit
|
|
|
|
// hop logic.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertInvoiceState(stream, lnrpc.Invoice_ACCEPTED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Increase the fee estimate so that the following force close tx will
|
|
|
|
// be cpfp'ed.
|
|
|
|
ht.SetFeeEstimate(30000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Next, Alice decides that she wants to exit the channel, so she'll
|
|
|
|
// immediately force close the channel by broadcast her commitment
|
|
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
|
|
hasAnchors := commitTypeHasAnchors(c)
|
|
|
|
closeStream, _ := ht.CloseChannelAssertPending(
|
|
|
|
alice, aliceChanPoint, true,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
aliceForceClose := ht.AssertStreamChannelForceClosed(
|
|
|
|
alice, aliceChanPoint, hasAnchors, closeStream,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for the channel to be marked pending force close.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertChannelPendingForceClose(alice, aliceChanPoint)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After closeChannelAndAssertType returns, it has mined a block so now
|
|
|
|
// bob will attempt to redeem his anchor commitment (if the channel
|
|
|
|
// type is of that type).
|
|
|
|
if hasAnchors {
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(1)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if c != lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
// Mine enough blocks for Alice to sweep her funds from the
|
|
|
|
// force closed channel. closeChannelAndAssertType() already
|
|
|
|
// mined a block containing the commitment tx and the commit
|
|
|
|
// sweep tx will be broadcast immediately before it can be
|
|
|
|
// included in a block, so mine one less than defaultCSV in
|
|
|
|
// order to perform mempool assertions.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(defaultCSV - 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Alice should now sweep her funds.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(1)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Suspend bob, so Carol is forced to go on chain.
|
|
|
|
restartBob := ht.SuspendNode(bob)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Settle invoice. This will just mark the invoice as settled, as there
|
|
|
|
// is no link anymore to remove the htlc from the commitment tx. For
|
|
|
|
// this test, it is important to actually settle and not leave the
|
|
|
|
// invoice in the accepted state, because without a known preimage, the
|
|
|
|
// channel arbitrator won't go to chain.
|
|
|
|
carol.RPC.SettleInvoice(preimage[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now mine enough blocks so Carol decides that she needs to go
|
|
|
|
// on-chain to claim the HTLC as Bob has been inactive.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := padCLTV(uint32(
|
|
|
|
invoiceReq.CltvExpiry - lncfg.DefaultIncomingBroadcastDelta,
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
if c != lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
numBlocks -= defaultCSV
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes := 1
|
|
|
|
if hasAnchors {
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol's commitment transaction should now be in the mempool. If
|
|
|
|
// there are anchors, Carol also sweeps her anchor.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The closing transaction should be spending from the funding
|
|
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
|
|
closingTx := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
ht.OutPointFromChannelPoint(bobChanPoint),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
closingTxid := closingTx.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine a block, which should contain: the commitment, possibly an
|
|
|
|
// anchor sweep and the coinbase tx.
|
|
|
|
block := ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, expectedTxes)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &closingTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Restart bob again.
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(ht, restartBob())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// After the force close transaction is mined, we should expect Bob and
|
|
|
|
// Carol to broadcast some transactions depending on the channel
|
|
|
|
// commitment type.
|
|
|
|
switch c {
|
|
|
|
// Carol should broadcast her second level HTLC transaction and Bob
|
|
|
|
// should broadcast a transaction to sweep his commitment output.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_LEGACY:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol should broadcast her second level HTLC transaction and Bob
|
|
|
|
// should broadcast a transaction to sweep his commitment output and
|
|
|
|
// another to sweep his anchor output.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_ANCHORS:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol should broadcast her second level HTLC transaction and Bob
|
|
|
|
// should broadcast a transaction to sweep his anchor output. Bob can't
|
|
|
|
// sweep his commitment output yet as he has incurred an additional CLTV
|
|
|
|
// due to being the channel initiator of a force closed script-enforced
|
|
|
|
// leased channel.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
ht.Fatalf("unhandled commitment type %v", c)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
txes := ht.Miner.GetNumTxsFromMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// All transactions should be pending from the commitment transaction.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertAllTxesSpendFrom(txes, closingTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine a block to confirm the two transactions (+ coinbase).
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Keep track of the second level tx maturity.
|
|
|
|
carolSecondLevelCSV := uint32(defaultCSV)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// When Bob notices Carol's second level transaction in the block, he
|
|
|
|
// will extract the preimage and broadcast a sweep tx to directly claim
|
|
|
|
// the HTLC in his (already closed) channel with Alice.
|
|
|
|
bobHtlcSweep := ht.Miner.GetNumTxsFromMempool(1)[0]
|
|
|
|
bobHtlcSweepTxid := bobHtlcSweep.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// It should spend from the commitment in the channel with Alice.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertTxSpendFrom(bobHtlcSweep, *aliceForceClose)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now mine a block which should confirm Bob's HTLC sweep
|
|
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
|
|
block = ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &bobHtlcSweepTxid)
|
|
|
|
carolSecondLevelCSV--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that the sweeping transaction has been confirmed, Bob should now
|
|
|
|
// recognize that all contracts for the Bob-Carol channel have been
|
|
|
|
// fully resolved
|
|
|
|
aliceBobPendingChansLeft := 0
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
aliceBobPendingChansLeft = 1
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, node := range []*node.HarnessNode{alice, bob} {
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(
|
|
|
|
node, aliceBobPendingChansLeft,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we then mine 3 additional blocks, Carol's second level tx will
|
|
|
|
// mature, and she should pull the funds.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(carolSecondLevelCSV)
|
|
|
|
carolSweep := ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(1)[0]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// When Carol's sweep gets confirmed, she should have no more pending
|
|
|
|
// channels.
|
|
|
|
block = ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, carolSweep)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(carol, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With the script-enforced lease commitment type, Alice and Bob still
|
|
|
|
// haven't been able to sweep their respective commit outputs due to the
|
|
|
|
// additional CLTV. We'll need to mine enough blocks for the timelock to
|
|
|
|
// expire and prompt their sweep.
|
|
|
|
if c == lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
// Due to the way the test is set up, Alice and Bob share the
|
|
|
|
// same CLTV for their commit outputs even though it's enforced
|
|
|
|
// on different channels (Alice-Bob and Bob-Carol).
|
|
|
|
resp := alice.RPC.PendingChannels()
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, resp.PendingForceClosingChannels, 1)
|
|
|
|
forceCloseChan := resp.PendingForceClosingChannels[0]
|
|
|
|
require.Positive(ht, forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine enough blocks for the timelock to expire.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := uint32(forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Both Alice and Bob show broadcast their commit sweeps.
|
|
|
|
aliceCommitOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{
|
|
|
|
Hash: *aliceForceClose, Index: 3,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceCommitSweep := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
aliceCommitOutpoint,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
aliceCommitSweepTxid := aliceCommitSweep.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
bobCommitOutpoint := wire.OutPoint{Hash: closingTxid, Index: 3}
|
|
|
|
bobCommitSweep := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
bobCommitOutpoint,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
bobCommitSweepTxid := bobCommitSweep.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Confirm their sweeps.
|
|
|
|
block := ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 2)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &aliceCommitSweepTxid)
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &bobCommitSweepTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Alice and Bob should not show any pending channels anymore as
|
|
|
|
// they have been fully resolved.
|
|
|
|
for _, node := range []*node.HarnessNode{alice, bob} {
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(node, 0)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The invoice should show as settled for Carol, indicating that it was
|
|
|
|
// swept on-chain.
|
|
|
|
invoice := ht.AssertInvoiceState(stream, lnrpc.Invoice_SETTLED)
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(ht, int64(invoiceAmt), invoice.AmtPaidSat)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally, check that the Alice's payment is correctly marked
|
|
|
|
// succeeded.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertPaymentStatus(alice, preimage, lnrpc.Payment_SUCCEEDED)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testMultiHopHtlcAggregation tests that in a multi-hop HTLC scenario, if we
|
|
|
|
// force close a channel with both incoming and outgoing HTLCs, we can properly
|
|
|
|
// resolve them using the second level timeout and success transactions. In
|
|
|
|
// case of anchor channels, the second-level spends can also be aggregated and
|
|
|
|
// properly feebumped, so we'll check that as well.
|
|
|
|
func testMultiHopHtlcAggregation(ht *lntemp.HarnessTest,
|
|
|
|
alice, bob *node.HarnessNode, c lnrpc.CommitmentType, zeroConf bool) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a three hop network: Alice -> Bob -> Carol.
|
|
|
|
aliceChanPoint, bobChanPoint, carol := createThreeHopNetwork(
|
|
|
|
ht, alice, bob, false, c, zeroConf,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// For neutrino backend, we need one additional UTXO to create
|
|
|
|
// the sweeping tx for the second-level success txes.
|
|
|
|
if ht.IsNeutrinoBackend() {
|
|
|
|
ht.FundCoins(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin, bob)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// To ensure we have capacity in both directions of the route, we'll
|
|
|
|
// make a fairly large payment Alice->Carol and settle it.
|
|
|
|
const reBalanceAmt = 500_000
|
|
|
|
invoice := &lnrpc.Invoice{Value: reBalanceAmt}
|
|
|
|
resp := carol.RPC.AddInvoice(invoice)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sendReq := &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
PaymentRequest: resp.PaymentRequest,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
stream := alice.RPC.SendPayment(sendReq)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertPaymentStatusFromStream(stream, lnrpc.Payment_SUCCEEDED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// With the network active, we'll now add a new hodl invoices at both
|
|
|
|
// Alice's and Carol's end. Make sure the cltv expiry delta is large
|
|
|
|
// enough, otherwise Bob won't send out the outgoing htlc.
|
|
|
|
const numInvoices = 5
|
|
|
|
const invoiceAmt = 50_000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
carolInvoices []*invoicesrpc.AddHoldInvoiceResp
|
|
|
|
aliceInvoices []*invoicesrpc.AddHoldInvoiceResp
|
|
|
|
alicePreimages []lntypes.Preimage
|
|
|
|
payHashes [][]byte
|
|
|
|
invoiceStreamsCarol []rpc.SingleInvoiceClient
|
|
|
|
invoiceStreamsAlice []rpc.SingleInvoiceClient
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add Carol invoices.
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < numInvoices; i++ {
|
|
|
|
var preimage lntypes.Preimage
|
|
|
|
copy(preimage[:], ht.Random32Bytes())
|
|
|
|
payHash := preimage.Hash()
|
|
|
|
invoiceReq := &invoicesrpc.AddHoldInvoiceRequest{
|
|
|
|
Value: invoiceAmt,
|
|
|
|
CltvExpiry: finalCltvDelta,
|
|
|
|
Hash: payHash[:],
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
carolInvoice := carol.RPC.AddHoldInvoice(invoiceReq)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
carolInvoices = append(carolInvoices, carolInvoice)
|
|
|
|
payHashes = append(payHashes, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Subscribe the invoice.
|
|
|
|
stream := carol.RPC.SubscribeSingleInvoice(payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
invoiceStreamsCarol = append(invoiceStreamsCarol, stream)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll give Alice's invoices a longer CLTV expiry, to ensure the
|
|
|
|
// channel Bob<->Carol will be closed first.
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < numInvoices; i++ {
|
|
|
|
var preimage lntypes.Preimage
|
|
|
|
copy(preimage[:], ht.Random32Bytes())
|
|
|
|
payHash := preimage.Hash()
|
|
|
|
invoiceReq := &invoicesrpc.AddHoldInvoiceRequest{
|
|
|
|
Value: invoiceAmt,
|
|
|
|
CltvExpiry: 2 * finalCltvDelta,
|
|
|
|
Hash: payHash[:],
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
aliceInvoice := alice.RPC.AddHoldInvoice(invoiceReq)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aliceInvoices = append(aliceInvoices, aliceInvoice)
|
|
|
|
alicePreimages = append(alicePreimages, preimage)
|
|
|
|
payHashes = append(payHashes, payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Subscribe the invoice.
|
|
|
|
stream := alice.RPC.SubscribeSingleInvoice(payHash[:])
|
|
|
|
invoiceStreamsAlice = append(invoiceStreamsAlice, stream)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that we've created the invoices, we'll pay them all from
|
|
|
|
// Alice<->Carol, going through Bob. We won't wait for the response
|
|
|
|
// however, as neither will immediately settle the payment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Alice will pay all of Carol's invoices.
|
|
|
|
for _, carolInvoice := range carolInvoices {
|
|
|
|
req := &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
PaymentRequest: carolInvoice.PaymentRequest,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
alice.RPC.SendPayment(req)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// And Carol will pay Alice's.
|
|
|
|
for _, aliceInvoice := range aliceInvoices {
|
|
|
|
req := &routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
|
|
|
PaymentRequest: aliceInvoice.PaymentRequest,
|
|
|
|
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
carol.RPC.SendPayment(req)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, all 3 nodes should now the HTLCs active on their
|
|
|
|
// channels.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(alice, payHashes...)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(bob, payHashes...)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertActiveHtlcs(carol, payHashes...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait for Alice and Carol to mark the invoices as accepted. There is
|
|
|
|
// a small gap to bridge between adding the htlc to the channel and
|
|
|
|
// executing the exit hop logic.
|
|
|
|
for _, stream := range invoiceStreamsCarol {
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertInvoiceState(stream, lnrpc.Invoice_ACCEPTED)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, stream := range invoiceStreamsAlice {
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertInvoiceState(stream, lnrpc.Invoice_ACCEPTED)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Increase the fee estimate so that the following force close tx will
|
|
|
|
// be cpfp'ed.
|
|
|
|
ht.SetFeeEstimate(30000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We want Carol's htlcs to expire off-chain to demonstrate bob's force
|
|
|
|
// close. However, Carol will cancel her invoices to prevent force
|
|
|
|
// closes, so we shut her down for now.
|
|
|
|
restartCarol := ht.SuspendNode(carol)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We'll now mine enough blocks to trigger Bob's broadcast of his
|
|
|
|
// commitment transaction due to the fact that the Carol's HTLCs are
|
|
|
|
// about to timeout. With the default outgoing broadcast delta of zero,
|
|
|
|
// this will be the same height as the htlc expiry height.
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := padCLTV(
|
|
|
|
uint32(finalCltvDelta - lncfg.DefaultOutgoingBroadcastDelta),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Bob's force close transaction should now be found in the mempool. If
|
|
|
|
// there are anchors, we also expect Bob's anchor sweep.
|
|
|
|
hasAnchors := commitTypeHasAnchors(c)
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes := 1
|
|
|
|
if hasAnchors {
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertNumTxsInMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
closeTx := ht.Miner.AssertOutpointInMempool(
|
|
|
|
ht.OutPointFromChannelPoint(bobChanPoint),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
closeTxid := closeTx.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Go through the closing transaction outputs, and make an index for
|
|
|
|
// the HTLC outputs.
|
|
|
|
successOuts := make(map[wire.OutPoint]struct{})
|
|
|
|
timeoutOuts := make(map[wire.OutPoint]struct{})
|
|
|
|
for i, txOut := range closeTx.TxOut {
|
|
|
|
op := wire.OutPoint{
|
|
|
|
Hash: closeTxid,
|
|
|
|
Index: uint32(i),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch txOut.Value {
|
|
|
|
// If this HTLC goes towards Carol, Bob will claim it with a
|
|
|
|
// timeout Tx. In this case the value will be the invoice
|
|
|
|
// amount.
|
|
|
|
case invoiceAmt:
|
|
|
|
timeoutOuts[op] = struct{}{}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If the HTLC has direction towards Alice, Bob will claim it
|
|
|
|
// with the success TX when he learns the preimage. In this
|
|
|
|
// case one extra sat will be on the output, because of the
|
|
|
|
// routing fee.
|
|
|
|
case invoiceAmt + 1:
|
|
|
|
successOuts[op] = struct{}{}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Once bob has force closed, we can restart carol.
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(ht, restartCarol())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine a block to confirm the closing transaction.
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Let Alice settle her invoices. When Bob now gets the preimages, he
|
|
|
|
// has no other option than to broadcast his second-level transactions
|
|
|
|
// to claim the money.
|
|
|
|
for _, preimage := range alicePreimages {
|
|
|
|
alice.RPC.SettleInvoice(preimage[:])
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch c {
|
|
|
|
// With the closing transaction confirmed, we should expect Bob's HTLC
|
|
|
|
// timeout transactions to be broadcast due to the expiry being reached.
|
|
|
|
// We will also expect the success transactions, since he learnt the
|
|
|
|
// preimages from Alice. We also expect Carol to sweep her commitment
|
|
|
|
// output.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_LEGACY:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 2*numInvoices + 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// In case of anchors, all success transactions will be aggregated into
|
|
|
|
// one, the same is the case for the timeout transactions. In this case
|
|
|
|
// Carol will also sweep her commitment and anchor output as separate
|
|
|
|
// txs (since it will be low fee).
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_ANCHORS,
|
|
|
|
lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE:
|
|
|
|
expectedTxes = 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
ht.Fatalf("unhandled commitment type %v", c)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
txes := ht.Miner.GetNumTxsFromMempool(expectedTxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Since Bob can aggregate the transactions, we expect a single
|
|
|
|
// transaction, that have multiple spends from the commitment.
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
timeoutTxs []*chainhash.Hash
|
|
|
|
successTxs []*chainhash.Hash
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
for _, tx := range txes {
|
|
|
|
txid := tx.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i := range tx.TxIn {
|
|
|
|
prevOp := tx.TxIn[i].PreviousOutPoint
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := successOuts[prevOp]; ok {
|
|
|
|
successTxs = append(successTxs, &txid)
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := timeoutOuts[prevOp]; ok {
|
|
|
|
timeoutTxs = append(timeoutTxs, &txid)
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// In case of anchor we expect all the timeout and success second
|
|
|
|
// levels to be aggregated into one tx. For earlier channel types, they
|
|
|
|
// will be separate transactions.
|
|
|
|
if hasAnchors {
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, timeoutTxs, 1)
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, successTxs, 1)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, timeoutTxs, numInvoices)
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, successTxs, numInvoices)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// All mempool transactions should be spending from the commitment
|
|
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertAllTxesSpendFrom(txes, closeTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mine a block to confirm the all the transactions, including Carol's
|
|
|
|
// commitment tx, anchor tx(optional), and the second-level timeout and
|
|
|
|
// success txes.
|
|
|
|
block := ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, expectedTxes)[0]
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, block.Transactions, expectedTxes+1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point, Bob should have broadcast his second layer success
|
|
|
|
// transaction, and should have sent it to the nursery for incubation,
|
|
|
|
// or to the sweeper for sweeping.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(bob, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// For this channel, we also check the number of HTLCs and the stage
|
|
|
|
// are correct.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumHTLCsAndStage(bob, bobChanPoint, numInvoices*2, 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if c != lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE {
|
|
|
|
// If we then mine additional blocks, Bob can sweep his
|
|
|
|
// commitment output.
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(defaultCSV - 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Find the commitment sweep.
|
|
|
|
bobCommitSweep := ht.Miner.GetNumTxsFromMempool(1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertTxSpendFrom(bobCommitSweep, closeTxid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Also ensure it is not spending from any of the HTLC output.
|
|
|
|
for _, txin := range bobCommitSweep.TxIn {
|
|
|
|
for _, timeoutTx := range timeoutTxs {
|
|
|
|
require.NotEqual(ht, *timeoutTx,
|
|
|
|
txin.PreviousOutPoint.Hash,
|
|
|
|
"found unexpected spend of timeout tx")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, successTx := range successTxs {
|
|
|
|
require.NotEqual(ht, *successTx,
|
|
|
|
txin.PreviousOutPoint.Hash,
|
|
|
|
"found unexpected spend of success tx")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch c {
|
|
|
|
// In case this is a non-anchor channel type, we must mine 2 blocks, as
|
|
|
|
// the nursery waits an extra block before sweeping. Before the blocks
|
|
|
|
// are mined, we should expect to see Bob's commit sweep in the mempool.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_LEGACY:
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(2, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mining one additional block, Bob's second level tx is mature, and he
|
|
|
|
// can sweep the output. Before the blocks are mined, we should expect
|
|
|
|
// to see Bob's commit sweep in the mempool.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_ANCHORS:
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Since Bob is the initiator of the Bob-Carol script-enforced leased
|
|
|
|
// channel, he incurs an additional CLTV when sweeping outputs back to
|
|
|
|
// his wallet. We'll need to mine enough blocks for the timelock to
|
|
|
|
// expire to prompt his broadcast.
|
|
|
|
case lnrpc.CommitmentType_SCRIPT_ENFORCED_LEASE:
|
|
|
|
resp := bob.RPC.PendingChannels()
|
|
|
|
require.Len(ht, resp.PendingForceClosingChannels, 1)
|
|
|
|
forceCloseChan := resp.PendingForceClosingChannels[0]
|
|
|
|
require.Positive(ht, forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
numBlocks := uint32(forceCloseChan.BlocksTilMaturity)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add debug log.
|
|
|
|
_, height := ht.Miner.GetBestBlock()
|
|
|
|
bob.AddToLogf("itest: now mine %d blocks at height %d",
|
|
|
|
numBlocks, height)
|
|
|
|
ht.MineBlocksAssertNodesSync(numBlocks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
ht.Fatalf("unhandled commitment type %v", c)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure it spends from the second level tx.
|
|
|
|
secondLevelSweep := ht.Miner.GetNumTxsFromMempool(1)[0]
|
|
|
|
bobSweep := secondLevelSweep.TxHash()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// It should be sweeping all the second-level outputs.
|
|
|
|
var secondLvlSpends int
|
|
|
|
for _, txin := range secondLevelSweep.TxIn {
|
|
|
|
for _, timeoutTx := range timeoutTxs {
|
|
|
|
if *timeoutTx == txin.PreviousOutPoint.Hash {
|
|
|
|
secondLvlSpends++
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, successTx := range successTxs {
|
|
|
|
if *successTx == txin.PreviousOutPoint.Hash {
|
|
|
|
secondLvlSpends++
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
require.Equal(ht, 2*numInvoices, secondLvlSpends)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// When we mine one additional block, that will confirm Bob's second
|
|
|
|
// level sweep. Now Bob should have no pending channels anymore, as
|
|
|
|
// this just resolved it by the confirmation of the sweep transaction.
|
|
|
|
block = ht.Miner.MineBlocksAndAssertNumTxes(1, 1)[0]
|
|
|
|
ht.Miner.AssertTxInBlock(block, &bobSweep)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(bob, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// THe channel with Alice is still open.
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNodeNumChannels(bob, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Carol should have no channels left (open nor pending).
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNumPendingForceClose(carol, 0)
|
|
|
|
ht.AssertNodeNumChannels(carol, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Coop close, no anchors.
|
|
|
|
ht.CloseChannel(alice, aliceChanPoint)
|
|
|
|
}
|