Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
18 KiB
BOLT #1: Base Protocol
Overview
This protocol assumes an underlying authenticated and ordered transport mechanism that takes care of framing individual messages. BOLT #8 specifies the canonical transport layer used in Lightning, though it can be replaced by any transport that fulfills the above guarantees.
The default TCP port is 9735. This corresponds to hexadecimal 0x2607
: the Unicode code point for LIGHTNING.1
All data fields are unsigned big-endian unless otherwise specified.
Table of Contents
- Connection Handling and Multiplexing
- Lightning Message Format
- Type-Length-Value Format
- Fundamental Types
- Setup Messages
- Control Messages
- Acknowledgments
- References
- Authors
Connection Handling and Multiplexing
Implementations MUST use a single connection per peer; channel messages (which include a channel ID) are multiplexed over this single connection.
Lightning Message Format
After decryption, all Lightning messages are of the form:
type
: a 2-byte big-endian field indicating the type of messagepayload
: a variable-length payload that comprises the remainder of the message and that conforms to a format matching thetype
The type
field indicates how to interpret the payload
field.
The format for each individual type is defined by a specification in this repository.
The type follows the it's ok to be odd rule, so nodes MAY send odd-numbered types without ascertaining that the recipient understands it.
A sending node:
- MUST NOT send an evenly-typed message not listed here without prior negotiation.
A receiving node:
- upon receiving a message of odd, unknown type:
- MUST ignore the received message.
- upon receiving a message of even, unknown type:
- MUST fail the channels.
The messages are grouped logically into four groups, ordered by the most significant bit that is set:
- Setup & Control (types
0
-31
): messages related to connection setup, control, supported features, and error reporting (described below) - Channel (types
32
-127
): messages used to setup and tear down micropayment channels (described in BOLT #2) - Commitment (types
128
-255
): messages related to updating the current commitment transaction, which includes adding, revoking, and settling HTLCs as well as updating fees and exchanging signatures (described in BOLT #2) - Routing (types
256
-511
): messages containing node and channel announcements, as well as any active route exploration (described in BOLT #7)
The size of the message is required by the transport layer to fit into a 2-byte unsigned int; therefore, the maximum possible size is 65535 bytes.
A node:
- MUST ignore any additional data within a message beyond the length that it expects for that type.
- upon receiving a known message with insufficient length for the contents:
- MUST fail the channels.
- that negotiates an option in this specification:
- MUST include all the fields annotated with that option.
Rationale
By default SHA2
and Bitcoin public keys are both encoded as
big endian, thus it would be unusual to use a different endian for
other fields.
Length is limited to 65535 bytes by the cryptographic wrapping, and messages in the protocol are never more than that length anyway.
The it's ok to be odd rule allows for future optional extensions without negotiation or special coding in clients. The "ignore additional data" rule similarly allows for future expansion.
Implementations may prefer to have message data aligned on an 8-byte boundary (the largest natural alignment requirement of any type here); however, adding a 6-byte padding after the type field was considered wasteful: alignment may be achieved by decrypting the message into a buffer with 6-bytes of pre-padding.
Type-Length-Value Format
Throughout the protocol, a TLV (Type-Length-Value) format is used to allow for the backwards-compatible addition of new fields to existing message types.
A tlv_record
represents a single field, encoded in the form:
- [
varint
:type
] - [
varint
:length
] - [
length
:value
]
A tlv_stream
is a series of (possibly zero) tlv_record
s, represented as the
concatenation of the encoded tlv_record
s. When used to extend existing
messages, a tlv_stream
is typically placed after all currently defined fields.
The type
is a varint encoded using the bitcoin CompactSize format. It
functions as a message-specific, 64-bit identifier for the tlv_record
determining how the contents of value
should be decoded.
The length
is a varint encoded using the bitcoin CompactSize format
signaling the size of value
in bytes.
The value
depends entirely on the type
, and should be encoded or decoded
according to the message-specific format determined by type
.
Requirements
The sending node:
- MUST order
tlv_record
s in atlv_stream
by monotonically-increasingtype
. - MUST minimally encode
type
andlength
. - SHOULD NOT use redundant, variable-length encodings in a
tlv_record
.
The receiving node:
- if zero bytes remain before parsing a
type
:- MUST stop parsing the
tlv_stream
.
- MUST stop parsing the
- if a
type
orlength
is not minimally encoded:- MUST fail to parse the
tlv_stream
.
- MUST fail to parse the
- if decoded
type
s are not monotonically-increasing:- MUST fail to parse the
tlv_stream
.
- MUST fail to parse the
- if
type
is known:- MUST decode the next
length
bytes using the known encoding fortype
.
- MUST decode the next
- otherwise, if
type
is unknown:- if
type
is even:- MUST fail to parse the
tlv_stream
.
- MUST fail to parse the
- otherwise, if
type
is odd:- MUST discard the next
length
bytes.
- MUST discard the next
- if
Rationale
The primary advantage in using TLV is that a reader is able to ignore new fields that it does not understand, since each field carries the exact size of the encoded element. Without TLV, even if a node does not wish to use a particular field, the node is forced to add parsing logic for that field in order to determine the offset of any fields that follow.
The monotonicity constraint ensures that all type
s are unique and can appear
at most once. Fields that map to complex objects, e.g. vectors, maps, or
structs, should do so by defining the encoding such that the object is
serialized within a single tlv_record
. The uniqueness constraint, among other
things, enables the following optimizations:
- canonical ordering is defined independent of the encoded
value
s. - canonical ordering can be known at compile-time, rather that being determined dynamically at the time of encoding.
- verifying canonical ordering requires less state and is less-expensive.
- variable-size fields can reserve their expected size up front, rather than appending elements sequentially and incurring double-and-copy overhead.
The use of a varint for type
and length
permits a space savings for small
type
s or short value
s. This potentially leaves more space for application
data over the wire or in an onion payload.
All type
s must appear in increasing order to create a canonical encoding of
the underlying tlv_record
s. This is crucial when computing signatures over a
tlv_stream
, as it ensures verifiers will be able to recompute the same message
digest as the signer. Note that the canonical ordering over the set of fields
can be enforced even if the verifier does not understand what the fields
contain.
Writers should avoid using redundant, variable-length encodings in a
tlv_record
since this results in encoding the length twice and complicates
computing the outer length. As an example, when writing a variable length byte
array, the value
should contain only the raw bytes and forgo an additional
internal length since the tlv_record
already carries the number of bytes that
follow. On the other hand, if a tlv_record
contains multiple, variable-length
elements then this would not be considered redundant, and is needed to allow the
receiver to parse individual elements from value
.
Fundamental Types
Various fundamental types are referred to in the message specifications:
byte
: an 8-bit byteu16
: a 2 byte unsigned integeru32
: a 4 byte unsigned integeru64
: an 8 byte unsigned integer
Inside TLV records which contain a single value, leading zeros in integers can be omitted:
tu16
: a 0 to 2 byte unsigned integertu32
: a 0 to 4 byte unsigned integertu64
: a 0 to 8 byte unsigned integer
The following convenience types are also defined:
chain_hash
: a 32-byte chain identifier (see BOLT #0)channel_id
: a 32-byte channel_id (see BOLT #2sha256
: a 32-byte SHA2-256 hashsignature
: a 64-byte bitcoin Elliptic Curve signaturepoint
: a 33-byte Elliptic Curve point (compressed encoding as per SEC 1 standard)short_channel_id
: an 8 byte value identifying a channel (see BOLT #7)
Setup Messages
The init
Message
Once authentication is complete, the first message reveals the features supported or required by this node, even if this is a reconnection.
BOLT #9 specifies lists of global and local features. Each feature is generally represented in globalfeatures
or localfeatures
by 2 bits. The least-significant bit is numbered 0, which is even, and the next most significant bit is numbered 1, which is odd.
Both fields globalfeatures
and localfeatures
MUST be padded to bytes with 0s.
- type: 16 (
init
) - data:
- [
u16
:gflen
] - [
gflen*byte
:globalfeatures
] - [
u16
:lflen
] - [
lflen*byte
:localfeatures
]
- [
The 2-byte gflen
and lflen
fields indicate the number of bytes in the immediately following field.
Requirements
The sending node:
- MUST send
init
as the first Lightning message for any connection. - MUST set feature bits as defined in BOLT #9.
- MUST set any undefined feature bits to 0.
- SHOULD use the minimum lengths required to represent the feature fields.
The receiving node:
- MUST wait to receive
init
before sending any other messages. - MUST respond to known feature bits as specified in BOLT #9.
- upon receiving unknown odd feature bits that are non-zero:
- MUST ignore the bit.
- upon receiving unknown even feature bits that are non-zero:
- MUST fail the connection.
Rationale
This semantic allows both future incompatible changes and future backward compatible changes. Bits should generally be assigned in pairs, in order that optional features may later become compulsory.
Nodes wait for receipt of the other's features to simplify error diagnosis when features are incompatible.
The feature masks are split into local features (which only affect the protocol between these two nodes) and global features (which can affect HTLCs and are thus also advertised to other nodes).
The error
Message
For simplicity of diagnosis, it's often useful to tell a peer that something is incorrect.
- type: 17 (
error
) - data:
- [
channel_id
:channel_id
] - [
u16
:len
] - [
len*byte
:data
]
- [
The 2-byte len
field indicates the number of bytes in the immediately following field.
Requirements
The channel is referred to by channel_id
, unless channel_id
is 0 (i.e. all bytes are 0), in which case it refers to all channels.
The funding node:
- for all error messages sent before (and including) the
funding_created
message:- MUST use
temporary_channel_id
in lieu ofchannel_id
.
- MUST use
The fundee node:
- for all error messages sent before (and not including) the
funding_signed
message:- MUST use
temporary_channel_id
in lieu ofchannel_id
.
- MUST use
A sending node:
- when sending
error
:- MUST fail the channel referred to by the error message.
- SHOULD send
error
for protocol violations or internal errors that make channels unusable or that make further communication unusable. - SHOULD send
error
with the unknownchannel_id
in reply to messages of type32
-255
related to unknown channels. - MAY send an empty
data
field. - when failure was caused by an invalid signature check:
- SHOULD include the raw, hex-encoded transaction in reply to a
funding_created
,funding_signed
,closing_signed
, orcommitment_signed
message.
- SHOULD include the raw, hex-encoded transaction in reply to a
- when
channel_id
is 0:- MUST fail all channels with the receiving node.
- MUST close the connection.
- MUST set
len
equal to the length ofdata
.
The receiving node:
- upon receiving
error
:- MUST fail the channel referred to by the error message, if that channel is with the sending node.
- if no existing channel is referred to by the message:
- MUST ignore the message.
- MUST truncate
len
to the remainder of the packet (if it's larger). - if
data
is not composed solely of printable ASCII characters (For reference: the printable character set includes byte values 32 through 126, inclusive):- SHOULD NOT print out
data
verbatim.
- SHOULD NOT print out
Rationale
There are unrecoverable errors that require an abort of conversations; if the connection is simply dropped, then the peer may retry the connection. It's also useful to describe protocol violations for diagnosis, as this indicates that one peer has a bug.
It may be wise not to distinguish errors in production settings, lest
it leak information — hence, the optional data
field.
Control Messages
The ping
and pong
Messages
In order to allow for the existence of long-lived TCP connections, at times it may be required that both ends keep alive the TCP connection at the application level. Such messages also allow obfuscation of traffic patterns.
- type: 18 (
ping
) - data:
- [
u16
:num_pong_bytes
] - [
u16
:byteslen
] - [
byteslen*byte
:ignored
]
- [
The pong
message is to be sent whenever a ping
message is received. It
serves as a reply and also serves to keep the connection alive, while
explicitly notifying the other end that the receiver is still active. Within
the received ping
message, the sender will specify the number of bytes to be
included within the data payload of the pong
message.
- type: 19 (
pong
) - data:
- [
u16
:byteslen
] - [
byteslen*byte
:ignored
]
- [
Requirements
A node sending a ping
message:
- SHOULD set
ignored
to 0s. - MUST NOT set
ignored
to sensitive data such as secrets or portions of initialized memory. - if it doesn't receive a corresponding
pong
:- MAY terminate the network connection,
- and MUST NOT fail the channels in this case.
- MAY terminate the network connection,
- SHOULD NOT send
ping
messages more often than once every 30 seconds.
A node sending a pong
message:
- SHOULD set
ignored
to 0s. - MUST NOT set
ignored
to sensitive data such as secrets or portions of initialized memory.
A node receiving a ping
message:
- SHOULD fail the channels if it has received significantly in excess of one
ping
per 30 seconds. - if
num_pong_bytes
is less than 65532:- MUST respond by sending a
pong
message, withbyteslen
equal tonum_pong_bytes
.
- MUST respond by sending a
- otherwise (
num_pong_bytes
is not less than 65532):- MUST ignore the
ping
.
- MUST ignore the
A node receiving a pong
message:
- if
byteslen
does not correspond to anyping
'snum_pong_bytes
value it has sent:- MAY fail the channels.
Rationale
The largest possible message is 65535 bytes; thus, the maximum sensible byteslen
is 65531 — in order to account for the type field (pong
) and the byteslen
itself. This allows
a convenient cutoff for num_pong_bytes
to indicate that no reply should be sent.
Connections between nodes within the network may be long lived, as payment
channels have an indefinite lifetime. However, it's likely that
no new data will be
exchanged for a
significant portion of a connection's lifetime. Also, on several platforms it's possible that Lightning
clients will be put to sleep without prior warning. Hence, a
distinct ping
message is used, in order to probe for the liveness of the connection on
the other side, as well as to keep the established connection active.
Additionally, the ability for a sender to request that the receiver send a response with a particular number of bytes enables nodes on the network to create synthetic traffic. Such traffic can be used to partially defend against packet and timing analysis — as nodes can fake the traffic patterns of typical exchanges without applying any true updates to their respective channels.
When combined with the onion routing protocol defined in BOLT #4, careful statistically driven synthetic traffic can serve to further bolster the privacy of participants within the network.
Limited precautions are recommended against ping
flooding, however some
latitude is given because of network delays. Note that there are other methods
of incoming traffic flooding (e.g. sending odd unknown message types, or padding
every message maximally).
Finally, the usage of periodic ping
messages serves to promote frequent key
rotations as specified within BOLT #8.
Acknowledgments
[ TODO: (roasbeef); fin ]
References
Authors
[ FIXME: Insert Author List ]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.