1
0
mirror of https://github.com/lightning/blips.git synced 2024-11-19 00:50:02 +01:00
lightning-blips/blip-0025.md

64 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown

```
bLIP: 25
Title: Allow forwarding HTLCs with less value than the onion claims to pay
Status: Draft
Author: Valentine Wallace <vwallace@protonmail.com>
Created: 2023-05-22
License: CC0
```
## Abstract
Penultimate hops in lightning payment paths may want to take an extra fee from the payee's final
received value. To do so, they can simply forward less than the amount encoded in the onion by the
sender, and specify the exact fee they took in a new `update_add_htlc` TLV for the receiver to
verify.
## Copyright
This bLIP is licensed under the CC0 license.
## Specification
We define a TLV field for `update_add_htlc` that allows a relaying node to
relay a smaller amount than the amount encoded in the onion:
1. `tlv_stream`: `update_add_htlc_tlvs`
2. types:
1. type: 65537 (`extra_fee`)
2. data:
- [`u64`:`amount_msat`]
The writer:
* MUST set `extra_fee` to the amount of extra fee they took from the receiver's final value
The receiver:
* MUST fail the HTLC if they did not expect an extra fee to be taken or if the extra fee taken is
too high
* MUST either accept or reject the HTLC as if it had received `htlc_value + extra_fee`
## Motivation
For context, it is expected that many lightning users will be connected to the lightning network via
Lightning Service Providers (LSPs), who are responsible for managing channel liquidity on end users'
behalf.
Often, users are onboarded to these services via a just-in-time inbound channel when they first
receive a payment. However, this channel open costs money, and so liquidity providers may want to
take an extra fee so that users can help bear the cost of this initial on-chain fee.
## Rationale
While it would be possible to avoid the extra TLV record if receivers could be trusted to calculate
that the fee taken by the penultimate hop is as-expected, in practice this may be tricky to get
right. If there were a bug in this logic, a sender could exploit it by forwarding less than the
invoice's expected value, and receive proof-of-payment that they paid the full value.
## Implementation Notes
See
<https://github.com/BitcoinAndLightningLayerSpecs/lsp/tree/main/LSPS2#3--invoice-generation>
for invoice requirements if this feature is being used in the JIT channel context.
## Reference Implementations
LDK: <https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pull/2319>