core-lightning/openingd/dualopend_wire.csv
niftynei 31e3bdb42d df-spec: consolidate dual-funding patches, update feerate protocol
We consolidate to the latest/singular RFC patch for dual-funding, so
there's just a single patchfile for the change. Plus we move back to the
opener setting the desired feerate, the accepter merely declines to
participate if they disagree with the set rate.
2021-03-09 14:55:05 +10:30

9.2 KiB

1#include <bitcoin/chainparams.h>
2#include <bitcoin/psbt.h>
3#include <common/cryptomsg.h>
4#include <common/channel_config.h>
5#include <common/channel_id.h>
6#include <common/derive_basepoints.h>
7#include <common/features.h>
8#include <common/fee_states.h>
9#include <common/htlc_wire.h>
10#include <common/penalty_base.h>
11#include <common/per_peer_state.h>
12# Which network are we configured for?
13# Base configuration we'll offer
14# Minimum/maximum configuration values we'll accept
15# Constraints in case the other end tries to open a channel.
16# Optional msg to send.
17# master-dualopend: peer has reconnected
18# Optional msg to send.
19# master->dualopend: reply back with our first funding info/contribs
20# master->dualopend: reply back with our funding info/contribs
21# dualopend->master: is this a valid RBF candidate transaction?
22# master->dualopend: this is a valid RBF candidate transaction
23# master->dualopend: attempt an RBF
24# dualopend->master: ready to commit channel open to database and
25# get some signatures for the funding_tx.
26# dualopend->master: peer updated the psbt
27# master->dualopend: we updated the psbt
28# master->dualopend: fail this channel open
29# dualopend->master received tx_sigs from peer
30# master->dualopend send our tx_sigs to peer
31# dualopend->master tx sigs transmitted to peer
32# dualopend->peer peer locked channel
33# dualopend->master this channel has been locked
34# master->dualopend funding reached depth; tell peer
35# Tell peer to shut down channel.
36# Peer told us that channel is shutting down
37# Peer presented proof it was from the future.
38# master -> dualopend: do you have a memleak?