If you run locally, it fails occasionally; presumably because it
sees previous funds. Use a random HSM key for that teste.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can tell this more generically because the count of revocations
received != count of commitments sent. This is the correct condition
which allows us to restore the test we had to eliminate in
c3cb7f1c85.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Due to the large number of changes in phrasing, we'd have a large
number of CI builds failing. So just temporarily disable BOLT
checking.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
As per the pending spec change: the other implementations use version 2,
and the current best practice advice (from maaku) is to use the latest
defined tx version.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
estimatesmartfee 4 ECONOMICAL was too high for lnd, so drop it, with some
increased security risk.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The filter is being populated while initializing the daemon and by
adding new keys as they are being generated. The filter is then used
in connect_block to identify transactions of interest.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This is mainly used to filter for transactions that may be of interest
to us, i.e., whether one of our keys is the recipient. It currently
does onyl simple scriptpubkey checks, but will eventually be extended
to use bloomfilters and add more sophisticated checks.
For now the goal is to speed up the processing of blocks during startup.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
I noticed some breakage with git master:
1. getinfo no longer supported (for us, use getblockchaininfo)
2. generate no longer supported (use generatetoaddress)
Both these options are supported at least in 0.15, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We weren't incrementing the `col` for the `local_shutdown_idx` field,
which meant that all following fields were incorrect. I removed the
`col` computation and opted for absolute indices instead, since they
are way less brittle. Just remember to add new fields to the query at
the end so we don't have to shift too often :-)
Reported-by: William Casarin @jb55
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This addresses a performance regression introduced by
6ceb375650. We were storing it in an
otherwise empty DB transaction, which means that DB transaction was no
longer a no-op. Now we defer storing until we need to store the
corresponding HTLC anyway, so we can just piggyback on top of that
transaction.
This is also more consistent since we'd be forgetting the payment
anyway if we restart between adding the HTLC and committing to it.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This seems to happen when we manage to check between the
channel_announcement and the channel_update being processed.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Add two simple tests: one for a single direct payment and one with
hundreds of parallel payments, reusing the same route.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We only send them when we're not awaiting revoke_and_ack: our
simplified handling can't deal with multiple in flights.
Closes: #244
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can have it happen on reconnect due to fee changes; we should really
detect this case, but it's harmless to let it happen as a noop.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Handling feerates for the fundee (who only receives fee_update) is
simple: it's practically atomic since we accept commitment and send
revocation, thus they're applied to both sides at once.
Handling feerates for the funder is more complex: in theory we could
have multiple in flight. However, if we avoid this using the same
logic as we use to suppress multiple commitments in flight, it's
simple again.
We fix the test code to use real feerate manipulation, thus have to
remove an assert about feerate being non-zero. And now we have
feechanges, we need to rely on the changes_pending flags, as we can
have changes without an HTLCs changing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The wire protocol uses this, in the assumption that we'll never see feerates
in excess of 4294967 satoshi per kiloweight.
So let's use that consistently internally as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
