local_chan was mainly around so we could "soft" disable channels (and
really disable them once we used the channel_update in an error
message).
Instead we introduce the idea of a "deferred_update": it's either
deferred indefinitely (a peer goes offline, if we need to send it in
an error we'll apply it immediatly), or simply delayed to avoid
spamming everyone.
The resulting rewrite is much clearer, IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Increasingly we want to know is it local, and get the direction: it's
more efficient to do both at once.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Once connectd is doing this, we can't close as soon as we send,
and in fact we can't do 'fail write' either.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These would have to be done by connectd, not the local daemon, once it's
intermediating. Otherwise the remote peer won't see any change.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The "read until closed" trick doesn't work if the other end doesn't
close (as found in the next patch, where we use DEV_DISCONNECT_DISABLE_AFTER).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
connectd is going to end up using this do demux; make it fast and complete.
Fixing this reveals a problem in openingd: it now extracts the channel_id
from funding_signed (which is where we transition off the temporary), and
gets upset. So fix that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. Freeing an unconfirmed channel already releases the subd, so don't
do that explicitly.
2. Use channel->owner to transfer ownership where possible, using
channel_set_owner() which handles all the cases.
This simplifies the code and makes it more readable, IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fire off a snapshot of current account balances (node wallet + every
'active' channel) after we've caught up to the chain tip for the *first*
time (in other words, on start).
We need to stash/save the amount of the lease fees on a leased channel,
we do this by re-using the 'push' amount field on channel (which is
technically correct, since we're essentially pushing the fee amount to
the peer).
Also updates a bit of how the pushes are accounted for (pushed to now
has an event; their channel will open at zero but then they'll
immediately register a push event).
Leases fees are treated exactly the same as pushes, except labeled
differently.
Required adding a 'lease_fee' field to the inflights so we keep track of
the fee for the lease until the open happens.
If we initialized the payment, the fees are the entire fee-chain
(final hop amount - starting hop amount)
If it's a payment we routed, the fees are the diff between the
inbound htlc and the outbound (net gain by this routing)
Added to database so data persists nicely.
We record the amount of fees collected for a routed payment. For
simplicity's sake on the data agg side, we record the fee payment on
*BOTH* the incoming htlc and the outgoing htlc. Note that this results
in double counting if you add up the fees from both an in-routed and
out-routed payment.
Get rid of the 'movement_idx', since we replay events now.
Since we're removing a field from the 'coin_movement' event emission, we
bump the version type.
Changelog-Updated: `coin_movements` events have been revamped and are now on version 2.
we used this originally to suppress duplicate issuance of coin-move
events; we're assuming that any plugin expects duplicate events though
(and knows how to de-dupe them), so we no longer need this logic.
test_onchain_dust_out restarts a node, which produces duplicate events.
this is expected, but we need to de-duplicate the events stream to get
accurate results
The old model of coin movements attempted to compute fees etc and log
amounts, not utxos. This is not as robust, as multi-party opens and dual
funded channels make it hard to account for fees etc correctly.
Instead, we move towards a 'utxo' view of the onchain events. Every
event is either the creation or 'destruction' of a utxo. For cases where
the value of the utxo is not (fully) debited/credited to our account, we
also record the output_value. E.g. channel closings spend a utxo who's
entire value we may not own.
Since we're now tracking UTXOs onchain, we can now do more complex
assertions about the onchain footprint of them. The integration tests
have been updated to now use more 'chain aware' assertions about the
ending state.
we assume that every event coming from onchaind is for that channel's
account, but now that we sometimes track external + wallet events from
onchaind, we should only add the channel account name if there's nothing
set there already
we're pivoting from a txid based world to a outpoint based world. every
coin movement (onchain) will correspond with a outpoint; only the spend
of an outpoint will have a tx_txid
We're not going to do 'spend tracks' any more; instead we'll emit an
event whenever an output is included in a broadcast tx
(even if the broadcast fails!!)
Suggested-by: Rusty Russell
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Changelog-Changed: Support hsm specific error error code in lightning-cli
You have to manually run "make extract-bolt-csv" to recreate the
spec files, so we didn't notice that I forgot to check this in :(
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we have the exact state of the channels from the `listpeers`
response we can filter out the ones that are not yet normal or not
anymore. This is more of a safety net, given that the `gossip_store`
should contain local disables, but better not be racy :-)
Changelog-None
