Since most callers use positional arguments, we should allow a 'null'
literal where we require no value at all.
Also adds some more value tests.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Paid invoices need to know how much was actually paid: both for the case
where no 'msatoshi' amount was specified, and for the normal case, where
clients are permitted to overpay in order to help them disguise their
payments.
While we migrate the db, we leave this field as 0 for old paid
invoices. This is unhelpful for accounting, but at least clearly
indicates what happened if we find this in the wild.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
'rhash' is the old terminology, but 'payment_preimage' and
'payment_hash' were decided on for the BOLTs, so we should fix that here.
We still use rhash internally, but that's much easier to fix.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Different commands (listinvoice, delinvoice, waitinvoice,
waitanyinvoice) returned different fields, as not all were updated.
This makes them uniform.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This reuses the same code internally, and also now means that we deal
correctly with "any" msatoshi invoices: the old code would a return
'msatoshi' of 0 in that case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The manfile and the online help use 'msatoshi', the returned
response uses 'msatoshi', nearly every invoice-related
monetary amount is labelled 'msatoshi' and not 'amount'.
> assert [c['active'] for c in l2.rpc.getchannels()['channels']] == [True, True]
E AssertionError: assert [False, True] == [True, True]
E At index 0 diff: False != True
E Full diff:
E - [False, True]
E + [True, True]
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to make sure all the updates are known to gossip. Since
one is the local update, we change that message to look the same.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Receiving them in channeld is not enough to avoid the race:
route = l1.rpc.getroute(l3.info['id'], 4999999, 1)["route"]
...
ValueError: RPC call failed: Could not find a route
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We wait the the receipt of the CHANNEL_UPDATE message by channeld,
but that doesn't mean it reached gossipd yet, causing spurious test
failure.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were using int32 for msatoshi values for outputs, which would
overflow for values larger than 2^32.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Otherwise, we otherwise end up with out-of-order updates
(ie. preceeding announcements).
I assume that is because of the locally-inserted connections.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is done it two parts, since we have to ask the main daemon to do
the lookup for us.
If this becomes a bottleneck, we can have a separate daemon, or even
an RPC pipe to bitcoind ourselves.
Fixes: #403
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It would be nice if bitcoind had an RPC to do this in one, but that's
a bit much to ask for. We could also hand around proofs, for lite nodes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. htlc->fail has been changed to a u8 *.
2. wallet_get_newindex saves to the db.
3. peer->next_htlc_id is saved to the db in peer_save_commitsig_sent() below.
4. We do store commit in peer_save_commitsig_received(peer, commitnum),
and the fixme below talks about HTLC sigs.
5. We do commit shachain and next_per_commit_point in wallet_shachain_add_hash
and update_per_commit_point respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We used to use a hack for gossip_resolve_channel_reply, where we'd send
a NULL key on failure. It's now been neatened to use a counter, so we
don't need this.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
