This marks all channels around the source node as free (no delay, no fee). This is normally what we want, if we are calculating a path for ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In general, we should be using tmpctx unless there's a specific reason not to.
It's clear, and simplifies the code somewhat.
If tmpctx is not cleaned often enough, we can look at a per-MCF context, but this
seems like premature optimization.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We let the caller choose mu, and iterate if necessary: it can also
check its limits for fees, etc. Rationalize it to 0-100 inclusive for
human consumption.
This means we don't loop internally, and in fact there's only one
failure mode: we cannot find enough capacity.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't know anything about most channels, so we create an array of
fp16_t containing them. We zero out ones where we do know something,
and use the previous code as the slow path.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means we never have to look up a local channel when asked the capacity.
We mark these dummy constraints with an MAX timestamp.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We apply all the gossmods for the layers they specified, and create a
naive routine to give the capacity of a channel given those layers.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
They tell us what paths they're using, so we can adjust capacity estimates
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Header from folded patch 'reserve-fixup.patch':
fixup! askrene: reservation implementation.
These are the repositories of all information.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Header from folded patch 'layers-fixup.patch':
fixup! askrene: add layers infrastructure.
This avoids globals (and means memleak traverses the variables!): we
only change over the test plugin though, to avoid unnecessary churn.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we actually check the other fields too, as per BOLT!
Reported-by: https://github.com/hMsatsFixes: #7513
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In CI, this would sometimes fail: we would timeout waiting for the
fetchinvoice reply. Never happened locally, so was annoying to debug.
What happened was simple: we called injectonionmessage then when it
returned, put the "sent" object in the linked list so we could recognize
any reply onion messages.
However, we were getting that reply before the plugin processed the response
to injectonionmessage. This is possible because there are two fds for
plugins: one for it to receive notifications and hooks (like onion messages)
and one for normal RPC usage (like commands to inject onion messages).
The fix is simple: put in the list *before* calling JSON RPC.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a final sweep to match the current BOLT12 text:
1563d13999d342680140c693de0b9d65aa522372 ("More bolt12 test vectors.")
Only two code changes, to change the order of checks to match the bolt,
and to give a warning on decode if a path is empty.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: offers: `invoicerequest` will set a blinded path if we're an unannounced node.
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: offers: `sendinvoice` will use a blinded path in an invoice_request, if specified.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's an internal undocumented interface, which makes this change less painful.
We *do* check that the invreq_metadata maps to the given invreq_payer_id, which would
is required for us to sign it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
They can do it now: before it would have been awkward to look up previous
payments to match it up for recurring offers (which need to use the same
key, hence the same invreq_metadata).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
invoice_path_id is actually a generic path_id thing, so rename it.
We're going to use the same scheme for path secrets and the tweak to
node_id when we create a fake pubkey for invoice_requests, so a new
header is appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The latest spec allows this to be omitted iff there is a blinded path
and it would be made up anyway.
In that case, the key they will use to sign the invoice will be the final
blinded key in the path we use.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The latest draft allows these experimental ranges, which involves more
changes than I expected.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: offers: handle experimental ranges in offers/invoice_requests/invoices.
Things are often equivalent but different types:
1. u8 arrays in libwally.
2. sha256
3. Secrets derived via sha256
4. txids
Rather than open-coding a BUILD_ASSERT & memcpy, create a macro to do it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: pay can now pay to bolt12 invoices if entry to blinded hop is specified as a short_channel_id (rather than node id).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This also lets us test offers and invoices work if we are the start of
the blinded path.
Changelog-Added: offers: automatically add a blinded path from a peer if we have no public channels, so unannounced nodes can have offers too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use this for invoices published by unannounced nodes: want
something very similar for offers, so generalize and expose it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Ideally, we would be able to submit a payment exactly as an incoming
HTLC would, but our forwarding and decoding logic is currently very
much tied to the HTLC. It would be wonderful to detach that and
have an "injectonion" interface which was unwrapped like any other
(see "injectonionmessage") which would handle self-pay without any
special paths.
Since I'm not prepared to rewrite that all now, instead we use an
interface to decrypt the first hop if it's us, and use the remainder
of the blinded path.
Changelog-Fixed: plugins: pay can now pay a bolt12 invoice even if we, ourselves, are the head of the blinded path within it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For bolt12, we have blinded paths so we route to the head of the blinded
path, which may not be the same as the final payment destination.
This matters mainly for detecting self-pay.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
