bitcoin/test
Wladimir J. van der Laan 3caee16946
Merge #19953: Implement BIP 340-342 validation (Schnorr/taproot/tapscript)
0e2a5e448f tests: dumping and minimizing of script assets data (Pieter Wuille)
4567ba034c tests: add generic qa-asset-based script verification unit test (Pieter Wuille)
f06e6d0345 tests: functional tests for Schnorr/Taproot/Tapscript (Pieter Wuille)
3c226639eb tests: add BIP340 Schnorr signature support to test framework (Pieter Wuille)
206fb180ec --- [TAPROOT] Tests --- (Pieter Wuille)
d7ff237f29 Activate Taproot/Tapscript on regtest (BIP 341, BIP 342) (Pieter Wuille)
e9a021d7e6 Make Taproot spends standard + policy limits (Pieter Wuille)
865d2c37e2 --- [TAPROOT] Regtest activation and policy --- (Pieter Wuille)
72422ce396 Implement Tapscript script validation rules (BIP 342) (Johnson Lau)
330de894a9 Use ScriptExecutionData to pass through annex hash (Pieter Wuille)
8bbed4b7ac Implement Taproot validation (BIP 341) (Pieter Wuille)
0664f5fe1f Support for Schnorr signatures and integration in SignatureCheckers (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille)
5de246ca81 Implement Taproot signature hashing (BIP 341) (Johnson Lau)
9eb590894f Add TaggedHash function (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille)
450d2b2371 --- [TAPROOT] BIP340/341/342 consensus rules --- (Pieter Wuille)
5d62e3a68b refactor: keep spent outputs in PrecomputedTransactionData (Pieter Wuille)
8bd2b4e784 refactor: rename scriptPubKey in VerifyWitnessProgram to exec_script (Pieter Wuille)
107b57df9f scripted-diff: put ECDSA in name of signature functions (Pieter Wuille)
f8c099e220 --- [TAPROOT] Refactors --- (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  This is an implementation of the Schnorr/taproot consensus rules proposed by BIPs [340](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), [341](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), and [342](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki).

  See the list of commits [below](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#issuecomment-691815830). No signing or wallet support of any kind is included, as testing is done entirely through the Python test framework.

  This is a successor to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977 (see discussion following [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977#issuecomment-682285983)), and will have further changes squashed/rebased. The history of this PR can be found in #19997.

ACKs for top commit:
  instagibbs:
    reACK 0e2a5e448f
  benthecarman:
    reACK 0e2a5e4
  kallewoof:
    reACK 0e2a5e448f
  jonasnick:
    ACK 0e2a5e448f almost only looked at bip340/libsecp related code
  jonatack:
    ACK 0e2a5e448f modulo the last four commits (tests) that I plan to finish reviewing tomorrow
  fjahr:
    reACK 0e2a5e448f
  achow101:
    ACK 0e2a5e448f

Tree-SHA512: 1b00314450a2938a22bccbb4e177230cf08bd365d72055f9d526891f334b364c997e260c10bc19ca78440b6767712c9feea7faad9a1045dd51a5b96f7ca8146e
2020-10-15 10:22:35 +02:00
..
functional Merge #19953: Implement BIP 340-342 validation (Schnorr/taproot/tapscript) 2020-10-15 10:22:35 +02:00
fuzz test/fuzz: add a seed corpus generation option to the test_runner 2020-08-23 23:09:26 +02:00
lint Merge #20069: test: Mention commit id in scripted diff error 2020-10-04 09:09:38 +02:00
sanitizer_suppressions policy/fees: remove a floating-point division by zero 2020-09-14 16:23:23 +02:00
util
config.ini.in test: Explain that a bug should be filed when the test fail 2020-05-29 15:33:54 -04:00
get_previous_releases.py util: Hard code previous release tarball checksums 2020-08-29 11:28:53 +03:00
README.md test: Bump linter versions 2020-06-22 20:15:53 +02:00

This directory contains integration tests that test bitcoind and its utilities in their entirety. It does not contain unit tests, which can be found in /src/test, /src/wallet/test, etc.

This directory contains the following sets of tests:

  • functional which test the functionality of bitcoind and bitcoin-qt by interacting with them through the RPC and P2P interfaces.
  • util which tests the bitcoin utilities, currently only bitcoin-tx.
  • lint which perform various static analysis checks.

The util tests are run as part of make check target. The functional tests and lint scripts can be run as explained in the sections below.

Running tests locally

Before tests can be run locally, Bitcoin Core must be built. See the building instructions for help.

Functional tests

Dependencies

The ZMQ functional test requires a python ZMQ library. To install it:

  • on Unix, run sudo apt-get install python3-zmq
  • on mac OS, run pip3 install pyzmq

Running the tests

Individual tests can be run by directly calling the test script, e.g.:

test/functional/feature_rbf.py

or can be run through the test_runner harness, eg:

test/functional/test_runner.py feature_rbf.py

You can run any combination (incl. duplicates) of tests by calling:

test/functional/test_runner.py <testname1> <testname2> <testname3> ...

Wildcard test names can be passed, if the paths are coherent and the test runner is called from a bash shell or similar that does the globbing. For example, to run all the wallet tests:

test/functional/test_runner.py test/functional/wallet*
functional/test_runner.py functional/wallet* (called from the test/ directory)
test_runner.py wallet* (called from the test/functional/ directory)

but not

test/functional/test_runner.py wallet*

Combinations of wildcards can be passed:

test/functional/test_runner.py ./test/functional/tool* test/functional/mempool*
test_runner.py tool* mempool*

Run the regression test suite with:

test/functional/test_runner.py

Run all possible tests with

test/functional/test_runner.py --extended

By default, up to 4 tests will be run in parallel by test_runner. To specify how many jobs to run, append --jobs=n

The individual tests and the test_runner harness have many command-line options. Run test/functional/test_runner.py -h to see them all.

Troubleshooting and debugging test failures

Resource contention

The P2P and RPC ports used by the bitcoind nodes-under-test are chosen to make conflicts with other processes unlikely. However, if there is another bitcoind process running on the system (perhaps from a previous test which hasn't successfully killed all its bitcoind nodes), then there may be a port conflict which will cause the test to fail. It is recommended that you run the tests on a system where no other bitcoind processes are running.

On linux, the test framework will warn if there is another bitcoind process running when the tests are started.

If there are zombie bitcoind processes after test failure, you can kill them by running the following commands. Note that these commands will kill all bitcoind processes running on the system, so should not be used if any non-test bitcoind processes are being run.

killall bitcoind

or

pkill -9 bitcoind
Data directory cache

A pre-mined blockchain with 200 blocks is generated the first time a functional test is run and is stored in test/cache. This speeds up test startup times since new blockchains don't need to be generated for each test. However, the cache may get into a bad state, in which case tests will fail. If this happens, remove the cache directory (and make sure bitcoind processes are stopped as above):

rm -rf test/cache
killall bitcoind
Test logging

The tests contain logging at five different levels (DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR and CRITICAL). From within your functional tests you can log to these different levels using the logger included in the test_framework, e.g. self.log.debug(object). By default:

  • when run through the test_runner harness, all logs are written to test_framework.log and no logs are output to the console.
  • when run directly, all logs are written to test_framework.log and INFO level and above are output to the console.
  • when run by our CI (Continuous Integration), no logs are output to the console. However, if a test fails, the test_framework.log and bitcoind debug.logs will all be dumped to the console to help troubleshooting.

These log files can be located under the test data directory (which is always printed in the first line of test output):

  • <test data directory>/test_framework.log
  • <test data directory>/node<node number>/regtest/debug.log.

The node number identifies the relevant test node, starting from node0, which corresponds to its position in the nodes list of the specific test, e.g. self.nodes[0].

To change the level of logs output to the console, use the -l command line argument.

test_framework.log and bitcoind debug.logs can be combined into a single aggregate log by running the combine_logs.py script. The output can be plain text, colorized text or html. For example:

test/functional/combine_logs.py -c <test data directory> | less -r

will pipe the colorized logs from the test into less.

Use --tracerpc to trace out all the RPC calls and responses to the console. For some tests (eg any that use submitblock to submit a full block over RPC), this can result in a lot of screen output.

By default, the test data directory will be deleted after a successful run. Use --nocleanup to leave the test data directory intact. The test data directory is never deleted after a failed test.

Attaching a debugger

A python debugger can be attached to tests at any point. Just add the line:

import pdb; pdb.set_trace()

anywhere in the test. You will then be able to inspect variables, as well as call methods that interact with the bitcoind nodes-under-test.

If further introspection of the bitcoind instances themselves becomes necessary, this can be accomplished by first setting a pdb breakpoint at an appropriate location, running the test to that point, then using gdb (or lldb on macOS) to attach to the process and debug.

For instance, to attach to self.node[1] during a run you can get the pid of the node within pdb.

(pdb) self.node[1].process.pid

Alternatively, you can find the pid by inspecting the temp folder for the specific test you are running. The path to that folder is printed at the beginning of every test run:

2017-06-27 14:13:56.686000 TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/user/1000/testo9vsdjo3

Use the path to find the pid file in the temp folder:

cat /tmp/user/1000/testo9vsdjo3/node1/regtest/bitcoind.pid

Then you can use the pid to start gdb:

gdb /home/example/bitcoind <pid>

Note: gdb attach step may require ptrace_scope to be modified, or sudo preceding the gdb. See this link for considerations: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/security/Yama.txt

Often while debugging rpc calls from functional tests, the test might reach timeout before process can return a response. Use --timeout-factor 0 to disable all rpc timeouts for that partcular functional test. Ex: test/functional/wallet_hd.py --timeout-factor 0.

Profiling

An easy way to profile node performance during functional tests is provided for Linux platforms using perf.

Perf will sample the running node and will generate profile data in the node's datadir. The profile data can then be presented using perf report or a graphical tool like hotspot.

To generate a profile during test suite runs, use the --perf flag.

To see render the output to text, run

perf report -i /path/to/datadir/send-big-msgs.perf.data.xxxx --stdio | c++filt | less

For ways to generate more granular profiles, see the README in test/functional.

Util tests

Util tests can be run locally by running test/util/bitcoin-util-test.py. Use the -v option for verbose output.

Lint tests

Dependencies

Lint test Dependency Version used by CI Installation
lint-python.sh flake8 3.8.3 pip3 install flake8==3.8.3
lint-python.sh mypy 0.781 pip3 install mypy==0.781
lint-shell.sh ShellCheck 0.7.1 details...
lint-shell.sh yq default pip3 install yq
lint-spelling.sh codespell 1.17.1 pip3 install codespell==1.17.1

Please be aware that on Linux distributions all dependencies are usually available as packages, but could be outdated.

Running the tests

Individual tests can be run by directly calling the test script, e.g.:

test/lint/lint-filenames.sh

You can run all the shell-based lint tests by running:

test/lint/lint-all.sh

Writing functional tests

You are encouraged to write functional tests for new or existing features. Further information about the functional test framework and individual tests is found in test/functional.