mirrors/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-02-22 06:52:36 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
34596 commits 6 branches 321 tags 5.8 GiB
C++ 56.4%
C 22.6%
Python 17.7%
CMake 1%
Shell 0.8%
Other 1.3%
Find a file
MacroFake a7f3479ba3
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25353: Add a -mempoolfullrbf node setting 
4c9666bd73 Mention `mempoolfullrbf` in policy/mempool-replacements.md (Antoine Riard)
aae66ab43d Update getmempoolinfo RPC with `mempoolfullrbf` (Antoine Riard)
3e27e31727 Introduce `mempoolfullrbf` node setting. (Antoine Riard)

Pull request description:

  This is ready for review.

  Recent discussions among LN devs have brought back on the surface concerns about the security of multi-party funded transactions against pinnings attacks and other mempool-based nuisances. The lack of full-rbf transaction-relay topology connected to miners open the way to cheap and naive DoS against multi-party funded transactions (e.g coinjoins, dual-funded channels, on-chain DLCs, ...) without solutions introducing an overhead cost or centralization vectors afaik . For more details, see [0].

  This PR implements a simple `fullrbf` setting, where the node always allows transaction replacement, ignoring BIP125 opt-in flag. The default value of the setting stays **false**, therefore opt-in replacement is still the default Bitcoin Core replacement policy. Contrary to a previous proposal of mine and listening to feedbacks collected since then [1], I think this new setting simply offers more flexibility in a node transaction-relay policy suiting one's application requirements, without arguing a change of the default behavior.

  I [posted](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-June/020557.html) on the ML to invite operators with a bitcoin application sensitive to full-rbf (e.g dual-funded LN channels service providers) or mempool researchers to join a bootstrapped full-rbf activated peers network for experimentation and learning. If people have strong opinions against the existence of such full-rbf transaction-relay network, I'm proposing to express them on the future thread.

  [0] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2021-May/003033.html
  [1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-June/019074.html

  Follow-up suggestions :
  - soft-enable opt-in RBF in the wallet : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353#issuecomment-1154918789
  - p2p discovery and additional outbound connection to full-rbf peers : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353#issuecomment-1156044401
  - match the code between RPC, wallet and mempool about disregard of inherited signaling : #22698

ACKs for top commit:
  instagibbs:
    reACK 4c9666bd73
  glozow:
    ACK 4c9666bd73, a few nits which are non-blocking.
  w0xlt:
    ACK 4c9666bd73

Tree-SHA512: 9e288bf22e06a9808804e58178444ef1830c3fdd42fd8a7cd7ffb101f8f586e08b000679be407d63ca76a56f7216227b368ff630c81f3fac3243db1a1202ab1c
2022-07-08 11:06:24 +02:00
.github doc: Remove label from good first issue template 2020-08-24 09:31:24 +02:00
.tx qt: Update transifex resource blob to 23.0 2022-02-03 13:18:28 +01:00
build-aux/m4 build: stop overriding user CXXFLAGS 2022-04-03 19:36:17 +01:00
build_msvc build: Clean up build_msvc/libsecp256k1_config.h 2022-06-28 23:48:49 +02:00
ci Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25447: fuzz: add low-level target for txorphanage 2022-07-07 14:03:52 +02:00
contrib Remove my key from trusted-keys 2022-07-07 16:53:48 -04:00
depends build: suppress array-bounds errors in libxkbcommon 2022-06-23 17:29:31 +01:00
doc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25353: Add a -mempoolfullrbf node setting 2022-07-08 11:06:24 +02:00
share doc: replace bitcoin.conf with placeholder file 2022-05-02 15:38:07 +02:00
src Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25353: Add a -mempoolfullrbf node setting 2022-07-08 11:06:24 +02:00
test Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25353: Add a -mempoolfullrbf node setting 2022-07-08 11:06:24 +02:00
.cirrus.yml Revert "ci: Increase CPU number for "Win64 native" task" 2022-06-27 14:01:08 +02:00
.editorconfig ci: Drop AppVeyor CI integration 2021-09-07 06:12:53 +03:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore refactor: cleanups post unsubtree'ing univalue 2022-06-15 12:56:44 +01:00
.python-version Bump minimum python version to 3.6 2020-11-09 17:53:47 +10:00
.style.yapf test: .style.yapf: Set column_limit=160 2019-03-04 18:28:13 -05:00
autogen.sh scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2019 2019-12-30 10:42:20 +13:00
configure.ac build: use BOOST_NO_CXX98_FUNCTION_BASE to suppress warnings 2022-06-23 17:29:37 +01:00
CONTRIBUTING.md doc: Explain squashing with merge commits 2022-05-24 08:17:41 +02:00
COPYING doc: Update license year range to 2022 2022-01-03 04:48:41 +08:00
INSTALL.md doc: Added hyperlink for doc/build 2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
libbitcoinconsensus.pc.in build: remove libcrypto as internal dependency in libbitcoinconsensus.pc 2019-11-19 15:03:44 +01:00
Makefile.am refactor: cleanups post unsubtree'ing univalue 2022-06-15 12:56:44 +01:00
README.md Squashed 'src/minisketch/' changes from 7eeb778fef..47f0a2d26f 2022-06-29 16:35:02 +01:00
REVIEWERS test: port 'lint-shell.sh' to python 2022-05-05 08:44:08 -05:00
SECURITY.md doc: Suggest keys.openpgp.org as keyserver in SECURITY.md 2021-11-08 12:22:04 +01:00

README.md

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.