d8b12a75db rpc: Allow named and positional arguments to be used together (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
It's nice to be able to use named options and positional arguments together.
Most shell tools accept both, and python functions combine options and arguments allowing them to be passed with even more flexibility. This change adds support for python's approach so as a motivating example:
```sh
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet wallet_name=mywallet load_on_startup=1
```
Can be shortened to:
```sh
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet mywallet load_on_startup=1
```
JSON-RPC standard doesn't have a convention for passing named and positional parameters together, so this implementation makes one up and interprets any unused `"args"` named parameter as a positional parameter array.
This change is backwards compatible. It doesn't change the interpretation of any previously valid calls, just treats some previously invalid calls as valid.
Another use case even if you only occasionally use named arguments is that you can define an alias:
```
alias bcli='bitcoin-cli -named'
```
And now use both named named and unnamed arguments from the same alias without having to manually add `-named` option for named arguments or see annoying error "No '=' in named argument... this needs to be present for every argument (even if it is empty)`" for unnamed arguments
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d8b12a75db
stickies-v:
re-ACK d8b12a75d
aureleoules:
re-ACK d8b12a75db
Tree-SHA512: 0cff8b50f584bcbbd376624adccf40536566ed8d1bcd6c88ad565dbc208f19d5e7a48c994efd6329d42b560149340d330397278f08a2912af5f3418d8c8837a9
fa84df1f03 scripted-diff: wallet: rename AvailableCoinsParams members to snake_case (furszy)
61c2265629 wallet: group AvailableCoins filtering parameters in a single struct (furszy)
f0f6a3577b RPC: listunspent, add "include immature coinbase" flag (furszy)
Pull request description:
Simple PR; adds a "include_immature_coinbase" flag to `listunspent` to include the immature coinbase UTXOs on the response. Requested by #25728.
ACKs for top commit:
danielabrozzoni:
reACK fa84df1f03
achow101:
ACK fa84df1f03
aureleoules:
reACK fa84df1f03
kouloumos:
reACK fa84df1f03
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa84df1f03
Tree-SHA512: 0f3544cb8cfd0378a5c74594480f78e9e919c6cfb73a83e0f3112f8a0132a9147cf846f999eab522cea9ef5bd3ffd60690ea2ca367dde457b0554d7f38aec792
It's nice to be able to use named options and positional arguments together.
Most shell tools accept both, and python functions combine options and
arguments allowing them to be passed with even more flexibility. This change
adds support for python's approach so as a motivating example:
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet wallet_name=mywallet load_on_startup=1
Can be shortened to:
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet mywallet load_on_startup=1
JSON-RPC standard doesn't have a convention for passing named and positional
parameters together, so this implementation makes one up and interprets any
unused "args" named parameter as a positional parameter array.
1184a66347 doc: Rearrange some lines in the dependency graph of libraries (Stacie Waleyko)
Pull request description:
In this PR, I've attempted to improve readability in the [dependency graph of libraries](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/design/libraries.md) by untangling a few crossed lines. I'm not sure if this is that big of an improvement but wanted to throw it out there.
I used an extremely scientific method of manually counting the number of crossed lines in the original diagram and got 15. This PR reduces that number down to about 10.
I also changed the curve of the lines to "basis" which rounds the edges out. Again, not sure if it really is that much of an improvement, but it seems marginally easier on the eyes.
Here is what the new graph looks like rendered:
The changes can be verified independently with [Mermaid](https://mermaid-js.github.io/mermaid/#/), with the easiest way being the online editor: https://mermaid.live/
I did try moving some more stuff around, particularly the top level of library callers, but was not able to simplify the graph any further.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK 1184a66347
Tree-SHA512: 61d33d68c1e6fa354aebdda5e06e9c7a722ca20886c6acc30dd08af7133d737130d7a646d87f9e5a8ae0bc5a5aabfbc64ded9ee04dfeed8f23d948444add916b
a8250e30f1 doc: add release note about `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
5c96020024 doc: add `/deploymentinfo` in REST-interface (brunoerg)
3e44bee08e test: add coverage for `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
91497031cb rest: add `/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
#23508 added a new RPC named `getdeploymentinfo`, it moved the softfork section from `getblockchaininfo` into this new one. In the REST interface, we have an endpoint named`/rest/chaininfo.json` (which refers to `getblockchaininfo`), so, this PR adds a new REST endpoint named `/deploymentinfo` which refers to `getdeploymentinfo`.
You can use it by passing a block hash, e.g: '/rest/deploymentinfo/<BLOCKHASH>.json' or you can use it without passing a block hash to get the 'deploymentinfo' for the last block.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK a8250e30f1 rebase-only since my last review at c65f82bb
achow101:
ACK a8250e30f1
stickies-v:
re-ACK a8250e30f1
Tree-SHA512: 0735183b6828d51a72ed0e2be5a09b314ac4693f548982c6e9adaa0ef07a55aa428d3b2d1b1de70b83169811a663a8624b686166e5797f624dcc00178b9796e6
bf95976061 doc: add note about snapshot chainstate init (James O'Beirne)
e4d7995286 test: add testcases for snapshot initialization (James O'Beirne)
cced4e7336 test: move-only-ish: factor out LoadVerifyActivateChainstate() (James O'Beirne)
51fc9241c0 test: allow on-disk coins and block tree dbs in tests (James O'Beirne)
3c361391b8 test: add reset_chainstate parameter for snapshot unittests (James O'Beirne)
00b357c215 validation: add ResetChainstates() (James O'Beirne)
3a29dfbfb2 move-only: test: make snapshot chainstate setup reusable (James O'Beirne)
8153bd9247 blockmanager: avoid undefined behavior during FlushBlockFile (James O'Beirne)
ad67ff377c validation: remove snapshot datadirs upon validation failure (James O'Beirne)
34d1590331 add utilities for deleting on-disk leveldb data (James O'Beirne)
252abd1e8b init: add utxo snapshot detection (James O'Beirne)
f9f1735f13 validation: rename snapshot chainstate dir (James O'Beirne)
d14bebf100 db: add StoragePath to CDBWrapper/CCoinsViewDB (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606)
---
Half of the replacement for #24232. The original PR grew larger than expected throughout the review process.
This change adds the ability to initialize a snapshot-based chainstate during init if one is detected on disk. This is of course unused as of now (aside from in unittests) given that we haven't yet enabled actually loading snapshots.
Don't be scared! There are some big move-only commits in here.
Accompanying changes include:
- moving the snapshot coinsdb directory from being called `chainstate_[base blockhash]` to `chainstate_snapshot`, since we only support one snapshot in use at a time. This simplifies some logic, but it necessitates writing that base blockhash out to a file within the coinsdb dir. See [discussion here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24232#discussion_r832762880).
- adding a simple fix in `FlushBlockFile()` that avoids a crash when attemping to flush to disk before `LoadBlockIndexDB()` is called, which happens when calling `MaybeRebalanceCaches()` during multiple chainstate init.
- improving the unittest to allow testing with on-disk chainstates - necessary to test a simulated restart and re-initialization.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK bf95976061
ariard:
Code Review ACK bf9597606
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bf95976061. Changes since last review: rebasing, switching from CAutoFile to AutoFile, adding comments, switching from BOOST_CHECK to Assert in test util, using chainman.GetMutex() in tests, destroying one ChainstateManager before creating a new one in tests
fjahr:
utACK bf95976061
aureleoules:
ACK bf95976061
Tree-SHA512: 15ae75caf19f8d12a12d2647c52897904d27b265a7af6b4ae7b858592eeadb8f9da6c2394b6baebec90adc28742c053e3eb506119577dae7c1e722ebb3b7bcc0
c456302d42 doc: minor improvements in getutxos REST endpoint synopsis (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Describing an optional sub-path as `<checkmempool>` in the synopsis could be misleading as the angle brackets normally indicate that the field has to be replaced a custom value. Clarify that by showing two variants instead, similar to the `block` endpoint with the `notxdetails` option:
```
#### Blocks
`GET /rest/block/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>`
`GET /rest/block/notxdetails/<BLOCK-HASH>.<bin|hex|json>`
```
Further improvements:
- uppercase `<TXID>` and `<N>`, to match the description of the other endpoints
- s/getutxo command/getutxos endpoint/
- describe what the `checkmempool` option does
- s/serialisation/serialization/ (the US spelling is more dominant than the UK spelling in the project, and there is indeed no other instance of the string "serialis*" in the source tree, except once in a release note)
- link to BIP64 within the text instead of only showing bare URL
- mention that BIP64 is only relevant for `bin` and `hex` output formats
- show two endpoint formats of the block section as list
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK c456302d42 - also checked that current master (cc12b8947) doesn't have any other lines changes that would require updates as per the outlined improvement points.
Tree-SHA512: b025aac0812397f5fbf78c805c13aeb5afa6862a049d13c0b101178799cdaff1ccd3abc368a5c103ea6ebf17cdff76584c54638d0f8d303d81ade2d71443d305
Check `port` options for invalid values (ports are parsed as uint16, so
in practice values >65535 are invalid; port 0 is undefined and therefore
considered invalid too). This allows for an early rejection of faulty
values and an supplying an informative message to the user.
Splits tests in `feature_proxy.py` to cover both invalid `hostname`
and `port` values.
Adds a release-note as previously valid `-port` and `-rpcport` values
can now result in errors.
a9d20eeceb doc: bump bips.md up-to-date version to v24.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a trivial follow-up to #26124.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK a9d20eeceb
Tree-SHA512: 24c17c72498f96f9122d8fb041f1f6f63bd186e25ac3cb5a661bb1993106c6632f5efd95a15d19681004d30d38eca2d2a16b383a7a1f1c3db17f887ae1fcd02a
0811cbfc28 doc: add info about status code 404 for some rest endpoints (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds an explanation about status code 404 for 2 endpoints (`/rest/tx/ `and `/rest/blockhashbyheight/`) in`REST-interface.md`. There are other endpoints that already cover it.
ACKs for top commit:
[deleted]:
reACK 0811cbfc28
shaavan:
ACK 0811cbfc28
Tree-SHA512: a01ac6653f706b7a7e4a4679a2b81e448381f31460ac4bcfc179af6186401cffae7b49a82f3a52c89e556acd5c16c159ce752c7a678177900ddf2e4e5c72fe6b
9580480570 Update debug logging section in the developer notes (Jon Atack)
1abaa31aa3 Update -debug and -debugexclude help docs for severity level logging (Jon Atack)
45f9282162 Create BCLog::Level::Trace log severity level (Jon Atack)
2a8712db4f Unit test coverage for -loglevel configuration option (klementtan)
eb7bee5f84 Create -loglevel configuration option (klementtan)
98a1f9c687 Unit test coverage for log severity levels (klementtan)
9c7507bf76 Create BCLog::Logger::LogLevelsString() helper function (klementtan)
8fe3457dbb Update LogAcceptCategory() and unit tests with log severity levels (klementtan)
c2797cfc60 Add BCLog::Logger::SetLogLevel()/SetCategoryLogLevel() for string inputs (klementtan)
f6c0cc0350 Add BCLog::Logger::m_category_log_levels data member and getter/setter (Jon Atack)
2978b387bf Add BCLog::Logger::m_log_level data member and getter/setter (Jon Atack)
f1379aeca9 Simplify BCLog::Level enum class and LogLevelToStr() function (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is an updated version of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25287 and the next steps in parent PR #25203 implementing, with Klement Tan, user-configurable, per-category severity log levels based on an idea by John Newbery and refined in GitHub discussions by Wladimir Van der Laan and Marco Falke.
- simplify the `BCLog::Level` enum class and the `LogLevelToStr()` function and add documentation
- update the logging logic to filter logs by log level both globally and per-category
- add a hidden `-loglevel` help-debug config option to allow testing setting the global or per-category severity level on startup for logging categories enabled with the `-debug` configuration option or the logging RPC (Klement Tan)
- add a `trace` log severity level selectable by the user; the plan is for the current debug messages to become trace, LogPrint ones to become debug, and LogPrintf ones to become info, warning, or error
```
$ ./src/bitcoind -help-debug | grep -A10 loglevel
-loglevel=<level>|<category>:<level>
Set the global or per-category severity level for logging categories
enabled with the -debug configuration option or the logging RPC:
info, debug, trace (default=info); warning and error levels are
always logged. If <category>:<level> is supplied, the setting
will override the global one and may be specified multiple times
to set multiple category-specific levels. <category> can be:
addrman, bench, blockstorage, cmpctblock, coindb, estimatefee,
http, i2p, ipc, leveldb, libevent, lock, mempool, mempoolrej,
net, proxy, prune, qt, rand, reindex, rpc, selectcoins, tor,
util, validation, walletdb, zmq.
```
See the individual commit messages for details.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
One final push per `git range-diff a5d5569 ce3c4c9 9580480` (should be trivial to re-ACK) to ensure this pull changes no default behavior in any way for users or the tests/CI in order to be completely v24 compatible, to update the unit test setup in general, and to update the debug logging section in the developer notes.
klementtan:
reACK 9580480570
1440000bytes:
reACK 9580480570
vasild:
ACK 9580480570
dunxen:
reACK 9580480
brunoerg:
reACK 9580480570
Tree-SHA512: 476a638e0581f40b5d058a9992691722e8b546471ec85e07cbc990798d1197fbffbd02e1b3d081b4978404e07a428378cdc8e159c0004b81f58be7fb01b7cba0
53e7ed075c doc: Release notes and other docs for migration (Andrew Chow)
9c44bfe244 Test migratewallet (Andrew Chow)
0b26e7cdf2 descriptors: addr() and raw() should return false for ToPrivateString (Andrew Chow)
31764c3f87 Add migratewallet RPC (Andrew Chow)
0bf7b38bff Implement MigrateLegacyToDescriptor (Andrew Chow)
e7b16f925a Implement MigrateToSQLite (Andrew Chow)
5b62f095e7 wallet: Refactor SetupDescSPKMs to take CExtKey (Andrew Chow)
22401f17e0 Implement LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::DeleteRecords (Andrew Chow)
35f428fae6 Implement LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::MigrateToDescriptor (Andrew Chow)
ea1ab390e4 scriptpubkeyman: Implement GetScriptPubKeys in Legacy (Andrew Chow)
e664af2976 Apply label to all scriptPubKeys of imported combo() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new `migratewallet` RPC which migrates a legacy wallet to a descriptor wallet. Migrated wallets will need a new backup. If a wallet has watchonly stuff in it, a new watchonly descriptor wallet will be created containing those watchonly things. The related transactions, labels, and descriptors for those watchonly things will be removed from the original wallet. Migrated wallets will not have any of the legacy things be available for fetching from `getnewaddress` or `getrawchangeaddress`. Wallets that have private keys enabled will have newly generated descriptors. Wallets with private keys disabled will not have any active `ScriptPubKeyMan`s.
For the basic HD wallet case of just generated keys, in addition to the standard descriptor wallet descriptors using the master key derived from the pre-existing hd seed, the migration will also create 3 descriptors for each HD chain in: a ranged combo external, a ranged combo internal, and a single key combo for the seed (the seed is a valid key that we can receive coins at!). The migrated wallet will then have newly generated descriptors as the active `ScriptPubKeyMan`s. This is equivalent to creating a new descriptor wallet and importing the 3 descriptors for each HD chain. For wallets containing non-HD keys, each key will have its own combo descriptor.
There are also tests.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 53e7ed075c
w0xlt:
reACK 53e7ed075c
Tree-SHA512: c0c003694ca2e17064922d08e8464278d314e970efb7df874b4fe04ec5d124c7206409ca701c65c099d17779ab2136ae63f1da2a9dba39b45f6d62cf93b5c60a
59aa54f731 i2p: log "SAM session" instead of "session" (Vasil Dimov)
d7ec30b648 doc: add release notes about the I2P transient addresses (Vasil Dimov)
47c0d02f12 doc: document I2P transient addresses usage in doc/i2p.md (Vasil Dimov)
3914e472f5 test: add a test that -i2pacceptincoming=0 creates a transient session (Vasil Dimov)
ae1e97ce86 net: use transient I2P session for outbound if -i2pacceptincoming=0 (Vasil Dimov)
a1580a04f5 net: store an optional I2P session in CNode (Vasil Dimov)
2b781ad66e i2p: add support for creating transient sessions (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Add support for generating a transient, one-time I2P address for ourselves when making I2P outbound connection and discard it once the connection is closed.
Background
---
In I2P connections, the host that receives the connection knows the I2P address of the connection initiator. This is unlike the Tor network where the recipient does not know who is connecting to them, not even the initiator's Tor address.
Persistent vs transient I2P addresses
---
Even if an I2P node is not accepting incoming connections, they are known to other nodes by their outgoing I2P address. This creates an opportunity to white-list given nodes or treat them differently based on their I2P address. However, this also creates an opportunity to fingerprint or analyze a given node because it always uses the same I2P address when it connects to other nodes. If this is undesirable, then a node operator can use the newly introduced `-i2ptransientout` to generate a transient (disposable), one-time I2P address for each new outgoing connection. That address is never going to be reused again, not even if reconnecting to the same peer later.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK 59aa54f731 (verified via range-diff that just a typo / `unique_ptr` initialisation were fixed)
achow101:
re-ACK 59aa54f731
jonatack:
utACK 59aa54f731 reviewed range diff, rebased to master, debug build + relevant tests + review at each commit
Tree-SHA512: 2be9b9dd7502b2d44a75e095aaece61700766bff9af0a2846c29ca4e152b0a92bdfa30f61e8e32b6edb1225f74f1a78d19b7bf069f00b8f8173e69705414a93e
1dc03dda05 [doc] remove non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (glozow)
32024d40f0 scripted-diff: remove mention of BIP125 from non-signaling var names (glozow)
Pull request description:
We have pretty thorough documentation of our RBF policy in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md. It enumerates each rule with several sentences of rationale. Also, each rule pretty much has its own function (3 and 4 share one), with extensive comments. The doc states explicitly that our rules are similar but differ from BIP125, and contains a record of historical changes to RBF policy.
We should not use "BIP125" as synonymous with our RBF policy because:
- Our RBF policy is different from what is specified in BIP125, for example:
- the BIP does not mention our rule about the replacement feerate being higher (our Rule 6)
- the BIP uses minimum relay feerate for Rule 4, while we have used incremental relay feerate since #9380
- the "inherited signaling" question (CVE-2021-31876). Call it discrepancy, ambiguous wording, doc misinterpretation, or implementation details, I would recommend users refer to doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md
- the signaling policy is configurable, see #25353
- Our RBF policy may change further
- We have already marked BIP125 as only "partially implemented" in docs/bips.md since 1fd49eb498
- See comments from people who are not me recently:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25038#discussion_r909507429
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25575#issuecomment-1179519204
This PR removes all non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (if people feel strongly, we can remove all mentions of BIP125 period). It may be useful to refer to the concept of "tx opts in to RBF if it has at least one nSequence less than (0xffffffff - 1)" as "BIP125 signaling" because:
- It is succint.
- It has already been widely marketed as BIP125 opt-in signaling.
- Our API uses it when referring to signaling (e.g. getmempoolentry["bip125-replaceable"] and wallet error message "not BIP 125 replaceable"). Changing those is more invasive.
- If/when we have other ways to signal in the future, we can disambiguate them this way. See #25038 which proposes another way of signaling, and where I pulled these commits from.
Alternatives:
- Changing our policy to match BIP125. This doesn't make sense as, for example, we would have to remove the requirement that a replacement tx has a higher feerate (Rule 6).
- Changing BIP125 to match what we have. This doesn't make sense as it would be a significant change to a BIP years after it was finalized and already used as a spec to implement RBF in other places.
- Document our policy as a new BIP and give it a number. This might make sense if we don't expect things to change a lot, and can be done as a next step.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK 1dc03dda05
ariard:
ACK 1dc03dda
t-bast:
ACK 1dc03dda05
Tree-SHA512: a3adc2039ec5785892d230ec442e50f47f7062717392728152bbbe27ce1c564141f85253143f53cb44e1331cf47476d74f5d2f4b3cd873fc3433d7a0aa783e02
a6b0c1fcc0 doc: add releases notes for 25504 (listsinceblock updates) (Antoine Poinsot)
0fd2d14454 rpc: add an include_change parameter to listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55f98d087e rpc: output parent wallet descriptors for coins in listunspent (Antoine Poinsot)
b724476158 rpc: output wallet descriptors for received entries in listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55a82eaf91 wallet: allow to fetch the wallet descriptors for a given Script (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Wallet descriptors are useful for applications using the Bitcoin Core wallet as a backend for tracking coins, as they allow to track coins for multiple descriptors in a single wallet. However there is no information currently given for such applications to link a coin with an imported descriptor, severely limiting the possibilities for such applications of using multiple descriptors in a single wallet. This PR outputs the matching imported descriptor(s) for a given received coin in `listsinceblock` (and friends).
It comes from a need for an application i'm working on, but i think it's something any software using `bitcoind` to track multiple descriptors in a single wallet would have eventually. For instance i'm thinking about the BDK project. Currently, the way to achieve this is to import raw addresses with labels and to have your application be responsible for wallet things like the gap limit.
I'll add this to the output of `listunspent` too if this gets a few Concept ACKs.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK a6b0c1fcc0
achow101:
re-ACK a6b0c1fcc0
Tree-SHA512: 7a5850e8de98b439ddede2cb72de0208944f8cda67272e8b8037678738d55b7a5272375be808b0f7d15def4904430e089dafdcc037436858ff3292c5f8b75e37
544b4332f0 Add wallet tests for spending rawtr() (Pieter Wuille)
e1e3081200 If P2TR tweaked key is available, sign with it (Pieter Wuille)
8d9670ccb7 Add rawtr() descriptor for P2TR with unknown tweak (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
It may be useful to be able to represent P2TR outputs in descriptors whose script tree and/or internal key aren't known. This PR does that, by adding a `rawtr(KEY)` descriptor, where the KEY represents the output key directly. If the private key corresponding to that output key is known, it also permits signing with it.
I'm not convinced this is desirable, but presumably "tr(KEY)" sounds more intended for direct use than "rawtr(KEY)".
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 544b4332f0
sanket1729:
code review ACK 544b4332f0
w0xlt:
reACK 544b4332f0
Tree-SHA512: 0de08de517468bc22ab0c00db471ce33144f5dc211ebc2974c6ea95709f44e830532ec5cdb0128c572513d352120bd651c4559516d4500b5b0a3d257c4b45aca
Our RBF policy is different from the rules specified in BIP125. For
example, the BIP does not mention Rule 6, and our Rule 4 uses the
(configurable) incremental relay feerate (distinct from the
minimum relay feerate). Those interested in our policy should refer to
doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md instead. These rules may also
continue to diverge with package RBF and other RBF improvements. Keep
references to the BIP125 signaling wrt sequence numbers, since that is
still correct and widely used. It is helpful to refer to this as "BIP125
signaling" since it is unambiguous and succint, especially if we have
multiple ways to signal replaceability in the future.
The rule numbers in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md correspond
largely to those of BIP 125, so we can still refer to them like "Rule 5."
