Commit Graph

1859 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
MarcoFalke
cc40b55da7
Merge #16726: tests: Avoid common Python default parameter gotcha when mutable dict/list:s are used as default parameter values
e4f4ea47eb lint: Catch use of [] or {} as default parameter values in Python functions (practicalswift)
25dd867150 Avoid using mutable default parameter values (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Avoid common Python default parameter gotcha when mutable `dict`/`list`:s are used as default parameter values.

  Examples of this gotcha caught during review:
  * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16673#discussion_r317415261
  * https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14565#discussion_r241942304

  Perhaps surprisingly this is how mutable list and dictionary default parameter values behave in Python:

  ```
  >>> def f(i, j=[], k={}):
  ...     j.append(i)
  ...     k[i] = True
  ...     return j, k
  ...
  >>> f(1)
  ([1], {1: True})
  >>> f(1)
  ([1, 1], {1: True})
  >>> f(2)
  ([1, 1, 2], {1: True, 2: True})
  ```

  In contrast to:

  ```
  >>> def f(i, j=None, k=None):
  ...     if j is None:
  ...         j = []
  ...     if k is None:
  ...         k = {}
  ...     j.append(i)
  ...     k[i] = True
  ...     return j, k
  ...
  >>> f(1)
  ([1], {1: True})
  >>> f(1)
  ([1], {1: True})
  >>> f(2)
  ([2], {2: True})
  ```

  The latter is typically the intended behaviour.

  This PR fixes two instances of this and adds a check guarding against this gotcha going forward :-)

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    Oh Python... ACK e4f4ea47eb. Testing tip: swap the two commits.

Tree-SHA512: 56e14d24fc866211a20185c9fdb274ed046c3aed2dc0e07699e58b6f9fa3b79f6d0c880fb02d72b7fe5cc5eb7c0ff6da0ead33123344e1a872209370c2e49e3f
2019-08-28 13:34:31 -04:00
MarcoFalke
119e97ae2d
Merge #16740: qa: Relax so that the subscriber is ready before publishing zmq messages
403e372407 qa: Relax so that the subscriber is ready before publishing zmq messages (João Barbosa)

Pull request description:

  Prevents the syndrome "slow joiner" - see http://zguide.zeromq.org/py:all#sockets-and-patterns - by relaxing before publishing messages.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    unsigned ACK 403e372407

Tree-SHA512: 0e856accbc450a9b09160bdce5112b2103dc9436cc317d31fb1c9634ebd76823a300a2e727818057fb4d0a615271772ff23e80553a13e9aa1935500de5eeec5f
2019-08-28 13:30:59 -04:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
71e08ab22d test: add executable flag for wallet_watchonly.py 2019-08-28 18:25:00 +02:00
João Barbosa
403e372407 qa: Relax so that the subscriber is ready before publishing zmq messages 2019-08-28 00:42:29 +01:00
MarcoFalke
af4100cd6f
Merge #16404: qa: Test ZMQ notification after chain reorg
abdfc5e89b qa: Test ZMQ notification after chain reorg (João Barbosa)
aa2622a726 qa: Refactor ZMQ test (João Barbosa)
6bc1ff915d doc: Add note regarding ZMQ block notification (João Barbosa)

Pull request description:

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: b93237adc8c84b3aa72ccc28097090eabcb006cf408083218bebf6fec703bd0de2ded80b6879e77096872e14ba9402a6d3f923b146a54d4c4e41dcb862c3e765
2019-08-26 09:13:46 -04:00
practicalswift
e4f4ea47eb lint: Catch use of [] or {} as default parameter values in Python functions 2019-08-26 10:53:10 +00:00
practicalswift
25dd867150 Avoid using mutable default parameter values 2019-08-26 10:45:25 +00:00
MarcoFalke
6dfa9efa3f
Merge #16656: test: fix rpc_setban.py race
6011c9d72d QA: fix rpc_setban.py race (Jonas Schnelli)

Pull request description:

  The new `rpc_setban.py` test failes regularly on CIs due to a race between injecting the ban and testing the log "on the other side".

  The problem is, that the test immediately after the `addnode` command on node0 checks for the `dropped (banned)` entry on node1 (without giving some time).

  Adding a 2 seconds sleep seems to solve the race (I guess there is no better event-driven delay).

  Example of a failed test: https://bitcoinbuilds.org/index.php?ansilog=bf743910-103f-4b54-9a97-960c471061bd.log#l2906

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 680f8ea3e5ddb07e93f824f1aeff4a459e25e6c14715a39fc7670e50506d7cf25925348672c5c2d8ba3e1243ccf5effbc2456bcd094fb96868349f8d26e008f1
2019-08-21 08:22:25 -04:00
Jonas Schnelli
6011c9d72d
QA: fix rpc_setban.py race 2019-08-21 14:18:40 +02:00
MarcoFalke
70b12af87e
Merge #16647: rpc: add weight to getmempoolentry output
17d178fb94 doc: add release-notes for getmempoolentry weight field addition (fanquake)
9c9cc2bd20 qa: Add RPC tests for weight in mempool entry (Daniel Edgecumbe)
54aaa7883c RPC: add weight to mempool entry output (Daniel Edgecumbe)

Pull request description:

  Rebase of #14649 (which itself was a rebase of #11256).

  Squash the two test related commits, and swapped out `size` usage for `vsize`.

  Added a commit with release notes.

ACKs for top commit:
  emilengler:
    Concept ACK 17d178f
  instagibbs:
    utACK 17d178fb94
  meshcollider:
    utACK 17d178fb94

Tree-SHA512: 1d354c9837e0ad0afa40325de9329b9e62688d5eab4d9e1cf9b46d8ae29d08f42d903ab37a41751c2ea8f9034231b21095881b1f5d911cb542b8b06bc85dc7cd
2019-08-20 13:54:42 -04:00
MarcoFalke
83112db129
Merge #15864: Fix datadir handling
ffea41f530 Enable all tests in feature_config_args.py (Hennadii Stepanov)
66f5c17f8a Use CheckDataDirOption() for code uniformity (Hennadii Stepanov)
7e33a18a34 Fix datadir handling in bitcoin-cli (Hennadii Stepanov)
b28dada374 Fix datadir handling in bitcoin-qt (Hennadii Stepanov)
50824093bb Fix datadir handling in bitcoind (Hennadii Stepanov)
740d41ce9f Add CheckDataDirOption() function (Hennadii Stepanov)
c1f325126c Return absolute path early in AbsPathForConfigVal (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  Fix #15240, see: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15240#issuecomment-487353760
  Fix #15745
  Fix broken `feature_config_args.py` tests (disabled by MarcoFalke@fabe28a0cdcfa13e0e595a0905e3642a960d3077). All test are enabled now.
  This PR is alternative to #13621.

  User's `$HOME` directory is not touched unnecessarily now.

  ~To make reviewing easier only `bitcoind` code is modified (neither `bitcoin-cli` nor `bitcoin-qt`).~

  Refs:
  - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15745#issuecomment-479852569 by **laanwj**
  - #16220

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 4a4cda10e0b67c8f374da0c9567003d2b566d948e7f8550fe246868b5794c15010e88ea206009480b9cd2f737f310a15e984f920730448f99a895893bed351df
2019-08-19 10:01:30 -04:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
27ee0cc5a6
Merge #16646: qa: Run tests with UPnP disabled
b168dd30cf Bugfix: QA: Run tests with UPnP disabled (Luke Dashjr)

Pull request description:

  This replaces #16560 by adding `upnp=0` to `bitcoin.conf` rather than passing it to nodes.

  > Needed for builds configured with --enable-upnp-default

  You can test this change using:
  ```bash
  ./configure --enable-upnp-default && make -j6 && test/functional/test_runner.py feature_config_args.py
  ```

  on master the test will fail without this change.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK b168dd30cf -- diff looks correct

Tree-SHA512: e639dd480dda2cffa19a679018c4bd7e4bd4d0f5e3001d6b407b833e3c166bde98b201063e267b8e45f8a20b0d53ec8bc028bec806b2357f9a7ba314cc4e2d07
2019-08-19 11:22:30 +02:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
ed9a2a37c1
Merge #16631: net: The default whitelistrelay should be true
3b05f0f70f Reformat p2p_permissions.py (nicolas.dorier)
ce7eac3cb0 [Fix] The default whitelistrelay should be true (nicolas.dorier)

Pull request description:

  I thought `whitelistrelay` default was `false` when it is `true`.

  The root of the issue come from the fact that all references to `DEFAULT_` are not in the scope of this file, so hard coding of default values are used everywhere in `net.cpp`. I think that in a separate PR we should fix that more fundamentally everywhere.

ACKs for top commit:
  promag:
    ACK 3b05f0f70f.
  Sjors:
    re-ACK 3b05f0f70f

Tree-SHA512: f4a75f986fa2adf1a5f1c91605e0d261f7ac5ac8535fb05437d83b8392dbcf5cc1a47d755adcf8ad8dc67a88de28060187200fd3ce06545261a5c7ec0fea831a
2019-08-19 11:20:23 +02:00
Daniel Edgecumbe
9c9cc2bd20
qa: Add RPC tests for weight in mempool entry 2019-08-19 11:45:19 +08:00
Luke Dashjr
b168dd30cf
Bugfix: QA: Run tests with UPnP disabled
Needed for builds configured with --enable-upnp-default
2019-08-19 09:58:43 +08:00
João Barbosa
abdfc5e89b qa: Test ZMQ notification after chain reorg 2019-08-19 01:25:33 +01:00
João Barbosa
aa2622a726 qa: Refactor ZMQ test 2019-08-19 01:25:31 +01:00
Andrew Chow
625534d7b1 Give more errors for specific failure conditions
Some failure conditions implicitly fail by failing some other check.
But the error messages are more helpful if they say explicitly what
actually caused the failure, so add those as failure conditions and
errors.
2019-08-16 19:34:01 -04:00
Andrew Chow
c325f619dd Return an error from descriptor Parse that gives more information about what failed 2019-08-16 19:34:01 -04:00
MeshCollider
7a960ba775
Merge #15986: Add checksum to getdescriptorinfo
26d3fad109 Add unmodified-but-with-checksum to getdescriptorinfo (Pieter Wuille)
104b3a5069 Factor out checksum checking from descriptor parsing (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    Code Review ACK 26d3fad109
  meshcollider:
    re-Code Review ACK 26d3fad109
  Sjors:
    ACK 26d3fad109

Tree-SHA512: b7a7f89b64a184927d6f9a0c183a087609983f0c5d5593f78e12db4714e930a4af655db9da4b0c407ea2e24d3b926cef6e1f2a15de502d0d1290a6e046826b99
2019-08-17 09:23:52 +12:00
nicolas.dorier
3b05f0f70f
Reformat p2p_permissions.py 2019-08-17 00:43:37 +09:00
nicolas.dorier
ce7eac3cb0
[Fix] The default whitelistrelay should be true 2019-08-17 00:43:22 +09:00
MarcoFalke
b80cdfec9a
Merge #16618: [Fix] Allow connection of a noban banned peer
d117f4541d Add test for setban (nicolas.dorier)
dc7529abf0 [Fix] Allow connection of a noban banned peer (nicolas.dorier)

Pull request description:

  Reported by @MarcoFalke on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16248#discussion_r314026195

  The bug would mean that if the peer connecting to you is banned, but whitelisted without specific permissions, it would not be able to connect to the node.

  The solution is just to move the same line below.

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    Agree inline is more clear. utACK d117f45
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK d117f4541d

Tree-SHA512: 0fed39acb1e8db67bb0bf4c4de3ad034ae776f38d55bd661f1ae0e1a4c6becaf1824ab46ed8279f2f31df3f4b29ff56461d8b167d3e9cece62cfe58b5a912811
2019-08-16 10:17:25 -04:00
nicolas.dorier
d117f4541d
Add test for setban 2019-08-16 13:40:31 +09:00
fanquake
0d65106dce
Merge #16383: rpcwallet: default include_watchonly to true for watchonly wallets
72eaab073b tests: functional watch-only wallet tests (William Casarin)
72ffbdc579 doc: add release note for include_watchonly default changes (William Casarin)
003a3c73c0 rpcwallet: document include_watchonly default for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
a50d9e6c0b rpcwallet: default include_watchonly to true for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)

Pull request description:

  Right now it's a bit annoying to deal with watchonly wallets, many rpc commands have an `include_watchonly` argument that needs to be explicitly set.

  Wallets created with `createwallet` can have a `disable_private_keys` parameter, for those wallets we already know that they are watchonly, so there's no reason to have to explicitly ask for it for every command. Instead we check this wallet flag when the `include_watchonly` parameter isn't set.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    Code review ACK 72eaab073b
  Sjors:
    ACK 72eaab073b
  promag:
    ACK 72eaab073b, code review only, didn't look closely to the test.
  kallewoof:
    ACK 72eaab073b
  fanquake:
    ACK 72eaab073b - I've looked over the changes, they make sense to me. Compiled and ran the tests etc.

Tree-SHA512: d3646b55e97f386594d7efc994f0712f3888475c6a5dc7f131ac9f8c49bf5d4677182b88f42b34152abe1ad101ecadd152b4c20e9d3c1267190db36f77ab8bd7
2019-08-16 11:55:35 +08:00
MarcoFalke
1bf2ff2bf8
Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments
e78aaf41f4 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery)
8319e738f9 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne)
0328dcdcfc [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery)
1c93b9b31c [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery)
3862e473f0 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66.

  CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt.

  This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360.

ACKs for top commit:
  ajtowns:
    ACK e78aaf41f4 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work
  ariard:
    ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected.
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK e78aaf41f4 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now)

Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2019-08-15 16:02:10 -04:00
MarcoFalke
85883a9f8e
Merge #16443: refactor: have CCoins* data managed under CChainState
582d2cd747 Cover UTXO set access with lock annotations (James O'Beirne)
5693530685 refactor: have CCoins* data managed under CChainState (James O'Beirne)
fae6ab6aed refactor: pcoinsTip -> CChainState::CoinsTip() (James O'Beirne)

Pull request description:

  This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):

  Parent PR: #15606
  Issue: #15605
  Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/2019-04-proposal/proposal

  ---

  This change encapsulates UTXO set data within CChainState instances, removing global data `pcoinsTip` and `pcoinsviewdb`. This is necessary if we want to maintain multiple chainstates with their own rendering of the UTXO set.

  We introduce a class CoinsViews which consolidates the construction of a CCoins* hierarchy.

  This commit could be broken into smaller pieces, but it would require more ephemeral diffs to, e.g., temporarily change CCoinsViewDB's constructor invocations.

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    reACK 582d2cd747
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 582d2cd747

Tree-SHA512: ec9d904fe5dca8cd2dc4b7916daa5d8bab30856dd4645987300f905e0a19f9919fce4f9d1ff03eda982943ca73e6e9a746be6cf53b46510de36e8c81a1eafba1
2019-08-15 12:47:15 -04:00
MarcoFalke
8bd5e0af99
Merge #16465: test: Test p2sh-witness and bech32 in wallet_import_rescan
fa3c6575ca lint: Add false positive to python dead code linter (MarcoFalke)
fa25668e1c test: Test p2sh-witness and bech32 in wallet_import_rescan (MarcoFalke)
fa79af2989 test: Replace fragile "rng" with call to random() (MarcoFalke)
fac3dcf7d0 test: Generate one block for each send in wallet_import_rescan (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  This adds test coverage for segwit in the `wallet_import_rescan` test, among other cleanups.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    ACK fa3c6575ca

Tree-SHA512: 877741763c62c1bf9d868864a1e3f0699857e8c028e9fcd65c7eeb73600c22cbe97b7b51093737743d9e87bcb991c1fe1086f673e18765aef0fcfe27951402f0
2019-08-15 10:28:58 -04:00
MarcoFalke
fa3c6575ca
lint: Add false positive to python dead code linter 2019-08-15 08:05:14 -04:00
MarcoFalke
e00501e00c
Merge #16561: tests: Use colors and dots in test_runner.py output only if standard output is a terminal
37f2784952 tests: Use colors and dots in test_runner.py output only if standard output is a terminal -- allows for using the test runner output as input to other programs (practicalswift)

Pull request description:

  Use colors and dots in `test_runner.py` output only if standard output is a terminal -- allows for using the test runner output as input to other programs.

  I found the need for this when parsing `test_runner.py` output while investigating intermittent functional test failures.

  Before:

  ```
  $ test/functional/test_runner.py wallet_hd.py > output 2>&1
  $ less output
  Temporary test directory at /tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20190807_074115
  ESC[1mWARNING!ESC[0m There is already a bitcoind process running on this system. Tests may fail unexpectedly due to resource contention!
  Remaining jobs: [wallet_hd.py]
  .......................................^M                                       ^M1/1 - ESC[1mwallet_hd.pyESC[0m passed, Duration: 20 s

  ESC[1mTEST         | STATUS    | DURATION

  ESC[0mESC[0;32mwallet_hd.py | ✓ Passed  | 20 s
  ESC[0mESC[1m
  ALL          | ✓ Passed  | 20 s (accumulated)
  ESC[0mRuntime: 20 s
  ```

  After:

  ```
  $ test/functional/test_runner.py wallet_hd.py > output 2>&1
  $ less output
  Temporary test directory at /tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20190807_074244
  1/1 - wallet_hd.py passed, Duration: 20 s
  WARNING! There is already a bitcoind process running on this system. Tests may fail unexpectedly due to resource contention!
  Remaining jobs: [wallet_hd.py]

  TEST         | STATUS    | DURATION

  wallet_hd.py | ✓ Passed  | 20 s

  ALL          | ✓ Passed  | 20 s (accumulated)
  Runtime: 20 s
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    ACK 37f2784952

Tree-SHA512: f15d95f9e07de2954c326d63d7a4bcd2971faeaa00386600dec2fb915ec89475aeef1dbc968b2c12aa5e988d4b3ed1974d6da0b6a3f1e1a105cfd90e8cb97cf6
2019-08-15 07:43:01 -04:00
practicalswift
37f2784952 tests: Use colors and dots in test_runner.py output only if standard output is a terminal -- allows for using the test runner output as input to other programs 2019-08-15 09:52:28 +00:00
MarcoFalke
fa25668e1c
test: Test p2sh-witness and bech32 in wallet_import_rescan 2019-08-14 17:20:07 -04:00
MarcoFalke
fa79af2989
test: Replace fragile "rng" with call to random() 2019-08-14 17:19:48 -04:00
MarcoFalke
fac3dcf7d0
test: Generate one block for each send in wallet_import_rescan
This ...
* ensures that enough coins are available/spendable, even when more
  variants are added
* ensures that all mempool txs are mined, even when more variants are
  added
* makes the test more specific to test that the confirmation height
  is properly reported and timestamps are correctly handled in the test
  logic
* prepares the test for a future, where blocks are skipped for rescan if
  they are deemed irrelevant by a filter (c.f. BIP157)
2019-08-14 16:22:37 -04:00
James O'Beirne
8319e738f9 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks 2019-08-14 15:52:52 -04:00
John Newbery
0328dcdcfc [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment
Hardcode segwit deployment height to 481824 for mainnet.
2019-08-14 15:52:52 -04:00
John Newbery
1c93b9b31c [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height
Hard code CSV deployment height to 419328 for mainnet.
2019-08-14 15:52:52 -04:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
67be6d7a17
Merge #16248: Make whitebind/whitelist permissions more flexible
c5b404e8f1 Add functional tests for flexible whitebind/list (nicolas.dorier)
d541fa3918 Replace the use of fWhitelisted by permission checks (nicolas.dorier)
ecd5cf7ea4 Do not disconnect peer for asking mempool if it has NO_BAN permission (nicolas.dorier)
e5b26deaaa Make whitebind/whitelist permissions more flexible (nicolas.dorier)

Pull request description:

  # Motivation

  In 0.19, bloom filter will be disabled by default. I tried to make [a PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16176) to enable bloom filter for whitelisted peers regardless of `-peerbloomfilters`.

  Bloom filter have non existent privacy and server can omit filter's matches. However, both problems are completely irrelevant when you connect to your own node. If you connect to your own node, bloom filters are the most bandwidth efficient way to synchronize your light client without the need of some middleware like Electrum.

  It is also a superior alternative to BIP157 as it does not require to maintain an additional index and it would work well on pruned nodes.

  When I attempted to allow bloom filters for whitelisted peer, my proposal has been NACKed in favor of [a more flexible approach](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16176#issuecomment-500762907) which should allow node operator to set fine grained permissions instead of a global `whitelisted` attribute.

  Doing so will also make follow up idea very easy to implement in a backward compatible way.

  # Implementation details

  The PR propose a new format for `--white{list,bind}`. I added a way to specify permissions granted to inbound connection matching `white{list,bind}`.

  The following permissions exists:
  * ForceRelay
  * Relay
  * NoBan
  * BloomFilter
  * Mempool

  Example:
  * `-whitelist=bloomfilter@127.0.0.1/32`.
  * `-whitebind=bloomfilter,relay,noban@127.0.0.1:10020`.

  If no permissions are specified, `NoBan | Mempool` is assumed. (making this PR backward compatible)

  When we receive an inbound connection, we calculate the effective permissions for this peer by fetching the permissions granted from `whitelist`  and add to it the permissions granted from `whitebind`.

  To keep backward compatibility, if no permissions are specified in `white{list,bind}` (e.g. `--whitelist=127.0.0.1`) then parameters `-whitelistforcerelay` and `-whiterelay` will add the permissions `ForceRelay` and `Relay` to the inbound node.

  `-whitelistforcerelay` and `-whiterelay` are ignored if the permissions flags are explicitly set in `white{bind,list}`.

  # Follow up idea

  Based on this PR, other changes become quite easy to code in a trivially review-able, backward compatible way:

  * Changing `connect` at rpc and config file level to understand the permissions flags.
  * Changing the permissions of a peer at RPC level.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    re-ACK c5b404e8f1

Tree-SHA512: adfefb373d09e68cae401247c8fc64034e305694cdef104bdcdacb9f1704277bd53b18f52a2427a5cffdbc77bda410d221aed252bc2ece698ffbb9cf1b830577
2019-08-14 17:07:12 +02:00
John Newbery
3862e473f0 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks
This combines reporting of buried (formally ISM) softfork deployments
and BIP9 versionbits softfork deployments into one JSON object in the
getblockchaininfo return object.
2019-08-13 15:53:02 -04:00
Elichai Turkel
afc0966d72
Moved and renamed hash256 from util.py to zmq_interface.py 2019-08-13 15:39:46 -04:00
nicolas.dorier
c5b404e8f1
Add functional tests for flexible whitebind/list 2019-08-11 11:33:29 +09:00
Pieter Wuille
26d3fad109 Add unmodified-but-with-checksum to getdescriptorinfo 2019-08-06 17:11:12 -07:00
James O'Beirne
fae6ab6aed refactor: pcoinsTip -> CChainState::CoinsTip()
This aliasing makes subsequent commits easier to review; eventually CoinsTip()
will return the CCoinsViewCache managed by CChainState.
2019-08-06 13:13:06 -04:00
MarcoFalke
b725979a11
Merge #16535: test: Explain why -whitelist is used in feature_fee_estimation
fa76285fdd test: Explain why -whitelist is used in feature_fee_estimation (MarcoFalke)
faff85a69a test: Format feature_fee_estimation with pep8 (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK fa76285fdd -- diff looks correct
  Sjors:
    ACK fa76285, every bit of clarification helps. It's clear that without `-whitelist` the test becomes extremely slow (it does pass).

Tree-SHA512: 13ec7e4cd0409e7bb76cbcd344e31c0f612c8ce4a1f1ec6ceaedf345f634bc09786ed38d38920c3469b2862c856ee3e5e42534ef90f531bd8dc83c3db3c06417
2019-08-06 08:34:07 -04:00
MarcoFalke
62117f9f36
Merge #16363: test: Add test for BIP30 duplicate tx
fa8489a155 test: Add test for BIP30 duplicate tx (MarcoFalke)
77770d95e2 test: Properly serialize BIP34 coinbase height (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  This adds a test for BIP30 to check that duplicate txs can exist in the blockchain given the first one was completely spent when the second one is added. (Requested by ajtowns in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16333#issuecomment-508604071)

  We can not add a test that a later duplicate tx overwrites a previous one, because BIP30 is always enforced on regtest. If someone feels strongly about such a test, some Bitcoin Core code would have to be modified, which can be done in a follow up pull request.

  Also, add a commit to fix the BIP34 test failures reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14633#issue-227712540

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fa8489a155

Tree-SHA512: c707d0bdc93937263876b603425b53322a2a9f9ec3f50716ae2fa9de8ddc644beb22b26c1bfde7f4aab102633e096b354ef380db919176bd2cb44a2828f884aa
2019-08-05 08:16:18 -04:00
MarcoFalke
d5ea8f4bf3
Merge #16509: test: Adapt test framework for chains other than "regtest"
faf36838bd test: Avoid hardcoding the chain name in combine_logs (MarcoFalke)
fa8a1d7ba3 test: Adapt test framework for chains other than "regtest" (MarcoFalke)
68f546635d test: Fix “local variable 'e' is assigned to but never used” (Ben Woosley)

Pull request description:

  This is required for various work in progress:

  * testchains #8994
  * signet #16411
  * some of my locally written tests

  While it will be unused in the master branch as of now, it will make all of those pull requests shorter. Thus review for non-regtest tests can focus on the actual changes and not some test framework changes.

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    ACK faf36838bd, ran tests and reviewed the code.

Tree-SHA512: 35add66c12cab68f2fac8f7c7d47c604d3f24eae9336ff78f83e2c92b3dc08a25e7f4217199bac5393dd3fb72f945bba9c001d6fbb8efd298c88858075fcb3d6
2019-08-05 08:08:18 -04:00
MarcoFalke
c77f7cdbd1
Merge #16197: net: Use mockable time for tx download
fab3658356 [qa] Test that getdata requests work as expected (Suhas Daftuar)
fa883ab35a net: Use mockable time for tx download (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Two commits:

  * First commit changes to mockable time for tx download (refactoring, should only have an effect on regtest)
  * Second commit adds a test that uses mocktime to test tx download

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    code review ACK 16197/commits/fab365835639a3da03f8ad9a58a0db6c6c4c2314
  jamesob:
    ACK fab3658356

Tree-SHA512: 3a64a3e283ec4bab1f6e506404b11f0a564a5b61d2a7508ae738a61f035e57220484c66e0ae47d847fe9f7e3ff5cc834909d7b34a9bbcea6abe01f8742806908
2019-08-05 08:01:28 -04:00
MarcoFalke
fa566b2601
test: Add missing sync_blocks to feature_pruning 2019-08-02 15:36:06 -04:00
MarcoFalke
3a3d8b8357
Merge #16097: Refactor: Add Flags enum to ArgsManager class
e6f649cb2c test: Make tests arg type specific (Hennadii Stepanov)
b70cc5d733 Revamp option negating policy (Hennadii Stepanov)
db08edb303 Replace IsArgKnown() with FlagsOfKnownArg() (Hennadii Stepanov)
dde80c272a Use ArgsManager::NETWORK_ONLY flag (Hennadii Stepanov)
9a12733508 Remove unused m_debug_only member from Arg struct (Hennadii Stepanov)
fb4b9f9e3b scripted-diff: Use ArgsManager::DEBUG_ONLY flag (Hennadii Stepanov)
1b4b9422ca scripted-diff: Use Flags enum in AddArg() (Hennadii Stepanov)
265c1b58d8 Add Flags enum to ArgsManager (Hennadii Stepanov)
e0d187dfeb Refactor InterpretNegatedOption() function (Hennadii Stepanov)
e0e18a1017 refactoring: Check IsArgKnown() early (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR adds the `Flags` enum to the `ArgsManager` class. Also the `m_flags` member is added to the `Arg` struct. Flags denote an allowed type of an arg value and special hints.

  This PR is only a refactoring and does not change behavior.

ACKs for top commit:
  jamesob:
    ACK e6f649cb2c
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK e6f649cb2c thanks for adding types to the command line options

Tree-SHA512: b867f8a9cbce2d2473c293d534af662d8cd5be15060ff0682e97af678974bdaac35e8bc6328ccba32f105034bcd38f169b92a6fb67798667891ce14d5d2a2dea
2019-08-02 12:18:16 -04:00
MarcoFalke
fa76285fdd
test: Explain why -whitelist is used in feature_fee_estimation
Also, Remove seemingly unused and undocumented -maxorphantx=1000
2019-08-02 11:16:24 -04:00