Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Aurèle Oulès
cb44c5923a
test: Add sendall test for min-fee setting 2022-12-02 13:30:40 +01:00
MacroFake
555519d082
test: Remove wallet option from non-wallet tests
Review note: The changes are complete, because self.options.descriptors
is set to None in parse_args (test_framework.py).

A value of None implies -disablewallet, see the previous commit.

So if a call to add_wallet_options is missing, it will lead to a test
failure when the wallet is compiled in.
2022-11-10 17:19:13 +01:00
Andrew Chow
315fd4dbab test: Test for out of bounds vout in sendall 2022-10-20 13:25:13 -04:00
Andrew Chow
708b72b715 test: Test that sendall works with watchonly spending specific utxos 2022-10-20 13:21:03 -04:00
kouloumos
cc434cbf58 wallet: fix sendall creates tx that fails tx-size check
The `sendall` RPC doesn't use `CreateTransactionInternal`as the rest of
the wallet RPCs and it never checks against the tx-size mempool limit.
Add a check for tx-size as well as test coverage for that case.
2022-09-15 13:22:19 +03:00
ishaanam
6f8e3818af sendall: check if the maxtxfee has been exceeded 2022-09-13 18:12:42 -04:00
ishaanam
bb84b7145b
add tests for no recipient and using send_max while inputs are specified 2022-03-29 16:37:49 -04:00
Murch
49090ec402
Add sendall RPC née sweep
_Motivation_
Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the
recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the
commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping
without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag
leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test
many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated
`sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality.

Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our
proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of
operation.
• sendall:
  Use _specific UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees.
• SFFO:
  Use a _specific budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees.

While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending from specific UTXOs,
emptying a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some
cases in which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget,
which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be
easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual computation
of the appropriate change amount.

As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a
different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and
numerous wallet tests.

_Sendall call details_
The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific subset of
the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns the funds to
one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified with a specific
amount or receive an equal share of the remaining unassigned funds. At
least one recipient must be provided without assigned amount to collect
the remainder. The `sendall` call will never create change. The call has
a `send_max` option that changes the default behavior of spending all
UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to maximizing the output amount of the
transaction by skipping uneconomic UTXOs. The `send_max` option is
incompatible with providing a specific set of inputs.
2022-03-29 16:37:47 -04:00