9ac114e5cd Throw error if invalid parameters passed to getnetworkhashps RPC endpoint (Jameson Lopp)
Pull request description:
When writing some scripts that iterated over many blocks to generate hashrate estimates I realized that my script was going out of range of the current chain tip height but was not encountering any errors.
I believe that passing an invalid block height to this function but receiving the hashrate estimate for the chain tip instead should be considered unexpected behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 9ac114e5cd
kevkevinpal:
reACK [9ac114e](9ac114e5cd)
achow101:
ACK 9ac114e5cd
Tree-SHA512: eefb465c2dd654fc48267f444e1809597ec5363cdd131ea9ec812458fed1e4bffbbbb0617d74687c9f7bb16274b598d8292f5eeb7953421e5d2a8dc2cc081f2b
35fb9930ad test: enable v2 transport for p2p_timeouts.py (Martin Zumsande)
2c1669c37a test: enable v2 transport for rpc_net.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
cc961c2695 test: enable v2 transport for p2p_node_network_limited.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
3598a1b5c9 test: enable --v2transport in combination with --usecli (Martin Zumsande)
68a9001751 test: persist -v2transport over restarts and respect -v2transport=0 (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This makes the functional test suite compatible with BIP324, so that
`python3 test_runner.py --v2transport`
should succeed (currently, 12 tests fail for me on master).
Includes two commits by TheStack I found in an old discussion https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28331#discussion_r1326714164
Note that even though all tests should pass, the python `p2p.py` module will do v2 connections only after the merge of #24748, so that for now only connections between two full nodes will actually run v2.
Some of the fixed tests were added with `--v2transport` to the test runner. Though after #24748 we might also want to consider running the entire suite with `--v2transport` in some CI.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 35fb9930ad. Thanks for taking care of this.
achow101:
ACK 35fb9930ad
theStack:
ACK 35fb9930ad
stratospher:
ACK 35fb993.
Tree-SHA512: 80dc0bf211fa525ff1d092043aea9f222f14c02e5832a548fb8b83b9ede1fcee03c5e8ade0d05c331bdaa492af9c1cf3d0f0b15b846673c6eacea82dd4cefbc3
fa01f884d3 ci: Add missing COPY for ./test/lint/test_runner (MarcoFalke)
faff3e3b46 lint: Report all lint errors instead of early exit (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`all-lint.py` currently collects all failures. However, the `06_script.sh` does not, since July this year (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28103#discussion_r1268115806).
Fix this by printing all failures before exiting.
Can be tested by modifying (for example) two subtrees in the same commit and then running the linters.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [fa01f88](fa01f884d3)
TheCharlatan:
lgtm ACK fa01f884d3
Tree-SHA512: c0f3110f2907d87e29c755e3b77a67dfae1f8a25833fe6ef8f2f2c58cfecf1aa46f1a20881576b62252b04930140a9e416c78b4edba0780d3c4fa7aaebabba81
a478c817b2 test: replace `Callable`/`Iterable` with their `collections.abc` alternative (PEP 585) (stickies-v)
4b9afb18e6 scripted-diff: use PEP 585 built-in collection types for verify-binary script (Sebastian Falbesoner)
d516cf83ed test: use built-in collection types for type hints (Python 3.9 / PEP 585) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
With Python 3.9 / [PEP 585](https://peps.python.org/pep-0585/), [type hinting has become a little less awkward](https://docs.python.org/3.9/whatsnew/3.9.html#type-hinting-generics-in-standard-collections), as for collection types one doesn't need to import the corresponding capitalized types (`Dict`, `List`, `Set`, `Tuple`, ...) anymore, but can use the built-in types directly (see https://peps.python.org/pep-0585/#implementation for the full list).
This PR applies the replacement for all Python scripts (i.e. in the contrib and test folders) for the basic types, i.e.:
- typing.Dict -> dict
- typing.List -> list
- typing.Set -> set
- typing.Tuple -> tuple
For an additional check, I ran mypy 1.6.1 on both master and the PR branch via
```
$ mypy --ignore-missing-imports --explicit-package-bases $(git ls-files "*.py")
```
and verified that the output is identical -- (from the 22 identified problems, most look like false-positives, it's probably worth it to go deeper here and address them in a follow-up though).
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK a478c817b2
fanquake:
ACK a478c817b2
Tree-SHA512: 6948c905f6abd644d84f09fcb3661d7edb2742e8f2b28560008697d251d77a61a1146ab4b070e65b0d27acede7a5256703da7bf6eb1c7c3a897755478c76c6e8
43de4d3630 doc: fix typos (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes typos found by lint-spelling.py using codespell 2.2.6.
Our CI linter job uses codespell 2.2.5 and found fewer typos that I did locally. In any case it's happy now.
ACKs for top commit:
pablomartin4btc:
re ACK 43de4d3630
Tree-SHA512: c032fe86cb49c924a468385653b31f309a9db68c478d70335bba3e65a1ff3826abe80284fe00a090ab5a509e1edbf17e476f6922fb15d055e50f1103dad2ccb0
fa6b053b5c mempool: persist with XOR (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the `mempool.dat` file stores data received from remote peers as-is. This may be problematic when a program other than Bitcoin Core tries to interpret them by accident. For example, an anti-virus program or other program may scan the file and move it into quarantine, or delete it, or corrupt it.
While the local wallet is expected to re-submit any pending transactions, unrelated transactions may be missing from the mempool after a restart. This may cause fee estimates to be off, or may cause block relay to be slower.
Fix this, similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6650, by rolling a random XOR pattern over the dat file when writing or reading it.
Obviously this can only protect against programs that accidentally and unintentionally are trying to mess with the dat file. Any program that intentionally wants to mess with the dat file can still trivially do so.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK fa6b053b5c
glozow:
reACK fa6b053b5c
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK fa6b053b5c
Tree-SHA512: ded2ce3d81bc944b828263534e3178a1e45a914fe8e024f4a14c6561a73e301820944ecc75dd704b3d4221a7a3a5c0597ccab79546250c1197609ee981fe324e
bbbbdb0cd5 ci: Add filesystem lint check (MarcoFalke)
fada2f9110 refactor: Replace <filesystem> with <util/fs.h> (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Using `std::filesystem` is problematic:
* There is a `fs` namespace wrapper for it. So having two ways to achieve the same is confusing.
* Not using the `fs` wrapper is dangerous and buggy, because it disables known bugs by deleting problematic functions.
Fix all issues by removing use of it and adding a linter to avoid using it again in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK bbbbdb0cd5
fanquake:
ACK bbbbdb0cd5🦀
Tree-SHA512: 0e2d49742b08eb2635e6fce41485277cb9c40fe20b81017c391d3472a43787db1278a236825714ca1e41c9d2f59913865cfb0c649e3c8ab1fb598c849f80c660
44445ae8f1 test: Avoid intermittent failures in feature_init (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The code not only modifies block dat files, but also leveldb files, which may be of smaller size. Such corruption may not force leveldb to abort, according to the intermittent test failures.
Fix the intermittent test failures by reverting 5ab6419f38 .
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
lgtm ACK [44445ae](44445ae8f1)
fjahr:
ACK 44445ae8f1
theStack:
ACK 44445ae8f1
Tree-SHA512: 8084e4aeb8a976c1706a1898d7854c55d0c4ec7b5a08f65f97ffc173c935f9b0e0c1caef7be1538a458e4c018f7bd1948173349ec76ca48bc4013a63f284bb0f
7de7685372 test, assumeutxo: Use assert_debug_log for error details (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up on the invalid hash dump fix#28698, [suggested](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28698#pullrequestreview-1698178157) by theStack and agreed by Sjors and ryanofsky.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 7de7685372
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 7de7685372
Tree-SHA512: 036b3cef3084e3ead8923e8dcabe4fa7ebe97fb514d223aa38bc38df10337e3fe3113e42322178b58fb03fcd4511af4b5b56bceecbb7ded5b9758842c70db3f2
faa2ad88bc test: Add missing wait for version to be sent in add_outbound_p2p_connection (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Can be tested with:
```diff
diff --git a/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py b/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py
index b1ed97b794..eb4f72c6b6 100755
--- a/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py
+++ b/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ class P2PConnection(asyncio.Protocol):
assert not self._transport
logger.debug("Connected & Listening: %s:%d" % (self.dstaddr, self.dstport))
self._transport = transport
+ import time;time.sleep(.1);
if self.on_connection_send_msg:
self.send_message(self.on_connection_send_msg)
self.on_connection_send_msg = None # Never used again
```
Found and reported by mzumsande in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28782#pullrequestreview-1718560252
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK faa2ad88bc
Tree-SHA512: 863f06125dec40cccaa852d0d8ca2e2b9c0b74610205e9fd6c9c279bdf36801ff475e3d873fd1b18172eb8220e17b2caff60069ce63512e569934a43f27d03fd
- "transport_protocol_type" of inbound peer before version handshake
is "detecting" on p2p v2 nodes (as opposed to "v1" for p2p v1)
- size of a ping/pong message is 29 bytes (as opposed to 32 for p2p v1)
- for the sendmsgtopeer RPC sub-test, enforce p2p v1 connection to
have a peer id of zero
By renaming the "command" send_cli arg. The old name was unsuitable
because the "addnode" RPC has its own "command" arg, leading to
ambiguity when included in kwargs.
Can be tested with
"python3 wallet_multiwallet.py --usecli --v2transport"
which fails on master because of this (python throws a TypeError).
Before, a global -v2transport provided to the test would be dropped
when restarting the node within a test and specifying any extra_args.
Fix this by adding "v2transport=1" to args (not extra_args) based
on the global parameter, and deciding for each (re)start of the node
based on this default and test-specific extra_args
(which take precedence over args) whether v2 should be used.
5039c346ca init: completely remove `-zapwallettxes` (remaining hidden option) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The `-zapwallettxes` functionality has been removed in v0.21.0 (see commit 3340dbadd3 / PR #19671), with the parameter being kept as hidden option, to inform users via an exit error that `abandontransaction` should be used instead.
As any guides that still suggest to use `-zapwallettxes` would refer to a Bitcoin Core version that is EOL since many years (i.e. <= v0.20.x), it is highly unlikely that the error caused by the option is still relevant for any user, hence it seems fine to remove it now.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5039c346ca
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK 5039c346ca
fanquake:
ACK 5039c346ca
Tree-SHA512: e3ccc6918e0f8fa68dbd1a7ec4999cc2a44e28038711919fcddaf0727648c73a9ba0fb77674317147592a113fad20755d4e727f48176bc17b048fbdebad2d6c9
0420f99f42 Create net_peer_connection unit tests (Jon Atack)
4b834f6499 Allow unit tests to access additional CConnman members (Jon Atack)
34b9ef443b net/rpc: Makes CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo able to return only non-connected address on request (Sergi Delgado Segura)
94e8882d82 rpc: Prevents adding the same ip more than once when formatted differently (Sergi Delgado Segura)
2574b7e177 net/rpc: Check all resolved addresses in ConnectNode rather than just one (Sergi Delgado Segura)
Pull request description:
## Rationale
Currently, `addnode` has a couple of corner cases that allow it to either connect to the same peer more than once, hence wasting outbound connection slots, or add redundant information to `m_added_nodes`, hence making Bitcoin iterate through useless data on a regular basis.
### Connecting to the same node more than once
In general, connecting to the same node more than once is something we should try to prevent. Currently, this is possible via `addnode` in two different ways:
1. Calling `addnode` more than once in a short time period, using two equivalent but distinct addresses
2. Calling `addnode add` using an IP, and `addnode onetry` after with an address that resolved to the same IP
For the former, the issue boils down to `CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections` calling `CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo` once, and iterating over the result to open connections (`CConman::OpenNetworkConnection`) on the same loop for all addresses.`CConnman::ConnectNode` only checks a single address, at random, when resolving from a hostname, and uses it to check whether we are already connected to it.
An example to test this would be calling:
```
bitcoin-cli addnode "127.0.0.1:port" add
bitcoin-cli addnode "localhost:port" add
```
And check how it allows us to perform both connections some times, and some times it fails.
The latter boils down to the same issue, but takes advantage of `onetry` bypassing the `CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections` logic and calling `CConnman::OpenNetworkConnection` straightaway. A way to test this would be:
```
bitcoin-cli addnode "127.0.0.1:port" add
bitcoin-cli addnode "localhost:port" onetry
```
### Adding the same peer with two different, yet equivalent, addresses
The current implementation of `addnode` is pretty naive when checking what data is added to `m_added_nodes`. Given the collection stores strings, the checks at `CConnman::AddNode()` basically check wether the exact provided string is already in the collection. If so, the data is rejected, otherwise, it is accepted. However, ips can be formatted in several ways that would bypass those checks.
Two examples would be `127.0.0.1` being equal to `127.1` and `[::1]` being equal to `[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]`. Adding any pair of these will be allowed by the rpc command, and both will be reported as connected by `getaddednodeinfo`, given they map to the same `CService`.
This is less severe than the previous issue, since even tough both nodes are reported as connected by `getaddednodeinfo`, there is only a single connection to them (as properly reported by `getpeerinfo`). However, this adds redundant data to `m_added_nodes`, which is undesirable.
### Parametrize `CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo`
Finally, this PR also parametrizes `CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo` so it returns either all added nodes info, or only info about the nodes we are **not** connected to. This method is used both for `rpc`, in `getaddednodeinfo`, in which we are reporting all data to the user, so the former applies, and to check what nodes we are not connected to, in `CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections`, in which we are currently returning more data than needed and then actively filtering using `CService.fConnected()`
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 0420f99f42
kashifs:
> > tACK [0420f9](0420f99f42)
sr-gi:
> > > tACK [0420f9](0420f99f42)
mzumsande:
Tested ACK 0420f99f42
Tree-SHA512: a3a10e748c12d98d439dfb193c75bc8d9486717cda5f41560f5c0ace1baef523d001d5e7eabac9fa466a9159a30bb925cc1327c2d6c4efb89dcaf54e176d1752
6559e4d27a tests: Increase wallet_miniscript.py rpc timeout to 90 seconds (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The signing test for the large miniscript can sometimes take longer than the 30 second timeout, depending on the load on my system. Increasing it to 90 seconds seems to be good enough.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
but increasing seems fine ACK [6559e4d](6559e4d27a)
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 6559e4d27a
Tree-SHA512: 1b7bf94c77f85a0deddb1384aacbeb934205d0a630fecc8e75a4a98d1946d77d9bca36692fb6c1ab8e9276392f617281aafc4c685c248a8d3b0c77f896cda624
fa02598469 test: Add missing sync on send_version in peer_connect (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without the sync, the logic will be racy. For example, `p2p_sendtxrcncl.py` is failing locally (and on CI occasionally), because non-version messages will be sent before the version message:
```py
self.log.info('SENDTXRCNCL with version=0 triggers a disconnect')
sendtxrcncl_low_version = create_sendtxrcncl_msg()
sendtxrcncl_low_version.version = 0
peer = self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(PeerNoVerack(), send_version=True, wait_for_verack=False)
with self.nodes[0].assert_debug_log(["txreconciliation protocol violation"]):
peer.send_message(sendtxrcncl_low_version)
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
```
```
test 2023-11-02T08:15:19.620000Z TestFramework (INFO): SENDTXRCNCL with version=0 triggers a disconnect
test 2023-11-02T08:15:19.621000Z TestFramework.p2p (DEBUG): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:11312
test 2023-11-02T08:15:19.624000Z TestFramework.p2p (DEBUG): Connected & Listening: 127.0.0.1:11312
test 2023-11-02T08:15:19.798000Z TestFramework.p2p (DEBUG): Send message to 127.0.0.1:11312: msg_sendtxrcncl(version=0, salt=2)
test 2023-11-02T08:15:19.799000Z TestFramework.p2p (DEBUG): Send message to 127.0.0.1:11312: msg_version(nVersion=70016 nServices=9 nTime=Thu Nov 2 08:15:19 2023 addrTo=CAddress(nServices=1 net=IPv4 addr=127.0.0.1 port=11312) addrFrom=CAddress(nServices=1 net=IPv4 addr=0.0.0.0 port=0) nNonce=0x369AC031CDA96022 strSubVer=/python-p2p-tester:0.0.3/ nStartingHeight=-1 relay=1)
node0 2023-11-02T08:15:19.804409Z [net] [net.cpp:3676] [CNode] [net] Added connection peer=0
node0 2023-11-02T08:15:19.805256Z [net] [net.cpp:1825] [CreateNodeFromAcceptedSocket] [net] connection from 127.0.0.1:55964 accepted
node0 2023-11-02T08:15:19.809861Z [msghand] [net_processing.cpp:3356] [ProcessMessage] [net] received: sendtxrcncl (12 bytes) peer=0
node0 2023-11-02T08:15:19.810297Z [msghand] [net_processing.cpp:3582] [ProcessMessage] [net] non-version message before version handshake. Message "sendtxrcncl" from peer=0
node0 2023-11-02T08:15:19.810928Z [msghand] [net_processing.cpp:3356] [ProcessMessage] [net] received: version (111 bytes) peer=0
...
test 2023-11-02T09:35:20.166000Z TestFramework.utils (ERROR): wait_until() failed. Predicate: ''''
def test_function():
if check_connected:
assert self.is_connected
return test_function_in()
'''
test 2023-11-02T09:35:20.187000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-s390x-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 132, in main
self.run_test()
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-s390x-linux-gnu/test/functional/p2p_sendtxrcncl.py", line 188, in run_test
peer.wait_for_disconnect()
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-s390x-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py", line 478, in wait_for_disconnect
self.wait_until(test_function, timeout=timeout, check_connected=False)
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-s390x-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py", line 470, in wait_until
wait_until_helper_internal(test_function, timeout=timeout, lock=p2p_lock, timeout_factor=self.timeout_factor)
File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-s390x-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 275, in wait_until_helper_internal
raise AssertionError("Predicate {} not true after {} seconds".format(predicate_source, timeout))
AssertionError: Predicate ''''
def test_function():
if check_connected:
assert self.is_connected
return test_function_in()
''' not true after 4800.0 seconds
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK fa02598469
Tree-SHA512: 78871f603d387e2df8c0acbdfa95441fa186f80e94593021bb219bbf1bc9dc7efc4e266bd254b5cc41114c38227ff3b7f6172335d9bb828427f0a2acffde752d
49d953281d fuzz: explicitly specify llvm-symbolizer path in runner (fanquake)
Pull request description:
It's not completely clear to me why this needs to be explicitly specified in some environments, and not in others, while at the same time that `llvm-symbolizer` is already in PATH, but this has fixed the 2 issues outlined in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28147.
Use `LLVM_SYMBOLIZER_PATH` as the env var, as that is somewhat also used inside LLVM, but not consistently, i.e it's checked for in the asan_symbolize script, but not in in the ubsan_symbolize script, or from in compiler-rt.
Alternative to #28804.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 49d953281d
Tree-SHA512: c3d5bf1c3629793b342c70754a419b3c7a3cd39f800b9aa69ce3395cc2bf83b4d46f2b329974337b94b99573cd0b8600d3f147ed5c21387bf3812316570d1ee3
The signing test for the large miniscript can sometimes take longer than
the 30 second timeout, depending on the load on my system. Increasing it
to 90 seconds seems to be good enough.
It's not completely clear to me why this needs to be explicitly
specified in some environments, and not in others, while at the same time
that `llvm-symbolizer` is already in PATH, but this has fixed the 2 issues
outlined in #28147.
Use `LLVM_SYMBOLIZER_PATH` as the env var, as that is somewhat also used
inside LLVM, but not consistently, i.e it's checked for in the asan_symbolize
script, but not in in the ubsan_symbolize script, or from in compiler-rt.
The `-zapwallettxes` functionality has been removed in v0.21.0
(see commit 3340dbadd3 / PR #19671),
with the parameter being kept as hidden option, to inform users via
an exit error that `abandontransaction` should be used instead.
As any guides that still suggest to use `-zapwallettxes` would refer to
a Bitcoin Core version that is EOL since many years (i.e. <= v0.20.x),
it is highly unlikely that the error caused by the option is still
relevant for any user, hence it seems fine to remove it now.
d9cc99d04e [test] MiniMiner::Linearize and manual construction (glozow)
dfd6a3788c [refactor] unify fee amounts in miniminer_tests (glozow)
f4b1b24a3b [MiniMiner] track inclusion order and add Linearize() function (glozow)
004075963f [test] add case for MiniMiner working with negative fee txns (glozow)
fe6332c0ba [MiniMiner] make target_feerate optional (glozow)
5a83f55c96 [MiniMiner] allow manual construction with non-mempool txns (glozow)
e3b2e630b2 [refactor] change MiniMinerMempoolEntry ctor to take values, update includes (glozow)
4aa98b79b2 [lint] update expected boost includes (glozow)
Pull request description:
This is part of #27463. It splits off the `MiniMiner`-specific changes from #26711 for ease of review, as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26711#issuecomment-1786392253.
- Allow using `MiniMiner` on transactions that aren't in the mempool.
- Make `target_feerate` param of `BuildMockTemplate` optional, meaning "don't stop building the template until all the transactions have been selected."
- Add clarification for how this is different from `target_feerate=0` (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26711#discussion_r1377019133)
- Track the order in which transactions are included in the template to get the "linearization order" of the transactions.
- Tests
Reviewers can take a look at #26711 to see how these functions are used to linearize the `AncestorPackage` there.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK d9cc99d04e
kevkevinpal:
reACK [d9cc99d](d9cc99d04e)
achow101:
re-ACK d9cc99d04e
Tree-SHA512: 32b80064b6679536ac573d674825c5ca0cd6245e49c2fd5eaf260dc535335a57683c74ddd7ce1f249b5b12b2683de4362a7b0f1fc0814c3b3b9f14c682665583
376dc2cfb3 test: add coverage to rpc_blockchain.py (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Included a test that checks the functionality of setting
the first param of getnetworkhashps to negative value returns
the average network hashes per second from the last difficulty change.
ACKs for top commit:
jlopp:
tACK 376dc2cfb3
achow101:
ACK 376dc2cfb3
ismaelsadeeq:
Tested ACK 376dc2cfb3
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 376dc2cfb3
Tree-SHA512: 02d52f622e9cb7a1240c5d124510dd75d03f696f119b2625b0befd60b004ec50ff1a2d5515e0e227601adeecd837e0778ed131ee2a8c5f75f1b824be711213a7
9cfc1c9440 test: check that we don't send a getaddr msg to an inbound peer (Martin Zumsande)
88c33c6748 test: make python p2p not send getaddr messages when it's being connected to (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
`bitcoind` nodes send `getaddr` messages only to outbound nodes (and ignore `getaddr` received by outgoing connections).
The python p2p node should mirror this behavior by not sending a `getaddr` message when it is not the initiator of the connection.
This is currently causing several unnecessary messages being sent and then ignored (`Ignoring "getaddr" from outbound-full-relay connection.`) in tests like `p2p_add_connections.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
concept ACK 9cfc1c9440
pablomartin4btc:
re ACK 9cfc1c9440
BrandonOdiwuor:
re ACK 9cfc1c9440
Tree-SHA512: 812bec5d8a4828b4384d4cdd4362d6eec09acb2363e888f2b3e3bf8b925e0e17f15e13dc297d6b616c68b93ace9ede7245b07b405d3f5f8eada98350f74230dc
02a4f1a385 addrman: log AS only when using asmap (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the log to just print the ASN when using asmap, same logic presented in other logs:
afa081a39b/src/net_processing.cpp (L3552-L3556)afa081a39b/src/net_processing.cpp (L3598-L3604)
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 02a4f1a385
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 02a4f1a385
Tree-SHA512: adad5904ab163660d47554b32dc2dc3dfdff8dd64b94e5320ad11706381264d1e338654fa8239430eed4ccbebc8f6670698b4278895794055c37fc4bcefe71bc
Currently it is possible to add the same node twice when formatting IPs in
different, yet equivalent, manner. This applies to both ipv4 and ipv6, e.g:
127.0.0.1 = 127.1 | [::1] = [0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]
`addnode` will accept both and display both as connected (given they translate to
the same IP). This will not result in multiple connections to the same node, but
will report redundant info when querying `getaddednodeinfo` and populate `m_added_nodes`
with redundant data.
This can be avoided performing comparing the contents of `m_added_addr` and the address
to be added as `CServices` instead of as strings.
811067ca1c test: add coverage for snapshot chainstate not matching AssumeUTXO parameters (pablomartin4btc)
4a5be10b92 assumeutxo, blockstorage: prevent core dump on invalid hash (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
While reviewing #27596 (ran `loadtxoutset` in `mainnet` before `m_assumeutxo_data` is empty as [currently](434495a8c1/src/kernel/chainparams.cpp (L175-L177)) in master - back to 1b1d711), got a `core dumped`, so it seems there's a potential issue if new releases ever remove snapshot details or a semi-experienced user performs a `loadtxoutset` on a different "customised" binary version (not sure if this is a real use case).
```
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] Using obfuscation key for /tmp/.test_utxo_2/blocks/index: 0000000000000000
node/blockstorage.cpp:390 LoadBlockIndex: Assertion `GetParams().AssumeutxoForBlockhash(*snapshot_blockhash)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
```
<details>
<summary>This is also happening before IBD is completed (<code>background validation</code> still being performed as it can be seen in rpc <code>getchainstates</code>)</summary>
```
/src/bitcoin-cli -datadir=${AU_DATADIR} getchainstates
{
"headers": 813097,
"chainstates": [
{
"blocks": 368249,
"bestblockhash": "00000000000000000b7a08224a1cb00d337100ba7a46c03d04b2c2d8964efc37",
"difficulty": 52278304845.59168,
"verificationprogress": 0.086288278873286,
"coins_db_cache_bytes": 7969177,
"coins_tip_cache_bytes": 14908338995,
"validated": true
},
{
"blocks": 813097,
"bestblockhash": "0000000000000000000270c9fdce7b17db64cca91f90106964b58e33a4d91089",
"difficulty": 61030681983175.59,
"verificationprogress": 0.999997140098457,
"coins_db_cache_bytes": 419430,
"coins_tip_cache_bytes": 784649420,
"snapshot_blockhash": "00000000000000000002a7c4c1e48d76c5a37902165a270156b7a8d72728a054",
"validated": false
}
]
}
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Steps to reproduce the core dump error and its output:</summary>
1. Perform a `loadtxoutset` in `mainnet` on compiled `bitcoind` adding the block hash from Sjors's [commit](24deb2022b).
2. Once step 1 finishes, remove the added code from step 1 and compile again or just compile `master` without any changes on top.
3. Run `bitcoind`, soon it'll crash with:
```
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] init message: Loading block index…
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] Assuming ancestors of block 00000000000000000001a0a448d6cf2546b06801389cc030b2b18c6491266815 have valid signatures.
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] Setting nMinimumChainWork=000000000000000000000000000000000000000052b2559353df4117b7348b64
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] Prune configured to target 3000 MiB on disk for block and undo files.
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] [snapshot] detected active snapshot chainstate (/tmp/.test_utxo_2/chainstate_snapshot) - loading
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] [snapshot] switching active chainstate to Chainstate [snapshot] @ height -1 (null)
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] Opening LevelDB in /tmp/.test_utxo_2/blocks/index
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] Opened LevelDB successfully
2023-10-18T17:42:52Z [init] Using obfuscation key for /tmp/.test_utxo_2/blocks/index: 0000000000000000
node/blockstorage.cpp:390 LoadBlockIndex: Assertion `GetParams().AssumeutxoForBlockhash(*snapshot_blockhash)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>After original change, error message output:</summary>
```
2023-10-20T15:49:12Z [init] init message: Loading block index…
2023-10-20T15:49:12Z [init] Assuming ancestors of block 00000000000000000001a0a448d6cf2546b06801389cc030b2b18c6491266815 have valid signatures.
2023-10-20T15:49:12Z [init] Setting nMinimumChainWork=000000000000000000000000000000000000000052b2559353df4117b7348b64
2023-10-20T15:49:12Z [init] Prune configured to target 3000 MiB on disk for block and undo files.
2023-10-20T15:49:12Z [init] [snapshot] detected active snapshot chainstate (/tmp/.test_utxo_2/chainstate_snapshot) - loading
2023-10-20T15:49:12Z [init] [snapshot] switching active chainstate to Chainstate [snapshot] @ height -1 (null)
2023-10-20T15:49:12Z [init] Opening LevelDB in /tmp/.test_utxo_2/blocks/index
2023-10-20T15:49:12Z [init] Opened LevelDB successfully
2023-10-20T15:49:12Z [init] Using obfuscation key for /tmp/.test_utxo_2/blocks/index: 0000000000000000
2023-10-20T15:49:13Z [init] *** Assumeutxo data not found for the given blockhash '00000000000000000002a7c4c1e48d76c5a37902165a270156b7a8d72728a054'.
2023-10-20T15:49:13Z [init] Error: Assumeutxo data not found for the given blockhash '00000000000000000002a7c4c1e48d76c5a37902165a270156b7a8d72728a054'.
Error: Assumeutxo data not found for the given blockhash '00000000000000000002a7c4c1e48d76c5a37902165a270156b7a8d72728a054'.
2023-10-20T15:49:13Z [init] Shutdown requested. Exiting.
2023-10-20T15:49:13Z [init] Shutdown: In progress...
2023-10-20T15:49:13Z [scheduler] scheduler thread exit
2023-10-20T15:49:13Z [shutoff] Flushed fee estimates to fee_estimates.dat.
2023-10-20T15:49:13Z [shutoff] Shutdown: done
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Alternative on error handling using <code>return error()</code> instead of <code>return FatalError()</code> used in this PR, which produces a different output and perhaps confusing:</summary>
```
2023-10-20T21:45:58Z [init] Using obfuscation key for /tmp/.test_utxo_2/blocks/index: 0000000000000000
2023-10-20T21:45:59Z [init] ERROR: Assumeutxo data not found for the given blockhash '00000000000000000002a7c4c1e48d76c5a37902165a270156b7a8d72728a054'.
2023-10-20T21:45:59Z [init] : Error loading block database.
Please restart with -reindex or -reindex-chainstate to recover.
: Error loading block database.
Please restart with -reindex or -reindex-chainstate to recover.
2023-10-20T21:45:59Z [init] Aborted block database rebuild. Exiting.
2023-10-20T21:45:59Z [init] Shutdown: In progress...
2023-10-20T21:45:59Z [scheduler] scheduler thread exit
2023-10-20T21:45:59Z [shutoff] Flushed fee estimates to fee_estimates.dat.
2023-10-20T21:45:59Z [shutoff] Shutdown: done
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Current state (including ryanofsky <a href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28698#discussion_r1368635965">suggestion</a>), after code change, error message output:</summary>
```
2023-10-25T02:29:57Z [init] Using obfuscation key for /home/pablo/.test_utxo_2/regtest/blocks/index: 0000000000000000
2023-10-25T02:29:57Z [init] *** Assumeutxo data not found for the given blockhash 'f09b5835f3f8b39481f2af3257bbc2e82845552d4d2d6d31cf520fc24263ed5b'.
2023-10-25T02:29:57Z [init] Error: A fatal internal error occurred, see debug.log for details
Error: A fatal internal error occurred, see debug.log for details
2023-10-25T02:29:57Z [init] Shutdown requested. Exiting.
2023-10-25T02:29:57Z [init] Shutdown: In progress...
2023-10-25T02:29:57Z [scheduler] scheduler thread exit
2023-10-25T02:29:57Z [shutoff] Flushed fee estimates to fee_estimates.dat.
2023-10-25T02:29:57Z [shutoff] Shutdown: done
```
</details>
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 811067ca1c
theStack:
ACK 811067ca1c
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 811067ca1c.
Tree-SHA512: cfc137b0a4f638b99fd7dac2c35cc729ef71ae1166a2a8960a91055ec90841cb33aed589834012cfe0e157937e2a76a88d1020ea1df2bc98e1114eb1fc8eaae4
fe3ac3700d test: replace random_bytes with randbytes #28720 (ns-xvrn)
Pull request description:
With Python upgraded to 3.9 replaced the `random_bytes` function in util of functional tests and replaced it's usage with `random.randbytes`.
Closes#28720.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK fe3ac3700d
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK fe3ac3700d
stickies-v:
ACK fe3ac3700d, thanks for picking this up
kristapsk:
utACK fe3ac3700d
Tree-SHA512: f65a75e73ebd840c2936eb133d42bccd552f25b717c8ca25c18d06e0593e12f292389cfcc0a0b0759004b67a46ea0c8ac237973ef90f246139778230be1e64e1
