b2e9fdc00f test: expect that files may disappear from /proc/PID/fd/ (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
`get_socket_inodes()` calls `os.listdir()` and then iterates on the results using `os.readlink()`. However a file may disappear from the directory after `os.listdir()` and before `os.readlink()` resulting in a `FileNotFoundError` exception.
It is expected that this may happen for `bitcoind` which is running and could open or close files or sockets at any time. Thus ignore the `FileNotFoundError` exception.
ACKs for top commit:
arejula27:
ACK [`b2e9fdc`](b2e9fdc00f)
sipa:
utACK b2e9fdc00f
achow101:
ACK b2e9fdc00f
theuni:
utACK b2e9fdc00f
hodlinator:
ACK b2e9fdc00f
Tree-SHA512: 8eb05393e4de4307a70af446c3fc7e8f7dc3f08bf9d68d74d02b0e4e900cfd4865249f297be31f1fd7b05ffea45eb855c5cfcd75704167950c1deb4f17109f33
386eecff5f doc: add release notes (ismaelsadeeq)
3eaa0a3b66 miner: init: add `-blockreservedweight` startup option (ismaelsadeeq)
777434a2cd doc: rpc: improve `getmininginfo` help text (ismaelsadeeq)
c8acd4032d init: fail to start when `-blockmaxweight` exceeds `MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT` (ismaelsadeeq)
5bb31633cc test: add `-blockmaxweight` startup option functional test (ismaelsadeeq)
2c7d90a6d6 miner: bugfix: fix duplicate weight reservation in block assembler (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
* This PR attempts to fix the duplicate coinbase weight reservation issue we currently have.
* Fixes#21950
We reserve 4000 weight units for coinbase transaction in `DEFAULT_BLOCK_MAX_WEIGHT`
7590e93bc7/src/policy/policy.h (L23)
And also reserve additional `4000` weight units in the default `BlockCreationOptions` struct.
7590e93bc7/src/node/types.h (L36-L40)
**Motivation**
- This issue was first noticed during a review here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11100#discussion_r136157411)
- It was later reported in issue #21950.
- I also came across the bug while writing a test for building the block template. I could not create a block template above `3,992,000` in the block assembler, and this was not documented anywhere. It took me a while to realize that we were reserving space for the coinbase transaction weight twice.
---
This PR fixes this by consolidating the reservation to be in a single location in the codebase.
This PR then adds a new startup option `-blockreservedweight` whose default is `8000` that can be used to lower or increase the block reserved weight for block header, txs count, coinbase tx.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 386eecff5f
fjahr:
Code review ACK 386eecff5f
glozow:
utACK 386eecff5f, nonblocking nits. I do think the release notes should be clarified more
pinheadmz:
ACK 386eecff5f
Tree-SHA512: f27efa1da57947b7f4d42b9322b83d13afe73dd749dd9cac49360002824dd41c99a876a610554ac2d67bad7485020b9dcc423a8e6748fc79d6a10de6d4357d4c
723440c5b8 test framework, wallet: rename get_scriptPubKey method to get_output_script (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
fa0232a3e0 test: add validation for gettxout RPC response (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
Pull request description:
Added a new test in `test/functional/rpc_blockchain.py` to validate the gettxout RPC response. This new test ensures all response elements are verified, including `bestblock`, `confirmations`, `value`, `coinbase`, and `scriptPubKey` details.
Also renamed the method `get_scriptPubKey` from `test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py` to the modern name `get_output_script` as suggested by maflcko (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30226#discussion_r1925491846)
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
reACK 723440c5b8
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 723440c5b8
brunoerg:
code review ACK 723440c5b8
Tree-SHA512: 3384578909d2e7548cef302c5b8a9fed5b82dfc942892503ad4a05e73f5cceafad1eab3af9a27e54aef3db7631f8935298d6b882c70d2f02a9a75b8e3c209b6c
- This commit renamed coinbase_max_additional_weight to block_reserved_weight.
- Also clarify that the reservation is for block header, transaction count
and coinbase transaction.
d45eb3964f test: compare BDB dumps of test framework parser and wallet tool (Sebastian Falbesoner)
01ddd9f646 test: complete BDB parser (handle internal/overflow pages, support all page sizes) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing features to our test framework's BDB parser with the goal of hopefully being able to read all legacy wallets that are created with current and past versions of Bitcoin Core. This could be useful both for making review of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26606 easier and to also possibly improve our functional tests for the wallet BDB-ro parser by additionally validating it with an alternative implementation. The second commits introduces a test that create a legacy wallet with huge label strings (in order to create overflow pages, i.e. pages needed for key/value data than is larger than the page size) and compares the dump outputs of wallet tool and the extended test framework BDB parser.
It can be exercised via `$ ./test/functional/tool_wallet.py --legacy`. BDB support has to be compiled in (obviously).
For some manual tests regarding different page sizes, the following patch can be used:
```diff
diff --git a/src/wallet/bdb.cpp b/src/wallet/bdb.cpp
index 38cca32f80..1bf39323d3 100644
--- a/src/wallet/bdb.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/bdb.cpp
@@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ void BerkeleyDatabase::Open()
DB_BTREE, // Database type
nFlags, // Flags
0);
+ pdb_temp->set_pagesize(1<<9); /* valid BDB pagesizes are from 1<<9 (=512) to <<16 (=65536) */
if (ret != 0) {
throw std::runtime_error(strprintf("BerkeleyDatabase: Error %d, can't open database %s", ret, strFile));
```
I verified that the newly introduced test passes with all valid page sizes between 512 and 65536.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d45eb3964f
furszy:
utACK d45eb3964f
brunoerg:
code review ACK d45eb3964f
Tree-SHA512: 9f8ac80452545f4fcd24a17ea6f9cf91b487cfb1fcb99a0ba9153fa4e3b239daa126454e26109fdcb72eb1c76a4ee3b46fd6af21dc318ab67bd12b3ebd26cfdd
faf2f2c654 test: Avoid redundant stop and error spam on shutdown (MarcoFalke)
fae3bf6b87 test: Avoid redundant stop and error spam on startup failure (MarcoFalke)
fa0dc09b90 test: Remove --noshutdown flag (MarcoFalke)
fad441fba0 test: Treat leftover process as error (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `--noshutdown` flag is brittle, confusing, and redundant:
* Someone wanting to inspect the state after a test failure will likely also want to debug the state on the python side, so the option is redundant with `--pdbonfailure`. If there was a use case to replicate `--pdbonfailure` without starting pdb, a dedicated flag could be added for that use case.
* It is brittle to use the flag for a passing test, because it will disable checks in the test. For example, on shutdown LSan will perform a leak check, and the test framework will check that the node did not crash, and it will check that the node did not print errors to stderr.
Fix all issues by removing it.
Also, tidy up startup error messages to be less confusing as a result.
ACKs for top commit:
hodlinator:
re-ACK faf2f2c654
pablomartin4btc:
re tACK faf2f2c654
Tree-SHA512: 46d7ae59c7be88b93f1f9e0b6be21af0fc101e646512e2c5e725682cb18bfec8aa010e0ebe89ce9ffe239e5caac0da5f81cc97b79e738d26ca5fa31930e8e4e3
1b51616f2e test: improve rogue calls in mining functions (i-am-yuvi)
Pull request description:
#31403 follow-up, see [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31403#pullrequestreview-2498806354)
- Rename `invalid_call` parameter to `called_by_framework` in `generateblock`, `generatetoaddress` and `generatetodescriptor` mining methods to better express its intended usage.
- Add explicit assertion message clarifying that these functions should only be called by TestFramework itself to maintain proper node synchronization.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 1b51616f2e
achow101:
ACK 1b51616f2e
hodlinator:
re-ACK 1b51616f2e
Prabhat1308:
ACK [1b51616](1b51616f2e)
Tree-SHA512: 56832626fe54dcaa07dacb4f9c960c0a83fad3fb12272155114ac697856c59b7f44805e1152eddeec7a5e8f7daf487382dc01b5b9ae2e74b62b2df6bd1f81f77
92787dd52c test: raise an error when target_vsize is below tx virtual size (ismaelsadeeq)
a8780c937f test: raise an error if output value is <= 0 in `create_self_transfer` (ismaelsadeeq)
f6e88931f0 test: test that `create_self_transfer_multi` respects `target_vsize` (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This is a simple test PR that does two things:
1. Raise an exception in `_bulk_tx_` when `target_vsize` is too low, i.e., below the tx vsize.
2. Addresses some review comments from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30162, which are:
- Raise an error if the output value is less than or equal to zero in `create_self_transfer`.
This prevents creating transactions with a value of 0 or less.
- Add a test to verify that `create_self_transfer_multi` also respects the passed `target_vsize`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 92787dd52c
theStack:
ACK 92787dd52c
rkrux:
reACK 92787dd52c
glozow:
ACK 92787dd52c
Tree-SHA512: 1f2767f2cf715ed65074c5fff347eec160b142685777d833d5e872cfef364d3dc1916b52ee442e99c7b9a8d514ff62bc67a9899d8854f65a4b93ac3ae300d18e
Trying to shut down a node after a test failure may fail and lead to an
RPC error.
Also, it is confusing to sidestep the existing fallback to kill any
leftover nodes on a test failure.
So just rely on the fallback.
Idea by Hodlinator.
Co-Authored-By: Hodlinator <172445034+hodlinator@users.noreply.github.com>
For blocks 1 through 15 the script_BIP34_coinbase_height appends OP_1
to comply with BIP34 and avoid bad-cb-length.
This is inconsistent with BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock() which adds
OP_0 instead.
The utxo_total_supply fuzzer and MinerTestingSetup::Block also use OP_0.
Changing it is required to import the test vectors in the next commit.
It also ensures the test vectors can be regenerated using the CPU miner
at https://github.com/pooler/cpuminer without patches (it uses OP_0).
The same helper is used by the signet miner, so this will impact newly
bootstrapped signets.
`p2p_seednode.py` would try to connect to `0.0.0.1` and `0.0.0.2` as
seed nodes. This sends outbound TCP packets on a non-loopback interface
to the default router.
Configure an unavailable proxy for all executions of `bitcoind` during
this test. Also change `0.0.0.1` and `0.0.0.2` because connecting to
them would skip the `-proxy=` setting because for such an address:
* `CNetAddr::IsLocal()` is true, thus
* `CNetAddr::IsRoutable()` is false, thus
* `CNetAddr::GetNetwork()` is `NET_UNROUTABLE`, even though
`CNetAddr::m_net` is `NET_IPV4`.
This speeds up the execution time of `p2p_seednode.py`
from 12.5s to 2.5s.
Trying to immediately shut down a node after a startup failure without
waiting for the RPC to be fully up will in most cases just fail and lead
to an RPC error.
Also, it is confusing to sidestep the existing fallback to kill any
leftover nodes on a test failure.
So just rely on the fallback.
Printing to stderr instead of stdout makes the test_runner.py fail on
leftover processes. This is desired and fine, because a leftover process
should only happen on a test failure anyway.
`get_socket_inodes()` calls `os.listdir()` and then iterates on the
results using `os.readlink()`. However a file may disappear from the
directory after `os.listdir()` and before `os.readlink()` resulting in a
`FileNotFoundError` exception.
It is expected that this may happen for `bitcoind` which is running and
could open or close files or sockets at any time. Thus ignore the
`FileNotFoundError` exception.
If the `releases` directory exists, but still only a subset of the
necessary previous release binaries are available, the test fails by
throwing an exception (sometimes leading to follow-up exceptions like
"AssertionError: [node 0] Error: no RPC connection") and printing out
a stack trace, which can be confusing and at a first glance suggests
that the node crashed or some alike.
Improve this by checking and printing out *all* of the missing release
binaries and failing with an explicit error in this case. Also add an
info on how to download previous releases binaries.
Noticed while testing #30328.
Can be tested by e.g.
$ ./test/get_previous_releases.py -b
$ rm -rf ./releases/v28.0/
$ ./build/test/functional/wallet_migration.py
a2c45ae548 test: report failure during utf8 response decoding (furszy)
Pull request description:
Useful for debugging issues such https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31241#issuecomment-2462816933.
Prints the entire response content instead of printing only the position of the byte it can't be decoded.
The diff between the error messages can be seen by running the `wallet_migration.py` functional test with the following patch applied:
```
diff --git a/src/wallet/rpc/wallet.cpp b/src/wallet/rpc/wallet.cpp
--- a/src/wallet/rpc/wallet.cpp(revision d65918c5da52c7d5035b4151dee9ffb2e94d4761)
+++ b/src/wallet/rpc/wallet.cpp(date 1731005254673)
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@
}
UniValue r{UniValue::VOBJ};
- r.pushKV("wallet_name", res->wallet_name);
+ r.pushKV("wallet_name", "\xc3\x28");
if (res->watchonly_wallet) {
r.pushKV("watchonly_name", res->watchonly_wallet->GetName());
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a2c45ae548
theStack:
re-ACK a2c45ae548
rkrux:
tACK a2c45ae548
ismaelsadeeq:
utACK a2c45ae548
Tree-SHA512: 6abb524b5a215c51ec881eea91ebe8174140a88ff3874c8c88676157edae7818801356586a904dbb21b45053183315a6d71dbf917d753611d8e413776b57c484
1dd3af8fbc Add release note for #31223 (Martin Zumsande)
997757dd2b test: add functional test for -port behavior (Martin Zumsande)
0e2b12b92a net, init: derive default onion port if a user specified a -port (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This resolves#31133 (setups with multiple local nodes each using a different `-port` no longer working with v28.0, see the issue description for more details) by deriving the default onion listening port to be the value specified by `-port` incremented by 1 (idea by vasild / laanwj).
Note that with this fix, the chosen `-port` values of two local nodes cannot be adjacent, otherwise there will be port collisions again.
From the discussion in the linked issue, this was the most popular option, followed by doing nothing and telling affected users to change their setups to use `-bind` instead of `-port`. But more opinions are certainly welcome!
I think that if we decide to do something about the problem described in the issue, we should do so soon (in 28.1.), so I opened this PR.
Fixes#31133
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 1dd3af8fbc
laanwj:
Tested ACK 1dd3af8fbc
tdb3:
Code review ACK 1dd3af8fbc
Tree-SHA512: 37fda2b23bbedcab5df3a401cf5afce66ae5318fb78f9660f83e3fd075b528e8156d7a0903f9a12ffe97ab5d83860587116b74af28670a1f4c2f0d1be4999f40
fae76393bd test: Avoid F541 (f-string without any placeholders) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
An extra `f` string-prefix is mostly harmless, but could be confusing or hint to a mistake where a format argument was forgotten.
Try to avoid the confusion and mistakes by applying the `F541` linter rule.
ACKs for top commit:
lucasbalieiro:
**Tested ACK** [fae7639](fae76393bd)
danielabrozzoni:
ACK fae76393bd
tdb3:
Code review ACK fae76393bd
Tree-SHA512: 4992a74fcf0c19b32e4d95f7333e087b4269b5c5259c556789fb86721617db81c7a4fe210ae136c92824976f07f71ad0f374655e7008b1967c02c73324862d9a
409d0d6293 test: enable running individual independent functional test methods (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
- Some test methods in the functional test framework are independent and do not require any prior context or setup in `run_test`.
- This commit adds a new option for running these specific methods within a test file, allowing them to be executed individually without running the entire test suite.
- Using this option reduces the time you need to wait before the test you are interested in starts executing.
- The functionality added by this PR can be achieved manually by commenting out code, but having a pragmatic option to do this is more convenient.
Note: Running test methods that require arguments or context will fail.
**Example Usage**:
```zsh
build/test/functional/feature_reindex.py --test_methods continue_reindex_after_shutdown
```
```zsh
build/test/functional/feature_config_args.py --test_methods test_log_buffer test_args_log test_connect_with_seednode
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 409d0d6293
rkrux:
reACK 409d0d6293
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 409d0d6293. This seems like a good step towards making it easy to run independent tests quickly. I think ideally there would be some naming convention or @ annotation added to test methods that can run independently, so the test framework could provide more functionality like being able to list test methods, being able to show command lines to quickly reproduce problems when tests fails, and calling test methods automatically instead of requiring individual tests to call them. But these ideas are all compatible with the new `--test_methods` option
Tree-SHA512: b0daac7c3b322e6fd9b946962335d8279e8cb004ff76f502c8d597b9c4b0073840945be198a79d44c5aaa64bda421429829d5c84ceeb8c6139eb6ed079a35878
111465d72d test: Remove unused attempts parameter from wait_until (Fabian Jahr)
5468a23eb9 test: Add check_interval parameter to wait_until (Fabian Jahr)
16c87d91fd test: Introduce ensure_for helper (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
A repeating pattern in the functional tests is that the test sleeps for a while to ensure that a certain condition is still true after some amount of time has elapsed. Most recently a new case of this was added in #30807. This PR here introduces an `ensure` helper to streamline this functionality.
Some approach considerations:
- It is possible to construct this by reusing `wait_until` and wrapping it in `try` internally. However, the logger output of the failing wait would still be printed which seems irritating. So I opted for simplified but similar internals to `wait_until`.
- This implementation starts for a failure in the condition right away which has the nice side-effect that it might give feedback on a failure earlier than is currently the case. However, in some cases, it may be expected that the condition may still be false at the beginning and then turns true until time has run out, something that would work when the test sleeps without checking in a loop. I decided against this design (and even against adding it as an option) because such a test design seems like it would be racy either way.
- I have also been going back and forth on naming. To me `ensure` works well but I am also not a native speaker, happy consider a different name if others don't think it's clear enough.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK 111465d72d🍋
achow101:
ACK 111465d72d
tdb3:
code review re ACK 111465d72d
furszy:
utACK 111465d72d
Tree-SHA512: ce01a4f3531995375a6fbf01b27d51daa9d4c3d7cd10381be6e86ec5925d2965861000f7cb4796b8d40aabe3b64c4c27e2811270e4e3c9916689575b8ba4a2aa
After port collisions are no longer tolerated but lead to
a startup failure in v28.0, local setups of multiple nodes,
each with a different -port value would not be possible anymore
due to collision of the onion default port - even if the nodes
were using tor or not interested in receiving onion inbound connections.
Fix this by deriving the onion listening port to be -port + 1.
(idea by vasild / laanwj)
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
- Some test methods in the functional test framework are independent
and do not require any previous context or setup defined in `run_test`.
- This commit adds a new option for running these specific methods within a test file,
allowing them to be executed individually without running the entire test suite.
- running test methods that require an argument or context will fail.
57529ac4db test: set P2PConnection.p2p_connected_to_node in peer_connect_helper() (Vasil Dimov)
22cd0e888c test: support WTX INVs from P2PDataStore and fix a comment (Vasil Dimov)
ebe42c00aa test: extend the SOCKS5 Python proxy to actually connect to a destination (Vasil Dimov)
ba621ffb9c test: improve debug log message from P2PConnection::connection_made() (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
If requested, make the SOCKS5 Python proxy redirect connections to a set of given destinations. Actually act as a real proxy, connecting the client to a destination, except that the destination is not what the client asked for.
This would enable us to "connect" to Tor addresses from the functional tests.
Plus a few other minor improvements in the test framework as individual commits.
---
These changes are part of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29415 but they make sense on their own and would be good to have them, regardless of the fate of #29415. Also, if this is merged, that would reduce the size of #29415, thus the current standalone PR.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Approach ACK 57529ac4db
achow101:
ACK 57529ac4db
tdb3:
CR and test ACK 57529ac4db
mzumsande:
Code review / tested ACK 57529ac4db
Tree-SHA512: a2892c97bff2d337b37455c409c6136cb62423ce6cc32b197b36f220c1eec9ca046b599135b9a2603c0eb6c1ac4d9795e73831ef0f04378aeea8b245ea733399
0ea84bc362 test: explicitly check boolean verbosity is disallowed (tdb3)
7a2e6b68cd doc: add rpc guidance for boolean verbosity avoidance (tdb3)
698f302df8 rpc: disallow boolean verbosity in getorphantxs (tdb3)
63f5e6ec79 test: add entry and expiration time checks (tdb3)
808a708107 rpc: add entry time to getorphantxs (tdb3)
56bf302714 refactor: rename rpc_getorphantxs to rpc_orphans (tdb3)
7824f6b077 test: check that getorphantxs is hidden (tdb3)
ac68fcca70 rpc: disallow undefined verbosity in getorphantxs (tdb3)
Pull request description:
Implements follow-up suggestions from #30793.
- Now disallows undefined verbosity levels (below and above valid values) (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30793#discussion_r1786093549)
- Disallows boolean verbosity (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30793#discussion_r1788273274) and adds guidance to developer-notes
- Checks that `getorphantxs` is a hidden rpc (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30793#discussion_r1786107786)
- Adds a test for `expiration` time
- Adds `entry` time to the returned orphan objects (verbosity >=1) to relieve the user from having to calculate it from `expiration`. Also adds associated test. (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30793#discussion_r1743687732)
- Minor cleanup (blank line removal and log message move) (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30793#discussion_r1786092641)
Included a commit to rename the test to a more generic `get_orphans` to better accommodate future orphanage-related RPCs (e.g. `getorphanangeinfo`). Can drop the refactor commit from this PR if people feel strongly about it.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0ea84bc362
glozow:
utACK 0ea84bc362
rkrux:
tACK 0ea84bc362
itornaza:
tACK 0ea84bc362
Tree-SHA512: e48a088f333ebde132923072da58e970461e74362d0acebbc799c3043d5727cdf5f28e82b43cb38bbed27c603df6710695dba91ff0695e623ad168e985dce08e
