Commit Graph

31318 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
MarcoFalke
23ae7931be
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23154: doc: add assumeutxo notes
9ab440199d doc: add assumeutxo notes (James O'Beirne)

Pull request description:

  This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)

  ---

  Adds some notes on assumeutxo design.

  Related: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21526#discussion_r715558994

ACKs for top commit:
  ariard:
    ACK 9ab4401
  naumenkogs:
    ACK 9ab4401
  michaelfolkson:
    ACK 9ab440199d
  fjahr:
    ACK 9ab440199d

Tree-SHA512: 2fca8373b78701754957d12bc43ce18aa6928507965448741cb4e8c56589ad61d261f8542e348094fc9631d46ee6a7afee75c965c0db993fc816758569137b74
2021-11-03 13:01:53 +01:00
MarcoFalke
e2b5192d1c
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23211: refactor: move update_* structs from txmempool.h to .cpp file
65aaf9495d refactor: move `update_*` structs from txmempool.h to .cpp file (Sebastian Falbesoner)
9947ce6262 refactor: use const reference for parents in `CTxMemPool::UpdateAncestorsOf` (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  These helpers are exclusively used in txmempool.cpp, hence they should also be moved there. The PR also contains a commit which fixes const-correctness for parents in `CTxMemPool::UpdateAncestorsOf` and declares them as reference to avoid a copy.

ACKs for top commit:
  promag:
    Code review ACK 65aaf9495d. Verified move-only commit locally.

Tree-SHA512: 7ce29f3ba0e68b5355001f27725b00f6d54cc993015356eb40b61b8cdd17db49b980f4c3d798c8e0c940d245dc3a72c474bb9ff3c0ee971ead450786076812c2
2021-11-03 08:59:03 +01:00
MarcoFalke
3c4729a515
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23223: Disable lock contention logging in checkqueue_tests
6ae9f1cf96 Disable lock contention logging in checkqueue_tests (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  This patch disables lock contention logging in the checkqueue_tests as some of these tests are designed to be heavily contested to trigger race conditions or other issues. This created very large log files when run with DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION defined (up to v22) or with lock logging enabled by default in current master.

  Examples running the following command:

  ```
  $ ./src/test/test_bitcoin -t checkqueue_tests/test_CheckQueue_Correct_Random -- DEBUG_LOG_OUT > testlog.txt

  -rw-r--r--   87042178 Oct  8 12:41 testlog-with-DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION-at-v22-run1.txt
  -rw-r--r--   73879896 Oct  8 12:42 testlog-with-DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION-at-v22-run2.txt
  -rw-r--r--   65150518 Oct  8 12:51 testlog-with-DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION-at-bb9f76a-run1.txt
  -rw-r--r--   65774554 Oct  8 12:52 testlog-with-DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION-at-bb9f76a-run2.txt
  -rw-r--r--   73493309 Oct  8 13:00 testlog-current-master-at-991753e-run1.txt
  -rw-r--r--   65616977 Oct  8 13:01 testlog-current-master-at-991753e-run2.txt
  -rw-r--r--       5093 Oct  8 13:04 testlog-with-this-commit-run1.txt
  -rw-r--r--       5093 Oct  8 13:05 testlog-with-this-commit-run2.txt
  ```

  Resolves #23167.

ACKs for top commit:
  vasild:
    ACK 6ae9f1cf96

Tree-SHA512: b16812ed60c58a1cf40c04ebeca9197ac076b2415f71673ac7bb5b7960a1ff80ba2c909345ad221c7689b0562d17f63a32a629f5d6dbcf0e57130bf5760388c1
2021-11-02 20:54:19 +01:00
amadeuszpawlik
79fd28cacb Adds verification step to Schnorr and ECDSA signing
As defined in BIP340, a verification step should be executed after
`secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign` to ensure that a potentially corrupted
signature isn't used; using corrupted signatures could reveal
information about the private key used. This applies to ECSDA as
well.

Additionally clears schnorr signature if signing failed.
2021-11-02 17:18:40 +01:00
MarcoFalke
9e3f7dcaa2
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22735: [net] Don't return an optional from TransportDeserializer::GetMessage()
f3e451bebf [net] Replace GetID() with id in TransportDeserializer constructor (Troy Giorshev)
8c96008ab1 [net] Don't return an optional from TransportDeserializer::GetMessage() (Troy Giorshev)

Pull request description:

  Also, access mapRecvBytesPerMsgCmd with `at()` not `find()`. This
  throws an error if COMMAND_OTHER doesn't exist, which should never
  happen. `find()` instead just accessed the last element, which could make
  debugging more difficult.

  Resolves review comments from PR19107:

  - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19107#discussion_r478718436
  - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19107#discussion_r478714497

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    Code-review ACK f3e451bebf
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK f3e451bebf. Changes since last review in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20364#pullrequestreview-534369904 were simplifying by dropping the third commit, rebasing, and cleaning up some style & comments in the first commit.

Tree-SHA512: 37de4b25646116e45eba50206e82ed215b0d9942d4847a172c104da4ed76ea4cee29a6fb119f3c34106a9b384263c576cb8671d452965a468f358d4a3fa3c003
2021-11-02 13:40:09 +01:00
MarcoFalke
76886ce11e
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23410: doc: Add output script descriptors BIPs 380..386
c02a674e97 doc: Add output script descriptors BIPs 380..386 (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  BIPs 380..385 are implemented as of v0.17.0.
  BIP 386 is implemented as of v22.0.

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    ACK c02a674e97
  jarolrod:
    ACK c02a674e97
  shaavan:
    ACK c02a674e97

Tree-SHA512: 40f0252d3aad08c61a8e1476d26a590dbcf3f9d66c1f8315d15d13feb17288cc25b9c75df5b938f77695eafaba847dacc0020a880ba6034a511e7c9b7f40fd8f
2021-11-02 09:41:46 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
c02a674e97
doc: Add output script descriptors BIPs 380..386 2021-11-01 16:20:35 +02:00
MarcoFalke
5adc5c0280
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23403: test: Fix segfault in the psbt_wallet_tests/psbt_updater_test
68018e4c3e test: Avoid excessive locking of `cs_wallet` (Hennadii Stepanov)
7986faf2e0 test: Fix segfault in the psbt_wallet_tests/psbt_updater_test (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  The dcd6eeb64a commit (bitcoin/bitcoin#23288) introduced an intermittent failure in the `psbt_wallet_tests/psbt_updater_test` unit test. See bitcoin/bitcoin#23368.

  The test failure can be easily made reproducible with the following patch:
  ```diff
  --- a/src/scheduler.cpp
  +++ b/src/scheduler.cpp
  @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ void CScheduler::serviceQueue()
               Function f = taskQueue.begin()->second;
               taskQueue.erase(taskQueue.begin());

  +            UninterruptibleSleep(100ms);
  +
               {
                   // Unlock before calling f, so it can reschedule itself or another task
                   // without deadlocking:
  ```

  This PR implements an idea which was mentioned in the [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23368#issuecomment-953796339):
  > Yes, as I said before this looks like a race where the wallet is deleted before stopping the scheduler: [#23368 (comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23368#issuecomment-952808824)
  >
  > IIRC, the order should be:
  >
  >    * stop scheduler
  >
  >    * delete wallet
  >
  >    * delete scheduler

  The second commit introduces a refactoring with no behavior change.

  Fixes bitcoin/bitcoin#23368.

ACKs for top commit:
  mjdietzx:
    Code review ACK 68018e4c3e

Tree-SHA512: d9103f6252aab807453628159dec243bc543a2595eecaa04ec761dca3c2370085592c55d6f50967d69a4ac6e8b5827eec30dd9b025132c99b0bb9aa5911ad915
2021-11-01 14:24:22 +01:00
MarcoFalke
fa93ef5a8a
refactor: Take Span in SetSeed
This makes calling code less verbose and less fragile. Also, by adding
the CKey::data() member function, it is now possible to call HexStr()
with a CKey object.
2021-11-01 14:20:56 +01:00
fanquake
3fc3641043
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22766: refactor: Clarify and disable unused ArgsManager flags
c5d7e34bd9 scripted-diff: disable unimplemented ArgsManager BOOL/INT/STRING flags (Russell Yanofsky)
b8c069b7a9 refactor: Add explicit DISALLOW_NEGATION ArgsManager flag to clarify flag usage (Russell Yanofsky)
26a50ab322 refactor: Split InterpretOption into Interpret{Key,Value} functions (Russell Yanofsky)

Pull request description:

  This is preparation for #16545 or another PR implementing type validation for ArgsManager settings. It fixes misleading usages of existing flags, prevents flags from being similarly misused in the future, and allows validation logic to be added without breaking backwards compatibility.

  ---

  Currently, ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags don't do any real validation, so current uses of these flags are misleading and will also break backwards compatibility whenever these flags are implemented in a future PR (draft PR is #16545).

  An additional complication is that while these flags don't do any real settings validation, they do affect whether setting negation syntax is allowed.

  Fix this mess by disabling ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags until they are implemented, and adding an unambiguous DISALLOW_NEGATION flag. This is done in three commits, with the first commit cleaning up some code, the second commit adding the DISALLOW_NEGATION flag, and the next commit disabling the ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags.

  None of the changes affect behavior in any way.

ACKs for top commit:
  ajtowns:
    utACK c5d7e34bd9
  promag:
    Code review ACK c5d7e34bd9, which as the new argument `-legacy`.

Tree-SHA512: cad0e06361e8cc584eb07b0a1f8b469e3beea18abb458c4e43d9d16e9f301b12ebf1d1d426a407fbd96f99724ad6c0eae5be05c713881da7c55e0e08044674eb
2021-11-01 11:25:42 +08:00
fanquake
994aaaa88d
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23380: addrman: Fix AddrMan::Add() return semantics and logging
61ec0539b2 [MOVEONLY] reorder functions in addrman_impl.h and addrman.cpp (John Newbery)
2095df7b7b [addrman] Add Add_() inner function, fix Add() return semantics (John Newbery)
2658eb6d68 [addrman] Rename Add_() to AddSingle() (John Newbery)
e58598e833 [addrman] Add doxygen comment to AddrMan::Add() (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Previously, Add() would return true if the function created a new
  AddressInfo object, even if that object could not be successfully
  entered into the new table and was deleted. That would happen if the new
  table position was already taken and the existing entry could not be
  removed.

  Instead, return true if the new AddressInfo object is successfully
  entered into the new table. This fixes a bug in the "Added %i addresses"
  log, which would not always accurately log how many addresses had been
  added.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    ACK 61ec0539b2
  mzumsande:
    ACK 61ec0539b2
  shaavan:
    ACK 61ec0539b2

Tree-SHA512: 276f1e8297d4b6d411d05d06ffc7c176f6290a784da039926ab6c471a8ed8e9159ab4f56c893b1285737ae292954930f0d28012d89dfb3f2f825d7df41016feb
2021-11-01 10:58:27 +08:00
Hennadii Stepanov
68018e4c3e
test: Avoid excessive locking of cs_wallet 2021-10-31 13:48:00 +02:00
Hennadii Stepanov
7986faf2e0
test: Fix segfault in the psbt_wallet_tests/psbt_updater_test
The bug was introduced in dcd6eeb64a.
2021-10-31 13:48:00 +02:00
fanquake
7efc628539
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23385: refactor: get wallet path relative to wallet_dir
9ba7c44265 refactor: get wallet path relative to wallet_dir (Michael Dietz)

Pull request description:

  Now that boost has been updated > 1.60 (see #22320), we can simplify how we get
  wallet path relative to wallet_dir by using:
  `boost::filesystem::lexically_relative`, removing a TODO.

  Test coverage comes from `test/functional/wallet_multiwallet.py`

  I first tried this in #20265 which was my first attempted PR, and funny enough exactly 1 year later I'm opening this one to hopefully finally close this.

ACKs for top commit:
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 9ba7c44265. Basically this same code change is made in #20744 commit b70c84348ac7a8e427a1183f894c73e52c734529, so this PR helps simplify that one
  lsilva01:
    Code Review ACK 9ba7c44

Tree-SHA512: 6ccb91a18bcb52c3ae0c789a94a18fb5be7db7769fd1121552d63f259fbd32b50c3dcf169cec0b02f978321db3bc60eb4b881b8327e9764f32e700236e0d8a35
2021-10-30 15:20:27 +08:00
Michael Dietz
9ba7c44265
refactor: get wallet path relative to wallet_dir
Now that boost has been updated > 1.60, we can simplify how we get
wallet path relative to wallet_dir by using:
`boost::filesystem::lexically_relative`
2021-10-29 09:36:32 -05:00
MarcoFalke
facc352648
test: Implicitly sync after generate*, unless opted out 2021-10-29 13:34:52 +02:00
MarcoFalke
5574881ce3
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23354: Introduce new V4 format addrman
d891ae7681 Introduce new V4 format addrman (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  #23306 effectively changed the on-disk format in an incompatible way: old deserializers cannot deal with multiple entries for the same IP.

  Introduce a `V4_MULTIPORT` format, and increment the compatibility base, so that old versions correctly recognize it as an incompatible future version, rather than corruption.

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    ACK d891ae7681
  ajtowns:
    utACK d891ae7681
  vasild:
    ACK d891ae7681

Tree-SHA512: de2153beb59152504ee0656dd0cc0b879b09136eb07e3ce0426d2fea778adfabacebbce5cf1a9a65dc99ad4e99cda42ab26743fe672fb82a9fbfec49c4cccb4d
2021-10-29 13:13:03 +02:00
MarcoFalke
8bac3b1096
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23375: test: MiniWallet: more deterministic coin selection for coinbase UTXOs (oldest first)
d2c4904ef7 test: MiniWallet: more deterministic coin selection for coinbase UTXOs (oldest first) (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  The coin selection strategy for MiniWallet is quite straight-forward: simply pick a single UTXO with the largest value:

  ab25ef8c7f/test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py (L173-L174)

  If there are several candidates with the same value, however, it is not clear which one is taken.  This can be particularly problematic for coinbase outputs with fixed block subsidy, since spending could lead to a `bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase` reject if an UTXO from a too-recent block is picked.  Introduce block height as second criteria (saved in `self._utxos` in the methods `generate(...)` and `rescan_utxos(...)`), in order to avoid potential issues with coinbases that are not matured yet. If there is a tie between coinbase UTXOs and non-coinbase UTXOs (the latter are added via `scan_tx(...)`), prefer the non-coinbase UTXOs, since those don't need to mature.

  The issue came up while refactoring the test rpc_blockchain.py, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23371#discussion_r737401936 (PR #23371).

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK d2c4904ef7
  shaavan:
    ACK d2c4904ef7

Tree-SHA512: 15d67b42fb8b77fd53022ea2ab8a6ed2b615567f3ce73bab16c06bfcb687c1a04dcb0360d0c2287c526b604cd3ac5eef7b14ce46fc31e23047ce1a3290027306
2021-10-29 12:55:51 +02:00
MarcoFalke
c426e0dc6f
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22972: test: fix misleading fee unit in mempool_limit.py
2600db6c36 test: fix misleading fee unit in mempool_limit.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  The PR is a follow-up to #22543. The helper `send_large_txs` in its current interface has a fee_rate parameter, implying that it would create a transaction with exactly that rate. Unfortunately, this fee rate is only passed to MiniWallet's `create_self_transfer` method, which can't know that we append several tx outputs after, increasing the tx's vsize and decreasing it's fee rate accordingly.

  In our case, the fee rate is off by several orders of magnitude, as the tx's vsize changes changes from 96 to 67552 vbytes (>700x), i.e. the value passed to this function is neither really a fee rate nor an absolute fee, but something in-between, which is very confusing. It was suggested to simply in-line this helper as it's currently only used in this single test (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22543#discussion_r701685136, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22543#issuecomment-918986896), but I could imagine that this helper may also become useful for other tests and may be moved to a library (e.g. wallet.py) in the future.

  Clarify the interface by passing an absolute fee that is deducted in the end (and also verified, via testmempoolaccept) and also describe how we come up with the value passed. On master, the comment says that the fee rate needs to increased "massively"; this word is also removed because the fee rate only needs to be higher for the test to succeed.

ACKs for top commit:
  stratospher:
    ACK 2600db6.

Tree-SHA512: 0bfacc3fa87603970d86c1d0186e51511f6c20c64b0559e19e7e12a68647f79dcb4f436000dee718fd832ce6a68e3bbacacb29145e0287811f1cb03d2f316843
2021-10-29 12:33:04 +02:00
MarcoFalke
baa9fc941c
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22787: refactor: actual immutable pointing
54011e7aa2 refactor: use CWallet const shared pointers when possible (Karl-Johan Alm)
96461989a2 refactor: const shared_ptrs (Karl-Johan Alm)

Pull request description:

  ```C++
  const std::shared_ptr<CWallet> wallet = x;
  ```
  means we can not do `wallet = y`, but we can totally do `wallet->DestructiveOperation()`, contrary to what that line looks like.

  This PR

  * introduces a new convention: always use const shared pointers to `CWallet`s (even when we mutate the pointed-to thing)
  * uses `const shared_ptr<const CWallet>` everywhere where wallets are not modified

  In the future, this should preferably apply to all shared pointers, not limited to just `CWallet`s.

  Both of these serve the same purpose: to dispell the misconception that `const shared_ptr<X>` immutates `X`. It doesn't, and it's dangerous to leave this misconception as is, for obvious reasons.

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    re-ACK 54011e7aa2

Tree-SHA512: 3bf4062fc821751be30770c6b4ead10a016847970f155a0a5156f304347d221b9830840030c2fbfba8cd1e282f4eda45f5b4107fe6df8138afdcb6c2e95a2836
2021-10-29 10:52:37 +02:00
glozow
36a8441912 [validation/rpc] cache + use vsize calculated in PreChecks
This is not only cleaner but also helps make sure we are always using
the virtual size measure that includes the sigop weight heuristic (which
is the vsize the mempool would return).
2021-10-28 15:58:54 +01:00
glozow
8fa2936b34 [validation] re-introduce bool for whether a transaction is RBF
This bool was originally part of Workspace and was removed in #22539
when it was no longer needed in Finalize(). Re-introducing it because,
once again, multiple functions will need to know whether we're doing an
RBF. Member of MemPoolAccept so that we can use this to inform package
RBF in the future.
2021-10-28 15:58:54 +01:00
glozow
cbb3598b5c [validation/refactor] store precomputed txdata in workspace
We want to be able to re-use the precomputed transaction data between
PolicyScriptChecks and ConsensusScriptChecks in
AcceptMultipleTransactions.
2021-10-28 15:58:53 +01:00
glozow
0a79eaba72 [validation] case-based constructors for ATMPArgs
No change in behavior.
ATMPArgs can continue to have granular rules like switching BIP125
on/off while we create an interface for the different sets of rules for
single transactions vs multiple-testmempoolaccept vs package validation.
This is a cleaner interface than manually constructing the args, which
makes it easy to mix up ordering, use the wrong default, etc. It also
means we don't need to edit ATMP/single transaction validation code
every time we update ATMPArgs for package validation.
2021-10-28 15:57:26 +01:00
John Newbery
61ec0539b2 [MOVEONLY] reorder functions in addrman_impl.h and addrman.cpp
Keep the internal {Function}_() functions grouped together.

Review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
2021-10-28 14:01:40 +01:00
John Newbery
2095df7b7b [addrman] Add Add_() inner function, fix Add() return semantics
Previously, Add() would return true if the function created a new
AddressInfo object, even if that object could not be successfully
entered into the new table and was deleted. That would happen if the new
table position was already taken and the existing entry could not be
removed.

Instead, return true if the new AddressInfo object is successfully
entered into the new table. This fixes a bug in the "Added %i addresses"
log, which would not always accurately log how many addresses had been
added.

p2p_addrv2_relay.py and p2p_addr_relay.py need to be updated since they
were incorrectly asserting on the buggy log (assuming that addresses are
added to addrman, when there could in fact be new table position
collisions that prevent some of those address records from being added).
2021-10-28 14:00:21 +01:00
MarcoFalke
11115169a1
ci: Build fuzz with libsqlite3-dev 2021-10-28 13:32:47 +01:00
John Newbery
2658eb6d68 [addrman] Rename Add_() to AddSingle() 2021-10-28 12:52:27 +01:00
John Newbery
e58598e833 [addrman] Add doxygen comment to AddrMan::Add()
Does not document the return value since we're going to fix the
semantics in a future commit.
2021-10-28 12:51:19 +01:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
d2c4904ef7 test: MiniWallet: more deterministic coin selection for coinbase UTXOs (oldest first)
The coin selection strategy for MiniWallet is quite straight-forward: simply
pick a single UTXO with the largest value:

self._utxos = sorted(self._utxos, key=lambda k: k['value'])
utxo_to_spend = utxo_to_spend or self._utxos.pop()

If there are several candidates with the same value, however, it is not clear
which one is taken.  This can be particularly problematic for coinbase outputs
with fixed block subsidy, since spending could lead to a
'bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase' reject if an UTXO from a too-recent
block is picked.  Introduce block height as second criteria (saved in
self._utxos in the methods generate(...) and rescan_utxos(...)), in order to
avoid potential issues with coinbases that are not matured yet.
2021-10-27 17:49:53 +02:00
MarcoFalke
ab25ef8c7f
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23305: test: refactor: add script_util helper for creating bare multisig scripts
4718897ce3 test: add script_util helper for creating bare multisig scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  This PR is a follow-up to #22363 and #23118 and introduces a helper `keys_to_multisig_script` for creating bare multisig outputs in the form of
  ```
  OP_K PubKey1 PubKey2 ... PubKeyN OP_N OP_CHECKMULTISIG
  ```
  The function takes a list of pubkeys (both hex- and byte-strings are accepted due to the `script_util.check_key` helper being used internally) and optionally a threshold _k_. If no threshold is passed, a n-of-n multisig output is created, with _n_ being the number of passed pubkeys.

ACKs for top commit:
  shaavan:
    utACK 4718897ce3
  rajarshimaitra:
    tACK 4718897ce3

Tree-SHA512: b452d8a75b0d17316b66ac4ed4c6893fe59c7c417719931d4cd3955161f59afca43503cd09b83a35b5a252a122eb3f0fbb9da9f0e7c944cf8da572a02219ed9d
2021-10-27 11:49:01 +01:00
MarcoFalke
e77d9679fd
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23006: multiprocess: Add new bitcoin-gui, bitcoin-qt, bitcoin-wallet init implementations
d5f985e51f multiprocess: Add new bitcoin-gui, bitcoin-qt, bitcoin-wallet init implementations (Russell Yanofsky)

Pull request description:

  Add separate `interfaces::Init` subclasses for `bitcoin-wallet`,  `bitcoin-gui`, and `bitcoin-qt` binaries instead of sharing `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-node` init subclasses in different binaries. After this, the new init subclasses can be customized in #10102, so node and wallet code is dropped from the `bitcoin-gui` binary and wallet code is dropped from into the `bitcoin-node` binary.

  ---

  This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).

ACKs for top commit:
  lsilva01:
    reACK d5f985e
  hebasto:
    re-ACK d5f985e51f, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23006#pullrequestreview-787537444) review.

Tree-SHA512: 6784210bd9ce3a6fbc66852680d0e9bc513c072dc538aeb7f48cb6a41580d3f567ccef04f975ee767a714a4b05d4d87273e94a79abda1b9c25d5ac4bbe752006
2021-10-26 15:54:52 +01:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
4718897ce3 test: add script_util helper for creating bare multisig scripts 2021-10-26 14:51:18 +02:00
MarcoFalke
af4275e8db
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23332: doc: Fix CWalletTx::Confirmation doc
fa8fef6ef2 doc: Fix CWalletTx::Confirmation doc (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Follow-up to:
  * commit 700c42b85d, which replaced pIndex
    with block_hash in AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe.

  * commit 9700fcb47f, which replaced
    posInBlock with confirm.nIndex.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fa8fef6ef2
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK fa8fef6ef2

Tree-SHA512: e7643b8e9200b8ebab3eda30435ad77006568a03476006013c9ac42c826c84e42e29bcdefc6f443fe4d55e76e903bfed5aa7a51f831665001c204634b6f06508
2021-10-26 13:50:15 +01:00
Pieter Wuille
d891ae7681 Introduce new V4 format addrman
92617b7a75 effectively changed the
on-disk format in an incompatible way: old deserializers cannot
deal with multiple entries for the same IP.

Introduce a V4_MULTIPORT format, and increment the compatibility base,
so that old versions correctly recognize it as an incompatible future
version.
2021-10-25 13:48:21 -04:00
Russell Yanofsky
c5d7e34bd9 scripted-diff: disable unimplemented ArgsManager BOOL/INT/STRING flags
This commit does not change behavior in any way. See previous commit for
complete rationale, but these flags are being disabled because they
aren't implemented and will otherwise break backwards compatibility when
they are implemented.

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's:\(ALLOW_.*\)   \(//!< unimplemented\):// \1\2:' src/util/system.h
sed -i '/DISALLOW_NEGATION.*scripted-diff/d' src/util/system.cpp
git grep -l 'ArgsManager::ALLOW_\(INT\|STRING\)'  | xargs sed -i 's/ArgsManager::ALLOW_\(INT\|STRING\)/ArgsManager::ALLOW_ANY | ArgsManager::DISALLOW_NEGATION/g'
git grep -l 'ALLOW_BOOL' -- ':!src/util/system.h' | xargs sed -i 's/ALLOW_BOOL/ALLOW_ANY/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2021-10-25 10:44:17 -04:00
MarcoFalke
22a9018649
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23306: Make AddrMan support multiple ports per IP
92617b7a75 Make AddrMan support multiple ports per IP (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  For a long part of Bitcoin's history, this codebase has aggressively avoided making automatic connections to anything but nodes running on port 8333. I'd like to propose changing that, and this is a first PR necessary for that.

  The folklore justification (eventually actually added as a comment to the codebase in #20668) is that this is to prevent the Bitcoin P2P network from being leveraged to perform a DoS attack on other services, if their IP/port would get rumoured. It appears, at least the current network scale - and probably significantly larger - that the impact is very low at best (see calculations by vasild in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/5150#issuecomment-853888909 e.g.). Another possible justification would be a risk that treating different IP:port combinations separately would help perform Eclipse attacks (by an attacker rumouring their own IP with many ports). This concern is (a) no different than what is possible with IPv6 (where large ranges of IP addresses are very cheaply available), and (b) already hopefully sufficiently addressed by addrman's design (which limits access through based selected based on network groups).

  And this policy has downsides too; in particular, a fixed port is easy to detect, and a very obvious sign a Bitcoin node is running there.

  One obstacle in moving away from a default port that is the fact that addrman is currently restricted to a single entry per IP address. If ports are no longer expected to be generally always the default one, we need to deal with the case where conflicting information is relayed. It turns out there is a very natural solution to this: treat (IP,port) combination exactly as we're treating IPs now; this automatically means that the same IP may appear with multiple ports, simply because those would be distinct entries. Given that indexing into addrman's bucket _already_ uses the port number, the only change required is making all addrman lookup be (IP,port) (aka `CService`) based, rather than IP (aka `CNetAddr`) based.

  This PR doesn't include any change to the actual outbound connection preference logic, as perhaps that's something that we want to phase in more gradually.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    Code review ACK 92617b7a75
  naumenkogs:
    ACK 92617b7a75
  ajtowns:
    ACK 92617b7a75
  vasild:
    ACK 92617b7a75

Tree-SHA512: 9eef06ce97a8b54a3f05fb8acf6941f253a9a5e0be8ce383dd05c44bb567cea243b74ee5667178e7497f6df2db93adab97ac66edbc37c883fd8ec840ee69a33f
2021-10-25 16:44:17 +02:00
Russell Yanofsky
b8c069b7a9 refactor: Add explicit DISALLOW_NEGATION ArgsManager flag to clarify flag usage
Currently, ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags don't do any real validation,
so current uses of these flags are misleading and will also break
backwards compatibility whenever these flags are implemented in a future
PR (draft PR is #16545).

An additional complication is that while these flags don't do any real
settings validation, they do affect whether setting negation syntax is
allowed.

Fix this mess by disabling ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags until they are
implemented, and adding an unambiguous DISALLOW_NEGATION flag. This is
done in two commits, with this commit adding the DISALLOW_NEGATION flag,
and the next commit disabling the ALLOW_{INT|BOOL|STRING} flags.
2021-10-25 10:44:17 -04:00
Russell Yanofsky
26a50ab322 refactor: Split InterpretOption into Interpret{Key,Value} functions
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
2021-10-25 10:44:17 -04:00
MarcoFalke
d565d9b56d
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23312: tests: reduce feature_segwit.py usage of the legacy wallet
e9ade032f3 tests: Add feature_segwit.py --descriptors to test_runner.py (Andrew Chow)
ae6cbcc909 tests: restrict feature_segwit legacy wallet import tests (Andrew Chow)
1d13c44a4c tests: Use descriptors for feature_segwit multisig setup (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  `feature_segwit.py` has tests for some legacy wallet behavior, but otherwise does not really need the legacy wallet. Those parts now require `--legacy-wallet` to be provided (as with other legacy wallet tests). Other parts of the test are changed to work with descriptor wallets as well.

ACKs for top commit:
  lsilva01:
    tACK e9ade03

Tree-SHA512: 4ae76a4d2a8d318e7f8ad4c984748e3cdd67ed00359fcd798a08492ed9399b1d01be88c9ebea3d6c996fbe190cf41708a15c98f088f0cb5c47d6d00fff258944
2021-10-25 15:32:27 +02:00
MarcoFalke
beb45b8b14
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23311: wallet: Use PACKAGE_NAME to mention our software
da791c7f66 wallet: Use PACKAGE_NAME to mention our software (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR replaces "bitcoin" and "bitcoind" with `PACKAGE_NAME` in wallet log and error messages.

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    ACK da791c7f66
  lsilva01:
    Tested ACK da791c7 on Ubuntu 20.04.
  brunoerg:
    tACK da791c7f66
  stratospher:
    Tested ACK da791c7
  shaavan:
    ACK da791c7f66

Tree-SHA512: c613446d9c8c3f85e6f5fec77382c9bc17746a853c89e72e1a3a79bf355d7bd9e455bbde8f9e02a894d225a67029c732cdc68ec8c58ac8237dde27d39dae8be7
2021-10-25 15:24:00 +02:00
MarcoFalke
1847ce2d49
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23157: txmempool -/-> validation 1/2: improve performance of check() and remove dependency on validation
082c5bf099 [refactor] pass coinsview and height to check() (glozow)
ed6115f1ea [mempool] simplify some check() logic (glozow)
9e8d7ad5d9 [validation/mempool] use Spend/AddCoin instead of UpdateCoins (glozow)
09d18916af MOVEONLY: remove single-use helper func CheckInputsAndUpdateCoins (glozow)
e8639ec26a [mempool] remove now-unnecessary code (glozow)
54c6f3c1da [mempool] speed up check() by using coins cache and iterating in topo order (glozow)
30e240f65e [bench] Benchmark CTxMemPool::check() (glozow)
cb1407196f [refactor/bench] make mempool_stress bench reusable and parameterizable (glozow)

Pull request description:

  Remove the txmempool <-> validation circular dependency by removing txmempool's dependency on validation. There are two functions in txmempool that need validation right now: `check()` and `removeForReorg()`. This PR removes the dependencies in `check()`.

  This PR also improves the performance of `CTxMemPool::check()` by walking through the entries exactly once, in ascending ancestorcount order, which guarantees that we see parents before children.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    reACK 082c5bf099
  GeneFerneau:
    tACK [082c5bf](082c5bf099)
  rajarshimaitra:
    tACK 082c5bf099
  theStack:
    Code-review ACK 082c5bf099

Tree-SHA512: 40ac622af1627b5c3e6abb4f0f035d833265a8c5e8dc88faf5354875dfb5137f137825e54bbd2a2668ed37b145c5d02285f776402629f58596e51853a9a79d29
2021-10-25 15:21:27 +02:00
MarcoFalke
49e40f5704
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22711: test: check for specific block reject reasons in p2p_segwit.py
45827fd718 test: check for block reject reasons in p2p_segwit.py [2/2] (Sebastian Falbesoner)
4eb532ff8b test: check for block reject reasons in p2p_segwit.py [1/2] (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b1488c4dce test: fix reference to block processing test in p2p_segwit.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  In the test `p2p_segwit.py`, there are many instances where we send a segwit block to a node with the expectation that it is rejected. For this purpose, the helper function `test_witness_block` exists which allows also to check for a specific reject `reason` that is asserted in the debug log:
  502d22ceed/test/functional/p2p_segwit.py (L119-L120)

  This PR aims to increase the precision of the tests by adding the expected reject reasons to all `test_witness_block` call instances (found via `grep`ing after `test_witness_block(.*accepted=False`). For some blocks that are rejected due to failed script verification, the exact reason is only shown in the debug log if parallel script verification is disabled. For this reason, the addition of the reasons is split up in two commits:
  * first, all instances are tackled that are not subject to script verification, i.e. it doesn't matter whether parallel script verification is enabled or not (e.g. `bad-blk-weight`, `bad-witness-merkle-match`...)
  * then, we explicitely set `-par=1` to only use one script thread, and add the remaining reasons (`non-mandatory-script-verify-flag` with the more specific reason in parantheses)

ACKs for top commit:
  stratospher:
    tested ACK 45827fd.

Tree-SHA512: 00f31867f11d48b38a42b1e79a1303bda1c797ccf3d8c73e6107d70b062604d51ee2a3f2251e7f068dfafdaf09469d27dfee438d9bc9ebaef7febc4b6ef90a95
2021-10-25 14:53:40 +02:00
MarcoFalke
b9cf505bdf
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23338: tests: speed up coinselector_tests
a52f1d1340 walletdb: Use SQLiteDatabase for mock wallet databases (Andrew Chow)
a78c229808 tests: Place into mapWallet in coinselector_tests (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  #23288 changed coinselector_tests to use `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan`, but it also ended up significantly slowing down the test, from 4 seconds to over 1 minute. It appears that the source of this slow down is with `CWallet::AddToWallet`, and primarily due to writing data to the mock wallet database. Because the only thing that is actually needed is for the created transaction to be placed into `CWallet::mapWallet`, this PR removes the call to `AddToWallet` and just places the transaction into `mapWallet` directly. This reduces the test time to 5 seconds.

  To speed things up further, `CreateMockWalletDatabase` is changed to make a `SQLiteDatabase` instead of a `BerkeleyDatabase`. This is safe because there are no tests that require a specific mock database type.

ACKs for top commit:
  brunoerg:
    tACK a52f1d1340
  lsilva01:
    tACK a52f1d1. Performed 74.36% better on Ubuntu 20.04 (VM, 12 MB, 8vCPU).
  glozow:
    utACK a52f1d1340

Tree-SHA512: da77936bfd2e816d2e71703567b9389d0ee79f3a4a690802ffe3469df5bed371b296cb822b897f625654dab9436d91fd6bc02364a518a47d746e487d70a72595
2021-10-25 13:28:38 +02:00
Karl-Johan Alm
54011e7aa2
refactor: use CWallet const shared pointers when possible
While const shared_ptr<X> gives us an immutable shared pointer to a mutable X (we can't set it to some other X later), shared_ptr<const X> gives us a shared pointer to an immutable X. Importantly, we can recast shared_ptr<X> into shared_ptr<const X>, but not the other way around. We do this for two reasons: because it makes the code safer to guarantee the wallet is not modified, and because it further dispells the misconception that const shared_ptr<X> gives immutability to X.
2021-10-25 16:12:21 +09:00
Karl-Johan Alm
96461989a2
refactor: const shared_ptrs
Introduce convention to use const shared pointers everywhere, unless the shared pointer is modified at some point, which it very rarely is.

We want this convention, as it helps alleviate the misconception that a const shared pointer somehow results in a pointer to an immutable object, which is false.
2021-10-25 16:12:19 +09:00
fanquake
04437ee721
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23215: ci: Add vcpkg tools cache
f778845d97 ci: Add vcpkg tools cache (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  On master (02feae54a5) vcpkg downloads some tools that are used internally:
  ```
  ...
    A suitable version of cmake was not found (required v3.20.0). Downloading portable cmake v3.20.0...
    Downloading cmake...
      https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/releases/download/v3.20.2/cmake-3.20.2-windows-i386.zip -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\cmake-3.20.2-windows-i386.zip
    Extracting cmake...
    A suitable version of 7zip was not found (required v18.1.0). Downloading portable 7zip v18.1.0...
    Downloading 7zip...
      https://www.nuget.org/api/v2/package/7-Zip.CommandLine/18.1.0 -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\7-zip.commandline.18.1.0.nupkg
    Extracting 7zip...
    A suitable version of nuget was not found (required v5.5.0). Downloading portable nuget v5.5.0...
    Downloading nuget...
      https://dist.nuget.org/win-x86-commandline/v5.5.1/nuget.exe -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\22ea847d-nuget.exe
    Detecting compiler hash for triplet x64-windows-static...
    A suitable version of powershell-core was not found (required v7.1.0). Downloading portable powershell-core v7.1.0...
    Downloading powershell-core...
      https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/releases/download/v7.1.3/PowerShell-7.1.3-win-x86.zip -> C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Temp\vcpkg\downloads\PowerShell-7.1.3-win-x86.zip
    Extracting powershell-core...
  ...
  ```

  If any of downloads above fails the whole CI task fails (see #23107). The most recent failure examples in the master branch:
  - c001da306b, [log](https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/task/5182966176415744/logs/build.log)
  - 12ff8993bc, [log](https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/task/5367684129882112/logs/build.log)

  This PR adds vcpkg tools cache.

  Closes #23107.

  ---

  Note for reviewers. Some patches from the initial PR were split into separated PRs: #23310 and #23329. Therefore, a discussion here could be outdated or irrelevant until the recent [push](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23215#issuecomment-949556531).

ACKs for top commit:
  sipsorcery:
    ACK f778845d97.

Tree-SHA512: 201f4e4d38c00cbec6aaeca4f3e1b60f1c65289fb68b82cead47f37f6af5ac42dd539cf8ed3566f5bd9afe4a7762d42bbabb316d58f47352d4e7bfc2214806fe
2021-10-23 09:42:53 +08:00
Andrew Chow
a52f1d1340 walletdb: Use SQLiteDatabase for mock wallet databases
Default to SQLiteDatabase instead of BerkeleyDatabase for
CreateDummyWalletDatabase. Most tests already use descriptor wallets and
the mock db doesn't really matter for tests. The tests where it does
matter will make the db directly.
2021-10-22 17:49:43 -04:00
Andrew Chow
a78c229808 tests: Place into mapWallet in coinselector_tests
Instead of using AddToWallet so that making a COutput will work,
directly add the transaction into wallet.mapWallet. This bypasses many
checks that AddToWallet will do which are pointless and just slow down
this test.
2021-10-22 17:49:43 -04:00
Hennadii Stepanov
bdbefdcd5c
Merge bitcoin-core/gui#454: Use only Qt translation primitives in GUI code
58765a450c qt: Use only Qt translation primitives in GUI code (W. J. van der Laan)

Pull request description:

  Use `Object::tr`, `QT_TRANSLATE_NOOP`, and `QCoreApplication::translate` as appropriate instead of using `_()` which doesn't get picked up.

  Replaces bitcoin/bitcoin#22764

  Edit: I checked that the strings end up in the appropriate context in `bitcoin_en.ts` after `make translate`:
  - "Settings file could not be read" "Settings file could not be written" end up in `bitcoin-core`
  - "(press q to shutdown and continue later)" and "press q to shutdown" end up in `SplashScreen`

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK 58765a450c

Tree-SHA512: d0cc5901426c47d411d0fe75aac195b9684b51385f74c161da772dbf9f0977f7ad7a0976e17366f49b40718e9b6eb87c3e93306dc845f97adddbc47d00731742
2021-10-22 23:50:20 +03:00