fa6b402114 test: Run mempool_packages.py with MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
fa448c27d2 test: Return fee from MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
faec09f240 test: Return chain of MiniWallet txs from MiniWallet chain method (MarcoFalke)
faa12d4ccd test: Refactor MiniWallet sign_tx (MarcoFalke)
fa2d82103f test: Return wtxid from create_self_transfer_multi (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This allows to run the test even when no wallet is compiled in.
Also, it is a lot nicer to read now.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK fa6b402
Tree-SHA512: de0338068fd51db01d64ce270f94fd2982a63a6de597325cd1e1f11127e9075bd4aeacace0ed76d09a2db8b962b27237cf11edb4c1fe1a01134d397f8a11bd05
603d295199 test: wallet: add coverage for `-spendzeroconfchange` setting (Sebastian Falbesoner)
50112034bc test: remove `-spendzeroconfchange` setting from mempool_limit.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `-spendzeroconfchange` setting (in particular the non-default case `=0`). Note that in contrast to the name, the setting does not only apply to change outputs, but in fact to _all_ unconfirmed outputs that we sent to ourselves, i.e. we can trigger the testing path simply with a single recipient address. The first commit removes the setting from the functional test mempool_limit.py, where it doesn't have any effect, since the test was changed to use MiniWallet in commit dddca3899c.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
crACK 603d295199
Tree-SHA512: 15d9c8bd5eb37c6b228bf887eb27debee0a391c82356662785da4553ee2558e611834c3936ef7136812b46f877bab7aa5f3088bbd278b81f296bdda96cc8e1c3
fa9f6d7bcd rpc: Run type check against RPCArgs (MarcoFalke)
faf96721a6 test: Fix wrong types passed to RPCs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It seems brittle to require `RPCTypeCheck` being called inside the code logic. Without compile-time enforcement this will lead to places where it is forgotten and thus to inconsistencies and bugs. Fix this by removing the calls to `RPCTypeCheck` and doing the check internally.
The changes should be reviewed as refactoring changes. However, if they change behavior, it will be a bugfix. For example the changes here happen to also detect/fix bugs like the one fixed in commit 3b5fb6e77a.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa9f6d7bcd
Tree-SHA512: fb2c0981fe6e24da3ca7dbc06898730779ea4e02ea485458505a281cf421015e44dad0221a04023fc547ea2c660d94657909843fc85d92b847611ec097532439
6bd098a838 test: simplify tests by using the pre-mined chain (kouloumos)
42029a7fd4 test: remove redundant blocks generation logic (kouloumos)
0377d6bb42 test: add `rescan_utxos` in MiniWallet's initialization (kouloumos)
Pull request description:
When a pre-mined blockchain is used (default behavior), it [contains coinbase outputs in blocks 76-10](07c54de550/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py (L809-L813)) to [the MiniWallet's default address](07c54de550/test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py (L99-L101)). That's why we always* `rescan_utxos()` after initializing the MiniWallet, in order for the MiniWallet to account for those mature UTXOs.
> The tests following this usage pattern can be seen with:
> ```git grep -n "MiniWallet(" $(git grep -le "rescan_utxos()" $(git grep -Le "self.setup_clean_chain = True"))```
**This PR adds `rescan_utxos()` inside MiniWallet's initialization to simplify usage when the MiniWallet is used with a pre-mined chain.**
### secondary changes
- *There are a few tests that use the pre-mined blockchain but do not `rescan_utxos()`, they instead generate new blocks to create mature UTXOs.
> Those were written before the `rescan_utxos()` method was introduced with https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22955 (fac66d0a39) and can be seen with:
> `git grep -n "MiniWallet(" $(git grep -Le "rescan_utxos()" $(git grep -Le "self.setup_clean_chain = True"))`
>
After including `rescan_utxos()` inside MiniWallets initilization, this blocks generation logic is not needed as the MiniWallet already accounts for enough mature UTXOs to perform the tests. **Therefore the now redundant blocks generation logic is removed from those tests with the second commit.**
- The rest of the MiniWallet tests use a clean chain (`self.setup_clean_chain = True`) and can be seen with
`git grep -n "MiniWallet(" $(git grep -le "self.setup_clean_chain = True")`
From those, there are a few that start from a clean chain and then create enough mature UTXOs for the MiniWallet with this kind of logic:
07c54de550/test/functional/mempool_expiry.py (L36-L40)
**Those tests are simplified in the third commit to instead utilize the mature UTXOs of the pre-mined chain.**
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 6bd098a838 🕷
theStack:
re-ACK 6bd098a838
Tree-SHA512: 7f9361e36910e4000c33a32efdde4449f4a8a763bb42df96de826fcde469f9362f701b8c99e2a2c482d2d5a42a83ae5ae3844fdbed187ed0ff231f386c222493
5ca7a7be76 rpc: Return accurate results for scanblocks (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Implements #26322.
Adds a `filter_false_positives` mode to `scanblocks` to accurately verify results from blockfilters.
If the option is enabled, pre-results given by blockfilters will be filtered out again by checking vouts and vins of all transactions of the relevant blocks against the given descriptors.
### Master
```bash
./src/bitcoin-cli -testnet -named scanblocks action=start scanobjects='["addr(tb1qcxf2gv93c26s6mqz7y6etpqdf70zmn67dualgr)"]'
{
"from_height": 0,
"to_height": 2376055,
"relevant_blocks": [
"000000000001bc35077dec4104e0ab1f667ae27059bd907f9a8fac55c802ae36",
"00000000000120a9c50542d73248fb7c37640c252850f0cf273134ad9febaf61",
"0000000000000082f7af3835da8b6146b0bfb243b8842f09c495fa1e74d454ed",
"0000000000000094c32651728193bfbe91f6789683b8d6ac6ae2d22ebd3cb5d3"
]
}
```
### PR (without `filter_false_positives` mode)
Same as master
```bash
./src/bitcoin-cli -testnet -named scanblocks action=start scanobjects='["addr(tb1qcxf2gv93c26s6mqz7y6etpqdf70zmn67dualgr)"]' filter_false_positives=false
{
"from_height": 0,
"to_height": 2376055,
"relevant_blocks": [
"000000000001bc35077dec4104e0ab1f667ae27059bd907f9a8fac55c802ae36",
"00000000000120a9c50542d73248fb7c37640c252850f0cf273134ad9febaf61",
"0000000000000082f7af3835da8b6146b0bfb243b8842f09c495fa1e74d454ed",
"0000000000000094c32651728193bfbe91f6789683b8d6ac6ae2d22ebd3cb5d3"
]
}
```
### PR (with `filter_false_positives` mode)
```bash
./src/bitcoin-cli -testnet -named scanblocks action=start scanobjects='["addr(tb1qcxf2gv93c26s6mqz7y6etpqdf70zmn67dualgr)"]' filter_false_positives=true
{
"from_height": 0,
"to_height": 2376058,
"relevant_blocks": [
"0000000000000082f7af3835da8b6146b0bfb243b8842f09c495fa1e74d454ed",
"0000000000000094c32651728193bfbe91f6789683b8d6ac6ae2d22ebd3cb5d3"
]
}
```
Also adds a test to check that the blockhash of a transaction will be included in the `relevant_blocks` whether the `filter_false_positives` mode is enabled or not.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5ca7a7be76
theStack:
re-ACK 5ca7a7be76
furszy:
Code review ACK 5ca7a7be
Tree-SHA512: e8f3cceddddd66f59509717b6314d89e2fef241e13cee81b18fd95e8362cbb95cc40f884342ce6cf892a86febd9e2d434afce05d51892240e67f72ae991852e7
cfe5aebc79 rpc: add minconf and maxconf options to sendall (ishaanam)
a07a413466 Wallet/RPC: Allow specifying min & max chain depth for inputs used by fund calls (Juan Pablo Civile)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a "minconf" option to `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, and `sendall`.
Alternative implementation of #14641Fixes#14542
Edit: This PR now also adds this option to `send`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK cfe5aebc79
Xekyo:
ACK cfe5aebc79
furszy:
diff ACK cfe5aebc, only a non-blocking nit.
Tree-SHA512: 836e610926eec3a62308fba88ddbd6a13d8f4dac37352d0309599f893cde9c1df5e9c298fda6e076493068e4d213e4afa7290a9e3bdb5a95a5d507da3f7b59e8
4159ccd031 test: Run feature_bip68_sequence.py with MiniWallet (Miles Liu)
fc0caaf4aa test: Add "include mempool" flag to MiniWallet rescan_utxos (Miles Liu)
d0a909ae54 test: Add "include immature coinbase" flag to MiniWallet get_utxos (Miles Liu)
e5b9127d9e test: Add signs P2TR and RAWSCRIPT to MiniWallet sign_tx (Miles Liu)
Pull request description:
This PR enables one more of the non-wallet functional tests (feature_bip68_sequence.py) to be run even when no wallet is compiled in by using the MiniWallet instead, as proposed in #20078.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4159ccd031
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 4159ccd031🤸
Tree-SHA512: e891b189381e961c840b45fc30d058363707fd54c1c4bdc3d29623b03309981f1d3ebfac27e6aecf621bdbcd7e31754a3ef7c53f86346f7dd241c137e64c92bd
d6fc1d6a33 test: add coverage for dust mempool policy (`-dustrelayfee` setting) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
8a5dbe2879 test: add `CScript` method for checking for witness program (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `-dustrelayfee` setting, which specifies the fee-rate used to define dust. Output scripts for all common types that are treated as standard by default (P2PK, P2(W)PKH, P2(W)SH, P2TR, bare multisig, null data, unknown witness versions v2+) are created and then checked for dust-mempool-policy each via the `testmempoolaccept` RPC: a tx with an output's nValue equal to the dust threshold should be accepted, one with an nValue of just one 1 satoshi below that should be rejected with reason `dust`. This is repeatedly done for a fixed (but obviously somewhat arbitrary) list of different `-dustrelayfee` settings on a single node, including the default and zero (i.e. no dust limit) settings.
Note that the first commit introduces a necessary `CScript` helper method `IsWitnessProgram` (using PascalCase in Python is likely controversial; in this case the style for the already existing method `GetSigOpCount` was followed, which also refers to a method in the core `CScript` class).
Some historical information about dust, contributed by pablomartin4btc:
"The concept of dust was first introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2577. This [commit](eb30d1a5b2) from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9380 introduced the -dustrelayfee option. Previous to that PR, the dust feerate was whatever -minrelaytxfee was set to."
ACKs for top commit:
LarryRuane:
ACK d6fc1d6a33
glozow:
ACK d6fc1d6a33
kouloumos:
ACK d6fc1d6a33
Tree-SHA512: 35ea2b2497dfb466395af5665bb217f7250aa7cab9dc43539a5658ab69a454e3623ff58fce7489fcc1105b37f8cb4840a93cec658c5df1de611732bc6439ccad
8cbd926a2c test: refactor: simplify p2p_permissions.py by using MiniWallet (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR simplies the functional test p2p_permissions.py by using MiniWallet in order to avoid manual low-level tx creation. Also, rather than mining 100 blocks manually, the pre-mined chain of the test framework is used, which speeds up the test a little (~2-3 seconds faster on my machine).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8cbd926a2c
Tree-SHA512: 36cbc2a0f6fb0251c8696cd017163ed30529690736bafd36e80b53007bd02b9030b68fe93b90dc50323526c8b7d8e0abd8f20890d46ff6015d5c632b64a08535
Since this test was changed to use MiniWallet instead of the Bitcoin
Core wallet (see commit d447ded6ba),
the setting doesn't have any effect and hence can be removed.
fa1bf4e705 test: Fix intermittent timeout in p2p_permissions.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The sync is based on `bytesrecv_per_msg["verack"]`. However, the bytes are counted before processing the message, so they are not sufficient to ensure the connection is fully up.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK fa1bf4e705
aureleoules:
ACK fa1bf4e705
Tree-SHA512: eb1ed537032c76a449b1ed5e42ff062e9b8b3c7e11fde2a5b8183ae0d6fbe31dba39e2c758836160cd8157d9ac5cc1f5d1916415861b8d711b7370c88f5e9790
f9ce0eadf4 For feebump, ignore abandoned descendant spends (John Moffett)
Pull request description:
Closes#26667
To be eligible for fee-bumping, a transaction must not have any of its outputs (eg - change) spent in other unconfirmed transactions in the wallet. This behavior is currently [enforced](9e229a542f/src/wallet/feebumper.cpp (L25-L28)) and [tested](9e229a542f/test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py (L270-L286)).
However, this check shouldn't apply to spends in abandoned descendant transactions, as explained by #26667.
`CWallet::IsSpent` already carves out an exception for abandoned transactions, so we can just use that.
I've also added a new test to cover this case.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK f9ce0eadf4
achow101:
ACK f9ce0eadf4
furszy:
ACK f9ce0ead
Tree-SHA512: 19d957d1cf6747668bb114e27a305027bfca5a9bed2b1d9cc9e1b0bd4666486c7c4b60b045a7fe677eb9734d746f5de76390781fb1e9e0bceb4a46d20acd1749
c467cfffce test: add coverage for `purpose` arg in `listlabels` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for `listlabels` command when specifying the `purpose` (send and receive).
dcdfd72861/src/wallet/rpc/addresses.cpp (L698-L704)
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK c467cfffce
Tree-SHA512: 7e7143c1264692f7b22952e7c70dbe9ed3f5dcd2e3b69962a47be9f9c21b3f4a9089ca87962fbc8ff9116e7d2dbeb7f36d6a132c9ac13724a255cfe1b32373a8
264f9ef17f [validation] return MempoolAcceptResult for every tx on PCKG_TX failure (glozow)
dae81e01e8 [refactor] rename variables in AcceptPackage for clarity (glozow)
da484bc738 [doc] release note effective-feerate and effective-includes RPC results (glozow)
5eab397b98 [validation] remove PackageMempoolAcceptResult::m_package_feerate (glozow)
601bac88cb [rpc] return effective-includes in testmempoolaccept and submitpackage (glozow)
1691eaa818 [rpc] return effective-feerate in testmempoolaccept and submitpackage (glozow)
d6c7b78ef2 [validation] return wtxids of other transactions whose fees were used (glozow)
1605886380 [validation] return effective feerate from mempool validation (glozow)
5d35b4a7de [test] package validation quits early due to non-policy, non-missing-inputs failure (glozow)
be2e4d94e5 [validation] when quitting early in AcceptPackage, set package_state and tx result (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes a bug and improves the mempool accept interface to return information more predictably.
Bug: In package validation, we first try the transactions individually (see doc/policy/packages.md for more explanation) and, if they all failed for missing inputs and policy-related (i.e. fee) reasons, we'll try package validation. Otherwise, we'll just "quit early" since, for example, if a transaction had an invalid signature, adding a child will not help make it valid. Currently, when we quit early, we're not setting the `package_state` to be invalid, so the caller might think it succeeded. Also, we're returning no results - it makes more sense to return the individual transaction failure. Thanks instagibbs for catching https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25038#discussion_r1013293248!
Also, make the package results interface generally more useful/predictable:
- Always return the feerate at which a transaction was considered for `CheckFeeRate` in `MempoolAcceptResult::m_effective_feerate` when it was successful. This can replace the current `PackageMempoolAcceptResult::m_package_feerate`, which only sometimes exists.
- Always provide an entry for every transaction in `PackageMempoolAcceptResult::m_tx_results` when the error is `PCKG_TX`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 264f9ef17f
achow101:
ACK 264f9ef17f
naumenkogs:
reACK 264f9ef17f
Tree-SHA512: ce7fd9927a80030317cc6157822596e85a540feff5dbf5eea7c62da2eb50c917cdddc9da1e2ff62cc18b98b27d360151811546bd9d498859679a04bbee090837
65e78bda7c test: Invalid label name coverage (Aurèle Oulès)
552b51e682 refactor: Add sanity checks in LabelFromValue (Aurèle Oulès)
67e7ba8e1a rpc: Sanitize label name in various RPCs (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
The following RPCs did not sanitize the optional label name:
- importprivkey
- importaddress
- importpubkey
- importmulti
- importdescriptors
- listsinceblock
Thus is was possible to import an address with a label `*` which should not be possible.
The wildcard label is used for backwards compatibility in the `listtransactions` rpc.
I added test coverage for these RPCs.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 65e78bda7c
achow101:
ACK 65e78bda7c
furszy:
diff ACK 65e78bd
stickies-v:
re-ACK 65e78bda7c
theStack:
re-ACK 65e78bda7c
Tree-SHA512: ad99f2824d4cfae352166b76da4ca0069b7c2eccf81aaa0654be25bbb3c6e5d6b005d93960f3f4154155f80e12be2d0cebd5529922ae3d2a36ee4eed82440b31
This value creates an extremely confusing interface as its existence is
dependent upon implementation details (whether something was submitted
on its own, etc). MempoolAcceptResult::m_effective_feerate is much more
helpful, as it always exists for submitted transactions.
c6119f4788 tests: Use unique port for ZMQ tests (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The ZMQ interface tests should use unique ports as we do for the p2p and rpc ports so that multiple instances of the test can be run at the same time.
Without this, the test may hang until killed, or fail.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK c6119f4788
Tree-SHA512: 2ca3ed2f35e5a83d7ab83740674fed362a8d146dc751156cfe100133a591347cd1ac9d164046f1744d65451a57c52cb22d3bb2161105f421f8f655c4a2512c59
730e14a317 test: wallet: check that labels are migrated to watchonly wallet (Sebastian Falbesoner)
d5f4ae7fac wallet: fully migrate address book entries for watchonly/solvable wallets (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Currently `migratewallet` migrates the address book (i.e. labels and purposes) for watchonly and solvable wallets only in RAM, but doesn't persist them on disk. Fix this by adding another loop for both of the special wallet types after which writes the corresponding NAME and PURPOSE entries to the database in a single batch. Also adds a corresponding test that checks if labels were migrated correctly for a watchonly wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 730e14a317
furszy:
code ACK 730e14a3, left a non-blocking nit.
aureleoules:
ACK 730e14a317
Tree-SHA512: 159487e11e858924ef762e0190ccaea185bdff239e3d2280c8d63c4ac2649ec71714dc4d53dec644f03488f91c3b4bbbbf3434dad23bc0fcecb6657f353ea766
21ad4e26ec test: add coverage for cross-chain wallet restore (Sebastian Falbesoner)
8c7222bda3 wallet: fix GUI crash on cross-chain legacy wallet restore (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Restoring a wallet backup from another chain should result in a dedicated error message (we have _"Wallet files should not be reused across chains. Restart bitcoind with -walletcrosschain to override."_ for that). Unfortunately this is currently not the case for legacy wallet restores, as in the course of cleaning up the newly created wallet directory a `filesystem_error` exception is thrown due to the directory not being empty; the wallet database did indeed load successfully (otherwise we wouldn't know that the chain doesn't match) and hence BDB-related files and directories are already created in the wallet directory.
For bitcoind, this leads to a very confusing error message:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli restorewallet test123 ~/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets/regtest_wallet/wallet.dat
error code: -1
error message: filesystem error: in remove: Directory not empty ["/home/thestack/.bitcoin/wallets/test123"]
```
Even worse, the GUI crashes in such a scenario:
```
libc++abi: terminating with uncaught exception of type std::__1::__fs::filesystem::filesystem_error: filesystem error: in remove: Directory not empty ["/home/thestack/.bitcoin/wallets/foobar"]
Abort trap (core dumped)
```
Fix this by simply deleting the whole folder via `fs::remove_all`. With this, the expected error message appears both for the `restorewallet` RPC call and in the GUI (as a message-box):
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli restorewallet test123 ~/.bitcoin/regtest/wallets/regtest_wallet/wallet.dat
error code: -4
error message:
Wallet loading failed. Wallet files should not be reused across chains. Restart bitcoind with -walletcrosschain to override.
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 21ad4e26ec
aureleoules:
ACK 21ad4e26ec
furszy:
utACK 21ad4e26
Tree-SHA512: 313f6494c2fbe823bff9b975cb2d9410bb518977a1e59a5159ee9836bc012947fa50b56be0e41b1a2f50d9c0c7f4fddfdf4fbe479d8a59a6ee44bb389c804abc
