34645c4dd0 Test txinwitness is accessible on coinbase vin (Rod Vagg)
3e4421070a Expose txinwitness for coinbase in JSON form (Rod Vagg)
Pull request description:
## Rationale
The CLI can provide you with everything about transactions and blocks that you need to reconstruct the block structure and raw block itself **except** for the witness commitment nonce which is stored in the `scriptWitness` of the coinbase and is not printed. You could manually parse the raw `"hex"` fields for transactions if you really wanted to, but this seems to defeat the point of having a JSONification of the raw block/transaction data.
Without the nonce you can't:
1. calculate and validate the witness commitment yourself, you can generate the witness tx merkle root but you don't have the nonce to combine it with
2. reconstruct the raw block form because you don't have `scriptWitness` stack associated with the coinbase (although you know how big it will be and can guess the common case of `[0x000...000]`)
I'm building some archiving tooling for block data and being able to do a validated two-way conversion is very helpful.
## What
This PR simply makes the `txinwitness` field not dependent on whether we are working with the coinbase or not. So you get it for the coinbase as well as the rest.
## Examples
Common case of a `[0x000...000]` nonce: 00000000000000000000140a7289f3aada855dfd23b0bb13bb5502b0ca60cdd7
```json
"vin": [
{
"coinbase": "0368890904c1fe8d5e2f706f6f6c696e2e636f6d2ffabe6d6d5565843a681160cf7b08b1b74ac90a719e6d6ab28c16d336b924f0dc2fcabdc6010000000000000051bf2ad74af345dbe642154b2658931612a70d195e007add0100ffffffff",
"txinwitness": [
"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
],
"sequence": 4294967295
}
],
...
```
Novel nonce value: 000000000000000000008c31945b2012258366cc600a3e9a3ee0598e8f797731
```json
"vin": [
{
"coinbase": "031862082cfabe6d6d80c099b5e21f4c186d54eb292e17026932e52b1b807fa1380574c5adc1c843450200000000000000",
"txinwitness": [
"5b5032506f6f6c5d5b5032506f6f6c5d5b5032506f6f6c5d5b5032506f6f6c5d"
],
"sequence": 4294967295
}
],
...
```
## Alternatives
This field could be renamed for the coinbase, `"witnessnonce"` perhaps. It could also be omitted when null/zero (`0x000...000`).
## Tests
This didn't break any tests and I couldn't find an obvious way to include a test for this. If this is desired I'd apreicate some pointers.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 34645c4dd0
Tree-SHA512: b192facc1dfd210a5ec3f0d5d1ac6d0cae81eb35be15eaa71f60009a538dd6a79ab396f218434e7e998563f7f0df2c396cc925cb91619f6841c5a67806148c85
412d5fe879 QA: feature_segwit: Check that template "rules" includes "!segwit" as appropriate (Luke Dashjr)
2abe8cc3b7 Bugfix: Include "csv","!segwit" in "rules" (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
#16060 removed CSV & segwit from versionbits, breaking the "rules" key returned by GBT.
Without this, miners don't know they're mining segwit blocks, and should fall back to pre-segwit block creation.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 412d5fe879
jnewbery:
Tested ACK 412d5fe879.
Tree-SHA512: 825d72e257dc0dd4941f2fe498d8d4f4f2a21b9505cd21a8f9eb7fb5d6d7dd9219347928cf90bb57a777920ce24295859763e64fa8a22ebb58fc2380f80f5615
3c21db7b78 [test] add 8 error messages to feature_segwit and change version to type (Gloria Zhao)
Pull request description:
Followup to [this](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15169/files#r303673472) comment on functional test feature_segwit.py verifying that unsigned witness transactions are invalid.
(1) Changes 8 error messages from "mandatory-script-verify-flag" to "non-mandatory-script-verify-flag" and with more specific error messages.
(2) Edits comments that incorrectly describe the test, namely that the `v` variable corresponds to using P2WSH versus P2WPKH, not witness versions.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3c21db7b78🍾
Tree-SHA512: 3734ea3762667636c4fb20f5285634ab94d6b3527b7390fcc5e41b4582829dfe0099beabeaed42098613d168ede3385a6ffcd73989d1fa9dbd18004f5e9cf083
P2WPKH witness program without signature -> throws "hash mismatch" error
P2WSH witness program without signature -> throws "empty witness" error
same errors for P2SH_P2WPKH and P2SH_P2WSH respectively when passed redeemScript but no signature
P2SH_P2WPKH and P2SH_P2WSH with no signature fail with "Operation not valid with current stack size" when not signed due to missing input
change VER to TYPE and constants WIT_V0 to P2WPKH=0 and WIT_V1 to P2WSH=1
Remove the BIP61 REJECT code from error messages and logs when a
transaction is rejected.
BIP61 support was removed from Bitcoin Core in
fa25f43ac5. The REJECT codes will be
removed from the codebase entirely in the following commit.
2dfd6834ef test: Add test for default maxfeerate in sendrawtransaction (Joonmo Yang)
261843e4be wallet/rpc: Use the default maxfeerate value as BTC/kB (Joonmo Yang)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16382
This patch tries to treat `maxfeerate` in sendrawtransaction/testmempoolaccept RPC as a rate(BTC/kB) instead of an absolute value(BTC).
The included test case checks if the new behavior works correctly, by using the transaction with an absolute fee of ~0.02BTC, where the fee rate is ~0.2BTC/kB.
This test should be failing if the default `maxfeerate` is 0.1BTC, but pass if the default value is 0.1BTC/kB
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 2dfd6834ef (ACKs by Sjors and MarcoFalke above for trivially different code)
Tree-SHA512: a1795bffe8a182acef8844797955db1f60bb0c0ded97148f3572dc265234d5219271a3a7aa0b6418a43f73b2b2720ef7412ba169c99bb1cdcac52051f537d6af
Calling getblocktemplate without the segwit rule specified is most
likely a client error, since it results in lower fees for the miner.
Prevent this client error by failing getblocktemplate if called without
the segwit rule specified.
3fc20632a3 qt: Set BLOCK_CHAIN_SIZE = 220 (DrahtBot)
2b6a2f4a28 Regenerate manpages (DrahtBot)
eb7daf4d60 Update copyright headers to 2018 (DrahtBot)
Pull request description:
Some trivial maintenance to avoid having to do it again after the 0.17 branch off.
(The scripts to do this are in `./contrib/`)
Tree-SHA512: 16b2af45e0351b1c691c5311d48025dc6828079e98c2aa2e600dc5910ee8aa01858ca6c356538150dc46fe14c8819ed8ec8e4ec9a0f682b9950dd41bc50518fa
7d0f80b Use anonymous namespace instead of static functions (Pieter Wuille)
b61fb71 Mention removal of bare multisig IsMine in release notes (Pieter Wuille)
9c2a8b8 Do not treat bare multisig as IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
08f3228 Optimization: only test for witness scripts at top level (Pieter Wuille)
3619735 Track difference between scriptPubKey and P2SH execution in IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
ac6ec62 Switch to a private version of SigVersion inside IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
19fc973 Do not expose SigVersion argument to IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
fb1dfbb Remove unused IsMine overload (Pieter Wuille)
952d821 Make CScript -> CScriptID conversion explicit (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Currently our wallet code will treat bare multisig outputs (meaning scriptPubKeys with multiple public keys + `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` operator in it) as ours without the user asking for it, as long as all private keys in it are in our wallet.
This is a pointless feature. As it only works when all private keys are in one place, it's useless compared to single key outputs (P2PK, P2PKH, P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WPKH), and worse in terms of space, cost, UTXO size, and ability to test (due to lack of address format for them).
Furthermore, they are problematic in that producing a list of all `scriptPubKeys` we accept is not tractable (it involves all combinations of all public keys that are ours). In further wallet changes I'd like to move to a model where all scriptPubKeys that are treated as ours are explicit, rather than defined by whatever keys we have. The current behavior of the wallet is very hard to model in such a design, so I'd like to get rid of it.
I think there are two options:
* Remove it entirely (do not ever accept bare multisig outputs as ours, unless watched)
* Only accept bare multisig outputs in situations where the P2SH version of that output would also be acceptable
This PR implements the first option. The second option was explored in #12874.
Tree-SHA512: 917ed45b3cac864cee53e27f9a3e900390c576277fbd6751b1250becea04d692b3b426fa09065a3399931013bd579c4f3dbeeb29d51d19ed0c64da75d430ad9a
Such outputs can still be watched, and signed for, but they aren't treated as valid payments.
That means they won't cause transactions to appear in listtransactions, their outputs to be
shown under listunspent, or affect balances.
Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that
no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \;
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
