2eb0eeda39 validation: document lack of inherited signaling in RBF policy (Antoine Riard)
906b6d9da6 test: Extend feature_rbf.py with no inherited signaling (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Contrary to BIP125 or other full-node implementation (e.g btcd), Bitcoin Core's mempool policy doesn't implement inherited signaling.
This PR documents our mempool behavior on this and add a test demonstrating the case.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 2eb0eeda39
benthecarman:
ACK 2eb0eeda39
Tree-SHA512: d41453d3b49bae3c1eb532a968f43bc047084913bd285929d4d9cba142777ff2be38163d912e28dfc635f4ecf446de68effad799c6e71be52f81e83410c712fb
Add an explicit sync_blocks call in wallet_orphanedreward.py, which was
missing and could lead to intermittent failures of the test due to
race conditions.
This will presumably fix https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22181.
faa94961d6 test: Add temporary logging to debug #20975 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
to be reverted after a fix
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK faa94961d6
Tree-SHA512: 1f3103fcf4cad0af54e26c4d257bd824b128b5f2d2b81c302e861a829fd55d6a099fa476b79b30a71fe98975ae604b9e3ff31fd48a51d442389a9bd515e60ba0
68ace23fa3 test: convert docs into type annotations in test_framework/test_node.py (fanquake)
8bfcba36db test: convert docs into type annotations in test_framework/wallet.py (fanquake)
b043ca8e8b test: convert docs into type annotations in test_framework/util.py (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Rather than having function types exist as documentation, make them type annotations, which enables more `mypy` checking.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 68ace23fa3
Tree-SHA512: b705f26b48baabde07b9b2c0a8d547b4dcca291b16eaf5ac70462bb3a1f9e9c2783d93a9d4290889d0cbb3f7db3671446754411a1f498b265d336f6ff33478df
fa2b6c62cd test: Remove unused node from feature_nulldummy (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is confusing and might even slow down the test.
This reverts a change that was added a year ago in d438d60 and then the need for it was removed by 95d5d5e six months ago.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 9a86792e9a634cf7bbd4e7a21b1acdfc3baba1b1962fe2b9b73848436d10351d2326dca01313c097ba2342dde7207add73e731d053c0bfa888a5d8f2b233a7cf
e4356f6a6c Testcase for wallet issue with orphaned rewards. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This adds a new test case demonstrating the wallet issue when block rewards are orphaned (#14148).
ACKs for top commit:
LarryRuane:
ACK e4356f6a6c
leonardojobim:
reACK e4356f6a6c .
Tree-SHA512: e9a2310ee1b3d52cfa302f431ed3d272bbc1b9195439ff318d9eb1006c0b28968dbe840e1600b6ff185e5d7ea57e4dcc837cef16051b5537445e10bc363b8c22
2667366aaa tests: check derivation of P2TR (Pieter Wuille)
7cedafc541 Add tr() descriptor (derivation only, no signing) (Pieter Wuille)
90fcac365e Add TaprootBuilder class (Pieter Wuille)
5f6cc8daa8 Add XOnlyPubKey::CreateTapTweak (Pieter Wuille)
2fbfb1becb Make consensus checking of tweaks in pubkey.* Taproot-specific (Pieter Wuille)
a4bf84039c Separate WitnessV1Taproot variant in CTxDestination (Pieter Wuille)
41839bdb89 Avoid dependence on CTxDestination index order (Pieter Wuille)
31df02a070 Change Solver() output for WITNESS_V1_TAPROOT (Pieter Wuille)
4b1cc08f9f Make XOnlyPubKey act like byte container (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is a subset of #21365, to aide review.
This adds support `tr(KEY)` or `tr(KEY,SCRIPT)` or `tr(KEY,{{S1,{{S2,S3},...}},...})` descriptors, describing Taproot outputs with specified internal key, and optionally any number of scripts, in nested groups of 2 inside `{`/`}` if there are more than one. While it permits importing `tr(KEY)`, anything beyond that is just laying foundations for more features later.
Missing:
* Signing support (see #21365)
* Support for more interesting scripts inside the tree (only `pk(KEY)` is supported for now). In particular, a multisig policy based on the new `OP_CHECKSIGADD` opcode would be very useful.
* Inferring `tr()` descriptors from outputs (given sufficient information).
* `getaddressinfo` support.
* MuSig support. Standardizing that is still an ongoing effort, and is generally kind of useless without corresponding PSBT support.
* Convenient ways of constructing descriptors without spendable internal key (especially ones that arent't trivially recognizable as such).
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 2667366 (based on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21365#issuecomment-846945215 review, plus the new functional test)
achow101:
Code Review ACK 2667366aaa
lsilva01:
Tested ACK 2667366aaa
meshcollider:
utACK 2667366aaa
Tree-SHA512: 61046fef22c561228338cb178422f0b782ef6587ec8208d3ce2bd07afcff29a664b54b35c6b01226eb70b6540b43f6dd245043d09aa6cb6db1381b6042667e75
5d82a57db4 contrib: remove torv2 seed nodes (Jon Atack)
5f7e086dac contrib: update generate-seeds.py to ignore torv2 addresses (Jon Atack)
8be56f0f8e p2p, refactor: extract OnionToString() from CNetAddr::ToStringIp() (Jon Atack)
5f9d3c09b4 p2p: remove torv2 from CNetAddr::ToStringIP() (Jon Atack)
3d39042144 p2p: remove torv2 in SetIP() and ADDR_TORV2_SIZE constant (Jon Atack)
cff5ec477a p2p: remove pre-addrv2 onions from SerializeV1Array() (Jon Atack)
4192a74413 p2p: ignore torv2-in-ipv6 addresses in SetLegacyIPv6() (Jon Atack)
1d631e956f p2p: remove BIP155Network::TORV2 from GetBIP155Network() (Jon Atack)
7d1769bc45 p2p: remove torv2 from SetNetFromBIP155Network() (Jon Atack)
eba9a94b9f fuzz: rename CNetAddr/CService deserialize targets (Jon Atack)
c56a1c9b18 p2p: drop onions from IsAddrV1Compatible(), no longer relay torv2 (Jon Atack)
f8e94002fc p2p: remove torv2/ADDR_TORV2_SIZE from SetTor() (Jon Atack)
0f1c58ae87 test: update feature_proxy to torv3 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This patch removes support in Bitcoin Core for Tor v2 onions, which are already removed from the release of Tor 0.4.6.
- no longer serialize/deserialize and relay Tor v2 addresses
- ignore incoming Tor v2 addresses
- remove Tor v2 addresses from the addrman and peers.dat on node launch
- update generate-seeds.py to ignore Tor v2 addresses
- remove Tor v2 hard-coded seeds
Tested with tor-0.4.6.1-alpha (no v2 support) and 0.4.5.7 (v2 support). With the latest Tor (no v2 support), this removes all the warnings like those reported with current master in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21351
```
<bitcoind debug log>
Socks5() connect to […].onion:8333 failed: general failure
<tor log>
Invalid hostname [scrubbed]; rejecting
```
and the addrman no longer has Tor v2 addresses on launching bitcoind.
```rake
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -addrinfo
{
"addresses_known": {
"ipv4": 44483,
"ipv6": 8467,
"torv2": 0,
"torv3": 2296,
"i2p": 6,
"total": 55252
}
}
```
After recompiling back to current master and restarting with either of the two Tor versions (0.4.5.7 or 0.4.6.1), -addrinfo initially returns 0 Tor v2 addresses and then begins finding them again.
Ran nodes on this patch over the past week on mainnet/testnet/signet/regtest after building with DEBUG_ADDRMAN.
Verified that this patch bootstraps an onlynet=onion node from the Tor v3 hardcoded fixed seeds on mainnet and testnet and connects to blocks and v3 onion peers: `rm ~/.bitcoin/testnet3/peers.dat ; ./src/bitcoind -testnet -dnsseed=0 -onlynet=onion`
Tested using `addnode`, `getaddednodeinfo`,`addpeeraddress`, `disconnectnode` and `-addrinfo` that a currently valid, connectable Tor v2 peer can no longer be added:
Thanks to Vasil Dimov, Carl Dong, and Wladimir J. van der Laan for their work on BIP155 and Tor v3 that got us here.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5d82a57db4
Tree-SHA512: 590ff3d2f6ef682608596facb4b01f44fef69716d2ab3552ae1655aa225f4bf104f9ee08d6769abb9982a8031de93340df553279ce1f5023771f9f2b651178bb
a3f0cbf82d test: run mempool_reorg.py even with wallet disabled (Darius Parvin)
Pull request description:
Run mempool_reorg.py test even when the wallet is disabled, as discussed in #20078.
As part of this PR I created a new method in `MiniWallet`, `create_self_transfer`, to return a raw tx (without broadcasting it) and its associated utxo.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK a3f0cbf82d
Tree-SHA512: 316a38faffadcb87499c1d6eca21e9696cef65362bbffcf621788a9b771bb1fa2971b1c7835cbd34b952d7612ad83afbca824cd8be39ecd6b994e8963027f991
The functions cltv_modify_tx(), cltv_invalidate() and cltv_validate()
all modify the passed transaction in-place, i.e. there is no need
to return a copy.
- run mempool_reorg.py even when the wallet is not compiled
- add `locktime` argument to `create_self_transfer` and `send_self_transfer`
- use more logs instead of comments
bfa9309ad6 Use COINBASE_MATURITY constant in functional tests. (Kiminuo)
525448df9d Move COINBASE_MATURITY from `feature_nulldummy` test to `blocktools`. (Kiminuo)
Pull request description:
`COINBASE_MATURITY` constant was added to `feature_nulldummy` test in #21373. This PR moves the constant to `blocktools.py` file and uses the constant in more tests as suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21373#discussion_r605418462).
Edit: Goal of this PR is to replace integer constants with `COINBASE_MATURITY` but not necessarily in *all* cases because that would mean to read and fully understand all tests. That's out of my time constraints. Any reports where `COINBASE_MATURITY` should be used are welcome though!
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK bfa9309ad6🌇
Tree-SHA512: 01f04645f05a39028681f355cf3d42dd63ea3303f76d93c430e0fdce441934358a2d847a54e6068d61932f1b75e1d406f51859b057b3e4b569f7083915cb317f
2be3572506 test: Fix IPv6 check on BSD systems (nthumann)
Pull request description:
I noticed that `test_ipv6_local()` always returns `False` on macOS or FreeBSD, even though IPv6 is working perfectly fine. This causes `test/functional/rpc_bind.py --ipv6` and `test/functional/feature_proxy.py` to skip their run.
Apparently, there's a check if the port number is `0` (see [here](64881da478/sys/netinet6/udp6_usrreq.c (L248)) or [here](8f02f2a044/bsd/netinet6/udp6_usrreq.c (L282))), while Linux has no problem with this.
This is fixed by specifying any other port number than `0`, e.g. `1`. Still, because of `SOCK_DGRAM`, no actual connection is made.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 2be3572506 - nice improvement. I checked that with this change ipv6 related tests in `feature_proxy.py` are being run.
theStack:
ACK 2be3572506
Tree-SHA512: 8417c2d3cf71050529f3fa409a03872040fe5d249eae4172f276e62156e505a20d375b963712a186c9ad7967d8a497b5900d327c74a9693f68c33063871d4691
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes#18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close#21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
e6fe1c37d0 rpc: Improve avoidpartialspends and avoid_reuse documentation (Fabian Jahr)
8f073076b1 wallet: Increase OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #17824.
This increases OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 which means that OutputGroups will now be up to 100 outputs large, up from previously 10. The main motivation for this change is that during the PR review club on #17824 [several participants signaled](https://bitcoincore.reviews/17824.html#l-339) that 100 might be a better value here.
I think fees should be manageable for users but more importantly, users should know what they can expect when using the wallet with this configuration, so I also tried to clarify the documentation on `-avoidpartialspends` and `avoid_reuse` a bit. If there are other additional ways how or docs where users can be made aware of the potential consequences of using these parameters, please let me know. Another small upside is that [there seem to be a high number of batching transactions with 100 and 200 inputs](https://miro.medium.com/max/3628/1*sZ5eaBSbsJsHx-J9iztq2g.png)([source](https://medium.com/@hasufly/an-analysis-of-batching-in-bitcoin-9bdf81a394e0)) giving these transactions a bit of a larger anonymity set, although that is probably a very weak argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
Xekyo:
retACK e6fe1c37d0
rajarshimaitra:
tACK `e6fe1c3`
achow101:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
glozow:
code review ACK e6fe1c37d0
Tree-SHA512: 79685c58bafa64ed8303b0ecd616fce50fc9a2b758aa79833e4ad9f15760e09ab60c007bc16ab4cbc4222e644cfd154f1fa494b0f3a5d86faede7af33a6f2826
Only allow "packages" with no conflicts, sorted in order of dependency,
and no more than 25 for now. Note that these groups of transactions
don't necessarily need to adhere to some strict definition of a package
or have any dependency relationships. Clients are free to pass in a
batch of 25 unrelated transactions if they want to.
For the MiniWallet constructor, the two boolean parameters
"raw_script" and "use_p2pk" are replaced by a single parameter of the
newly introduced type MiniWalletMode (derived by enum.Enum), which can
hold the following values:
- ADDRESS_OP_TRUE
- RAW_OP_TRUE
- RAW_P2PK
4bea301692 test: use P2PK-MiniWallet for feature_csv_activation.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dc7eb64e83 test: MiniWallet: add P2PK support (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds support for creating and spending transactions with raw pubkey (P2PK) outputs to MiniWallet, [as suggested by MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21900#discussion_r629524841). Using that mode in the test `feature_csv_activation.py`, all txs submitted to the mempool follow the standard policy, i.e. `-acceptnonstdtxn=1` can be removed.
Possible follow-ups:
* Improve MiniWallet constructor Interface; an enum-like parameter instead of two booleans would probably be better
* Look at other tests that could benefit from P2PK (e.g. feature_cltv.py?)
* Check vsize also for P2PK txs (vsize varies due to signature, i.e. a range has to be asserted)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4bea301692
Tree-SHA512: 9b428e6b7cfde59a8c7955d5096cea88af1384a5f49723f00052e9884d819d952d20a5ab39bb02f9d8b6073769c44462aa265d84a33e33da33c2d21670c488a6
Using the MiniWallet in P2PK mode, all transactions submitted to the
mempool are following the standard policy now, i.e. the node command
line parameter '-acceptnonstdtxn=1' is not needed anymore.
bd7f27d16d refactor: feature_csv_activation.py: move tx helper functions to methods (Sebastian Falbesoner)
2eca46b0aa test: use MiniWallet for feature_csv_activation.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR enables one more of the non-wallet functional tests (feature_csv_activation.py) to be run even with the Bitcoin Core wallet disabled by using the new MiniWallet instead, as proposed in #20078.
Short reviewers guideline:
- Since we exclusively work with anyone-can-spend outputs here (raw scriptPubKey = OP_TRUE), signing is not needed anymore. The function `sign_transaction` and its calls are removed, after changing a tx (e.g. its scriptSig or nVersion) a simple `.rehash()` call is sufficient. Also, generating an address `self.nodeaddress` (and with that, passing it to the the various test tx creation/sending helper methods) is not needed anymore and removed.
- The test repeatedly uses the same input for creating different txs (e.g. with different txversions 1 and 2). To let `MiniWallet` create a tx with a specific input, we have to call `.get_utxo()` before which also marks the UTXO as spent. The method is changed to also support keeping the UTXO in its internal list (`mark_as_spent=False`). With the behaviour on master, the second call to `.get_utxo()` with the same input would fail.
- To keep the diff in the first commit short, the `miniwallet` is set as a global variable, to avoid passing it on every tx creation/spending helper. The global is eliminated in the second (refactoring) commit, where all the helpers are moved to the test class as methods. By that, we can use `self.nodes[0]` directly in the helpers and don't have to pass it again and again. I think there could still be a lot of improvements/refactoring done in the test, but that should hopefully serve as a good basis.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bd7f27d16d
MarcoFalke:
review ACK bd7f27d16d🐕
Tree-SHA512: 24fb6a0f7702bae40d5271d197119827067d4b597e954d182e4c1aa5d0fa870368eb3ffed469b26713fa8ff8eb3ecc06abc80b2449cd68156d5559e7ae8a2b11
