fa6c114ae6 test: Add sanitizer suppressions for AMD EPYC CPUs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the ci system only runs on intel cpus (and some arm devices), but it won't run on CPUs `Using the 'shani(1way,2way)' SHA256 implementation` (excerpt from debug log).
For reference, google cloud CPUs (which is what Cirrus CI uses) print `Using the 'sse4(1way),sse41(4way),avx2(8way)' SHA256 implementation`
The traceback I got:
```
crypto/sha256_shani.cpp:87:18: runtime error: unsigned integer overflow: 0 - 1 cannot be represented in type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long')
#0 0x55c0000e95ec in sha256_shani::Transform(unsigned int*, unsigned char const*, unsigned long) /root/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/crypto/sha256_shani.cpp:87:18
#1 0x55bfffb926f8 in (anonymous namespace)::SelfTest() /root/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/crypto/sha256.cpp:517:9
#2 0x55bfffb906ed in SHA256AutoDetect[abi:cxx11]() /root/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/crypto/sha256.cpp:626:5
#3 0x55bfff87ab97 in BasicTestingSetup::BasicTestingSetup(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::vector<char const*, std::allocator<char const*> > const&) /root/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/util/setup_common.cpp:104:5
#4 0x55bffe885877 in main /root/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/qt/test/test_main.cpp:52:27
#5 0x7f20c3bf60b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2)
#6 0x55bffe7a5f6d in _start (/root/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt+0x1d00f6d)
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: unsigned-integer-overflow crypto/sha256_shani.cpp:87:18 in
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Anyhow ACK fa6c114ae6
Tree-SHA512: 968a1d28eedec58c337b1323862f583cb1bcd78c5f03396940b9ab53ded12f8c6652877909aba05ee5586532137418fd817ff979bd7bef6e07856094f9d7f9b1
1112035d32 doc: fix various typos (Ikko Ashimine)
e8640849c7 doc: Use https URLs where possible (Sawyer Billings)
Pull request description:
Consolidates / fixes the changes from #20762, #20836, #20810. There is no output when `test/lint/lint-all.sh` is run.
Closes#20807.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1112035d32
Tree-SHA512: 22ca824688758281a74e5ebc6a84a358142351434e34c88c6b36045d2d241ab95fd0958565fd2060f98317e62e683323b5320cc7ec13592bf340e6922294ed78
fa749fbea3 rpc: Replace boost::variant with std::variant for RPCArg.m_fallback (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that we can use std::variant from the vanilla standard library, drop the third-party boost variant dependency.
Patch is split out from #20480. A step-by-step replacement is possible because we don't have our own `Variant` wrapper and the source code specifies `boost::variant` explicitly.
I think a step-by-step replacement should be preferred, because it simplifies review.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK fa749fbea3
Sjors:
re-ACK fa749fbea3
Tree-SHA512: 5e3c12b7d535f73065b4afa8df0a488f78fb25d2234f5ecbf740e624db03a34c35fea100eb7d37e84741721310e6450b7fb4296a2207a7ed1fa24485b3650981
454a4088a8 [doc] Add release notes for removed getpeerinfo fields. (Amiti Uttarwar)
b1a936d4ae [rpc] Remove deprecated "whitelisted" field from getpeerinfo (Amiti Uttarwar)
094c3beaa4 [rpc] Remove deprecated "banscore" field from getpeerinfo (Amiti Uttarwar)
537053336f [rpc] Remove deprecated "addnode" field from getpeerinfo (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
This PR removes support for 3 fields on the `getpeerinfo` RPC that were deprecated in v0.21- `addnode`, `banscore` & `whitelisted`.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 454a4088a8
jnewbery:
ACK 454a4088a8.
Tree-SHA512: ccc0e90c0763eeb8529cf0c46162dbaca3f7773981b3b52d9925166ea7421aed086795d56b320e16c9340f68862388785f52a9b78314865070917b33180d7cd6
40fdb2a212 test: Fix Comment Typo in BitcoinTestFramework (Joel Klabo)
Pull request description:
Missing "override" in comment describing use of set_test_params
ACKs for top commit:
michaelfolkson:
ACK 40fdb2a212
Tree-SHA512: bf893a0d5f8dc86a3ec2eaf48cd7c0f0f832f3b3d254b3d99953336db7e294571b1d2c8686030bf8a27cbe67b1a85a54e53ebefb2e57d6d8d6ac864a15dce4e7
fa511042b0 doc: [test] Remove outdated comment in fuzz runner (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
All folders are soft-created with `os.makedirs`
ACKs for top commit:
RiccardoMasutti:
ACK fa51104
Tree-SHA512: 4051688946a205a981bbb005300fe3263495ead26591042b38ae44f4297c7689a613b560052fb5405a62054734d2599cfb0554a37c7b7369fb3a3636743d04a8
66d012ad7f test: RPC: getblock fee calculations (Elliott Jin)
bf7d6e31b1 RPC: getblock: tx fee calculation for verbosity 2 via Undo data (Elliott Jin)
Pull request description:
This change is progress towards #18771 . It adapts the fee calculation part of #16083 and addresses some feedback. The additional "verbosity level 3" features are planned for a future PR.
**Original PR description:**
> Using block undo data (like in #14802) we can now show fee information for each transaction in a block without the need for additional -txindex and/or a ton of costly lookups. For a start we'll add transaction fee information to getblock verbosity level 2. This comes at a negligible speed penalty (<1%).
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
tACK 66d012ad7f
fjahr:
tACK 66d012ad7f
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 66d012ad7f 🗜
Tree-SHA512: be1fe4b866946a8dc36427f7dc72a20e10860e320a28fa49bc85bd2a93a0d699768179be29fa52e18b2ed8505d3ec272e586753ef2239b4230e0aefd233acaa2
812baaa1f8 Switch to BIP341's suggested scheme for outputs without script (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
BIP341 suggests using Hash<sub>TapTweak</sub>(pubkey) to derive the tweak in case of key-only outputs. The functional test framework currently uses Hash<sub>TapTweak</sub>(pubkey || 0x00...00) instead. Change this.
There is no technical reason to prefer one over the other, but in case someone looks at it for inspiration, it's better to be consistent with the BIP.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 812baaa1f8
instagibbs:
ACK 812baaa1f8
Tree-SHA512: 02576c38776ec786255f49d7edecdb1ed8a9dcf0f547d58c23099588b4c3296edf279b103a6eb80e0f07d3c5ee9743f67d152f5244fd63adc6613b004f6969ed
fa957f8dc9 test: Add race:SendZmqMessage tsan suppression (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Add suppression for `race:SendZmqMessage`, which isn't covered by the existing `zmq::*` suppression
Fixes#20618
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK fa957f8dc9, as my previous comment is not directly related to this pull changes.
Tree-SHA512: 8642a8b79bbfa4bee89042b66e528f27fd78c5e84a33023df440662e9114e31445fd7b04940f44b11fa4ab7438d346385a21816289c818cce9958a9b16730452
fab46b34f4 test: Fix restart node race (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is not allowed to start a node before it has been fully stopped. Otherwise it could lead to intermittent issues due to access issues (e.g. cookie file https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6409665024098304?command=ci#L4793)
Fix that by waiting for the node to fully stop.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK fab46b34f4
Tree-SHA512: 7605cac0573a7b04f05ff110d0131e8940d87f7baf6d698505ed16b363d4d15b1e552c5ffd1a187c8fe5639f7e265c3122734c85283275746e46bd789614fd21
11a32722f0 test: run mempool_resurrect.py even with wallet disabled (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Another functional test rewritten as proposed in #20078
**Request for help:**
`node.gettransaction(txid)` fails for transactions sent with `wallet.send_self_transfer`. Even though the `txid`s look correct, are added to the mempool correctly, and removed from the mempool when a block is mined - all as expected.
However, `node.gettransaction(txid)` throws the error:
```sh
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 126, in main
self.run_test()
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/mempool_resurrect.py", line 43, in run_test
assert_equal(len(list(filter(lambda txid: node.gettransaction(txid)["confirmations"] > 0, spends_ids))), len(spends_ids))
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/mempool_resurrect.py", line 43, in <lambda>
assert_equal(len(list(filter(lambda txid: node.gettransaction(txid)["confirmations"] > 0, spends_ids))), len(spends_ids))
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/coverage.py", line 47, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
File "/Users/michaeldietz/Documents/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 146, in __call__
raise JSONRPCException(response['error'], status)
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: Invalid or non-wallet transaction id (-5)
```
Anyone know what's going wrong / can point me in the right direction if I'm making a mistake, or `MiniWallet` needs to be improved for this to work correctly?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 11a32722f0
Tree-SHA512: 13d83a13ec23920db716e99b68670e61329d1cc73b12063d85bc1679ee6425a9951da4d2e392ca1f27760be7be049ccdc6f504e192ed5cd24ed0ba003b66fab3
fa4435e22f Replace boost::optional with std::optional (MarcoFalke)
fa7e803f3e Remove unused MakeOptional (MarcoFalke)
fadd4029dc psbt: Assert that tx has a value in UpdatePSBTOutput (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that we can use std::optional from the vanilla standard library, drop the third-party boost dependency
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa4435e22f: patch looks correct!
laanwj:
code review ACK fa4435e22f
hebasto:
ACK fa4435e22f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 50c5a1a130cac65e043e0177ba5b009fc2ba09343af4e23322ff2eb32184a55f8f2dea66e7a1b9d9acf56bc164eef4e47448750549a07f3b661199ac9bf9afef
fae32f295c wallet: Add missing check for -descriptors wallet tool option (MarcoFalke)
faf8f61368 test: Add missing check for is_sqlite_compiled (MarcoFalke)
fa7dde1c41 wallet: Pass ArgsManager into ExecuteWalletToolFunc instead of using global (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also, fix a test failure when compiled without sqlite
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fae32f295c. Thanks for implementing the -descriptors check and dealing with the test failure!
jonatack:
Code review utACK fae32f295c
Tree-SHA512: 3d7710694085822739a8316e4abc6db270799ca6ff6b0f9e5563ae240da65ae6a9cab7ba2647feae6ba540dac40b55b38ed41c8f6ed0bf02a3d1536284448927
95487b0553 doc: Drop mentions of Travis CI as it is no longer used (Hennadii Stepanov)
09d105ef0f ci: Drop travis_fold feature as Travis CI is no longer used (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
As Travis CI is no longer used, this PR:
- drops `travis_fold` feature
- drops mentions of Travis CI in docs
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 95487b0553
Tree-SHA512: 2e259bb8b1e37bcefc1251737bb2716f06ddb57c490010b373825c4e70f42ca38efae69a2f63f21f577d7cee3725b94097bdddbd313f8ebf499281cf97c53cef
23cac24dd3 tests: Test bitcoin-wallet dump and createfromdump (Andrew Chow)
a88c320041 wallettool: Add createfromdump command (Andrew Chow)
e1e7a90d5f wallettool: Add dump command (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds two commands to the `bitcoin-wallet` tool: `dump` and `createfromdump`. These commands will be useful for a wallet storage migration in the future. It is also generally useful to have a storage agnostic dump like this. These commands are similar to BDB's `db_dump` and `db_load` tools. This can also be useful for manual construction of a wallet file for tests.
`dump` outputs every key-value pair from the wallet as comma separated hex. Each key-value pair is on its own line with the key and value in hex separated by a comma. This is output to the file specified by the new `-dumpfile` option.
`createfromdump` takes a file produced by `dump` and creates a new wallet file with exactly the records specified in that file.
A new option `-dumpfile` is added to the wallet tool. When used with `dump`, the records will be written to the specified file. When used with `createfromdump`, the file is read and the key-value pairs constructed from it. `createfromdump` requires `-dumpfile`.
A simple round-trip test is added to the `tool_wallet.py`.
This PR is based on #19334,
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 23cac24
MarcoFalke:
re review ACK 23cac24dd3 only change is rebase and removing useless shared_ptr wrapper 🎼
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 23cac24dd3. Only changes since last review rebase and changing a pointer to a reference
Tree-SHA512: 2d63cf62baca3d16495aa698dc02f7d889c81b41015e9c92c23c275bb4a690fc176d351c3fd7f310bd6b17f5a936cc9be694cbecd702af741b96c0f530e72fa2
bc4a230087 Remove redundant p2p lock tacking for tx download functional tests (Antoine Riard)
d3b5eac9a9 Add mutation for functional test test_preferred_inv (Antoine Riard)
06efb3163c Add functional test test_txid_inv_delay (Antoine Riard)
a07910abcd test: Makes wtxidrelay support a generic P2PInterface option (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
This is a simple functional test to increase coverage of #19988, checking that txid announcements from txid-relay peers are delayed by TXID_RELAY_DELAY, assuming we have at least another wtxid-relay peer.
You can verify new test with the following diff :
```
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index f14db379f..2a2805df5 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ void PeerManager::AddTxAnnouncement(const CNode& node, const GenTxid& gtxid, std
auto delay = std::chrono::microseconds{0};
const bool preferred = state->fPreferredDownload;
if (!preferred) delay += NONPREF_PEER_TX_DELAY;
- if (!gtxid.IsWtxid() && g_wtxid_relay_peers > 0) delay += TXID_RELAY_DELAY;
+ //if (!gtxid.IsWtxid() && g_wtxid_relay_peers > 0) delay += TXID_RELAY_DELAY;
const bool overloaded = !node.HasPermission(PF_RELAY) &&
m_txrequest.CountInFlight(nodeid) >= MAX_PEER_TX_REQUEST_IN_FLIGHT;
if (overloaded) delay += OVERLOADED_PEER_TX_DELAY;
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK bc4a230087
Tree-SHA512: 150e806bc5289feda94738756ab375c7fdd23c80c12bd417d3112043e26a91a717dc325a01079ebd02a88b90975ead5bd397ec86eb745c7870ebec379a8aa711
173cc9b7be test: walettool create descriptors (Ivan Metlushko)
345e88eecf wallettool: add param to create descriptors wallet (Ivan Metlushko)
6d3af3ab62 wallettool: pass in DatabaseOptions into MakeWallet (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Rationale: expose and promote descriptor wallets in more places; make cli tool more consistent with `createwallet` rpc.
Add `-descriptors` parameter which is off by default. When specified it will create a new descriptors wallet with sqlite backend, which is consistent with `createwallet` rpc.
This PR is based on a suggestion from **ryanofsky** https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19137#discussion_r516779603
Example:
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-wallet -wallet=fewty -descriptors create
Topping up keypool...
Wallet info
===========
Name: fewty
Format: sqlite
Descriptors: yes
Encrypted: no
HD (hd seed available): yes
Keypool Size: 6000
Transactions: 0
Address Book: 0
```
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-wallet -wallet=fewty create
Topping up keypool...
Wallet info
===========
Name: fewty
Format: bdb
Descriptors: no
Encrypted: no
HD (hd seed available): yes
Keypool Size: 2000
Transactions: 0
Address Book: 0
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 173cc9b7be
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 173cc9b7be. This seems pretty nicely implemented now, with opportunities to clean up more and dedup later
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK 173cc9b7beðŸŒ
Tree-SHA512: cc32ba336ff709de2707ee15f495b4617908e8700ede8401a58e894f44cda485c544d644023c9a6604d88a62db9d92152383ee2e8abf691688c25cf6e222c622
fab48da908 test: Fix intermittent wallet_multiwallet issue with got_loading_error (MarcoFalke)
fa8e15f7b7 test: pep8 wallet_multiwallet.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Failing the test after 10 iterations without a loading error is problematic because it may take 11 iterations to get a loading error.
Fix that by running until a loading error occurs, which should happen in almost all runs within the first 10 iterations.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fab48da908. This seems like a good workaround. I think more ideally think load and unload RPCs would not have racy status reporting (suggested previously https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19300#pullrequestreview-435362710 and
Tree-SHA512: 6b80b26d916276efe2a01af93bca7dbf71a3e67db9d3deb15175070719bf7d1325a1410d93e74c0316942e388faa2ba185dc9d3759c82d1c73c3c509b9997f05
3b064fcb9d test: run mempool_expiry.py even with wallet disabled (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Run the mempool expiry test even when the wallet was not compiled, as proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20078.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3b064fcb9d
Tree-SHA512: 5860dc021d02bc3752268ec1e859505bec87174953223b34b1af8a8e4ab66d645458fbf9571c0b816a9de891c3ff41314996e580869671fccd6972c093e78154
fa13e1b0c5 build: Add option --enable-danger-fuzz-link-all (MarcoFalke)
44444ba759 fuzz: Link all targets once (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the linker is invoked more than 150 times when compiling with `--enable-fuzz`. This is problematic for several reasons:
* It wastes disk space north of 20 GB, as all libraries and sanitizers are linked more than 150 times
* It wastes CPU time, as the link step can practically not be cached (similar to ccache for object files)
* It makes it a blocker to compile the fuzz tests by default for non-fuzz builds #19388, for the aforementioned reasons
* The build file is several thousand lines of code, without doing anything meaningful except listing each fuzz target in a highly verbose manner
* It makes writing new fuzz tests unnecessarily hard, as build system knowledge is required; Compare that to boost unit tests, which can be added by simply editing an existing cpp file
* It encourages fuzz tests that re-use the `buffer` or assume the `buffer` to be concatenations of seeds, which increases complexity of seeds and complexity for the fuzz engine to explore; Thus reducing the effectiveness of the affected fuzz targets
Fixes#20088
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK fa13e1b0c5
sipa:
ACK fa13e1b0c5. Reviewed the code changes, and tested the 3 different test_runner.py modes (run once, merge, generate). I also tested building with the new --enable-danger-fuzz-link-all
Tree-SHA512: 962ab33269ebd51810924c51266ecc62edd6ddf2fcd9a8c359ed906766f58c3f73c223f8d3cc49f2c60f0053f65e8bdd86ce9c19e673f8c2b3cd676e913f2642
7fabe0f359 net: don't relay to the address' originator (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
For each address to be relayed we "randomly" pick 2 nodes to send the
address to (in `RelayAddress()`). However we do not take into
consideration that it does not make sense to relay the address back to
its originator (`CNode::PushAddress()` will do nothing in that case).
This means that if the originator is among the "randomly" picked nodes,
then we will relay to one node less than intended.
Fix this by skipping the originating node when choosing candidates to
relay to.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK 7fabe0f359 (this time I looked at the test, and verified the test breaks in expected ways if I break the code).
jnewbery:
utACK 7fabe0f359 (only net_processing changes. I haven't reviewed the test changes)
jonatack:
re-ACK 7fabe0f359 per `git range-diff b76abae fd897f8 7fabe0f`, change since last review is rebase and more readable Doxygen documentation
Tree-SHA512: c6a9d11c7afc97ab4e8960513f6416648d4a8c0c64b713c145a7482a7b9e54946f81386a3351e3ec0011e5594ba5ccff4d10c6f656bb80680d9f0d0a63366165
faaad1bbac p2p: Ignore version msgs after initial version msg (MarcoFalke)
fad68afcff p2p: Ignore non-version msgs before version msg (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Handshake misbehaviour doesn't cost us more than any other unknown message, so it seems odd to treat it differently
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK faaad1bbac
practicalswift:
ACK faaad1bbac: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 9f30c3b5c1f6604fd02cff878f10999956152419a3dd9825f8267cbdeff7d06787418b41c7fde8a00a5e557fe89204546e05d5689042dbf7b07fbb7eb95cddff
