Log block header in net_processing

Previously ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader would log when it
saw a new header. This commit moves logging to the call site(s) in
net_processing. The next commits will then log which peer sent it
and whether it was part of a compact block.

This commit changes behavior:
- when multiple headers are received in a single message, only the
  last one is logged
- if any of the headers are invalid, the valid ones are not logged

This happens because net_processing calls ProcessNewBlockHeaders
with multiple headers, which then calls AcceptBlockHeader one
header at a time.

Additionally:
- when the header is received via a compact block, there's no more
  duplicate log (a later commit also unifies logging code paths)

src/net_processing.cpp

@@ -1041,6 +1041,8 @@ private:
 
     void AddAddressKnown(Peer& peer, const CAddress& addr) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(g_msgproc_mutex);
     void PushAddress(Peer& peer, const CAddress& addr) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(g_msgproc_mutex);
+
+    void LogBlockHeader(const CBlockIndex& index);
 };
 
 const CNodeState* PeerManagerImpl::State(NodeId pnode) const
@@ -2938,7 +2940,10 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, Peer& peer,
 
     // Now process all the headers.
     BlockValidationState state;
-    if (!m_chainman.ProcessNewBlockHeaders(headers, /*min_pow_checked=*/true, state, &pindexLast)) {
+    const bool processed{m_chainman.ProcessNewBlockHeaders(headers,
+                                                           /*min_pow_checked=*/true,
+                                                           state, &pindexLast)};
+    if (!processed) {
         if (state.IsInvalid()) {
             MaybePunishNodeForBlock(pfrom.GetId(), state, via_compact_block, "invalid header received");
             return;
@@ -2946,6 +2951,10 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessHeadersMessage(CNode& pfrom, Peer& peer,
     }
     assert(pindexLast);
 
+    if (processed && received_new_header) {
+        LogBlockHeader(*pindexLast);
+    }
+
     // Consider fetching more headers if we are not using our headers-sync mechanism.
     if (nCount == m_opts.max_headers_result && !have_headers_sync) {
         // Headers message had its maximum size; the peer may have more headers.
@@ -3371,6 +3380,29 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessCompactBlockTxns(CNode& pfrom, Peer& peer, const Bl
     return;
 }
 
+void PeerManagerImpl::LogBlockHeader(const CBlockIndex& index) {
+    // To prevent log spam, this function should only be called after it was determined that a
+    // header is both new and valid.
+    //
+    // These messages are valuable for detecting potential selfish mining behavior;
+    // if multiple displacing headers are seen near simultaneously across many
+    // nodes in the network, this might be an indication of selfish mining.
+    // In addition it can be used to identify peers which send us a header, but
+    // don't followup with a complete and valid (compact) block.
+    // Having this log by default when not in IBD ensures broad availability of
+    // this data in case investigation is merited.
+    const auto msg = strprintf(
+        "Saw new header hash=%s height=%d",
+        index.GetBlockHash().ToString(),
+        index.nHeight
+    );
+    if (m_chainman.IsInitialBlockDownload()) {
+        LogDebug(BCLog::VALIDATION, "%s\n", msg);
+    } else {
+        LogInfo("%s\n", msg);
+    }
+}
+
 void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, DataStream& vRecv,
                                      const std::chrono::microseconds time_received,
                                      const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc)

src/validation.cpp

@@ -4411,23 +4411,6 @@ bool ChainstateManager::AcceptBlockHeader(const CBlockHeader& block, BlockValida
     if (ppindex)
         *ppindex = pindex;
 
-    // Since this is the earliest point at which we have determined that a
-    // header is both new and valid, log here.
-    //
-    // These messages are valuable for detecting potential selfish mining behavior;
-    // if multiple displacing headers are seen near simultaneously across many
-    // nodes in the network, this might be an indication of selfish mining. Having
-    // this log by default when not in IBD ensures broad availability of this data
-    // in case investigation is merited.
-    const auto msg = strprintf(
-        "Saw new header hash=%s height=%d", hash.ToString(), pindex->nHeight);
-
-    if (IsInitialBlockDownload()) {
-        LogPrintLevel(BCLog::VALIDATION, BCLog::Level::Debug, "%s\n", msg);
-    } else {
-        LogPrintf("%s\n", msg);
-    }
-
     return true;
 }
 

src/validation.h

@@ -1218,6 +1218,7 @@ public:
      * @param[in]  min_pow_checked  True if proof-of-work anti-DoS checks have been done by caller for headers chain
      * @param[out] state This may be set to an Error state if any error occurred processing them
      * @param[out] ppindex If set, the pointer will be set to point to the last new block index object for the given headers
+     * @returns false if AcceptBlockHeader fails on any of the headers, true otherwise (including if headers were already known)
      */
     bool ProcessNewBlockHeaders(std::span<const CBlockHeader> headers, bool min_pow_checked, BlockValidationState& state, const CBlockIndex** ppindex = nullptr) LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main);