mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2024-11-20 10:38:42 +01:00
doc: update package RBF comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e3c4394cf
commit
afd52d8e63
@ -36,10 +36,29 @@ The following rules are enforced for all packages:
|
||||
* Packages cannot have conflicting transactions, i.e. no two transactions in a package can spend
|
||||
the same inputs. Packages cannot have duplicate transactions. (#20833)
|
||||
|
||||
* No transaction in a package can conflict with a mempool transaction. Replace By Fee is
|
||||
currently disabled for packages. (#20833)
|
||||
* Only limited package replacements are currently considered. (#28984)
|
||||
|
||||
- Package RBF may be enabled in the future.
|
||||
- All direct conflicts must signal replacement (or have `-mempoolfullrbf=1` set).
|
||||
|
||||
- Packages are 1-parent-1-child, with no in-mempool ancestors of the package.
|
||||
|
||||
- All conflicting clusters(connected components of mempool transactions) must be clusters of up to size 2.
|
||||
|
||||
- No more than MAX_REPLACEMENT_CANDIDATES transactions can be replaced, analogous to
|
||||
regular [replacement rule](./mempool-replacements.md) 5).
|
||||
|
||||
- Replacements must pay more total total fees at the incremental relay fee (analogous to
|
||||
regular [replacement rules](./mempool-replacements.md) 3 and 4).
|
||||
|
||||
- Parent feerate must be lower than package feerate.
|
||||
|
||||
- Must improve [feerate diagram](https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/mempool-incentive-compatibility/553). (#29242)
|
||||
|
||||
- *Rationale*: Basic support for package RBF can be used by wallets
|
||||
by making chains of no longer than two, then directly conflicting
|
||||
those chains when needed. Combined with V3 transactions this can
|
||||
result in more robust fee bumping. More general package RBF may be
|
||||
enabled in the future.
|
||||
|
||||
* When packages are evaluated against ancestor/descendant limits, the union of all transactions'
|
||||
descendants and ancestors is considered. (#21800)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user