mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2024-11-20 10:38:42 +01:00
test: Added test coverage to listsinceblock rpc
This change adds a test to add coverage to the rpc error that emmits the message "Can't read block from disk"
This commit is contained in:
parent
f15778536a
commit
881724d443
@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
self.test_no_blockhash()
|
||||
self.test_invalid_blockhash()
|
||||
self.test_reorg()
|
||||
self.test_cant_read_block()
|
||||
self.test_double_spend()
|
||||
self.test_double_send()
|
||||
self.double_spends_filtered()
|
||||
@ -167,6 +168,31 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
found = next(tx for tx in transactions if tx['txid'] == senttx)
|
||||
assert_equal(found['blockheight'], self.nodes[0].getblockheader(nodes2_first_blockhash)['height'])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_cant_read_block(self):
|
||||
self.log.info('Test the RPC error "Can\'t read block from disk"')
|
||||
|
||||
# Split network into two
|
||||
self.split_network()
|
||||
|
||||
# generate on both sides
|
||||
nodes1_last_blockhash = self.generate(self.nodes[1], 6, sync_fun=lambda: self.sync_all(self.nodes[:2]))[-1]
|
||||
self.generate(self.nodes[2], 7, sync_fun=lambda: self.sync_all(self.nodes[2:]))[0]
|
||||
|
||||
self.join_network()
|
||||
|
||||
# Renaming the block file to induce unsuccessful block read
|
||||
blk_dat = (self.nodes[0].blocks_path / "blk00000.dat")
|
||||
blk_dat_moved = blk_dat.rename(self.nodes[0].blocks_path / "blk00000.dat.moved")
|
||||
assert not blk_dat.exists()
|
||||
|
||||
# listsinceblock(nodes1_last_blockhash) should now fail as blocks are not accessible
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-32603, "Can't read block from disk",
|
||||
self.nodes[0].listsinceblock, nodes1_last_blockhash)
|
||||
|
||||
# Restoring block file
|
||||
blk_dat_moved.rename(self.nodes[0].blocks_path / "blk00000.dat")
|
||||
assert blk_dat.exists()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_double_spend(self):
|
||||
'''
|
||||
This tests the case where the same UTXO is spent twice on two separate
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user