mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-02-21 14:34:49 +01:00
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23683: bug fix: valid but different LockPoints after a reorg
b4adc5ad67
[bugfix] update lockpoints correctly during reorg (glozow)b6002b07a3
MOVEONLY: update_lock_points to txmempool.h (glozow) Pull request description: I introduced a bug in #22677 (sorry! 😅) Mempool entries cache `LockPoints`, containing the first height/blockhash/`CBlockIndex*` at which the transaction becomes valid. During a reorg, we re-check timelocks on all mempool entries using `CheckSequenceLocks(useExistingLockPoints=false)` and remove any now-invalid entries. `CheckSequenceLocks()` also mutates the `LockPoints` passed in, and we update valid entries' `LockPoints` using `update_lock_points`. Thus, `update_lock_points(lp)` needs to be called right after `CheckSequenceLocks(lp)`, otherwise we lose the data in `lp`. I incorrectly assumed they could be called in separate loops. The incorrect behavior introduced is: if we have a reorg in which a timelocked mempool transaction is still valid but becomes valid at a different block, the cached `LockPoints` will be incorrect. This PR fixes the bug, adds a test, and adds an assertion at the end of `removeForReorg()` to check that all mempool entries' lockpoints are valid. You can reproduce the bug by running the test added in the [test] commit on the code before the [bugfix] commit. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: ACKb4adc5ad67
vasild: ACKb4adc5ad67
mzumsande: Code Review ACKb4adc5ad67
hebasto: ACKb4adc5ad67
MarcoFalke: re-ACKb4adc5ad67
🏁 Tree-SHA512: 16b59f6ff8140d0229079ca1c6b04f2f4a00a2e49931275150e4f3fe5ac4ec109698b083fa6b223ba9511f328271cc1ab081263669d5da020af7fee83c13e401
This commit is contained in:
commit
75a227e39e
3 changed files with 13 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -64,16 +64,6 @@ private:
|
|||
int64_t feeDelta;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct update_lock_points
|
||||
{
|
||||
explicit update_lock_points(const LockPoints& _lp) : lp(_lp) { }
|
||||
|
||||
void operator() (CTxMemPoolEntry &e) { e.UpdateLockPoints(lp); }
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
const LockPoints& lp;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
bool TestLockPointValidity(CChain& active_chain, const LockPoints& lp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
|
||||
|
@ -649,10 +639,7 @@ void CTxMemPool::removeForReorg(CChain& chain, std::function<bool(txiter)> check
|
|||
}
|
||||
RemoveStaged(setAllRemoves, false, MemPoolRemovalReason::REORG);
|
||||
for (indexed_transaction_set::const_iterator it = mapTx.begin(); it != mapTx.end(); it++) {
|
||||
const LockPoints lp{it->GetLockPoints()};
|
||||
if (!TestLockPointValidity(chain, lp)) {
|
||||
mapTx.modify(it, update_lock_points(lp));
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert(TestLockPointValidity(chain, it->GetLockPoints()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -312,6 +312,16 @@ public:
|
|||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct update_lock_points
|
||||
{
|
||||
explicit update_lock_points(const LockPoints& _lp) : lp(_lp) { }
|
||||
|
||||
void operator() (CTxMemPoolEntry &e) { e.UpdateLockPoints(lp); }
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
const LockPoints& lp;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Multi_index tag names
|
||||
struct descendant_score {};
|
||||
struct entry_time {};
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -375,6 +375,8 @@ void CChainState::MaybeUpdateMempoolForReorg(
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// CheckSequenceLocks updates lp. Update the mempool entry LockPoints.
|
||||
if (!validLP) m_mempool->mapTx.modify(it, update_lock_points(lp));
|
||||
return should_remove;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue