mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2024-11-20 10:38:42 +01:00
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23813: Add test and docs for getblockfrompeer with pruning
fe329dc936
test: Add test for getblockfrompeer on pruned nodes (Fabian Jahr)cd761e6b2c
rpc: Add note on guarantees to getblockfrompeer (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: These are additions to `getblockfrompeer` that I already [suggested on the original PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20295#pullrequestreview-817157738). The two commits do the following: 1. Add a test for `getblockfrompeer` usage on pruned nodes. This is important because many use-cases for `getblockfrompeer` are in a context of a pruned node. 2. Add some information on how long the users of pruned nodes can expect the block to be available after they have used the RPC. I think the behavior is not very intuitive for users and I would not be surprised if users expect the block to be available indefinitely. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-utACKfe329dc936
MarcoFalke: review ACKfe329dc936
🍉 stratospher: ACKfe329dc
. brunoerg: re-ACKfe329dc936
Tree-SHA512: a686bd8955d9c3baf365db384e497d6ee1aa9ce2fdb0733fe6150f7e3d94bae19d55bc1b347f1c9f619e749e18b41a52b9f8c0aa2042dd311a968a4b5d251fac
This commit is contained in:
commit
6e662a8985
@ -432,7 +432,8 @@ static RPCHelpMan getblockfrompeer()
|
||||
"We must have the header for this block, e.g. using submitheader.\n"
|
||||
"Subsequent calls for the same block and a new peer will cause the response from the previous peer to be ignored.\n"
|
||||
"Peers generally ignore requests for a stale block that they never fully verified, or one that is more than a month old.\n"
|
||||
"When a peer does not respond with a block, we will disconnect.\n\n"
|
||||
"When a peer does not respond with a block, we will disconnect.\n"
|
||||
"Note: The block could be re-pruned as soon as it is received.\n\n"
|
||||
"Returns an empty JSON object if the request was successfully scheduled.",
|
||||
{
|
||||
{"blockhash", RPCArg::Type::STR_HEX, RPCArg::Optional::NO, "The block hash to try to fetch"},
|
||||
|
@ -24,14 +24,19 @@ from test_framework.util import (
|
||||
|
||||
class GetBlockFromPeerTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
def set_test_params(self):
|
||||
self.num_nodes = 2
|
||||
self.num_nodes = 3
|
||||
self.extra_args = [
|
||||
[],
|
||||
[],
|
||||
["-fastprune", "-prune=1"]
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
def setup_network(self):
|
||||
self.setup_nodes()
|
||||
|
||||
def check_for_block(self, hash):
|
||||
def check_for_block(self, node, hash):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
self.nodes[0].getblock(hash)
|
||||
self.nodes[node].getblock(hash)
|
||||
return True
|
||||
except JSONRPCException:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
@ -48,7 +53,7 @@ class GetBlockFromPeerTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Connect nodes to sync headers")
|
||||
self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
|
||||
self.sync_blocks()
|
||||
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:2])
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Node 0 should only have the header for node 1's block 3")
|
||||
x = next(filter(lambda x: x['hash'] == short_tip, self.nodes[0].getchaintips()))
|
||||
@ -81,7 +86,7 @@ class GetBlockFromPeerTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Successful fetch")
|
||||
result = self.nodes[0].getblockfrompeer(short_tip, peer_0_peer_1_id)
|
||||
self.wait_until(lambda: self.check_for_block(short_tip), timeout=1)
|
||||
self.wait_until(lambda: self.check_for_block(node=0, hash=short_tip), timeout=1)
|
||||
assert_equal(result, {})
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Don't fetch blocks we already have")
|
||||
@ -111,6 +116,40 @@ class GetBlockFromPeerTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
error_msg = "In prune mode, only blocks that the node has already synced previously can be fetched from a peer"
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, error_msg, self.nodes[1].getblockfrompeer, blockhash, node1_interface_id)
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Connect pruned node")
|
||||
# We need to generate more blocks to be able to prune
|
||||
self.connect_nodes(0, 2)
|
||||
pruned_node = self.nodes[2]
|
||||
self.generate(self.nodes[0], 400, sync_fun=self.no_op)
|
||||
self.sync_blocks([self.nodes[0], pruned_node])
|
||||
pruneheight = pruned_node.pruneblockchain(300)
|
||||
assert_equal(pruneheight, 248)
|
||||
# Ensure the block is actually pruned
|
||||
pruned_block = self.nodes[0].getblockhash(2)
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not available (pruned data)", pruned_node.getblock, pruned_block)
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Fetch pruned block")
|
||||
peers = pruned_node.getpeerinfo()
|
||||
assert_equal(len(peers), 1)
|
||||
pruned_node_peer_0_id = peers[0]["id"]
|
||||
result = pruned_node.getblockfrompeer(pruned_block, pruned_node_peer_0_id)
|
||||
self.wait_until(lambda: self.check_for_block(node=2, hash=pruned_block), timeout=1)
|
||||
assert_equal(result, {})
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Fetched block persists after next pruning event")
|
||||
self.generate(self.nodes[0], 250, sync_fun=self.no_op)
|
||||
self.sync_blocks([self.nodes[0], pruned_node])
|
||||
pruneheight += 251
|
||||
assert_equal(pruned_node.pruneblockchain(700), pruneheight)
|
||||
assert_equal(pruned_node.getblock(pruned_block)["hash"], "36c56c5b5ebbaf90d76b0d1a074dcb32d42abab75b7ec6fa0ffd9b4fbce8f0f7")
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Fetched block can be pruned again when prune height exceeds the height of the tip at the time when the block was fetched")
|
||||
self.generate(self.nodes[0], 250, sync_fun=self.no_op)
|
||||
self.sync_blocks([self.nodes[0], pruned_node])
|
||||
pruneheight += 250
|
||||
assert_equal(pruned_node.pruneblockchain(1000), pruneheight)
|
||||
assert_raises_rpc_error(-1, "Block not available (pruned data)", pruned_node.getblock, pruned_block)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
GetBlockFromPeerTest().main()
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user