[validation] remove PackageMempoolAcceptResult::m_package_feerate

This value creates an extremely confusing interface as its existence is
dependent upon implementation details (whether something was submitted
on its own, etc). MempoolAcceptResult::m_effective_feerate is much more
helpful, as it always exists for submitted transactions.

src/rpc/mempool.cpp

@@ -785,7 +785,6 @@ static RPCHelpMan submitpackage()
                         }},
                     }}
                 }},
-                {RPCResult::Type::STR_AMOUNT, "package-feerate", /*optional=*/true, "package feerate used for feerate checks in " + CURRENCY_UNIT + " per KvB. Excludes transactions which were deduplicated or accepted individually."},
                 {RPCResult::Type::ARR, "replaced-transactions", /*optional=*/true, "List of txids of replaced transactions",
                 {
                     {RPCResult::Type::STR_HEX, "", "The transaction id"},
@@ -900,9 +899,6 @@ static RPCHelpMan submitpackage()
                 tx_result_map.pushKV(tx->GetWitnessHash().GetHex(), result_inner);
             }
             rpc_result.pushKV("tx-results", tx_result_map);
-            if (package_result.m_package_feerate.has_value()) {
-                rpc_result.pushKV("package-feerate", ValueFromAmount(package_result.m_package_feerate.value().GetFeePerK()));
-            }
             UniValue replaced_list(UniValue::VARR);
             for (const uint256& hash : replaced_txids) replaced_list.push_back(hash.ToString());
             rpc_result.pushKV("replaced-transactions", replaced_list);

src/test/txpackage_tests.cpp

@@ -101,9 +101,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_validation_tests, TestChain100Setup)
     BOOST_CHECK(it_child != result_parent_child.m_tx_results.end());
     BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(it_child->second.m_state.IsValid(),
                         "Package validation unexpectedly failed: " << it_child->second.m_state.GetRejectReason());
-    BOOST_CHECK(result_parent_child.m_package_feerate.has_value());
-    BOOST_CHECK(result_parent_child.m_package_feerate.value() ==
-                CFeeRate(2 * COIN, GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_parent) + GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_child)));
     BOOST_CHECK(it_child->second.m_effective_feerate.value().GetFee(GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_child)) == COIN);
     BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(it_child->second.m_wtxids_fee_calculations.value().size(), 1);
     BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(it_child->second.m_wtxids_fee_calculations.value().front(), tx_child->GetWitnessHash());
@@ -118,7 +115,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_validation_tests, TestChain100Setup)
     auto it_giant_tx = result_single_large.m_tx_results.find(giant_ptx->GetWitnessHash());
     BOOST_CHECK(it_giant_tx != result_single_large.m_tx_results.end());
     BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(it_giant_tx->second.m_state.GetRejectReason(), "tx-size");
-    BOOST_CHECK(result_single_large.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
 
     // Check that mempool size hasn't changed.
     BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), initialPoolSize);
@@ -239,7 +235,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_submission_tests, TestChain100Setup)
     BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(result_unrelated_submit.m_state.GetResult(), PackageValidationResult::PCKG_POLICY);
     BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(result_unrelated_submit.m_state.GetRejectReason(), "package-not-child-with-parents");
     BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), expected_pool_size);
-    BOOST_CHECK(result_unrelated_submit.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
 
     // Parent and Child (and Grandchild) Package
     Package package_parent_child;
@@ -281,7 +276,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_submission_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(result_3gen_submit.m_state.GetResult(), PackageValidationResult::PCKG_POLICY);
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(result_3gen_submit.m_state.GetRejectReason(), "package-not-child-with-parents");
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), expected_pool_size);
-        BOOST_CHECK(result_3gen_submit.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
     }
 
     // Parent and child package where transactions are invalid for reasons other than fee and
@@ -314,8 +308,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_submission_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(result_missing_parent.m_state.GetResult(), PackageValidationResult::PCKG_POLICY);
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(result_missing_parent.m_state.GetRejectReason(), "package-not-child-with-unconfirmed-parents");
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), expected_pool_size);
-
-        BOOST_CHECK(result_missing_parent.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
     }
 
     // Submit package with parent + child.
@@ -341,10 +333,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_submission_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), expected_pool_size);
         BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx_parent->GetHash())));
         BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx_child->GetHash())));
-
-        // Since both transactions have high feerates, they each passed validation individually.
-        // Package validation was unnecessary, so there is no package feerate.
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_parent_child.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
     }
 
     // Already-in-mempool transactions should be detected and de-duplicated.
@@ -365,8 +353,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_submission_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), expected_pool_size);
         BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx_parent->GetHash())));
         BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(tx_child->GetHash())));
-
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_deduped.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
     }
 }
 
@@ -442,11 +428,8 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_witness_swap_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(ptx_child1->GetHash())));
 
         // Child2 would have been validated individually.
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_witness1.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
-
         const auto submit_witness2 = ProcessNewPackage(m_node.chainman->ActiveChainstate(), *m_node.mempool,
                                                        {ptx_parent, ptx_child2}, /*test_accept=*/false);
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_witness2.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
         BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_witness2.m_state.IsValid(),
                             "Package validation unexpectedly failed: " << submit_witness2.m_state.GetRejectReason());
         auto it_parent2_deduped = submit_witness2.m_tx_results.find(ptx_parent->GetWitnessHash());
@@ -470,7 +453,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_witness_swap_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         auto it_child_dup = submit_segwit_dedup.m_tx_results.find(ptx_child1->GetWitnessHash());
         BOOST_CHECK(it_parent_dup->second.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::MEMPOOL_ENTRY);
         BOOST_CHECK(it_child_dup->second.m_result_type == MempoolAcceptResult::ResultType::MEMPOOL_ENTRY);
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_witness2.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
     }
 
     // Try submitting Package1{child2, grandchild} where child2 is same-txid-different-witness as
@@ -505,9 +487,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_witness_swap_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(ptx_child2->GetHash())));
         BOOST_CHECK(!m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Wtxid(ptx_child2->GetWitnessHash())));
         BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Wtxid(ptx_grandchild->GetWitnessHash())));
-
-        // Since child2 is ignored, grandchild would be validated individually.
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_spend_ignored.m_package_feerate == std::nullopt);
     }
 
     // A package Package{parent1, parent2, parent3, child} where the parents are a mixture of
@@ -620,11 +599,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_witness_swap_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK(m_node.mempool->exists(GenTxid::Txid(ptx_mixed_child->GetHash())));
 
         // package feerate should include parent3 and child. It should not include parent1 or parent2_v1.
-        BOOST_CHECK(mixed_result.m_package_feerate.has_value());
         const CFeeRate expected_feerate(1 * COIN, GetVirtualTransactionSize(*ptx_parent3) + GetVirtualTransactionSize(*ptx_mixed_child));
-        BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(mixed_result.m_package_feerate.value() == expected_feerate,
-                            strprintf("Expected package feerate %s, got %s", expected_feerate.ToString(),
-                                      mixed_result.m_package_feerate.value().ToString()));
         BOOST_CHECK(it_parent3->second.m_effective_feerate.value() == expected_feerate);
         BOOST_CHECK(it_child->second.m_effective_feerate.value() == expected_feerate);
         std::vector<uint256> expected_wtxids({ptx_parent3->GetWitnessHash(), ptx_mixed_child->GetWitnessHash()});
@@ -678,11 +653,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_cpfp_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_tx_results.empty());
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_node.mempool->size(), expected_pool_size);
         const CFeeRate expected_feerate(0, GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_parent) + GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_child));
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_package_feerate.has_value());
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_package_feerate.value() == CFeeRate{0});
-        BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_cpfp_deprio.m_package_feerate.value() == expected_feerate,
-                            strprintf("Expected package feerate %s, got %s", expected_feerate.ToString(),
-                                      submit_cpfp_deprio.m_package_feerate.value().ToString()));
     }
 
     // Clear the prioritisation of the parent transaction.
@@ -718,10 +688,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_cpfp_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK(it_parent->second.m_wtxids_fee_calculations.value() == expected_wtxids);
         BOOST_CHECK(it_child->second.m_wtxids_fee_calculations.value() == expected_wtxids);
         BOOST_CHECK(expected_feerate.GetFeePerK() > 1000);
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_cpfp.m_package_feerate.has_value());
-        BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_cpfp.m_package_feerate.value() == expected_feerate,
-                            strprintf("Expected package feerate %s, got %s", expected_feerate.ToString(),
-                                      submit_cpfp.m_package_feerate.value().ToString()));
     }
 
     // Just because we allow low-fee parents doesn't mean we allow low-feerate packages.
@@ -756,10 +722,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_cpfp_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         const CFeeRate expected_feerate(200,
             GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_parent_cheap) + GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_child_cheap));
         BOOST_CHECK(expected_feerate.GetFeePerK() < 1000);
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_package_too_low.m_package_feerate.has_value());
-        BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_package_too_low.m_package_feerate.value() == expected_feerate,
-                            strprintf("Expected package feerate %s, got %s", expected_feerate.ToString(),
-                                      submit_package_too_low.m_package_feerate.value().ToString()));
     }
 
     // Package feerate includes the modified fees of the transactions.
@@ -774,10 +736,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_cpfp_tests, TestChain100Setup)
                 "Package validation unexpectedly failed" << submit_prioritised_package.m_state.GetRejectReason());
         const CFeeRate expected_feerate(1 * COIN + 200,
             GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_parent_cheap) + GetVirtualTransactionSize(*tx_child_cheap));
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_prioritised_package.m_package_feerate.has_value());
-        BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_prioritised_package.m_package_feerate.value() == expected_feerate,
-                            strprintf("Expected package feerate %s, got %s", expected_feerate.ToString(),
-                                      submit_prioritised_package.m_package_feerate.value().ToString()));
         auto it_parent = submit_prioritised_package.m_tx_results.find(tx_parent_cheap->GetWitnessHash());
         auto it_child = submit_prioritised_package.m_tx_results.find(tx_child_cheap->GetWitnessHash());
         BOOST_CHECK(it_parent != submit_prioritised_package.m_tx_results.end());
@@ -823,10 +781,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(package_cpfp_tests, TestChain100Setup)
         BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_rich_parent.m_state.IsInvalid(), "Package validation unexpectedly succeeded");
 
         // The child would have been validated on its own and failed, then submitted as a "package" of 1.
-        // The package feerate is just the child's feerate, which is 0sat/vb.
-        BOOST_CHECK(submit_rich_parent.m_package_feerate.has_value());
-        BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(submit_rich_parent.m_package_feerate.value() == CFeeRate(),
-                            "expected 0, got " << submit_rich_parent.m_package_feerate.value().ToString());
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_rich_parent.m_state.GetResult(), PackageValidationResult::PCKG_POLICY);
         BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(submit_rich_parent.m_state.GetRejectReason(), "package-fee-too-low");
 

src/validation.cpp

@@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ PackageMempoolAcceptResult MemPoolAccept::AcceptMultipleTransactions(const std::
     if (args.m_package_feerates &&
         !CheckFeeRate(m_total_vsize, m_total_modified_fees, placeholder_state)) {
         package_state.Invalid(PackageValidationResult::PCKG_POLICY, "package-fee-too-low");
-        return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, package_feerate, {});
+        return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, {});
     }
 
     // Apply package mempool ancestor/descendant limits. Skip if there is only one transaction,
@@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ PackageMempoolAcceptResult MemPoolAccept::AcceptMultipleTransactions(const std::
     // transactions, but this exemption is not extended to packages in CheckPackageLimits().
     std::string err_string;
     if (txns.size() > 1 && !PackageMempoolChecks(txns, package_state)) {
-        return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, package_feerate, std::move(results));
+        return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, std::move(results));
     }
 
     std::vector<uint256> all_package_wtxids;
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ PackageMempoolAcceptResult MemPoolAccept::AcceptMultipleTransactions(const std::
             // Exit early to avoid doing pointless work. Update the failed tx result; the rest are unfinished.
             package_state.Invalid(PackageValidationResult::PCKG_TX, "transaction failed");
             results.emplace(ws.m_ptx->GetWitnessHash(), MempoolAcceptResult::Failure(ws.m_state));
-            return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, package_feerate, std::move(results));
+            return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, std::move(results));
         }
         if (args.m_test_accept) {
             const auto effective_feerate = args.m_package_feerates ? ws.m_package_feerate :
@@ -1286,14 +1286,14 @@ PackageMempoolAcceptResult MemPoolAccept::AcceptMultipleTransactions(const std::
         }
     }
 
-    if (args.m_test_accept) return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, package_feerate, std::move(results));
+    if (args.m_test_accept) return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, std::move(results));
 
     if (!SubmitPackage(args, workspaces, package_state, results)) {
         // PackageValidationState filled in by SubmitPackage().
-        return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, package_feerate, std::move(results));
+        return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, std::move(results));
     }
 
-    return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, package_feerate, std::move(results));
+    return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state, std::move(results));
 }
 
 PackageMempoolAcceptResult MemPoolAccept::AcceptPackage(const Package& package, ATMPArgs& args)
@@ -1418,7 +1418,6 @@ PackageMempoolAcceptResult MemPoolAccept::AcceptPackage(const Package& package,
 
     // Nothing to do if the entire package has already been submitted.
     if (quit_early || txns_new.empty()) {
-        // No package feerate when no package validation was done.
         return PackageMempoolAcceptResult(package_state_quit_early, std::move(results));
     }
     // Validate the (deduplicated) transactions as a package.
@@ -1427,7 +1426,6 @@ PackageMempoolAcceptResult MemPoolAccept::AcceptPackage(const Package& package,
     for (const auto& [wtxid, mempoolaccept_res] : results) {
         submission_result.m_tx_results.emplace(wtxid, mempoolaccept_res);
     }
-    if (submission_result.m_state.IsValid()) assert(submission_result.m_package_feerate.has_value());
     return submission_result;
 }
 

src/validation.h

@@ -216,10 +216,6 @@ struct PackageMempoolAcceptResult
     * was a package-wide error (see result in m_state), m_tx_results will be empty.
     */
     std::map<const uint256, const MempoolAcceptResult> m_tx_results;
-    /** Package feerate, defined as the aggregated modified fees divided by the total virtual size
-     * of all transactions in the package.  May be unavailable if some inputs were not available or
-     * a transaction failure caused validation to terminate early. */
-    std::optional<CFeeRate> m_package_feerate;
 
     explicit PackageMempoolAcceptResult(PackageValidationState state,
                                         std::map<const uint256, const MempoolAcceptResult>&& results)
@@ -227,7 +223,7 @@ struct PackageMempoolAcceptResult
 
     explicit PackageMempoolAcceptResult(PackageValidationState state, CFeeRate feerate,
                                         std::map<const uint256, const MempoolAcceptResult>&& results)
-        : m_state{state}, m_tx_results(std::move(results)), m_package_feerate{feerate} {}
+        : m_state{state}, m_tx_results(std::move(results)) {}
 
     /** Constructor to create a PackageMempoolAcceptResult from a single MempoolAcceptResult */
     explicit PackageMempoolAcceptResult(const uint256& wtxid, const MempoolAcceptResult& result)

test/functional/rpc_packages.py

@@ -321,12 +321,6 @@ class RPCPackagesTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         # submitpackage result should be consistent with testmempoolaccept and getmempoolentry
         self.assert_equal_package_results(node, testmempoolaccept_result, submitpackage_result)
 
-        # Package feerate is calculated for the remaining transactions after deduplication and
-        # individual submission. If only 0 or 1 transaction is left, e.g. because all transactions
-        # had high-feerates or were already in the mempool, no package feerate is provided.
-        # In this case, since all of the parents have high fees, each is accepted individually.
-        assert "package-feerate" not in submitpackage_result
-
         # The node should announce each transaction. No guarantees for propagation.
         peer.wait_for_broadcast([tx["tx"].getwtxid() for tx in package_txns])
         self.generate(node, 1)
@@ -363,12 +357,6 @@ class RPCPackagesTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
         assert_equal([tx_poor["wtxid"], tx_child["tx"].getwtxid()], poor_parent_result["fees"]["effective-includes"])
         assert_equal([tx_poor["wtxid"], tx_child["tx"].getwtxid()], child_result["fees"]["effective-includes"])
 
-        # Package feerate is calculated for the remaining transactions after deduplication and
-        # individual submission. Since this package had a 0-fee parent, package feerate must have
-        # been used and returned.
-        assert "package-feerate" in submitpackage_result
-        assert_fee_amount(DEFAULT_FEE, rich_parent_result["vsize"] + child_result["vsize"], submitpackage_result["package-feerate"])
-
         # The node will broadcast each transaction, still abiding by its peer's fee filter
         peer.wait_for_broadcast([tx["tx"].getwtxid() for tx in package_txns])
         self.generate(node, 1)