mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2024-11-20 02:25:40 +01:00
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#28530: tests, bug fix: DisconnectedBlockTransactions rewrite followups
9b3da70bd0
[test] DisconnectedBlockTransactions::DynamicMemoryUsage (glozow)b2d0447964
bugfix: correct DisconnectedBlockTransactions memory usage (stickies-v)f4254e2098
assume duplicate transactions are not added to `iters_by_txid` (ismaelsadeeq)29eb219c12
move only: move implementation code to disconnected_transactions.cpp (ismaelsadeeq)81dfeddea7
refactor: update `MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL` from kb to bytes (ismaelsadeeq) Pull request description: This PR is a follow-up to fix review comments and a bugfix from #28385 The PR - Updated `DisconnectedBlockTransactions`'s `MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL` from kb to bytes. - Moved `DisconnectedBlockTransactions` implementation code to `kernel/disconnected_transactions.cpp`. - `AddTransactionsFromBlock` now assume duplicate transactions are not passed by asserting after inserting each transaction to `iters_by_txid`. - Included a Bug fix: In the current master we are underestimating the memory usage of `DisconnectedBlockTransactions`. * When adding and subtracting `cachedInnerUsage` we call `RecursiveDynamicUsage` with `CTransaction` which invokes this [`RecursiveDynamicUsage(const CTransaction& tx)`](6e721c923c/src/core_memusage.h (L32)
) version of `RecursiveDynamicUsage`, the output of that call only account for the memory usage of the inputs and outputs of the `CTransaction`, this omits the memory usage of the `CTransaction` object and the control block. * This PR fixes this bug by calling `RecursiveDynamicUsage` with `CTransactionRef` when adding and subtracting `cachedInnerUsage` which invokes [`RecursiveDynamicUsage(const std::shared_ptr<X>& p)`](6e721c923c/src/core_memusage.h (L67)
) version of `RecursiveDynamicUsage` the output of the calculation accounts for the` CTransaction` object, the control blocks, inputs and outputs memory usage. * see [comment ](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28385#discussion_r1322948452) - Added test for DisconnectedBlockTransactions memory limit. ACKs for top commit: stickies-v: ACK9b3da70bd0
- nice work! BrandonOdiwuor: re ACK9b3da70bd0
glozow: ACK9b3da70bd0
Tree-SHA512: 69b9595d09f4d0209038f97081d790cea92ccf63efb94e9e372749979fcbe527f7f17a8e454720cedd12021be0c8e11cf99874625d3dafd9ec602b12dbeb4098
This commit is contained in:
commit
023418a140
@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ libbitcoin_node_a_SOURCES = \
|
||||
kernel/coinstats.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/context.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/cs_main.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/disconnected_transactions.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/mempool_persist.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/mempool_removal_reason.cpp \
|
||||
mapport.cpp \
|
||||
@ -944,6 +945,7 @@ libbitcoinkernel_la_SOURCES = \
|
||||
kernel/coinstats.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/context.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/cs_main.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/disconnected_transactions.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/mempool_persist.cpp \
|
||||
kernel/mempool_removal_reason.cpp \
|
||||
key.cpp \
|
||||
|
@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ BITCOIN_TESTS =\
|
||||
test/dbwrapper_tests.cpp \
|
||||
test/denialofservice_tests.cpp \
|
||||
test/descriptor_tests.cpp \
|
||||
test/disconnected_transactions.cpp \
|
||||
test/flatfile_tests.cpp \
|
||||
test/fs_tests.cpp \
|
||||
test/getarg_tests.cpp \
|
||||
|
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static ReorgTxns CreateBlocks(size_t num_not_shared)
|
||||
|
||||
static void Reorg(const ReorgTxns& reorg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_SIZE * 1000};
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_BYTES};
|
||||
// Disconnect block
|
||||
const auto evicted = disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(reorg.disconnected_txns);
|
||||
assert(evicted.empty());
|
||||
|
90
src/kernel/disconnected_transactions.cpp
Normal file
90
src/kernel/disconnected_transactions.cpp
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
|
||||
// Copyright (c) 2023 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
||||
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
||||
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
||||
|
||||
#include <kernel/disconnected_transactions.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <assert.h>
|
||||
#include <core_memusage.h>
|
||||
#include <memusage.h>
|
||||
#include <primitives/transaction.h>
|
||||
#include <util/hasher.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <memory>
|
||||
#include <utility>
|
||||
|
||||
// It's almost certainly a logic bug if we don't clear out queuedTx before
|
||||
// destruction, as we add to it while disconnecting blocks, and then we
|
||||
// need to re-process remaining transactions to ensure mempool consistency.
|
||||
// For now, assert() that we've emptied out this object on destruction.
|
||||
// This assert() can always be removed if the reorg-processing code were
|
||||
// to be refactored such that this assumption is no longer true (for
|
||||
// instance if there was some other way we cleaned up the mempool after a
|
||||
// reorg, besides draining this object).
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions::~DisconnectedBlockTransactions()
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(queuedTx.empty());
|
||||
assert(iters_by_txid.empty());
|
||||
assert(cachedInnerUsage == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<CTransactionRef> DisconnectedBlockTransactions::LimitMemoryUsage()
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::vector<CTransactionRef> evicted;
|
||||
|
||||
while (!queuedTx.empty() && DynamicMemoryUsage() > m_max_mem_usage) {
|
||||
evicted.emplace_back(queuedTx.front());
|
||||
cachedInnerUsage -= RecursiveDynamicUsage(queuedTx.front());
|
||||
iters_by_txid.erase(queuedTx.front()->GetHash());
|
||||
queuedTx.pop_front();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return evicted;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
size_t DisconnectedBlockTransactions::DynamicMemoryUsage() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return cachedInnerUsage + memusage::DynamicUsage(iters_by_txid) + memusage::DynamicUsage(queuedTx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[[nodiscard]] std::vector<CTransactionRef> DisconnectedBlockTransactions::AddTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
iters_by_txid.reserve(iters_by_txid.size() + vtx.size());
|
||||
for (auto block_it = vtx.rbegin(); block_it != vtx.rend(); ++block_it) {
|
||||
auto it = queuedTx.insert(queuedTx.end(), *block_it);
|
||||
auto [_, inserted] = iters_by_txid.emplace((*block_it)->GetHash(), it);
|
||||
assert(inserted); // callers may never pass multiple transactions with the same txid
|
||||
cachedInnerUsage += RecursiveDynamicUsage(*block_it);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return LimitMemoryUsage();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void DisconnectedBlockTransactions::removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Short-circuit in the common case of a block being added to the tip
|
||||
if (queuedTx.empty()) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (const auto& tx : vtx) {
|
||||
auto iter = iters_by_txid.find(tx->GetHash());
|
||||
if (iter != iters_by_txid.end()) {
|
||||
auto list_iter = iter->second;
|
||||
iters_by_txid.erase(iter);
|
||||
cachedInnerUsage -= RecursiveDynamicUsage(*list_iter);
|
||||
queuedTx.erase(list_iter);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void DisconnectedBlockTransactions::clear()
|
||||
{
|
||||
cachedInnerUsage = 0;
|
||||
iters_by_txid.clear();
|
||||
queuedTx.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::list<CTransactionRef> DisconnectedBlockTransactions::take()
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::list<CTransactionRef> ret = std::move(queuedTx);
|
||||
clear();
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
@ -5,8 +5,6 @@
|
||||
#ifndef BITCOIN_KERNEL_DISCONNECTED_TRANSACTIONS_H
|
||||
#define BITCOIN_KERNEL_DISCONNECTED_TRANSACTIONS_H
|
||||
|
||||
#include <core_memusage.h>
|
||||
#include <memusage.h>
|
||||
#include <primitives/transaction.h>
|
||||
#include <util/hasher.h>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -14,8 +12,8 @@
|
||||
#include <unordered_map>
|
||||
#include <vector>
|
||||
|
||||
/** Maximum kilobytes for transactions to store for processing during reorg */
|
||||
static const unsigned int MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_SIZE = 20'000;
|
||||
/** Maximum bytes for transactions to store for processing during reorg */
|
||||
static const unsigned int MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_BYTES{20'000'000};
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* DisconnectedBlockTransactions
|
||||
|
||||
@ -38,8 +36,7 @@ static const unsigned int MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_SIZE = 20'000;
|
||||
*/
|
||||
class DisconnectedBlockTransactions {
|
||||
private:
|
||||
/** Cached dynamic memory usage for the CTransactions (memory for the shared pointers is
|
||||
* included in the container calculations). */
|
||||
/** Cached dynamic memory usage for the `CTransactionRef`s */
|
||||
uint64_t cachedInnerUsage = 0;
|
||||
const size_t m_max_mem_usage;
|
||||
std::list<CTransactionRef> queuedTx;
|
||||
@ -47,39 +44,15 @@ private:
|
||||
std::unordered_map<uint256, TxList::iterator, SaltedTxidHasher> iters_by_txid;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Trim the earliest-added entries until we are within memory bounds. */
|
||||
std::vector<CTransactionRef> LimitMemoryUsage()
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::vector<CTransactionRef> evicted;
|
||||
|
||||
while (!queuedTx.empty() && DynamicMemoryUsage() > m_max_mem_usage) {
|
||||
evicted.emplace_back(queuedTx.front());
|
||||
cachedInnerUsage -= RecursiveDynamicUsage(*queuedTx.front());
|
||||
iters_by_txid.erase(queuedTx.front()->GetHash());
|
||||
queuedTx.pop_front();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return evicted;
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::vector<CTransactionRef> LimitMemoryUsage();
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions(size_t max_mem_usage) : m_max_mem_usage{max_mem_usage} {}
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions(size_t max_mem_usage)
|
||||
: m_max_mem_usage{max_mem_usage} {}
|
||||
|
||||
// It's almost certainly a logic bug if we don't clear out queuedTx before
|
||||
// destruction, as we add to it while disconnecting blocks, and then we
|
||||
// need to re-process remaining transactions to ensure mempool consistency.
|
||||
// For now, assert() that we've emptied out this object on destruction.
|
||||
// This assert() can always be removed if the reorg-processing code were
|
||||
// to be refactored such that this assumption is no longer true (for
|
||||
// instance if there was some other way we cleaned up the mempool after a
|
||||
// reorg, besides draining this object).
|
||||
~DisconnectedBlockTransactions() {
|
||||
assert(queuedTx.empty());
|
||||
assert(iters_by_txid.empty());
|
||||
assert(cachedInnerUsage == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
~DisconnectedBlockTransactions();
|
||||
|
||||
size_t DynamicMemoryUsage() const {
|
||||
return cachedInnerUsage + memusage::DynamicUsage(iters_by_txid) + memusage::DynamicUsage(queuedTx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
size_t DynamicMemoryUsage() const;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Add transactions from the block, iterating through vtx in reverse order. Callers should call
|
||||
* this function for blocks in descending order by block height.
|
||||
@ -88,50 +61,16 @@ public:
|
||||
* corresponding entry in iters_by_txid.
|
||||
* @returns vector of transactions that were evicted for size-limiting.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
[[nodiscard]] std::vector<CTransactionRef> AddTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
iters_by_txid.reserve(iters_by_txid.size() + vtx.size());
|
||||
for (auto block_it = vtx.rbegin(); block_it != vtx.rend(); ++block_it) {
|
||||
auto it = queuedTx.insert(queuedTx.end(), *block_it);
|
||||
iters_by_txid.emplace((*block_it)->GetHash(), it);
|
||||
cachedInnerUsage += RecursiveDynamicUsage(**block_it);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return LimitMemoryUsage();
|
||||
}
|
||||
[[nodiscard]] std::vector<CTransactionRef> AddTransactionsFromBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx);
|
||||
|
||||
/** Remove any entries that are in this block. */
|
||||
void removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Short-circuit in the common case of a block being added to the tip
|
||||
if (queuedTx.empty()) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (const auto& tx : vtx) {
|
||||
auto iter = iters_by_txid.find(tx->GetHash());
|
||||
if (iter != iters_by_txid.end()) {
|
||||
auto list_iter = iter->second;
|
||||
iters_by_txid.erase(iter);
|
||||
cachedInnerUsage -= RecursiveDynamicUsage(**list_iter);
|
||||
queuedTx.erase(list_iter);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
void removeForBlock(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& vtx);
|
||||
|
||||
size_t size() const { return queuedTx.size(); }
|
||||
|
||||
void clear()
|
||||
{
|
||||
cachedInnerUsage = 0;
|
||||
iters_by_txid.clear();
|
||||
queuedTx.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
void clear();
|
||||
|
||||
/** Clear all data structures and return the list of transactions. */
|
||||
std::list<CTransactionRef> take()
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::list<CTransactionRef> ret = std::move(queuedTx);
|
||||
clear();
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::list<CTransactionRef> take();
|
||||
};
|
||||
#endif // BITCOIN_KERNEL_DISCONNECTED_TRANSACTIONS_H
|
||||
|
95
src/test/disconnected_transactions.cpp
Normal file
95
src/test/disconnected_transactions.cpp
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
|
||||
// Copyright (c) 2023 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
||||
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
||||
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
||||
//
|
||||
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
|
||||
#include <core_memusage.h>
|
||||
#include <kernel/disconnected_transactions.h>
|
||||
#include <test/util/setup_common.h>
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(disconnected_transactions, TestChain100Setup)
|
||||
|
||||
//! Tests that DisconnectedBlockTransactions limits its own memory properly
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(disconnectpool_memory_limits)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Use the coinbase transactions from TestChain100Setup. It doesn't matter whether these
|
||||
// transactions would realistically be in a block together, they just need distinct txids and
|
||||
// uniform size for this test to work.
|
||||
std::vector<CTransactionRef> block_vtx(m_coinbase_txns);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(block_vtx.size(), 100);
|
||||
|
||||
// Roughly estimate sizes to sanity check that DisconnectedBlockTransactions::DynamicMemoryUsage
|
||||
// is within an expected range.
|
||||
|
||||
// Overhead for the hashmap depends on number of buckets
|
||||
std::unordered_map<uint256, CTransaction*, SaltedTxidHasher> temp_map;
|
||||
temp_map.reserve(1);
|
||||
const size_t MAP_1{memusage::DynamicUsage(temp_map)};
|
||||
temp_map.reserve(100);
|
||||
const size_t MAP_100{memusage::DynamicUsage(temp_map)};
|
||||
|
||||
const size_t TX_USAGE{RecursiveDynamicUsage(block_vtx.front())};
|
||||
for (const auto& tx : block_vtx)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(RecursiveDynamicUsage(tx), TX_USAGE);
|
||||
|
||||
// Our overall formula is unordered map overhead + usage per entry.
|
||||
// Implementations may vary, but we're trying to guess the usage of data structures.
|
||||
const size_t ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE{
|
||||
TX_USAGE
|
||||
// list entry: 2 pointers (next pointer and prev pointer) + element itself
|
||||
+ memusage::MallocUsage((2 * sizeof(void*)) + sizeof(decltype(block_vtx)::value_type))
|
||||
// unordered map: 1 pointer for the hashtable + key and value
|
||||
+ memusage::MallocUsage(sizeof(void*) + sizeof(decltype(temp_map)::key_type)
|
||||
+ sizeof(decltype(temp_map)::value_type))};
|
||||
|
||||
// DisconnectedBlockTransactions that's just big enough for 1 transaction.
|
||||
{
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAP_1 + ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE};
|
||||
// Add just 2 (and not all 100) transactions to keep the unordered map's hashtable overhead
|
||||
// to a minimum and avoid all (instead of all but 1) transactions getting evicted.
|
||||
std::vector<CTransactionRef> two_txns({block_vtx.at(0), block_vtx.at(1)});
|
||||
auto evicted_txns{disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(two_txns)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage() <= MAP_1 + ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE);
|
||||
|
||||
// Only 1 transaction can be kept
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(1, evicted_txns.size());
|
||||
// Transactions are added from back to front and eviction is FIFO.
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(block_vtx.at(1), evicted_txns.front());
|
||||
|
||||
disconnectpool.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// DisconnectedBlockTransactions with a comfortable maximum memory usage so that nothing is evicted.
|
||||
// Record usage so we can check size limiting in the next test.
|
||||
size_t usage_full{0};
|
||||
{
|
||||
const size_t USAGE_100_OVERESTIMATE{MAP_100 + ENTRY_USAGE_ESTIMATE * 100};
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{USAGE_100_OVERESTIMATE};
|
||||
auto evicted_txns{disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(block_vtx)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(evicted_txns.size(), 0);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage() <= USAGE_100_OVERESTIMATE);
|
||||
|
||||
usage_full = disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage();
|
||||
|
||||
disconnectpool.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// DisconnectedBlockTransactions that's just a little too small for all of the transactions.
|
||||
{
|
||||
const size_t MAX_MEMUSAGE_99{usage_full - sizeof(void*)};
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAX_MEMUSAGE_99};
|
||||
auto evicted_txns{disconnectpool.AddTransactionsFromBlock(block_vtx)};
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(disconnectpool.DynamicMemoryUsage() <= MAX_MEMUSAGE_99);
|
||||
|
||||
// Only 1 transaction needed to be evicted
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(1, evicted_txns.size());
|
||||
|
||||
// Transactions are added from back to front and eviction is FIFO.
|
||||
// The last transaction of block_vtx should be the first to be evicted.
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(block_vtx.back(), evicted_txns.front());
|
||||
|
||||
disconnectpool.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
|
@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(chainstatemanager_snapshot_init, SnapshotTestSetup)
|
||||
// it will initialize instead of attempting to complete validation.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that this is not a realistic use of DisconnectTip().
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions unused_pool{MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_SIZE * 1000};
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions unused_pool{MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_BYTES};
|
||||
BlockValidationState unused_state;
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK2(::cs_main, bg_chainstate.MempoolMutex());
|
||||
|
@ -3062,7 +3062,7 @@ bool Chainstate::ActivateBestChainStep(BlockValidationState& state, CBlockIndex*
|
||||
|
||||
// Disconnect active blocks which are no longer in the best chain.
|
||||
bool fBlocksDisconnected = false;
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_SIZE * 1000};
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_BYTES};
|
||||
while (m_chain.Tip() && m_chain.Tip() != pindexFork) {
|
||||
if (!DisconnectTip(state, &disconnectpool)) {
|
||||
// This is likely a fatal error, but keep the mempool consistent,
|
||||
@ -3420,7 +3420,7 @@ bool Chainstate::InvalidateBlock(BlockValidationState& state, CBlockIndex* pinde
|
||||
|
||||
// ActivateBestChain considers blocks already in m_chain
|
||||
// unconditionally valid already, so force disconnect away from it.
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_SIZE * 1000};
|
||||
DisconnectedBlockTransactions disconnectpool{MAX_DISCONNECTED_TX_POOL_BYTES};
|
||||
bool ret = DisconnectTip(state, &disconnectpool);
|
||||
// DisconnectTip will add transactions to disconnectpool.
|
||||
// Adjust the mempool to be consistent with the new tip, adding
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user