2016-03-19 20:58:06 +01:00
|
|
|
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
2020-04-16 19:14:08 +02:00
|
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2014-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
|
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
2017-01-18 00:34:40 +01:00
|
|
|
"""Test the abandontransaction RPC.
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-18 00:34:40 +01:00
|
|
|
The abandontransaction RPC marks a transaction and all its in-wallet
|
|
|
|
descendants as abandoned which allows their inputs to be respent. It can be
|
|
|
|
used to replace "stuck" or evicted transactions. It only works on transactions
|
|
|
|
which are not included in a block and are not currently in the mempool. It has
|
2018-01-27 23:45:32 +01:00
|
|
|
no effect on transactions which are already abandoned.
|
2017-01-18 00:34:40 +01:00
|
|
|
"""
|
2018-07-07 00:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
from decimal import Decimal
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-07-07 00:10:35 +02:00
|
|
|
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
from test_framework.util import (
|
|
|
|
assert_equal,
|
|
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error,
|
|
|
|
connect_nodes,
|
|
|
|
disconnect_nodes,
|
2019-11-19 20:35:58 +01:00
|
|
|
wait_until,
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-27 23:45:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
2017-06-10 00:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
def set_test_params(self):
|
2016-05-14 13:01:31 +02:00
|
|
|
self.num_nodes = 2
|
2019-02-14 04:22:40 +01:00
|
|
|
self.extra_args = [["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"], []]
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-09 19:32:37 +02:00
|
|
|
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
|
|
|
|
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
def run_test(self):
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[1].generate(100)
|
2019-04-07 00:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
self.sync_blocks()
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
|
|
txA = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
|
|
|
txB = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
|
|
|
txC = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
2019-04-07 00:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
self.sync_mempools()
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-27 23:45:32 +01:00
|
|
|
# Can not abandon non-wallet transaction
|
|
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, 'Invalid or non-wallet transaction id', lambda: self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txid='ff' * 32))
|
|
|
|
# Can not abandon confirmed transaction
|
|
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, 'Transaction not eligible for abandonment', lambda: self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txid=txA))
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-07 00:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
self.sync_blocks()
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
assert balance - newbalance < Decimal("0.001") #no more than fees lost
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-05 19:01:27 +02:00
|
|
|
# Disconnect nodes so node0's transactions don't get into node1's mempool
|
|
|
|
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Identify the 10btc outputs
|
2019-01-25 00:52:29 +01:00
|
|
|
nA = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txA)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
|
|
|
nB = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txB)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
|
|
|
nC = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txC)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
inputs = []
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
# spend 10btc outputs from txA and txB
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txA, "vout": nA})
|
|
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txB, "vout": nB})
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
outputs = {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("14.99998")
|
|
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("5")
|
2017-09-06 01:49:18 +02:00
|
|
|
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
txAB1 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Identify the 14.99998btc output
|
2019-01-25 00:52:29 +01:00
|
|
|
nAB = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txAB1)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("14.99998"))
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#Create a child tx spending AB1 and C
|
|
|
|
inputs = []
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txAB1, "vout": nAB})
|
|
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txC, "vout": nC})
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
outputs = {}
|
|
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("24.9996")
|
2017-09-06 01:49:18 +02:00
|
|
|
signed2 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
txABC2 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-12 23:19:00 +02:00
|
|
|
# Create a child tx spending ABC2
|
|
|
|
signed3_change = Decimal("24.999")
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
inputs = [{"txid": txABC2, "vout": 0}]
|
|
|
|
outputs = {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): signed3_change}
|
2018-07-12 23:19:00 +02:00
|
|
|
signed3 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
|
|
|
|
# note tx is never directly referenced, only abandoned as a child of the above
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed3["hex"])
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
# In mempool txs from self should increase balance from change
|
|
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
2018-07-12 23:19:00 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("30") + signed3_change)
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Restart the node with a higher min relay fee so the parent tx is no longer in mempool
|
|
|
|
# TODO: redo with eviction
|
2017-03-24 04:56:31 +01:00
|
|
|
self.stop_node(0)
|
2017-06-09 22:35:17 +02:00
|
|
|
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
|
2019-11-19 20:35:58 +01:00
|
|
|
wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded'])
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-05 19:01:27 +02:00
|
|
|
# Verify txs no longer in either node's mempool
|
2016-08-17 13:28:09 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
2017-05-05 19:01:27 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Not in mempool txs from self should only reduce balance
|
|
|
|
# inputs are still spent, but change not received
|
|
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
2018-07-12 23:19:00 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - signed3_change)
|
2016-03-17 17:48:05 +01:00
|
|
|
# Unconfirmed received funds that are not in mempool, also shouldn't show
|
|
|
|
# up in unconfirmed balance
|
2020-03-27 17:21:14 +01:00
|
|
|
balances = self.nodes[0].getbalances()['mine']
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(balances['untrusted_pending'] + balances['trusted'], newbalance)
|
2016-03-17 17:48:05 +01:00
|
|
|
# Also shouldn't show up in listunspent
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
assert not txABC2 in [utxo["txid"] for utxo in self.nodes[0].listunspent(0)]
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Abandon original transaction and verify inputs are available again
|
|
|
|
# including that the child tx was also abandoned
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txAB1)
|
|
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
2016-08-17 13:28:09 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("30"))
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify that even with a low min relay fee, the tx is not reaccepted from wallet on startup once abandoned
|
2017-03-24 04:56:31 +01:00
|
|
|
self.stop_node(0)
|
2017-06-09 22:35:17 +02:00
|
|
|
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"])
|
2019-11-19 20:35:58 +01:00
|
|
|
wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded'])
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-17 13:28:09 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), balance)
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-18 15:26:45 +01:00
|
|
|
# But if it is received again then it is unabandoned
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
# And since now in mempool, the change is available
|
|
|
|
# But its child tx remains abandoned
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
|
|
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
2016-08-17 13:28:09 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("20") + Decimal("14.99998"))
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-18 15:26:45 +01:00
|
|
|
# Send child tx again so it is unabandoned
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
|
|
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
2016-08-17 13:28:09 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10") - Decimal("14.99998") + Decimal("24.9996"))
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Remove using high relay fee again
|
2017-03-24 04:56:31 +01:00
|
|
|
self.stop_node(0)
|
2017-06-09 22:35:17 +02:00
|
|
|
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
|
2019-11-19 20:35:58 +01:00
|
|
|
wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded'])
|
2016-08-17 13:28:09 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
2016-08-17 13:28:09 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output
|
|
|
|
# Mine double spend from node 1
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
inputs = []
|
|
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txA, "vout": nA})
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
outputs = {}
|
|
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("9.9999")
|
|
|
|
tx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
|
2017-09-06 01:49:18 +02:00
|
|
|
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(tx)
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
|
2019-04-07 00:19:45 +02:00
|
|
|
self.sync_blocks()
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted
|
|
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
2016-08-17 13:28:09 +02:00
|
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20"))
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# There is currently a minor bug around this and so this test doesn't work. See Issue #7315
|
|
|
|
# Invalidate the block with the double spend and B's 10 BTC output should no longer be available
|
|
|
|
# Don't think C's should either
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
|
|
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
2016-08-17 13:28:09 +02:00
|
|
|
#assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10"))
|
2017-03-08 00:46:17 +01:00
|
|
|
self.log.info("If balance has not declined after invalidateblock then out of mempool wallet tx which is no longer")
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("conflicted has not resumed causing its inputs to be seen as spent. See Issue #7315")
|
|
|
|
self.log.info(str(balance) + " -> " + str(newbalance) + " ?")
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-25 17:34:39 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-08 17:39:24 +01:00
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
|
|
AbandonConflictTest().main()
|