bitcoin/test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt

asend
blockin
cachable
fo
fpr
hights
hist
inout
invokable
keypair
mor
nin
ser
unparseable
unser
useable
wit
lint: update list of spelling linter false positives 2020-12-31 11:09:07 +01:00			`asend`
			`blockin`
			`cachable`
			`fo`
			`fpr`
Fix typos reported by codespell 2018-08-14 09:27:30 +02:00			`hights`
lint: update list of spelling linter false positives 2020-12-31 11:09:07 +01:00			`hist`
			`inout`
script: fix spelling linter raising spuriously on "invokable" 2021-06-03 13:55:36 +02:00			`invokable`
script, doc: spelling update 2021-06-23 13:33:18 +02:00			`keypair`
Fix typos reported by codespell 2018-08-14 09:27:30 +02:00			`mor`
lint: update list of spelling linter false positives 2020-12-31 11:09:07 +01:00			`nin`
			`ser`
			`unparseable`
			`unser`
Fix typos reported by codespell 2018-08-14 09:27:30 +02:00			`useable`
Fix spelling errors identified by codespell 1.15.0 After this commit, the only remaining output is: $ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt Note: * I ignore several valid alternative spellings * homogenous is present in tinyformat, hence should be addressed upstream * process' is correct only if there are plural processes 2019-06-09 18:52:10 +02:00			`wit`