Luke Dashjr
5f697ea543
Merge branch 'master' into segwit_gbt_updates_20160330
2016-04-23 20:02:53 +00:00
Luke-Jr
cf51071ccd
Merge pull request #376 from jl2012/bip141p2sh
...
BIP141: Add P2SH-P2WPKH example and clarify block cost
2016-04-23 20:02:00 +00:00
jl2012
f245646f8b
BIP141: Block cost clrification
2016-04-23 16:25:53 +02:00
jl2012
43c34e846b
Add P2SH-P2WPKH example
2016-04-23 08:26:48 +02:00
Luke-Jr
cd1932a67a
Merge pull request #375 from voisine/patch-4
...
fix BIP141 nested P2SH scriptSig byte representation
2016-04-23 03:33:13 +00:00
Aaron Voisine
d72c1bfc71
Update bip-0141.mediawiki
...
The byte representation of "<0 <32-byte-hash>>" is "0x220020{32-byte-hash}"
What was listed here would be the byte representation of "0 <32-byte-hash>". The text explains that there is only one item in scriptSig, so I'm guessing the byte representation is wrong. Also the corrected byte representation would produce the same sig/pubkey described in P2WSH after following the bip16 rules.
2016-04-22 08:44:29 -07:00
Luke-Jr
932d0750f2
Merge pull request #374 from kanzure/bip143-signaturehash
...
BIP143: Explicitly mention the SignatureHash function
2016-04-20 19:41:40 +00:00
Luke-Jr
a80fbaf619
Merge pull request #373 from kanzure/bip143-typofix
...
BIP143: fix typo ("including")
2016-04-20 19:41:23 +00:00
Luke-Jr
5160fc71be
Merge pull request #372 from jl2012/patch-16
...
BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE
2016-04-20 19:40:42 +00:00
Bryan Bishop
a488367502
BIP143: explicitly mention the SignatureHash function
...
The purpose of BIP143 is to propose an updated SignatureHash function
but "sighash" only appears near the end buried in the text. By
explicitly mentioning the SignatureHash function, readers can more
readily understand the context of the proposal.
2016-04-20 12:45:48 -05:00
Johnson Lau
c1ef3a05e3
BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE
2016-04-21 01:39:30 +08:00
Bryan Bishop
4cb4534fd9
BIP143: fix typo ("including")
2016-04-20 12:29:44 -05:00
Luke-Jr
5d0b400823
Merge pull request #371 from justusranvier/bip47
...
BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints
2016-04-17 22:17:57 +00:00
Justus Ranvier
97dafa75b3
BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints
...
Introduce the terms 'designated input' and 'designated pubkey' for clarity
Update reference link for outpoint to a more canonical source
2016-04-17 09:52:53 -05:00
Luke-Jr
3ff0772bb2
Merge pull request #369 from instagibbs/bip114clar
...
Some clarification on path meaning and structure
2016-04-14 10:38:10 +00:00
Luke-Jr
6026a0b599
Merge pull request #370 from jl2012/bip114ref
...
BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation
2016-04-14 10:37:53 +00:00
jl2012
3ef07340b4
BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation
2016-04-14 00:43:16 +08:00
instagibbs
58409dd0e8
Some clarification on path meaning and structure
2016-04-13 11:48:20 -04:00
Luke Dashjr
6c71b46623
Merge BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree
2016-04-12 20:20:35 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
952ba4ad16
Assign BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree
2016-04-12 20:20:06 +00:00
Luke-Jr
2b478b5f0a
Merge pull request #367 from jl2012/bip141commitment
...
BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram
2016-04-08 22:03:25 +00:00
jl2012
ee744caca9
BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram
2016-04-09 03:13:37 +08:00
jl2012
735a556129
Create BIP MAST
2016-04-02 01:06:35 +08:00
Luke-Jr
4cdb00287d
Merge pull request #366 from btcdrak/patch-7
...
Clarify what remains "to be decided"
2016-03-31 19:23:30 +00:00
฿tcDrak
9c0d407b10
Clarify what remains "to be decided"
2016-03-31 15:39:33 +01:00
Luke Dashjr
2fa7fb9b5c
BIP 141: Specify VB name
2016-03-30 22:47:40 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
161b39fa68
BIP 145: Update for BIP 9
2016-03-30 22:47:40 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
12a2131bb4
BIP 9: GBT specification
2016-03-30 22:46:18 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
b0b65ceede
BIP 9: Add softfork deployment "name"
2016-03-30 22:46:18 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
b8467dfb7c
BIP 9: Clarify nVersion interpretation and bit order
2016-03-30 22:46:18 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
a5447e0c4b
BIP 141 & 145: Clarify sigop interaction
2016-03-30 22:46:18 +00:00
Luke-Jr
ba16f16742
Merge pull request #364 from jl2012/patch-13
...
BIP143: Provide private key used in the example
2016-03-28 21:24:30 +00:00
Luke-Jr
51319e55c6
Merge pull request #363 from CodeShark/bip141_edits
...
Witness validation logic trigger clarifications
2016-03-28 21:24:18 +00:00
Luke-Jr
f8c439a704
Merge pull request #360 from luke-jr/bip0002_deferred
...
Defer BIP 2
2016-03-28 21:23:35 +00:00
Johnson Lau
cb81c9ab5f
BIP143: Provide private key used in the example
2016-03-29 01:19:50 +08:00
Eric Lombrozo
ee7b3ab4c0
Witness validation logic trigger clarifications
2016-03-25 01:35:01 -04:00
Luke-Jr
4650545169
Merge pull request #361 from btcdrak/patch-5
...
Remove deployment section
2016-03-21 17:23:05 +00:00
฿tcDrak
932d75e24f
Remove deployment section.
...
Now we know we will use BIP9 version bits, remove references to ISM() and leave TDB
as was done with BIP68,112 and 113.
2016-03-21 10:09:58 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
2fd1811331
Defer BIP 2
2016-03-18 20:03:56 +00:00
Luke-Jr
f5c136057b
Merge pull request #359 from btcdrak/cvsdeploy
...
Set deployment schedule for BIP 68,112,113
2016-03-18 19:20:00 +00:00
BtcDrak
63660c0fb7
Set deployment schedule for BIP 68,112,113
2016-03-17 21:18:17 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
24de1f450e
Merge BIP 75
2016-03-17 05:23:41 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
19845126ec
Put BIP 75 in the right place in README, and clean up formatting a bit
2016-03-17 05:21:40 +00:00
Matt David
9d86a41747
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master'
2016-03-16 22:07:44 -07:00
Matt David
e8c9f67005
Update BIP header to pass TravisCI
2016-03-16 22:03:49 -07:00
Matt David
4c045c8801
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
2016-03-16 22:00:17 -07:00
Matt David
43ea7bf4a6
Merge pull request #16 from jmacwhyte/proofread
...
Removed BIP70 extensions
2016-03-16 17:04:06 -07:00
Luke-Jr
3979dbd6da
Merge pull request #355 from jl2012/patch-12
...
BIP142: Deferred
2016-03-16 18:22:52 +00:00
Johnson Lau
3f586626d5
BIP142: Deferred
2016-03-17 02:15:55 +08:00
Johnson Lau
159cc9bd0e
BIP142: Deferred
...
BIP142 will not be deployed with BIP141 at the same time. Initially, people are expected to use P2SH segwit, or payment protocol for native segwit
2016-03-16 23:20:58 +08:00
