Contributing to Bisq

Anyone is welcome to contribute to Bisq. This document provides an overview of how we work. If you're looking for somewhere to start contributing, see the good first issue list.

Communication Channels

Most communication about Bisq happens in the Bisq Slack workspace.

Discussion about code changes happens in GitHub issues and pull requests.

Discussion about larger changes to the way Bisq works happens in issues the bisq-network/proposals repository. See https://docs.bisq.network/proposals.html for details.

Contributor Workflow

All Bisq contributors submit changes via pull requests. The workflow is as follows:

Fork the repository
Create a topic branch from the master branch
Commit patches
Squash redundant or unnecessary commits
Submit a pull request from your topic branch back to the master branch of the main repository

Pull requests should be focused on a single change. Do not mix, for example, refactorings with a bug fix or implementation of a new feature. This practice makes it easier for fellow contributors to review each pull request on its merits and and to give a clear ACK/NACK (see below).

Reviewing Pull Requests

Bisq follows the review workflow established by the Bitcoin Core project. The following is adapted from the Bitcoin Core contributor documentation:

Anyone may participate in peer review which is expressed by comments in the pull request. Typically reviewers will review the code for obvious errors, as well as test out the patch set and opine on the technical merits of the patch. Project maintainers take into account the peer review when determining if there is consensus to merge a pull request (remember that discussions may have been spread out over GitHub, mailing list and IRC discussions). The following language is used within pull-request comments:

ACK means "I have tested the code and I agree it should be merged";
NACK means "I disagree this should be merged", and must be accompanied by sound technical justification. NACKs without accompanying reasoning may be disregarded;
utACK means "I have not tested the code, but I have reviewed it and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged";
Concept ACK means "I agree in the general principle of this pull request";
Nit refers to trivial, often non-blocking issues.

Compensation

Bisq is not a company, but operates as a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). For any work merged into Bisq's master branch, you can submit a compensation request and earn BSQ (the Bisq DAO native token). Learn more about the Bisq DAO and BSQ here.

Style and Coding Conventions

Configure Git user name and email metadata

See https://help.github.com/articles/setting-your-username-in-git/ for instructions.

Write well-formed commit messages

From https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/#seven-rules:

Separate subject from body with a blank line
Limit the subject line to 50 characters
Capitalize the subject line
Do not end the subject line with a period
Use the imperative mood in the subject line
Wrap the body at 72 characters
Use the body to explain what and why vs. how

Sign your commits with GPG

Not strictly required, but recommended for those who commit frequently.

See https://github.com/blog/2144-gpg-signature-verification for background and https://help.github.com/articles/signing-commits-with-gpg/ for instructions.

Use an editor that supports Editorconfig

The .editorconfig settings in this repository ensure consistent management of whitespace, line endings and more. Most modern editors support it natively or with plugin. See http://editorconfig.org for details. See also bisq-network/style#10.

Keep the git history clean

It's very important to keep the git history clear, light and easily browsable. This means contributors must make sure their pull requests include only meaningful commits (if they are redundant or were added after a review, they should be removed) and no merge commits.

Additional style guidelines

See the issues in the bisq-network/style repository.

4.8 KiB Raw Blame History