Replace it by find_my_address() everywhere. This changes many parts of the
code that uses it to use a tor_addr_t instead of a plain uint32_t for IPv4.
Many changes to the unit test to also use the new interface.
Part #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Series of changes:
1. Rename function to reflect the namespace of the file.
2. Use the new last resolved cache instead of the unused
last_resolved_addr_v4 (which is also removed in this commit).
3. Make the entire code base use the new resolved_addr_is_local() function.
You will notice that this function uses /24 to differentiate subnets where the
rest of tor uses /16 (including documentation of EnforceDistinctSubnets).
Ticket #40009 has been opened for that.
But that the moment, the function keeps looking at /24.
Part of #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Series of things done in this commit:
1. Rename the functions to better reflect the namespace of the file.
2. Make both reset and get function to operate on the last_resolved_addrs
cache that is per family.
3. Make the get function to take a tor_addr_t.
4. Change all callsite to use the new convention.
Part of #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
These identifiers are confusing and unreadable. I think these
replacements should be better. Closes ticket #40012.
This is an automated commit, generated by this command:
./scripts/maint/rename_c_identifier.py \
router_should_skip_orport_reachability_check_family router_orport_seems_reachable \
router_should_skip_dirport_reachability_check router_dirport_seems_reachable \
router_should_skip_dirport_reachability_check router_all_orports_seem_reachable
Since "skip orport check" is the "and" of v4_ok and v6_ok, we can
just compute v4_ok and v6_ok once, to clarify that we don't enter
this block of code if they're both true.
With prop312, we want to support IPv4 and IPv6 thus multiple Address statement
(up to 2) will be accepted.
For this, "Address" option becomes a LINELIST so we can properly process the
IPv4 or/and IPv6.
Part of #33233
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
I've managed to keep this change mainly contained to our
self-testing module. The changes here are:
* There are two different variables for tracking "is our orport
reachable".
* We have a new function that says whether we can skip a single
family's orport reachability test; the old function for this now
tells whether we can skip _all_ orport reachability testing.
(The name, router_should_skip_orport_reachability_test, is not
so good. I will rename it later if I can think of a good
replacement.)
* The function that launches orport reachability tests now only
launches the ones that haven't completed.
* The function that notes that we're reachable on an ORPort now
takes a family.
* Various log messages are cleaned up.
Since Tor 0.2.9 has been unsupported since January, 0.3.5 is the
oldest supported version, and its features constitute the oldest
recommended feature-set.
This patch updates these recommendations:
DirCache=2
Support for consensus diffs.
New in 0.3.1.1-alpha.
HSDir=2
Support for v3 onion service descriptors.
New in 0.3.0.4-alpha.
HSIntro=4
Support for Ed25519 intropoint authentication keys.
New in 0.3.0-4-alpha.
HSRend=2
Support for rendezvous cells longer than 20 bytes.
New in 0.2.9.4-alpha.
Link=5
Link padding and link padding negotiation.
New in 0.3.3.2-alpha.
LinkAuth=3
Ed25519 link authentication.
New in 0.3.0.1-alpha.
Resume being willing to use preemptively-built circuits when
UseEntryGuards is set to 0. We accidentally disabled this feature with
that config setting (in our fix for #24469), leading to slower load times.
Fixes bug 34303; bugfix on 0.3.3.2-alpha.
The warning was:
11:23:10 ../tor/src/feature/hs/hs_service.c: In function 'log_cant_upload_desc':
11:23:10 ../tor/src/feature/hs/hs_service.c:3118:3: error: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Werror=type-limits]
See #34254 for more info.
I guess this means that gcc assigned an unsigned type to the
`log_desc_upload_reason_t` enum and it warned if we compared it against 0...
For now I think it's simpler to remove that check instead of turning the enum
to a signed type, or trying to hack it some other way.
From what it seems, enum is up to the compiler on whether it's signed/unsigned:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/159034/are-c-enums-signed-or-unsigned
